<p><strong>🎤 Presenter:</strong> <strong>Barbara Grace Saunders </strong>(William &amp; Mary, Williamsburg, USA)</p><p>💾 <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://gcms.labrulez.com/paper/32782"><strong>PDF presentation</strong></a></p><h3><strong>Abstract</strong></h3><p><strong>Gunshot residue (GSR) is expelled as a "plume" of vaporized material during a firearm discharge event. As it disperses, condenses, and settles on surfaces in vicinity of the discharge, it creates chemical depositions that provide essential information for forensic casework involving criminal firearm usage.</strong></p><p>GSR contains organic (OGSR) and inorganic (IGSR) components, both of which may carry evidentiary value. Traditional analyses involve the targeted point analysis of IGSR via scanning electron microscopy - energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://icpms.labrulez.com/library?search=SEM-EDS"><strong>SEM-EDS</strong></a>), and conclusions are drawn based on a well-established elemental and morphological profile "characteristic" to IGSR. This method has lost impact as a standard for forensic analysis due to increased use of "green" - heavy metal-free - ammunition, which omits the lead, barium, and antimony that are traditionally seen as the "characteristic" markers of GSR.</p><p>This study aimed to develop a holistic approach to the analysis of GSR using both SEM-EDS as a targeted approach to IGSR analysis and comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography – time-of-flight mass spectrometry (<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://gcms.labrulez.com/library?instrumentationItems=2-3-13"><strong>GC×GC-TOFMS</strong></a>) as a nontargeted approach to OGSR analysis. GSR samples were collected from the hands of shooters at a police firearms recertification training using the tape lift method. SEM-EDS was used to identify IGSR and develop new morphological and elemental profiles for heavy metal-free residues. OGSR components have been positively identified through sample analysis via liquid extraction, chromatographic separation via GC×GC-TOFMS, and data processing.</p><p>Future work on this project will include the optimization of data processing methods and the development of SPME as an alternative sample extraction method.</p><h3><strong>Video Transcription</strong></h3><p>The transition toward environmentally friendly “green” ammunition is creating new challenges for forensic laboratories. Traditional gunshot residue (GSR) analysis relies heavily on the detection of heavy-metal-containing particles produced during firearm discharge. However, modern ammunition formulations increasingly eliminate these metals, making conventional forensic protocols less effective.</p><p>This study presents the development of a combined analytical strategy for the characterization of <strong>green gunshot residue (GSR)</strong> by integrating:</p><ul><li><strong>Scanning Electron Microscopy with Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (SEM-EDS)</strong> for inorganic GSR (IGSR)</li><li><strong>Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography coupled to Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry (GC×GC-TOFMS)</strong> for organic GSR (OGSR)</li></ul><p>The ultimate goal is to provide forensic laboratories with a more complete and defensible analytical approach for firearm discharge investigations.</p><h4><strong>Why Green Gunshot Residue Is a Challenge</strong></h4><p>Gunshot residue consists of particulate matter expelled from firearms during discharge. Rapid increases in temperature and pressure vaporize materials originating from:</p><ul><li>primer compositions</li><li>bullets</li><li>cartridge cases</li><li>firearm components</li></ul><p>These materials rapidly condense and deposit on:</p><ul><li>hands</li><li>skin</li><li>hair</li><li>clothing</li><li>nearby surfaces</li></ul><p>Because GSR is directly associated with firearm discharge events, it remains an important source of forensic evidence.</p><p>Historically, forensic scientists have identified GSR using <strong>SEM-EDS</strong>, focusing on particles containing characteristic heavy metals.</p><p>However, ammunition manufacturers have increasingly removed heavy metals from primers due to health and environmental concerns. Modern green ammunition replaces traditional metallic components with more environmentally common elements, making classical identification criteria less reliable.</p><h4><strong>Project Objectives</strong></h4><p>The project was designed around three primary goals:</p><ol><li>Redevelop inorganic GSR classification criteria for green ammunition.</li><li>Develop a robust GC×GC-TOFMS workflow for organic GSR analysis.</li><li>Combine both approaches into a comprehensive forensic methodology suitable for future laboratory implementation.</li></ol><h4><strong>Collection of Green GSR Samples</strong></h4><p>Samples were collected using standard forensic SEM-compatible collection kits.</p><p>Each kit consisted of:</p><ul><li>an airtight glass vial</li><li>an aluminum SEM pin stub</li><li>black carbon adhesive for particle collection</li></ul><p>Sampling was performed by repeatedly dabbing the adhesive surface across:</p><ul><li>palms</li><li>backs of hands</li><li>forearms</li></ul><p>of volunteers.</p><p>To ensure authentic green GSR samples, collection took place during police firearms recertification training at a local firing range. All ammunition used was verified as green ammunition.</p><h4><strong>Redevelopment of Green IGSR Characterization by SEM-EDS</strong></h4><p>The first phase focused on updating SEM-EDS criteria for green ammunition residues.</p><p>Analysis of numerous samples revealed morphological and elemental characteristics that differed from traditional heavy-metal-containing GSR particles.</p><p>One notable observation was that many candidate particles exhibited a characteristic “sparkling” appearance against the SEM background. These particles often contained elevated metallic content, although not necessarily heavy metals.</p><p>The resulting profiles provided a more reliable framework for identifying inorganic components of green GSR.</p><p>Nevertheless, the approach still involved a degree of analyst judgment, motivating the development of a more objective complementary analytical strategy based on organic residue analysis.</p><h4><strong>Why GC×GC-TOFMS Was Selected</strong></h4><p>The second phase focused on characterization of <strong>organic gunshot residue (OGSR)</strong>.</p><p>Compared with conventional one-dimensional GC, GC×GC offers:</p><ul><li>increased chromatographic peak capacity</li><li>enhanced separation power</li><li>improved resolution of structurally similar compounds</li><li>better discrimination of constitutional isomers</li></ul><p>These advantages are particularly valuable for forensic samples, where highly complex mixtures often contain numerous nitroaromatic compounds and energetic materials.