Evaluation of PDMS-Based Extraction Techniques and GC-TOFMS for the Analysis of Off-Flavor Chemicals in Beer
Applications | 2008 | LECOInstrumentation
Understanding and quantifying off-flavor compounds in beer is essential for product consistency and sensory quality in brewing. Trace aldehydes, sulfur volatiles, and Maillard reaction products can degrade taste during storage or light exposure, impacting consumer perception and shelf life.
This study aimed to develop and compare four PDMS-based extraction techniques—stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE), headspace sorptive extraction (HSSE), purge-and-trap (P&T), and dynamic headspace closed-loop stripping (DHSCLS)—coupled with gas chromatography–time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC-TOFMS) to measure a suite of 14 odor-active chemicals in beer at low parts-per-billion levels.
The analyses employed an Agilent 6890 GC with a CIS 4 inlet and Gerstel MPS 2 robotic sampler with thermal desorption unit. Separation used a 30 m HP-5MS column (0.32 mm ID, 0.25 μm film), helium carrier gas at 1.5 mL/min, and a LECO Pegasus TOFMS acquiring 40–300 amu at 10 spectra/s with advanced peak deconvolution algorithms.
• SBSE – 10 mL beer stirred with a PDMS-coated stir bar (Twister) at 900 rpm for 2 h, followed by rinsing and thermal desorption.
• HSSE – Twister suspended in headspace for 2 h with stirring.
• P&T – 20 mL beer purged with N₂ (30 mL/min) for 20 min through a PDMS foam trap.
• DHSCLS – 10 mL beer in a gas-washing bottle recirculated with air through a PDMS foam trap for 5 min.
SBSE demonstrated the highest accuracy (average R² 0.984) and sensitivity, detecting all 14 targeted compounds with <10 % precision, outperforming HSSE, P&T, and DHSCLS. Heat aging (12 weeks at 30 °C) elevated Maillard-derived furfural, furfuryl ethyl ether, and ß-damascenone, while light exposure (8 h sunlight) generated dimethyl disulfide, dimethyl trisulfide, and increased benzeneacetaldehyde. Advanced TOFMS deconvolution enabled resolution of coeluting peaks such as ß-damascenone, furfuryl ethyl ether, and (Z)-2-nonenal, ensuring accurate quantitation of key off-flavor markers.
The solventless PDMS-based approaches streamline sample preparation, reduce chemical use, and provide robust detection of trace off-flavor volatiles. SBSE–GC–TOFMS is particularly valuable for quality control, shelf-life assessment, and flavor profiling in brewery laboratories.
• Integration with selective detectors (e.g., PFPD) to enhance sulfur compound analysis.
• Coupling instrumental data with sensory panels for aroma impact studies.
• Extending methods to other beverages and food matrices.
• Automation and miniaturization for high-throughput screening.
The comparison of four PDMS extraction techniques confirmed SBSE–GC–TOFMS as a superior, solventless method for comprehensive off-flavor analysis in beer. Critical to this approach is the TOFMS deconvolution capability, which allows precise quantitation of overlapping volatile compounds, supporting effective quality management in brewing.
GC/MSD, HeadSpace, Thermal desorption, GC/TOF
IndustriesFood & Agriculture
ManufacturerAgilent Technologies, GERSTEL, LECO
Summary
Importance of the Topic
Understanding and quantifying off-flavor compounds in beer is essential for product consistency and sensory quality in brewing. Trace aldehydes, sulfur volatiles, and Maillard reaction products can degrade taste during storage or light exposure, impacting consumer perception and shelf life.
Objectives and Study Overview
This study aimed to develop and compare four PDMS-based extraction techniques—stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE), headspace sorptive extraction (HSSE), purge-and-trap (P&T), and dynamic headspace closed-loop stripping (DHSCLS)—coupled with gas chromatography–time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC-TOFMS) to measure a suite of 14 odor-active chemicals in beer at low parts-per-billion levels.
Instrumentation
The analyses employed an Agilent 6890 GC with a CIS 4 inlet and Gerstel MPS 2 robotic sampler with thermal desorption unit. Separation used a 30 m HP-5MS column (0.32 mm ID, 0.25 μm film), helium carrier gas at 1.5 mL/min, and a LECO Pegasus TOFMS acquiring 40–300 amu at 10 spectra/s with advanced peak deconvolution algorithms.
Methodology
• SBSE – 10 mL beer stirred with a PDMS-coated stir bar (Twister) at 900 rpm for 2 h, followed by rinsing and thermal desorption.
• HSSE – Twister suspended in headspace for 2 h with stirring.
• P&T – 20 mL beer purged with N₂ (30 mL/min) for 20 min through a PDMS foam trap.
• DHSCLS – 10 mL beer in a gas-washing bottle recirculated with air through a PDMS foam trap for 5 min.
Main Results and Discussion
SBSE demonstrated the highest accuracy (average R² 0.984) and sensitivity, detecting all 14 targeted compounds with <10 % precision, outperforming HSSE, P&T, and DHSCLS. Heat aging (12 weeks at 30 °C) elevated Maillard-derived furfural, furfuryl ethyl ether, and ß-damascenone, while light exposure (8 h sunlight) generated dimethyl disulfide, dimethyl trisulfide, and increased benzeneacetaldehyde. Advanced TOFMS deconvolution enabled resolution of coeluting peaks such as ß-damascenone, furfuryl ethyl ether, and (Z)-2-nonenal, ensuring accurate quantitation of key off-flavor markers.
