Traditional ducted fume hoods remain the gold standard for chemical containment in most laboratories, but several innovative alternatives can provide effective protection while offering unique advantages. These alternatives include glove boxes, snorkel systems, and specialized containment units that address specific laboratory needs while potentially reducing energy consumption and installation complexity.<img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/Organomation_Alternatives_to_Traditional_Fume_Hoods_A_Comprehensive_Guide_to_Laboratory_Containment_Solutions_9c39f814df.jpg" alt="Organomation: Alternatives to Traditional Fume Hoods: A Comprehensive Guide to Laboratory Containment Solutions" srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_Organomation_Alternatives_to_Traditional_Fume_Hoods_A_Comprehensive_Guide_to_Laboratory_Containment_Solutions_9c39f814df.jpg 208w," sizes="100vw" width="2016" height="1512"><h3>Glove Boxes: Maximum Containment for High-Risk Materials</h3>Glove boxes, also known as isolation enclosures, represent the highest level of containment available for laboratory operations. These fully enclosed systems create a complete physical barrier between operators and hazardous materials while maintaining precise environmental control.<h4>Key Features and Applications</h4>Glove boxes consist of hermetically sealed stainless steel or transparent enclosures equipped with integrated gloves that allow manipulation without breaking containment. Modern systems include sophisticated transfer airlocks, sensors, regulators, and automatic safety flow systems that compensate for pressure drops or accidental containment breaches.These systems excel in applications requiring extremely low occupational exposure limits (OELs). For materials classified as OEB 4 (1-50 μg/m³) or OEB 5 (&lt;1 μg/m³), glove boxes provide containment levels as low as 0.1 μg/m³ or even 0.01 μg/m³. This makes them essential for handling highly potent pharmaceutical compounds, radioactive materials, and other extremely hazardous substances.<h4>Specialized Configurations</h4>The versatility of glove box technology extends to numerous specialized applications. Compounding Aseptic Isolators (CAI) create positive pressure environments for sterile pharmaceutical compounding, meeting USP 797 requirements. Conversely, Compounding Aseptic Containment Isolators (CACI) operate under negative pressure for handling hazardous drugs per USP 800 guidelines.Inert atmosphere glove boxes utilize nitrogen or argon purging to create oxygen-free environments essential for moisture-sensitive materials and anaerobic research. These systems feature automated purge cycles and one-touch operation for seamless anaerobic transitions.<h4>Construction Materials and Performance</h4>Stainless steel construction (316L grade) provides optimal chemical resistance and durability, with continuous seam welds and wide radius corners facilitating easy decontamination. Leak rates typically specification below 0.05% chamber volume per hour, verified through pressure decay testing. Advanced systems incorporate built-in sterilization capabilities using vaporized hydrogen peroxide (VHP) generators for thorough decontamination between uses.<h4>Advantages and Limitations</h4>Glove boxes offer unparalleled containment performance with complete environmental isolation, precise atmospheric control, and robust decontamination capabilities. The closed design eliminates airflow disturbances that can compromise containment in open-front systems.However, glove boxes require larger footprints, higher initial investment, and more complex maintenance compared to open containment systems. The enclosed design may limit accessibility for larger equipment or rapid material transfers, and extended use can cause operator fatigue due to the ergonomic constraints of glove manipulation.<h3>Snorkel Systems: Localized Fume Extraction</h3>Snorkel systems, also known as articulating extraction arms or fume extraction arms, provide targeted fume capture at the source while maintaining workspace flexibility.<h4>Design and Operation</h4>These systems feature flexible, articulating arms typically 3-8 inches in diameter with working radii ranging from 3-14 feet. The arms incorporate three adjustable joints allowing 360-degree rotation and positioning flexibility. Standard configurations handle airflow rates from 30-1000 CFM depending on arm diameter and application requirements.Multiple specialized configurations address specific laboratory needs. The Original model provides general-purpose fume extraction for standard laboratory applications. ESD/EX models incorporate conductive materials to eliminate electrostatic discharge risks in electronic environments. CHEM models feature double anodized aluminum construction for enhanced corrosion resistance in aggressive chemical environments.