</p><p>The instrumentation used was a:</p><ul><li><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://gcms.labrulez.com/products/37"><strong>LECO Pegasus BT GC×GC-TOFMS</strong></a></li></ul><p>which combines comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography with high-resolution time-of-flight mass spectrometric detection.</p><h4><strong>Development of the Organic GSR Extraction Method</strong></h4><p>Organic residues were extracted using a liquid extraction procedure adapted from OSAC recommendations for GC-MS analysis.</p><p>The workflow included:</p><ol><li>Extraction in methanol</li><li>Evaporation to dryness under nitrogen</li><li>Reconstitution</li><li>Transfer into GC×GC-compatible vials</li></ol><p>Additional vortexing and sonication steps were incorporated to maximize analyte recovery.</p><h4><strong>Comparison of Extraction Procedures</strong></h4><p>The newly developed in-house method was compared with a literature-based extraction protocol.</p><p>The results demonstrated that the in-house procedure:</p><ul><li>recovered more analytes</li><li>produced higher peak intensities</li><li>generated a larger average number of chromatographic peaks</li></ul><p>Important target compounds such as:</p><ul><li>diphenylamine</li><li>skin matrix compounds</li><li>nitroaromatic species</li></ul><p>were detected at significantly higher abundance levels.</p><p>Consequently, the in-house extraction method was selected for all subsequent experiments.</p><h4><strong>Optimization of the GC×GC Method</strong></h4><h5><strong>Carrier Gas Selection</strong></h5><p>Initial experiments compared helium and hydrogen carrier gases.</p><p>Hydrogen provided:</p><ul><li>improved chromatographic expansion</li><li>better compound visibility</li><li>enhanced separation</li></ul><p>Therefore, hydrogen was selected for the final method.</p><h5><strong>Inlet Temperature Optimization</strong></h5><p>Two inlet temperatures were evaluated:</p><ul><li>170 °C</li><li>200 °C</li></ul><p>Although the lower temperature generated a larger number of detected analytes overall, critical GSR target compounds such as:</p><ul><li>nitroglycerin (ethylene glycol dinitrate)</li><li>diphenylamine</li></ul><p>showed lower responses or were not detected.</p><p>As a result, <strong>200 °C</strong> was selected as the optimal inlet temperature.</p><h5><strong>Modulation Period Optimization</strong></h5><p>Three modulation periods were compared: 2.0 s / 2.5 s / 3.0 s</p><ul><li><strong>Two-Second Modulation:</strong> Produced wraparound effects where analytes could not fully elute within a modulation cycle.</li><li><strong>Three-Second Modulation: </strong>Created excessive unused chromatographic space and compressed analyte distributions.</li><li><strong>Two-and-a-Half-Second Modulation:</strong> Provided the best balance between resolution and chromatographic efficiency.</li></ul><p>Therefore, <strong>2.5 seconds</strong> was selected as the final modulation period.</p><h4><strong>Validation Using Analytical Standards</strong></h4><p>The optimized GC×GC method was validated using several reference standards.</p><h5><strong>Seven-Component Phthalate Standard</strong></h5><p>All seven analytes were successfully identified.</p><p>The compounds exhibited:</p><ul><li>excellent chromatographic resolution</li><li>reproducible retention behavior</li><li>clear separation across both chromatographic dimensions</li></ul><p>These retention regions subsequently helped identify corresponding compounds in authentic GSR samples.</p><h5><strong>Twelve-Component Nitroaromatic Standard</strong></h5><p>All twelve analytes were successfully identified.</p><p>Particularly important was the clear separation of compounds such as:</p><ul><li>TNT</li><li>DNT</li><li>nitrotoluenes</li></ul><p>which frequently appear in explosive and propellant formulations.</p><p>This experiment demonstrated the superior resolving power of GC×GC compared with conventional one-dimensional GC.</p><h5><strong>Nitroglycerin Standard</strong></h5><p>Nitroglycerin was successfully detected and its retention coordinates established.</p><p>These retention characteristics will serve as reference markers for future identification in authentic GSR samples.</p><h5><strong>Gun Surveillance Standard</strong></h5><p>The final validation mixture contained nine known compounds.</p><p>Seven components were successfully identified.</p><p>Two unexpected compounds:</p><ul><li>phenazine</li><li>benzothiazole</li></ul><p>appeared in the chromatograms, while one expected analyte overlapped with column bleed.</p><p>Although further refinement is required, the preliminary results demonstrated promising analytical performance.</p><h4><strong>Major Outcomes of the Study</strong></h4><p>The project has already produced several significant achievements:</p><h5><strong>Inorganic GSR Analysis</strong></h5><ul><li>Redesigned SEM-EDS classification profiles for green ammunition residues</li><li>Improved characterization of heavy-metal-free particles</li></ul><h5><strong>Organic GSR Analysis</strong></h5><ul><li>Optimized methanol-based extraction procedure</li><li>Fully developed GC×GC-TOFMS analytical workflow</li><li>Improved detection of key OGSR markers</li><li>Verified retention behavior of multiple relevant analytes</li></ul><h5><strong>Integrated Forensic Strategy</strong></h5><ul><li>Combined IGSR and OGSR characterization</li><li>Enhanced confidence in green GSR identification</li><li>Improved potential for courtroom-defensible evidence interpretation</li></ul><h4><strong>Future Work</strong></h4><p>Although the method successfully distinguishes the presence or absence of green GSR, additional validation remains necessary before routine forensic implementation.</p><p>Future investigations will focus on:</p><ul><li>comparison of sorbent-based extraction approaches with methanol extraction</li><li>acquisition of retention indices for stronger compound confirmation</li><li>further validation of target analyte identities</li><li>increased method robustness for forensic casework</li></ul><p>The ultimate objective is to establish a validated methodology suitable for routine forensic laboratory deployment in the era of green ammunition.</p><h4><strong>Conclusion</strong></h4><p>This study demonstrates that combining <strong>SEM-EDS</strong> and <strong>GC×GC-TOFMS</strong> provides a promising framework for the forensic analysis of modern green gunshot residue. By integrating inorganic and organic residue characterization, forensic scientists can generate a more comprehensive evidential profile of firearm discharge events. The optimized extraction protocol, chromatographic conditions, and preliminary validation results show strong potential for future implementation in forensic laboratories, helping maintain the evidential value of GSR as ammunition technologies continue to evolve.</p><blockquote><p><strong>This text has been automatically transcribed from a video presentation using AI technology. It may contain inaccuracies and is not guaranteed to be 100% correct.</strong></p></blockquote>