Benefits and Practical Applications
The solventless PDMS-based approaches streamline sample preparation, reduce chemical use, and provide robust detection of trace off-flavor volatiles. SBSE–GC–TOFMS is particularly valuable for quality control, shelf-life assessment, and flavor profiling in brewery laboratories.
Future Trends and Potential Uses
• Integration with selective detectors (e.g., PFPD) to enhance sulfur compound analysis.
• Coupling instrumental data with sensory panels for aroma impact studies.
• Extending methods to other beverages and food matrices.
• Automation and miniaturization for high-throughput screening.
Conclusion
The comparison of four PDMS extraction techniques confirmed SBSE–GC–TOFMS as a superior, solventless method for comprehensive off-flavor analysis in beer. Critical to this approach is the TOFMS deconvolution capability, which allows precise quantitation of overlapping volatile compounds, supporting effective quality management in brewing.
References
- Varmuza K., Steiner I., Glinsner T. Chemometric evaluation of concentration profiles from compounds relevant in beer aging. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 215:235-239 (2002).
- Masuda S., Kikuchi K., Harayam K. Determination of light-struck character in beer by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 58:152-154 (2000).
- Lermusieau G., Bulens M., Collin S. Use of GC-olfactometry to identify hop aromatic compounds in beer. J. Agric. Food Chem. 49:3867-3874 (2001).
- Cochran J. Comparing two beers using solid-phase microextraction with gas chromatography. LECO application note.
- Vesely P., Lusk L., Basarova G., Seabrooks J., Ryder D. Analysis of aldehydes in beer using solid-phase microextraction with on-fiber derivatization and GC/MS. J. Agric. Food Chem. 51:6941-6944 (2003).
- Murakami A.A., Goldstein H., Navarro A., Seabrooks J.R., Ryder D.S. Investigation of beer flavor by gas chromatography-olfactometry. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 61:23-32 (2003).
- Baltussen H.A. New Concepts in Sorption Based Sample Preparation for Chromatography. Doctoral dissertation, GERSTEL GmbH & Co. KG (2000).
- David F., Sandra P., Hoffmann A., Harms D., Nietzsche F. Elucidation of the hoppy aroma in beers by stir bar and headspace sorptive extraction followed by thermal desorption–GC–MS/PFPD. GERSTEL application note (2001).
Content was automatically generated from an orignal PDF document using AI and may contain inaccuracies.
Similar PDF
Evaluation of PDMS-Based Extraction Techniques and GC-TOFMS for the Analysis of Off-fl avor Chemicals in Beer
2006|Agilent Technologies|Applications
AppNote 10/2006 Evaluation of PDMS-Based Extraction Techniques and GC-TOFMS for the Analysis of Off-flavor Chemicals in Beer Ray T. Marsili, Laura Laskonis Marsili Consulting Group, Rockford College, Starr Science Building, 5050 East State St., Rockford, IL 61008, USA KEYWORDS Beer,…
Key words
beer, beerflavor, flavorpdms, pdmsethyl, ethylabused, abusedmethional, methionalsbse, sbsedamascenone, damascenonegerstel, gersteldeconvolution, deconvolutionhsse, hsseextraction, extractiontofms, tofmsfoam, foamphenyl
Screening of Flavor Volatiles in Exhaled Breath After Tasting Cream Cheese and Fruit Punch Utilizing PDMS Foam Tubes, Thermal Desorption and GC-TOFMS
2008|Agilent Technologies|Applications
® Screening of Flavor Volatiles in Exhaled Breath After Tasting Cream Cheese and Fruit Punch Utilizing PDMS Foam Tubes, Thermal Desorption and GC-TOFMS LECO Corporation; Saint Joseph, Michigan USA Key Words: GC-TOFMS, TDU, Food &Flavors, Deconvolution The samples analyzed were…
Key words
breath, breathacid, acidlactone, lactonepdms, pdmsdelta, deltaoxidation, oxidationlipid, lipidcream, creamcheese, cheeseproduct, productquant, quantpeak, peakoctanal, octanalfoam, foamtasting
Gas Chromatography with Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry for Aroma Profiling Elizabeth M. Humston-Fulmer and Joe Binkley | LECO Corporation, St. Joseph, MI Introduction Characterization of aroma compounds provides useful information in the food and beverage industry that can provide insight to…
Key words
aroma, aromahop, hopprofiling, profilingcoffee, coffeeanalyte, analyteflavor, flavorbeer, beercherry, cherrydifferences, differencesindividual, individualclassify, classifynotes, notesbrands, brandsdesorbed, desorbedipa
Elucidation of the Hoppy Aroma in Beers by Stir Bar and Headspace Sorptive Extraction followed by Thermal Desorption - CGC - MS/PFPD
2001|Agilent Technologies|Applications
AppNote 4/2001 Elucidation of the Hoppy Aroma in Beers by Stir Bar and Headspace Sorptive Extraction followed by Thermal Desorption - CGC - MS/PFPD Frank David Research Institute for Chromatography, Kennedypark 20, B-8500 Kortrijk Belgium Pat Sandra Department of Organic…
Key words
abundance, abundancehsse, hssestir, stirgerstel, gerstelpfpd, pfpdbeer, beersbse, sbsehoppy, hoppysorptive, sorptivearoma, aromaspme, spmeextraction, extractionbar, barirradiated, irradiatedelucidation