<h4>Installation and Integration</h4>Snorkel systems mount to walls, ceilings, workbenches, or specialized support structures. They integrate with facility HVAC systems or standalone filtration units depending on application requirements. Mobile configurations with integrated collectors provide complete portability for applications requiring frequent repositioning.Advanced mounting systems include swing boom configurations for extended reach applications (18-35 feet) and rail-mounted trolley systems for linear positioning along extended work areas. These systems require minimal operator force for positioning and repositioning.<h4>Hood Options and Customization</h4>Extraction hoods vary based on application requirements. Transparent dome hoods optimize visibility for precision work while providing effective capture for high-dispersion particles. Metal hoods offer enhanced durability and chemical resistance for aggressive environments. Specialized hood geometries optimize capture efficiency for specific processes like chromatography or analytical instrumentation.<h4>Performance and Applications</h4>Snorkel systems excel in applications requiring localized fume extraction from specific equipment like chromatographs, analytical instruments, or small-scale chemical processes. They provide effective capture distances of 12-20 inches from the source with capture areas up to 20 inches in diameter.These systems prove particularly valuable in laboratories with limited space, flexible furniture arrangements, or applications where full fume hood installation is impractical. Educational laboratories benefit from their overhead mounting that preserves floor space while providing necessary ventilation.<h4>Energy Efficiency Considerations</h4>Snorkel systems typically require lower airflow rates than full-sized fume hoods, reducing energy consumption and HVAC demands. When integrated with variable speed controls and demand-based operation, they provide energy-efficient alternatives to constant-volume hood operation.<h3>Ductless Fume Hoods: Energy-Efficient Alternatives</h3>Ductless fume hoods represent a growing alternative to traditional ducted systems, offering significant energy savings and installation flexibility while maintaining safety standards.<h4>Energy Performance Advantages</h4>Ductless systems achieve remarkable energy efficiency improvements over traditional ducted hoods. Studies indicate energy efficiency improvements of 18-25 times compared to total exhaust systems, primarily through air recirculation rather than continuous exhaust of conditioned air. This translates to substantial reductions in HVAC loads and operational costs.A comparative analysis of a hypothetical 30-hood facility demonstrated that ductless systems consume only 2.4 kBTU per square foot annually compared to 127.5 kBTU for constant volume hoods and 74.1 kBTU for VAV systems. Carbon dioxide emissions similarly decrease from 873 tons annually for constant volume systems to just 55 tons for ductless alternatives.<h4>Filtration Technology and Safety</h4>Modern ductless hoods employ sophisticated multi-stage filtration systems combining carbon, HEPA, and specialized chemical filters. Advanced monitoring systems continuously assess filter performance and provide alerts when replacement is required. These systems maintain face velocities of 100 feet per minute, meeting OSHA recommendations while achieving ASHRAE 110 certification standards.Filter replacement costs range from $350-2,000 annually, representing significant savings compared to ongoing HVAC operational costs of ducted systems. Filter life varies based on application but typically extends 6-12 months under normal laboratory conditions.<h4>Installation and Flexibility Benefits</h4>Ductless hoods arrive fully certified and ready for immediate use without requiring building modifications or HVAC integration. This eliminates lengthy installation timelines and coordination requirements associated with ducted systems. Mobile configurations provide additional flexibility for laboratories requiring equipment relocation.The plug-and-play nature of ductless systems allows rapid deployment and adaptation to changing laboratory needs without facility downtime or infrastructure modifications.