Developing a Combined Approach to Green Gunshot Residue Analysis in the Forensic Laboratory (Barbara Grace Saunders, MDCW 2026)

<p><strong>Our Library never stops expanding. What are the most recent contributions to LabRulezGCMS Library in the week of 25th May 2026? Check out new documents from the field of the gas phase, especially GC and GC/MS techniques!</strong></p><blockquote><p><span style="font-size:20px;">👉 </span><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://gcms.labrulez.com/library"><span style="font-size:20px;"><strong>SEARCH THE LARGEST REPOSITORY OF DOCUMENTS ABOUT GCMS AND RELATED TECHNIQUES</strong></span></a></p></blockquote><blockquote><p><strong>👉 Need info about different analytical techniques?</strong> Peek into <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://lcms.labrulez.com/library"><strong>LabRulezLCMS</strong></a> or <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://icpms.labrulez.com/library"><strong>LabRulezICPMS</strong></a> libraries.</p></blockquote><p>This week we bring you application note by<strong> Shimadzu, </strong>presentation by <strong>MDCW / University of Washington</strong> and poster by <strong>Waters Corporation!</strong></p><h3><strong>1. MDCW / University of Washington: Implementing Tile-Based Fisher Ratio Analysis of GC×GC-TOFMS Data to Obtain a Master Peak Table of All Detected Analyte Compounds in Many Petroleum-Based Samples</strong></h3><ul><li>Presentation</li><li><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://gcms.labrulez.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/O_9_Halvorsen_136808e314.pdf"><strong>Full PDF for download</strong></a></li></ul><section><div><div><div><div><div><div><p>This presentation describes the development of a new chemometric workflow for processing <strong>GC×GC-TOFMS (comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography coupled with time-of-flight mass spectrometry)</strong> data from petroleum-derived fuels. The work was conducted by researchers from the University of Washington in collaboration with Chevron Technical Center and focuses on creating a comprehensive <strong>Master Peak Table (MPT)</strong> containing all detectable analytes across multiple fuel sample classes. The motivation was that moving from conventional GC to GC×GC dramatically increased chromatographic peak capacity and resolution, but also created a need for more sophisticated data analysis methods capable of handling the much larger number of detected compounds.</p><p>The analytical platform employed <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://gcms.labrulez.com/products/37"><strong>GC×GC-TOFMS</strong></a> with a <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://gcms.labrulez.com/products/1289"><strong>thermal-flow modulator</strong></a> and a TOF mass spectrometer detector. Fuel samples were analyzed using an <strong>Rxi-1 column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm)</strong> in the first dimension and an <strong>Rxi-17MS column (2.0 m × 0.18 mm × 0.20 μm)</strong> in the second dimension. The sample set included multiple petroleum products such as hydrobates, reformates, naphthas, FCC gasoline, and blank samples. Log-scale chromatograms revealed numerous late-eluting trace compounds and significant compositional differences between fuel batches that were not readily visible in conventional chromatographic representations.</p><p>To process these highly complex datasets, the researchers implemented a <strong>tile-based Fisher Ratio (F-ratio) chemometric approach</strong> using <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://gcms.labrulez.com/products/348"><strong>ChromaTOF Tile software</strong></a>. The method divides GC×GC chromatograms into small tiles and identifies regions where analyte signals differ significantly between sample classes by comparing between-class and within-class variance. Instead of relying solely on F-ratio ranking, the workflow incorporates statistical testing against blank samples. Three blank chromatograms were used to establish tile-specific confidence intervals and p-test thresholds, allowing the system to determine whether detected signals represent genuine compounds rather than background noise. This strategy enabled the creation of a unified master peak table while minimizing problems caused by retention-time shifts and reducing the need for manual user intervention.</p><p>Application of the method generated <strong>719 statistically significant analyte hits</strong> across the fuel classes and demonstrated excellent reproducibility, with only <strong>6.3% of classifications showing inconsistent behavior among replicates</strong>. Detected compounds included hydrocarbons and aromatic species such as <strong>1-methylnaphthalene, 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene, β-vatirenene, 2-octene, and tetramethylheptadecane</strong>, whose occurrence patterns aligned well with expected fuel chemistry. The resulting master peak table contained both shared and sample-specific compounds and provided a much more comprehensive representation of petroleum composition than conventional workflows. The authors conclude that the approach should be broadly applicable to other complex sample types and could be extended using alternative chemometric metrics beyond Fisher Ratio analysis to address different experimental objectives.</p><h3><strong>2. Shimadzu: A Simple Method for Determination of β-Sitosterol as a Marker of Vegetable Oil Adulteration in Ghee by GC</strong></h3><ul><li>Application note</li><li><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://gcms.labrulez.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/an_06_sip_gc_042_en_f4c307005b.pdf"><strong>Full PDF for download</strong></a></li></ul><h5><strong>User Benefits</strong></h5><ul><li>ShimadzuNexis GC-2030 can be effectivelyused for determination of adulteration of Ghee with vegetable oil.</li><li>The NexisGC-2030 easily meets the acceptancecriteria as per the proposed FSSAI method no.01.097:2022.</li><li>This method is suitable for routine food industry analysis and academic research.