<h4>Application Limitations and Considerations</h4>Ductless systems prove most effective for applications involving naturally evaporating chemicals in limited volumes. They are not suitable for heated chemicals, highly volatile solvents, or applications generating large volumes of hazardous vapors. Regular filter monitoring and replacement are essential to maintain protection effectiveness.<h3>Specialized Containment Solutions</h3>Beyond traditional glove boxes and snorkel systems, several specialized containment solutions address specific laboratory needs.<h4>Downflow Booths</h4>Downflow booths utilize unidirectional airflow to carry contaminants away from operator breathing zones into low-level exhaust systems. These systems prove effective for powder handling operations requiring containment levels of 50-100 μg/m³.Recirculatory configurations suit powder operations while single-pass designs handle applications involving solvents or vapor generation. HEPA filtration and controlled airflow patterns (typically 90 FPM) provide effective containment while maintaining operator accessibility.<h4>Mobile Fume Extractors</h4>Portable fume extraction units combine the benefits of source capture with complete mobility. These self-contained systems feature integrated filtration, typically 3-stage systems with aluminum mesh pre-filters, MERV 15 cartridge filters, and activated carbon after-filters.Units range from 750-1200 CFM capacity with 6-8 inch diameter extraction arms in lengths from 7-14 feet. Advanced models incorporate pulse-cleaning systems extending filter life 6-7 times beyond traditional reverse-pulse systems.<h4>Biosafety Cabinets and Biological Containment</h4>While primarily designed for biological applications, Class III biosafety cabinets function as glove box systems for maximum biological containment. These systems provide complete enclosure with HEPA filtration for handling BSL-3 and BSL-4 materials.Class II biosafety cabinets offer open-front operation with HEPA filtration for lower-risk biological materials while providing some chemical containment capabilities for limited applications.<h3>Selection Criteria and Implementation Considerations</h3><h4>Material Hazard Assessment</h4>The selection of appropriate fume hood alternatives depends primarily on the occupational exposure limits and toxicological properties of materials being handled. OEB classifications provide guidance for containment requirements:<ul><li>OEB 1-2 (100-5000 μg/m³): Standard downflow booths with minimal additional controls</li><li>OEB 3 (10-100 μg/m³): Enhanced downflow booths or limited containment systems</li><li>OEB 4 (1-10 μg/m³): Specialized containment or glove box systems recommended</li><li>OEB 5 (&lt;1 μg/m³): Full isolation systems required</li></ul><h4>Economic Considerations</h4>Initial investment costs vary significantly among alternatives. Ductless hoods typically require lower upfront investment due to eliminated infrastructure requirements. Glove boxes represent higher initial costs but provide superior long-term containment assurance for high-risk materials.Operational costs favor ductless systems through reduced energy consumption, while glove boxes may require higher maintenance but offer lower risk exposure costs.<h4>Laboratory Design Integration</h4>Space constraints and laboratory layout significantly influence alternative selection. Snorkel systems optimize overhead space utilization while maintaining floor accessibility. Ductless hoods provide location flexibility without ducting constraints. Glove boxes require dedicated space but offer maximum containment assurance.Future laboratory needs and potential application changes should inform selection decisions, with modular and mobile solutions providing greater adaptability.The landscape of fume hood alternatives continues expanding with advancing filtration technology, improved energy efficiency, and enhanced safety monitoring systems. Each alternative offers distinct advantages addressing specific laboratory requirements while potentially providing economic and operational benefits over traditional ducted systems. Proper selection requires careful assessment of material hazards, operational requirements, and facility constraints to ensure both safety and efficiency objectives are met.

Alternatives to Traditional Fume Hoods: A Comprehensive Guide to Laboratory Containment Solutions

News from LabRulezGCMS Library - Week 09, 2026

<h3>Helium as a Critical Resource in Gas Chromatography</h3>Gas chromatography is among the analytical techniques with the highest helium consumption. In routine laboratory operation, helium is used not only during analytical runs themselves, but also during method development, stabilization modes, standby operation, and instrument maintenance. Taken together, GC and GC–MS systems account for a significant share of total helium consumption in analytical laboratories.<img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/Watrex_GC_green_uvod_9d153f0f42.jpg" alt="Watrex: Helium Saver from Watrex Praha" srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_Watrex_GC_green_uvod_9d153f0f42.jpg 245w," sizes="100vw" width="1600" height="900">From the perspective of modern green chromatography, this represents a major challenge. Helium is a non-renewable and strategically limited resource, and its waste during non-productive phases of operation is unsustainable in the long term. Contemporary approaches to sustainable chromatography therefore do not aim to replace helium at any cost, but rather focus on optimizing its use deploying helium only where it is analytically truly necessary.<h4>Supply Disruptions and Price Volatility: The Everyday Reality of GC Laboratories</h4>Over recent decades, repeated disruptions in helium supply, significant price fluctuations, and increasing pressure from other industrial sectors—particularly cryogenics, medicine, and the semiconductor industry—have become common. These sectors consume helium in large volumes and often receive priority in distribution.For analytical laboratories, this has several direct consequences:<ul><li>increased operating costs due to rising prices,</li><li>uncertainty in planning routine analyses,</li><li>the need to limit GC system operation during periods of shortage,</li><li>pressure to seek alternative operational strategies.</li></ul>Especially problematic is the fact that a substantial portion of helium consumption in laboratories does not directly contribute to the analytical value of measurements, but merely serves to keep systems in an operational state.<h4>Green Chromatography: Efficient Use Instead of Replacement</h4>While switching to alternative carrier gases (e.g., nitrogen or hydrogen) may be suitable in some applications, it is not always technically or validation-wise feasible—particularly for established GC methods. Green chromatography therefore increasingly relies on the concept of intelligent carrier gas management, which makes it possible to:<ul><li>preserve helium for analytical runs,</li><li>minimize its consumption during non-productive modes,</li><li>eliminate human error associated with manual gas switching.</li></ul>This is precisely where automated technological solutions come into play.<h4>Model Calculation of Helium Savings in a Typical GC Laboratory</h4>To illustrate the potential for savings, consider a model GC laboratory with the following parameters:<ul><li>helium flow rate: 1.5 mL/min</li><li>instrument operation: 24 hours per day</li><li>analytical runs: 8 hours per day</li><li>non-productive modes (standby, waiting, stabilization): 16 hours per day</li></ul>Daily helium consumption without optimization:<ul><li>1.5 mL/min × 60 × 24 = 2.16 L helium/day</li></ul>Of this:<ul><li>analytical runs: 0.72 L/day</li><li>non-productive operation: 1.44 L/day</li></ul>If helium is replaced by nitrogen during non-productive modes via automatic switching:<blockquote>➡ helium savings: approx. 67% of daily consumption</blockquote>At a helium price (including logistics and cylinder rental) of, for example, CZK 400–600 per m³, and with several GC systems in operation, annual savings can reach tens of thousands of Czech crowns per instrument while also improving operational stability during periods of limited helium availability.<h4>Automated Solution: Helium Saver™ in the Context of Green Chromatography</h4><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://watrex.com/obchod/chromatography/dedicated-instruments/helium-saver/?utm_source=labrulez&amp;utm_medium=propagace&amp;utm_campaign=labrulez_clanky">Helium Saver™</a> from <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://watrex.com/?utm_source=labrulez&amp;utm_medium=propagace&amp;utm_campaign=labrulez_clanky">Watrex Praha</a> is an intelligent device designed for automatic switching between helium and nitrogen based on predefined operating modes. Helium is used exclusively during analytical runs, while during non-productive phases the system is automatically switched to nitrogen.<img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/Watrex_GC_green_schema_98b674386d.jpg" alt="Watrex: Fig.2: Typical Helium Saver connection" srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_Watrex_GC_green_schema_98b674386d.jpg 245w," sizes="100vw" width="1600" height="900">Thanks to its modular design (Control Module, Switching Valve, and Manual Switch) and universal interface, <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://watrex.com/obchod/chromatography/dedicated-instruments/helium-saver/?utm_source=labrulez&amp;utm_medium=propagace&amp;utm_campaign=labrulez_clanky">Helium Saver™</a> can be integrated into GC systems from various manufacturers without major modifications to the instrumentation.From a green chromatography perspective, this solution represents a practical compromise between sustainability, economic efficiency, and preservation of analytical data quality.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Increasing pressure on helium availability and the sustainability of laboratory operations is forcing analytical laboratories to reconsider traditional models of gas chromatography operation. Intelligent management of helium consumption enables significant reductions in costs and environmental burden without the need to modify validation protocols or analytical methodologies.Automated solutions such as <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://watrex.com/obchod/chromatography/dedicated-instruments/helium-saver/?utm_source=labrulez&amp;utm_medium=propagace&amp;utm_campaign=labrulez_clanky">Helium Saver™ </a>demonstrate that the principles of green chromatography can be successfully applied even in routine GC practice.<blockquote>Are you interested in <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://watrex.com/obchod/chromatography/dedicated-instruments/helium-saver/?utm_source=labrulez&amp;utm_medium=propagace&amp;utm_campaign=labrulez_clanky">Helium Saver</a>? Feel free to contact us at watrex@watrex.com for more information or a non-binding quote.</blockquote>

Green Chromatography in Practice: How to Reduce Helium Consumption in GC Without Compromising Data Quality

Article

Product

Application

Academy

Presentation

Laboratories

Everything from the world of analytical chemistry in one place. We connect people in solving their problems. At Labrulez you will find all the necessary information easily, quickly and clearly. Stop searching and start finding.

LabRulez

Organomation, founded in 1959, designs and manufactures high-quality nitrogen evaporators and extraction systems. Known for innovation and durability, their lab instruments are used globally for efficient sample preparation with strong customer support.

Organomation

WATREX Prague is the distributor and producer of HPLC techniques in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. Main Chromatografic and Related Techniques Supported: LC, GPC, IC, IEC, Automated SPE, LC Columns and special column packings, LC method development, Software development, Laboratory Robots.