</li></ul><p>The most common milk product in Indian cuisine is ghee or clarified butter. Due to its high cost, ghee is adulterated with vegetable oil, to gain commercial benefits. β-sitosterol, a common phytosterol, found in a variety of natural sources, including vegetable fat or oil from plants (Figure 1). It is used as a marker of vegetable oil adulteration in ghee<sup>1</sup>.</p><p>The primary goal of this study is to assess the vegetable oil adulteration in ghee by analyzing β-Sitosterol as a marker using gas chromatography (GC). This will establish a foundation for the rapid detection of ghee adulteration. In this study, a simple, sensitive, and inexpensive method is developed for extraction of β-Sitosterol from ghee which is then subjected to gas chromatography with flame ionization detection for quantitation. The effects of several important parameters influencing the extraction efficiencies of β-Sitosterol including water-immiscible organic solvent (type and volume), volume of water, sonication time, surfactant (type and concentration), and organic modifier (type and volume) were investigated. This method is ideal for routine analysis in the food industry during the manufacturing, processing, and commercial testing of milk fat samples, or for academic research purposes.</p><h4><strong>&nbsp;Sample Preparation and Analysis Conditions</strong></h4><p>Standard and sample preparations were conducted following the guidelines outlined in the proposed FSSAI method No. 01.097:20222. The analysis was performed using a Shimadzu <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://gcms.labrulez.com/library?mainauthorItems=1&amp;search=Nexis+GC-2030"><strong>Nexis GC-2030</strong></a> equipped with a Flame Ionization Detector (FID), as shown in Figure 2. The specific configuration and analytical conditions used during the study are provided in Table 1.</p><h4><strong>Conclusion&nbsp;</strong></h4><p>A gas chromatography–based method using GC-2030 was developed for the estimation of β-Sitosterol in ghee. The method exhibits a detection limit of 2 %, enabling the identification of vegetable oil adulteration in ghee at levels as low as 2 %. At this adulteration level, the signal of β-Sitosterol achieved a signal-to-noise (S/N) greater than 3, confirming the reliability of detection at the established limit. This method provides a reliable and effective approach for the quantification of β-Sitosterol, which serves as a marker for vegetable oil adulteration in ghee.</p><h3><strong>3. Waters Corporation: Multidimensional Characterization of Short Chain Chlorinated Paraffins (SCCPs) with GC-APCI and Cyclic Ion Mobility</strong></h3><ul><li>Poster</li><li><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://gcms.labrulez.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/720009386_3232568115.pdf"><strong>Full PDF for download</strong></a></li></ul><p>This poster presents a multidimensional analytical approach for the characterization of <strong>short-chain chlorinated paraffins (SCCPs)</strong>, a class of persistent environmental pollutants included in the Stockholm Convention due to their environmental persistence and bioaccumulation potential. SCCPs are highly complex mixtures of chlorinated hydrocarbons containing thousands of possible congeners, making their analysis particularly challenging. The study evaluates the use of <strong>gas chromatography coupled with atmospheric pressure chemical ionization, cyclic ion mobility spectrometry, and high-resolution mass spectrometry (GC-APCI-IMS-HRMS)</strong> as a powerful platform for improved SCCP characterization.</p><p>The analytical instrumentation consisted of a modified <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://gcms.labrulez.com/library?mainauthorItems=10&amp;search=8890"><strong>Agilent 8890 gas chromatograph</strong></a> equipped with an <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://gcms.labrulez.com/library?mainauthorItems=7&amp;search=Rxi-5SilMS"><strong>Rxi-5SilMS capillary column</strong></a><strong> (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm)</strong> and connected to a <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://lcms.labrulez.com/products/202"><strong>Waters SELECT SERIES Cyclic IMS</strong></a><strong> high-resolution mass spectrometer</strong> using an <strong>Atmospheric Pressure GC (APGC) ion source</strong>. Unlike conventional electron ionization methods, APCI was operated in negative-ion mode with a chloroform modifier, promoting the formation of characteristic <strong>[M+Cl]⁻ molecular ions</strong>. This significantly reduced fragmentation and provided strong molecular-ion signals, improving both qualitative identification and quantitative analysis of SCCP homologues.</p><p>Using three commercial SCCP technical mixtures (51.5%, 55%, and 63% chlorine content), the researchers demonstrated that GC-APCI-HRMS could selectively detect SCCP homologues according to carbon-chain length and degree of chlorination. Although substantial chromatographic overlap was observed among many homologues, the addition of <strong>ion mobility spectrometry (IMS)</strong> introduced a valuable extra separation dimension. Distinct drift-time versus m/z trendlines were observed for compounds sharing the same number of chlorine atoms, allowing homologues to be grouped and characterized more effectively than by chromatographic retention and mass spectrometry alone. The IMS data also enabled estimation of the relative abundance of individual homologue groups within each technical mixture.</p><p>The authors further explored the resolving power of the <strong>cyclic IMS device</strong> by employing multiple ion-mobility passes (up to eight cycles) to investigate individual SCCP congeners. While complete separation of individual congeners within a homologue group was not achieved, higher ion-mobility resolution revealed measurable differences between early- and late-eluting species and provided additional insight into compositional differences among SCCP mixtures. The study concludes that combining <strong>GC-APCI, cyclic ion mobility spectrometry, and high-resolution mass spectrometry</strong> offers a powerful multidimensional workflow for the characterization of complex chlorinated paraffin mixtures and may improve environmental monitoring and future regulatory analysis of these challenging contaminants.</p></div></div></div></div></div></div></section>