Watrex Praha

Separation Science

The Analytical Scientist

Agilent Technologies

Thermo Fisher Scientific

Wasson-ECE Instrumentation

<ul>
<li>Wait what?! Who knew!? There are so many things that a mass spec can do.
</li>
<li>I&#39;ve used it for years, yes this may be true.
</li>
<li>I&#39;ve processed some samples, more than a few.
</li>
<li>But between me and you, I had no idea all the things it could do!
</li>
<li>From sample prep to separation, you just won&#39;t believe…
</li>
<li>All of the tips and tricks we have up our sleeve.
</li>
<li>So, take a few minutes, about 15 should do.
</li>
<li>And learn all the things your mass spec can do.
</li>
</ul>
Thinking of developing a new method utilizing MS? Selecting the best analytical method begins with a decision on how to best separate the analytes of interest. This choice will affect sample preparation and sample introduction, so it is important to get it right early. In this webinar we will review analyte structural properties that make the compound more amenable to either liquid chromatography or to gas chromatography.
<blockquote>
Presenter: Karen Yannell (LC/MS Application Engineer, Agilent Technologies, Inc.)
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Karen E. Yannell is a LC/MS Application Engineer at Agilent Technologies. She is an expert in small molecule high throughput analysis by triple quadrupole (TQ) and quadrupole time-of-flight (QTOF) mass spectrometry for applied markets. Her recent work has focused on developing routine Q-TOF workflows for both expert and non-expert users alike. Previously, Karen worked on forensic, metabolomics, and biomarker discovery applications with ambient ionization sources. She received her PhD in Analytical Chemistry from Purdue University where studied under the advisement of Prof. R. Graham Cooks. Outside of the laboratory, she enjoys cooking unique dishes and hiking along the beach with her dog.
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Presenter: David Weil, PhD (Senior Applications Scientist, Agilent Technologies, Inc.)
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
David Weil is a senior applications scientist in Agilent located in Wood Dale with over 30 years of experience using mass spectrometry. Prior to joining Agilent in 2004, he worked for 14 years at 3M in the Corporate Research Analytical Laboratories (St.Paul, MN) and 4 years at Nicolet/Extrel doing ultra-high resolution mass spectrometry. David received his Ph.D. in Physical Chemistry from the University of Minnesota and Post Doc with Dr Charles Wilkins at University of California-Riverside developing laser desorption FTMS and ion-molecule reactions. David has three grown sons and live with his wife Naomi just blocks from Wrigley Field and Lake Michigan.
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Presenter: Matt Curtis, PhD (GC/MS Applications Scientist, Agilent Technologies, Inc.)
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Matt joined Agilent in 2013 as a GC/MS applications scientist in the Santa Clara, CA Center of Excellence. His primary responsibility is focused on providing instrument demos for customer interested in each technology Agilent offers; the GC/MS single quadrupole, triple quadrupole and the quadrupole Time-of-Flight. The variety of different samples submitted to the demo lab provide a unique knowledge of optimizing parameters for different applications to provide the best quality data from the instrument.
</blockquote>

Agilent Technologies: Selecting your Separation: Are my Compounds Better for GC or LC

Selecting your Separation: Are my Compounds Better for GC or LC

We will review analyte structural properties that make the compound more amenable to either liquid chromatography or to gas chromatography.

Separation selection: Are my Compounds Better for GC or LC

This presentation will introduce you to the Agilent flow path solutions for residual solvents, terpenes, and pesticide testing in cannabis and hemp. We will discuss how we have made it easier for you to get up and running quickly with e-Methods, application notes, and consumable kits.
<blockquote>
Presenter: Simon Jones (GC Applications Engineer/Scientist, Agilent Technologies, Inc.)
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Simon Jones has over 23 years of GC experience. For the last 15 years, he has been with Agilent as a GC applications engineer/scientist based out of the GC column manufacturing facility in Folsom California. In his roles he has assisted with application development, troubleshooting chromatographic issues, and assisting with instrument configurations. Prior to joining Agilent in 2005, he worked in an analytical lab for the power industry, developing and optimizing testing methodologies for insulating fluids and materials in transformers.
</blockquote>

Agilent Technologies: Agilent GC/MS Solutions for Cannabis and Hemp Testing

Agilent GC/MS Solutions for Cannabis and Hemp Testing

This presentation will introduce you to the Agilent flow path solutions for residual solvents, terpenes, and pesticide testing in cannabis and hemp.

The presentation will introduce DiscovIR-GC® (FTIR) as a universal detector that can be coupled with any Gas Chromatograph, using solid-phase direct deposition to afford unique molecule fingerprinting, while boosting the resolution and sensitivity over conventional gas phase devices.
FTIR is a powerful tool for the identification of specific isomers of controlled substances and when integrated with MS, accuracy of identification is superior. By joining the strengths of the FTIR and MS detectors, the characterization of unknowns is easily performed in a single analysis. FTIR allows for spectral distinction between positional isomers where identification by MS is limited.
As a walk-up instrument, the DiscovIR-GC system is designed to meet the needs of forensic drug chemistry laboratories and make use of spectral databases for rapid and accurate identification of unknowns through the orthogonal information gathered from FTIR.
Learning Objectives of Webinar:
<ul>
<li>Understand the technology behind solid-phase deposition FTIR coupled with GC</li>
<li>Gain insight into the differences between gas phase IR and solid-phase IR spectroscopy</li>
<li>Understand the capability for identification of synthetic opioids based on structural differences in IR finger printing</li>
</ul>
<blockquote>
Presenter: Nathan Hawkins (CEO, Spectrometrics Limited)
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Nathan is the CEO of Spectrometrics, UK. He managed a metabolomics core facility for 14 years, before moving into a hybrid commercial role that included account and product management of a small instrument vendor’s portfolio of life science &amp; forensics instruments.
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
He established Spectrometrics in 2022 to bring new &amp; emerging analytical technologies to the UK &amp; Ireland.
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Presenter: Tracy Phillpott (Senior Applications Chemist,, Spectra Analysis Instruments, Inc.)
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Tracy Phillpott is the Senior Applications Chemist with Spectra Analysis Instruments, USA. She has a Bachelor’s in Textile Chemistry from Auburn University. Her previous experience has been in the Textile, Polymer, Tire, and Pharma Industries for Morton International, Michelin Americas R&amp;D, Schweizerhall Development Company and IRIX Pharmaceuticals.
</blockquote>

The Analytical Scientist: DiscovIR-GC® Detector: Integration of GC-FTIR and MS as a Unique Tool in the Identification of Positional and Structural Isomers

DiscovIR-GC Detector: Integration of GC-FTIR and MS as a Unique Tool in the Identification of Positional and Structural Isomers

The presentation will introduce DiscovIR-GC (FTIR) as a universal detector that can be coupled with any Gas Chromatograph.

DiscovIR-GC Detector: Integration of GC-FTIR and MS

Webinars will cover the following Gas Chromatography topics:
<ul>
<li>6/27 - Vaporizers for LPG Samples</li>
<li>7/11 - Dynamic Blending for Linearity and LDL</li>
<li>7/18 - GC Valves: Purposes and Service</li>
<li>7/25 - Calibration Techniques for Accurate Data</li>
<li>8/1 - Sample Capture, Transport, and Introduction</li>
<li>8/8 - GC Detectors I: PDHID and SCD</li>
<li>8/15 - GC Autosamplers for Gas and LPG Samples</li>
<li>8/22 - GC Detectors II: The Strengths of Mass Spectrometry</li>
<li>8/29 - Methanizers for Trace CO &amp; CO2</li>
<li>9/5 - Training Program for GC Operators</li>
</ul>
<blockquote>
Presenter: John Wasson (President, Wasson-ECE Instrumentation, Inc.)
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
John Wasson has over 40 years of experience in Gas Chromatography and Chemical Instrumentation.
</blockquote>