News from LabRulezGCMS Library - Week 22, 2026

<p><strong>Low analyte recovery is one of the most common challenges encountered during Solid Phase Extraction (SPE) sample preparation. In this Phenomenex Video Tip, Genevie Hodson, Senior Manager of Technical Support and Applications at Phenomenex, explains a practical troubleshooting approach for situations where analyte recovery after an </strong><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://lcms.labrulez.com/products?category=6&amp;manufacturerItems=50"><strong>SPE </strong></a><strong>procedure is lower than expected.</strong></p><p>The key objective of troubleshooting is not simply to identify that recovery is low, but to determine exactly where the analyte was lost during the extraction process. Once the point of loss has been identified, corrective actions can be implemented systematically.</p><h3><strong>Fundamental Principle of SPE Recovery Troubleshooting</strong></h3><h4><strong>Determine Where the Analyte Is Going</strong></h4><p>The most important step when troubleshooting low recovery is to identify the location of the missing analyte.</p><p>The process begins with the assumption that the sample originally contained 100% of the target analyte. If the final recovery is lower than expected, some portion of the analyte has been lost during SPE processing.</p><p>To identify the loss point, each fraction generated during the SPE procedure must be collected and analyzed separately.</p><h5><strong>Fractions to Collect</strong></h5><p>During the SPE workflow, the following fractions should be collected individually:</p><ul><li><strong>Load fraction (flow-through)</strong></li><li><strong>Wash fraction(s)</strong></li><li><strong>Elution fraction</strong></li></ul><p>Each collected fraction is transferred into a vial and analyzed using the laboratory’s analytical method.</p><p><strong>The analytical results reveal whether the analyte is:</strong></p><ul><li>Present in the load fraction</li><li>Present in one of the wash fractions</li><li>Present in the elution fraction</li><li>Missing from all collected fractions</li></ul><p>The location of the analyte provides direct information about the root cause of the recovery problem and guides the next troubleshooting steps.</p><h4><strong>Scenario 1: Analyte Detected in the Load Fraction</strong></h4><h5><strong>What It Means</strong></h5><ul><li>If the analyte appears in the load fraction, it was not retained by the SPE sorbent during sample loading.</li><li>Instead of binding to the stationary phase, the analyte passed directly through the cartridge.</li></ul><h5><strong>Possible Causes</strong></h5><ol><li><strong>Incorrect Phase Selection</strong></li></ol><ul><li>The selected SPE sorbent may not be appropriate for the analyte being extracted.</li><li>If the analyte cannot interact effectively with the sorbent chemistry, retention will not occur.</li></ul><ol start="2"><li><strong>Excessively Strong Sample Solvent</strong></li></ol><ul><li>The sample may be dissolved in a solvent that is too strong.</li><li>A strong sample solvent can prevent proper interaction between the analyte and the sorbent, causing breakthrough during loading.</li></ul><ol start="3"><li><strong>Incorrect pH Conditions</strong></li></ol><ul><li>Retention often depends on maintaining the analyte in the correct ionization state.</li><li>If the sample pH is not appropriate, the analyte may not interact correctly with the sorbent and therefore will not be retained.</li></ul><ol start="4"><li><strong>Sorbent Overload</strong></li></ol><ul><li>The SPE cartridge may have received:<ul><li>Too much analyte</li><li>Too much sample matrix</li></ul></li><li>When sorbent capacity is exceeded, analytes can break through the cartridge and appear in the load fraction.</li></ul><h5><strong>Corrective Action</strong></h5><p>When overload is suspected, increasing the amount of sorbent can improve analyte retention and prevent breakthrough.</p><h4><strong>Scenario 2: Analyte Detected in the Wash Fraction</strong></h4><h5><strong>What It Means</strong></h5><p>If the analyte appears in the wash fraction, it was initially retained but subsequently removed during the washing step.</p><h5><strong>Possible Causes</strong></h5><ol><li><strong>Wash Solvent Too Strong</strong></li></ol><ul><li>The most common cause is an overly aggressive wash solvent.</li><li>A wash solution with excessive elution strength can remove the analyte before the intended elution step.</li></ul><ol start="2"><li><strong>Incorrect pH During Washing</strong></li></ol><ul><li>When pH control is required for retention, the same conditions must be maintained throughout the process.</li><li>A pH change during washing may alter analyte retention and cause premature elution.</li></ul><h5><strong>Corrective Action</strong></h5><p><strong>Review:</strong></p><ul><li>Wash solvent composition</li><li>Wash solvent strength</li><li>pH conditions during washing</li></ul><p>Adjustments should ensure that the analyte remains retained until the elution step.</p><h4><strong>Scenario 3: Analyte Missing from All Fractions</strong></h4><h5><strong>What It Means</strong></h5><ul><li>If the analyte is not found in the load fraction, wash fractions, or elution fraction, it is likely still retained on the SPE sorbent.</li><li>In this situation, the analyte has not been effectively eluted from the cartridge.</li></ul><h5><strong>Possible Cause</strong></h5><p><strong>Elution Solvent Not Strong Enough</strong></p><ul><li>The final elution solvent may lack sufficient strength to remove the analyte from the sorbent.</li><li>As a result, the analyte remains bound to the stationary phase and never reaches the collection vial.</li></ul><h4><strong>Corrective Action</strong></h4><ul><li>Increase the strength of the elution solvent during the final SPE elution step.</li><li>A stronger solvent can improve analyte desorption and recovery.</li></ul><h3><strong>Summary of Low Recovery Troubleshooting Strategy</strong></h3><p>The recommended troubleshooting workflow consists of four steps:</p><h4><strong>1. Collect All SPE Fractions</strong></h4><p><strong>Gather:</strong></p><ul><li>Load fraction</li><li>Wash fraction(s)</li><li>Elution fraction</li></ul><h4><strong>2. Analyze Each Fraction Separately</strong></h4><p>Use the analytical method to determine where the analyte is located.</p><h4><strong>3. Identify the Root Cause</strong></h4><div><div><h5><strong>Analyte Location&nbsp;&nbsp;/&nbsp;&nbsp;Likely Cause</strong></h5><ul><li><strong>Load fraction:</strong> Incorrect phase, strong sample solvent, incorrect pH, sorbent overload</li><li><strong>Wash fraction: </strong>Wash solvent too strong, incorrect pH</li><li><strong>Not found in any fraction:</strong> Incomplete elution from sorbent</li></ul></div></div><h4><strong>4. Apply Corrective Measures</strong></h4><p><strong>Modify:</strong></p><ul><li>Sorbent selection</li><li>Sample solvent composition</li><li>pH conditions</li><li>Sorbent amount</li><li>Wash solvent strength</li><li>Elution solvent strength</li></ul><h3><strong>Other Common SPE Issues</strong></h3><p>In addition to low recovery, several other SPE-related problems are commonly encountered.</p><p><strong>These include:</strong></p><ul><li>Contamination</li><li>Reproducibility Problems</li><li>Flow-Related Issues</li></ul><h3><strong>Conclusion</strong></h3><p>Successful troubleshooting of low SPE recovery depends on identifying where the analyte is lost during the extraction process. Collecting and analyzing individual SPE fractions provides a systematic method for locating the analyte and determining the underlying cause of poor recovery.</p><p>Whether the analyte passes through during loading, elutes during washing, or remains bound to the sorbent after extraction, fraction-based investigation enables targeted corrective actions. This structured approach allows SPE methods to be optimized efficiently and helps restore acceptable analyte recovery.</p>