Wasson-ECE Instrumentation: Free GC Webinar Series

Dynamic Blending for Linearity and LDL

GC Valves: Purposes and Service

Calibration Techniques for Accurate Data

Following up from our very successful previous sessions, we are delighted to offer another panel discussion in the ever popular “Ask the Agilent Experts” series.
Have you ever had a question about your GC/GCMS analysis and thought, “I have no idea what to do,” or that since the question seemed so simple, everyone must already know the answer and &quot;Am I the only one who doesn’t know what to do?” We can assure you that you are not alone.
If you have a question, we can guarantee that you are not the first...nor the last person to ask the question. Sometimes the simplest of questions can have the most complex answers. A question about which liner to use can lead to a discussion on the benefits of glass wool versus glass frits. A question about how long a column should last may trigger a discussion about the importance of a leak free system, the maximum temperature limit, proper phase selection, and how an application may benefit from using backflush. There’s no such thing as an easy answer because the answer always “depends” on many different factors. 
We will discuss some of the most frequently asked questions about GC and GCMS that we have received. Some may seem like simple questions, but they have anything but simple answers. Experts from Agilent as well as from the field will also answer new questions that we hope you will submit to us in advance.
<blockquote>
Presenter: Vanessa Abercrombie (MFS, GC Applications Chemist, Agilent Technologies)
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Vanessa has a broad background in GC and GC/MS, including experience as an instrument chemist at Bode Technology in Virginia working under contract to the FBI’s Laboratory Division. Prior to that, Vanessa worked for ETS Labs in St. Helena, California as an Analytical Chemist where she researched and developed quantitative separations by GC/MS and UHPLC for beer, wine and spirits. She holds a Masters of Forensic Science from The George Washington University and a Bachelor of Arts in Chemistry from Sonoma State University.
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Presenter: Samuel Haddad (Ph.D., Application Development Chemist, Agilent Technologies)
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Samuel Haddad is a GC Application Development Chemist at Agilent Technologies in Wilmington, Delaware. Samuel specializes in GC and GCMS applications of trace analysis in environmental and heavy matrix samples. His specialty includes sample preparation techniques to separate analytes from matrix components and extraction from a wide variety of matrix including water, fish, aquatic life, soil, and complex fluids. Samuel holds a Ph.D. in Environmental Science from Baylor University and a B.S in Biology from Southern Illinois University Edwardsville.
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Moderator: Diane Turner (Director &amp; Senior Consultant, Anthias Consulting Ltd)
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
A Warwick University graduate, Diane completed her masters in Analytical Chemistry and started her career in environmental chemistry, later gaining significant experience as an Applications Chemist. Diane’s area of research through her PhD studies at The Open University was disease diagnosis. She has developed methods and given support and training for companies in most industries around the world for more than 20 years. Diane holds voluntary roles with The Royal Society of Chemistry and other scientific organizations.
</blockquote>

Separation science: Ask the Agilent Experts - Part 4: GC and GC/MS Scientists Discuss & Answer Your Most Frequently Asked Questions

Ask the Agilent Experts - Part 4: GC and GC/MS Scientists Discuss & Answer Your Most Frequently Asked Questions

The most frequently asked questions about GC and GCMS that we have received.

Ask the Agilent Experts - Part 4: GC and GC/MS

Welcome to Thermo Fisher Scientific’s Powering Productivity in Food and Environmental Testing webinar series!
The global helium shortage continues to have a profound impact on the productivity of analytical testing labs that rely on helium as a carrier gas for their GC analyses.
In this webinar, hosted by Petra Gerhards, GC&amp;GC-MS experts Daniela Cavagnino and Adam Ladak will discuss the recurring shortage, the effect it is having on gas chromatography users, and solutions that Thermo Fisher Scientific can provide to help reduce the burden of increased cost and supply uncertainty in routine testing labs. The solutions covered include technologies for saving helium, as well as using hydrogen instead of helium- including data that validates the workflow for hydrogen usage.
<blockquote>
Presenter: Daniela Cavagnino (Product Marketing Manager, Thermo Fisher Scientific)
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Dr. Daniela Cavagnino received a Master Degree in Chemistry at the University of Milan, Italy. She started her career in gas chromatography at Thermo Fisher Scientific spending several years in the R&amp;D laboratories working on GC technology innovation and more than 15 years in product and marketing management roles promoting GC/GCMS technology and applications.
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Presenter: Adam Ladak (Global Product Marketing Manager, GC Quadrupole MS, Thermo Fisher Scientific)
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Adam started his career working in a contracting testing lab analyzing sports supplements and horse feed for prohibited substances. Adam spent over 10 years working for a leading instrument manufacturer in various roles from an application specialist in the UK and the US to a global marketing role focus on food and environmental testing. Adam is passionate about utilizing our GC-MS instrumentation to meet customer needs and solve real-world problems.
</blockquote>

Thermo Scientific: Ask-the-experts on effective GC solutions to deal with the helium shortage

Ask-the-experts on effective GC solutions to deal with the helium shortage

Technologies for saving helium, as well as using hydrogen instead of helium- including data that validates the workflow for hydrogen usage.

Effective GC solutions to deal with the helium shortage

MOSH and MOAH refer to Mineral Oil Saturated Hydrocarbons and Mineral Oil Aromatic Hydrocarbons. These mineral oils are hydrocarbon mixtures containing hundreds of chemical compounds of various sizes and structural configurations which are mainly derived from crude oil. Also, they are derived from liquefaction of coal, natural gas, and biomass.
MOAH are hydrocarbons majorly consisting of highly alkylated mono- and/or poly-aromatic rings. These compounds can be found everywhere in the environment, whereas MOSH are paraffin-like, open chained, commonly branched hydrocarbons (e.g., alkanes) and naphthene-like cyclic hydrocarbons (cycloalkanes).
The analysis of such contaminants in food is a challenging task and requires a comprehensive approach to tackle the cumbersome issues related to their determination. Additionally, their toxicity is still under investigation and requires further studies supported by more detailed analytical data.
In this live webinar in association with Gulf Bio Analytical LLC (GBA), you will learn:
1. Basics of MOSH/MOAH Analysis
2. Tackling challenges of MOSH/MOAH Analysis
3. Hyphenated chromatographic techniques as powerful tools to gain deeper insights into the MOSH and MOAH problem
Who should attend: Lab chemists, scientists, R&amp;D chemists, lab managers, technical assistants, food chemists
Why you should attend: To learn and mitigate challenges of MOSH/MOAH analysis through unique technologies
Hurry, register today.
<blockquote>
Presenter: Sajit Parameshwaran (Product Manager, Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry, Gulf Bio Analytical LLC (GBA))
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Sajit Parameshwaran is currently working as a Product manager, Chromatography &amp; Mass Spectrometry in the Gulf Bioanalytical group, located in Dubai. He has completed his Masters in Analytical chemistry from Mumbai university. Prior to joining Gulf Bioanalytical, he worked as an application specialist &amp; HPLC trainer at Agilent Technologies India Pvt. Ltd. He has more than 20 years of experience in the analytical instrumentation industry. In the current organization, he has been instrumental in delivering application training and method setup on chromatography and mass spectrometry instruments related to food testing, forensics, petrochemicals and pharmaceuticals. In his current role, he is responsible to provide the right instrument solutions based on customer’s application requirements. He is actively involved in delivering talks in various webinars &amp; seminars on new product technologies and applications catering to applied markets.
</blockquote>

Agilent Technologies: Let's Talk MOSH/MOAH Analysis

Let's Talk MOSH/MOAH Analysis

Basics of MOSH/MOAH Analysis. Tackling challenges of MOSH/MOAH Analysis. Hyphenated chromatographic techniques.

Does the supply or cost of Helium carrier gas concern you &amp; the profitability of your lab?
Are you looking to switch to a faster &amp; cost-effective alternative?
Learn more by joining us for the upcoming webinar, where we will discuss the possibilities to save on helium costs &amp; to switch away from helium as a carrier gas.
The webinar will focus on the advantages and disadvantages of switching to a different carrier gas, as well as the implications of the same. 
We will talk about an innovative addition to the Agilent portfolio that offers opportunities to equip GC-MS systems in such a way that working with hydrogen as a carrier gas will lead to better results than was ever possible before. 
Key learning objectives: 
<ul>
<li>What are the options to save on Helium carrier gas cost
</li>
<li>Learning the implications of moving away from Helium as a carrier gas
</li>
<li>Implementing alternatives for Helium carrier gas
</li>
</ul>
Who should attend: Everyone using Helium as a carrier gas for GC/GC-MS application and those who want to save on Helium costs or are forced to move away from Helium for varied reasons. 
<blockquote>
Presenter: Dr. Anshu Kumari Singh (Technical Support Manager, Agilent Technologies)
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Dr. Anshu Kumari Singh is the Technical Support Manager for India in the Chemistries and Supplies Division. She has more than 20 years of experience in this industry. She is leading a team of highly qualified Individuals responsible for providing technical support to customers. She provides support to customers on queries related to applications, products and troubleshooting for GC and LC columns and Supplies. She also conducts workshops, trainings and seminars for the customers helping them in understanding the chemistry behind GC &amp; HPLC columns and Sample Preparation Products. Dr. Anshu holds a Doctorate degree from Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi and is based out of Delhi.
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Presenter: Praveen Arya (Application Engineer - GCMS, Agilent Technologies
</blockquote>
Praveen Arya, Application Engineer at Agilent technologies, has a commitment and appreciation for Gas-phase residue applications. In 2005, Mr. Praveen Arya completed his MSc. in Food Technology . After post-graduation, he served as a Senior Analyst at SGS, Gurgaon- a commercial testing laboratory for 6 years and developed expertise in Residue analysis using sophisticated chromatographic instruments such as LCMS and GCMS. After that, in 2011, He joined Agilent Technologies as an Application Engineer where he supported country-wide GCMS customers for resolving application issues and method development. He has more than 18 years of experience in residue analysis in food and environmental samples using various high end chromatographic and spectrometric techniques (GC, GCMS, GCMS/MS, TDS, Headspace, Purge &amp; trap etc.). His area of specialization includes new analytical method development and validation as per national and international guidelines.

Agilent Technologies: The Helium to Hydrogen Switch

The Helium to Hydrogen Switch

We will discuss the possibilities to save on helium costs & to switch away from helium as a carrier gas.

GCMS webinars focusing on GC - page 14