SPE Troubleshooting: Understanding and Resolving Low Recovery in Solid Phase Extraction

Article

Application

Academy

Video

Presentation

Poster

The Multidimensional Chromatography (MDC) Workshop draws experts in this exciting field to share and discuss their research.

The Multidimensional Chromatography Workshop

Everything from the world of analytical chemistry in one place. We connect people in solving their problems. At Labrulez you will find all the necessary information easily, quickly and clearly. Stop searching and start finding.

LabRulez

Phenomenex is a global technology leader committed to developing novel analytical chemistry solutions that solve the separation and purification challenges of researchers in industrial, government and academic laboratories.

Phenomenex

Shimadzu UV-2600i Plus, UV-2700i Plus UV-VIS-NIR Spectrophotometer

Shimadzu UV-2600i Plus and UV-2700i Plus spectrophotometers deliver high performance with flexible wavelength ranges, advanced optics, and efficient software control.

<h4><strong>Versatile, Expandable Mid-Range UV Spectrophotometers for Diverse Applications</strong></h4><section><section><section><ul><li><strong>The UV-2600i Plus </strong>is a<strong> single monochromator system </strong>with an <strong>expandable wavelength range up to 1400 nm </strong>using an optional integrating sphere, making it adaptable for various needs.</li><li><strong>The UV-2700i Plus </strong>is a <strong>double monochromator system capable of 8-Abs measurements</strong>, ideal for low transmittance samples.</li></ul><p>Both models come equipped with the intuitive <strong>Shimadzu LabSolutions UV-Vis software</strong>, ensuring data integrity and ease of use. Additionally, these spectrophotometers can be <strong>scheduled to shut down or enter sleep mode </strong>to save power and lamp life, and can <strong>automatically wake up at a specified time</strong>, enhancing efficiency. Elevate your analysis with these versatile and efficient spectrophotometers.</p><h3><strong>Features</strong></h3><h3><strong>Perfect for a Wide Variety of Applications</strong></h3><p>The functionality of the <strong>UV-2600i Plus /2700i Plus</strong> can be freely expanded to suit the measurement objective. By accommodating a wealth of accessories, the system can address any user’s applications and a variety of situations. Thanks to intuitive operations, anyone can easily obtain the data required.</p><p><img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/Shimadzu_UV_2600i_Plus_UV_2700i_Plus_UV_VIS_NIR_Spectrophotometer_e5efa72f19.jpg" alt="Shimadzu UV-2600i Plus, UV-2700i Plus UV-VIS-NIR Spectrophotometer.jpg" srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_Shimadzu_UV_2600i_Plus_UV_2700i_Plus_UV_VIS_NIR_Spectrophotometer_e5efa72f19.jpg 245w," sizes="100vw" width="1040" height="561"></p><h5><strong>Single monochromator UV-2600i Plus</strong></h5><p><strong>A key feature</strong> of the UV-2600i Plus equipped with a single monochromator is its<strong> measurement wavelength range</strong>. By using the optional ISR-2600Plus Integrating Sphere attachment, the measurement wavelength range can be extended from<strong> 220 nm to 1400 nm</strong>, significantly expanding its applications.</p><p><strong>Integrating Sphere Enables Measurements to 1400 nm</strong></p><p>The<strong> UV-2600i Plus</strong> is equipped with <strong>Shimadzu's proprietary LO-RAY-LIGH™ grade diffraction grating</strong>, which achieves high efficiency and low stray light levels. By installing the ISR-2600Plus two-detector integrating sphere, the <strong>300 nm to 1100 nm</strong> wavelength range of conventional models can be extended to <strong>1400 nm</strong>. In addition, the UV-2600i achieves a significant noise reduction, and can accommodate measurements of solar cell anti-reflective films and polycrystalline silicon wafers.</p><p><img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/Shimadzu_UV_2600i_Plus_UV_2700i_Plus_UV_VIS_NIR_Spectrophotometer_11_40f2d1e598.jpg" alt="Shimadzu UV-2600i Plus, UV-2700i Plus UV-VIS-NIR Spectrophotometer" srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_Shimadzu_UV_2600i_Plus_UV_2700i_Plus_UV_VIS_NIR_Spectrophotometer_11_40f2d1e598.jpg 245w," sizes="100vw" width="365" height="228"><img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/Shimadzu_UV_2600i_Plus_UV_2700i_Plus_UV_VIS_NIR_Spectrophotometer_12_b71fa50d8f.jpg" alt="Shimadzu UV-2600i Plus, UV-2700i Plus UV-VIS-NIR Spectrophotometer" srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_Shimadzu_UV_2600i_Plus_UV_2700i_Plus_UV_VIS_NIR_Spectrophotometer_12_b71fa50d8f.jpg 245w," sizes="100vw" width="1052" height="433"><img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/Shimadzu_UV_2600i_Plus_UV_2700i_Plus_UV_VIS_NIR_Spectrophotometer_13_6adf0a1565.jpg" alt="Shimadzu UV-2600i Plus, UV-2700i Plus UV-VIS-NIR Spectrophotometer" srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_Shimadzu_UV_2600i_Plus_UV_2700i_Plus_UV_VIS_NIR_Spectrophotometer_13_6adf0a1565.jpg 245w," sizes="100vw" width="1052" height="466"></p><h4><strong>Measures Slight Differences in Absorbance</strong></h4><p>Equipped with a double monochromator that achieves ultra-low stray light levels, the <strong>UV-2700i Plus</strong> is optimal for measuring low transmittance samples, such as polarization films used for LCD panels. The UV-2700i Plus is capable of <strong>8 Abs measurements</strong>, and can make accurate transmittance measurements to 1 part in 100 million, accommodating a variety of sample measurements.</p><p><strong>Achieves Ultra-Low Stray Light, Enabling 8-Abs Measurements</strong></p><p>In the case of a device equipped with a general double monochromator, the absorbance that can be covered is about<strong> </strong>5 to 6, but the UV-2700i Plus offers a range to 8 Abs, with a transmittance value of <strong>0.000001 %</strong> (1 part in 100 million). This system achieves high-level absorbance measurements with incomparable precision. In addition to measuring even high-concentration samples as is, eliminating the need to dilute samples, the system can be applied to evaluating the transmission characteristics of polarization films. Wavelengths in the<strong> 400 nm to 650 nm range</strong> can be measured to 8 Abs.</p><p><img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/Shimadzu_UV_2600i_Plus_UV_2700i_Plus_UV_VIS_NIR_Spectrophotometer_16_a08f314ee7.jpg" alt="Shimadzu UV-2600i Plus, UV-2700i Plus UV-VIS-NIR Spectrophotometer" srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_Shimadzu_UV_2600i_Plus_UV_2700i_Plus_UV_VIS_NIR_Spectrophotometer_16_a08f314ee7.jpg 164w," sizes="100vw" width="511" height="485"><img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/Shimadzu_UV_2600i_Plus_UV_2700i_Plus_UV_VIS_NIR_Spectrophotometer_14_0d004ee208.jpg" alt="Shimadzu UV-2600i Plus, UV-2700i Plus UV-VIS-NIR Spectrophotometer" srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_Shimadzu_UV_2600i_Plus_UV_2700i_Plus_UV_VIS_NIR_Spectrophotometer_14_0d004ee208.jpg 245w," sizes="100vw" width="1052" height="466"></p><p><strong>Sample Polarization Film Measurement</strong></p><p>With the rotating film holder (image below), two film samples can be set on the same optical axis. In this example, the polarization film is rotated in the plane, and the transmittance is measured when the film transmits and blocks light.</p><p><img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/Shimadzu_UV_2600i_Plus_UV_2700i_Plus_UV_VIS_NIR_Spectrophotometer_1_5ff393836a.jpg" alt="Shimadzu UV-2600i Plus, UV-2700i Plus UV-VIS-NIR Spectrophotometer" srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_Shimadzu_UV_2600i_Plus_UV_2700i_Plus_UV_VIS_NIR_Spectrophotometer_1_5ff393836a.jpg 163w," sizes="100vw" width="397" height="381"><img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/Shimadzu_UV_2600i_Plus_UV_2700i_Plus_UV_VIS_NIR_Spectrophotometer_2_f293cd4e0e.jpg" alt="Shimadzu UV-2600i Plus, UV-2700i Plus UV-VIS-NIR Spectrophotometer" srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_Shimadzu_UV_2600i_Plus_UV_2700i_Plus_UV_VIS_NIR_Spectrophotometer_2_f293cd4e0e.jpg 184w," sizes="100vw" width="450" height="381"></p><h4><strong>Enables Compliance with ER/ES Regulations and Stronger Data Management</strong></h4><div><div><p><strong>Compatible with Validation from PC Software</strong></p><p>Validation can be implemented with PC software using UV validation software. In addition to simplifying daily inspections, this makes instrument performance checks and records management easier, enabling more secure regulatory compliance.</p><p><img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/Shimadzu_UV_1900i_Plus_UV_VIS_spectrophotometer_18_1aa29e9a5d.jpg" alt="Shimadzu UV-2600i Plus, UV-2700i Plus UV-VIS-NIR Spectrophotometer" srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_Shimadzu_UV_1900i_Plus_UV_VIS_spectrophotometer_18_1aa29e9a5d.jpg 232w," sizes="100vw" width="450" height="302"></p><ul><li>Inspection results can not only be printed but also saved to a file, so the results can be called up later for confirmation.</li><li>The inspection parameters can also be saved to separate files for periodic and routine inspections and then called up for use.</li></ul><p><img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/Shimadzu_UV_1900i_Plus_UV_VIS_spectrophotometer_19_7395087cba.jpg" alt="Shimadzu UV-2600i Plus, UV-2700i Plus UV-VIS-NIR Spectrophotometer" srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_Shimadzu_UV_1900i_Plus_UV_VIS_spectrophotometer_19_7395087cba.jpg 232w," sizes="100vw" width="450" height="302"></p><ul><li>The user can select confirmation of instrument performance indicators as per JIS K 0115 General rules for molecular absorptiometric analysis, as well as the general test methods in the Japanese Pharmacopeia. (Order inspection jigs and reagents separately.)</li></ul><p><i>Note: Optional validation software is required to support the US Pharmacopeia and European Pharmacopeia.</i></p><p><strong>Support for FDA 21 CFR Part 11, PIC/S GMP Guidelines and Other Regulations and Guidelines</strong></p><p>Ensuring the integrity of data (database management), including the user management, user authority management, and data audit trails required for compliance with <strong>FDA 21 CFR Part 11, PIC/S GMP guidelines</strong>, and <strong>other ER/ES regulations</strong> is possible.</p><p><strong>Option Software Assists with Regulation-Compliant Validation</strong></p><p>UV validation software assists with performing the measurements and calculations required for validation. The software is included standard with UV-2600i/2700i models. In addition to routine inspections, it can also be used to perform instrument validation that is compliant with Japanese, US, and European pharmacopoeias.</p><p><strong>Assist Function</strong></p><p>The instrument assists the user to ensure that measurements are performed using the correct procedure.*1</p><p><img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/Shimadzu_UV_1900i_Plus_UV_VIS_spectrophotometer_10_a30e63a8a4.jpg" alt="Shimadzu UV-2600i Plus, UV-2700i Plus UV-VIS-NIR Spectrophotometer" srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_Shimadzu_UV_1900i_Plus_UV_VIS_spectrophotometer_10_a30e63a8a4.jpg 245w," sizes="100vw" width="1201" height="212"></p><p>*1 This function can be enabled/disabled.</p><p><strong>Shutdown/Wakeup Functions</strong></p><section><div><p>The instrument can be shut down, and put into sleep mode. Putting the instrument into sleep mode limits power consumption and helps preserve the lamp. After a long period of measurements, the instrument and software can automatically be shut down. After shutdown, the instrument can also be set to wake up automatically at a specified time. With this function, analysis can start the instant the user arrives at the laboratory.</p><p><img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/Shimadzu_UV_2600i_Plus_UV_2700i_Plus_UV_VIS_NIR_Spectrophotometer_15_45b844fcc9.jpg" alt="Shimadzu UV-2600i Plus, UV-2700i Plus UV-VIS-NIR Spectrophotometer" srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_Shimadzu_UV_2600i_Plus_UV_2700i_Plus_UV_VIS_NIR_Spectrophotometer_15_45b844fcc9.jpg 245w," sizes="100vw" width="781" height="258"></p></div></section><h3><strong>Applications</strong></h3><h4><strong>Electricity, Electronics, and Optics</strong></h4><p><strong>Band Gap Measurements for Compound Semiconductors</strong></p><p><img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/Shimadzu_UV_2600i_Plus_UV_2700i_Plus_UV_VIS_NIR_Spectrophotometer_3_03d8793fe0.jpg" alt="Shimadzu UV-2600i Plus, UV-2700i Plus UV-VIS-NIR Spectrophotometer: The diffuse reflection spectra for two types of compound semiconductors (red line: Culn0.5Ga0.5Se2, blue line: CulnSe2) used as solar cell materials were measured using the ISR-2600Plus integrating sphere. It is evident that the absorption edge (position where the reflectance drops) differs depending on the sample. This difference signifies a difference in the band gap* for these samples. (The samples were provided by Wada Laboratory, Faculty of Science and Technology, Ryukoku University.) The band gaps for the samples were calculated utilizing the Tauc method. The results obtained were 1.27 eV for Culn0.5Ga0.5Se2 (red line) and 0.99 eV for CulnSe2 (blue line).  *The term band gap refers to the energy difference between the top of the valence band, which is full of electrons, and the bottom of the conduction band, which does not contain electrons." srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_Shimadzu_UV_2600i_Plus_UV_2700i_Plus_UV_VIS_NIR_Spectrophotometer_3_03d8793fe0.jpg 222w," sizes="100vw" width="519" height="364"></p><h4><strong>Chemicals</strong></h4><p><strong>Thickness Measurements of Cling Films</strong></p><p><img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/Shimadzu_UV_2600i_Plus_UV_2700i_Plus_UV_VIS_NIR_Spectrophotometer_4_a5e83ed3ad.jpg" alt="Shimadzu UV-2600i Plus, UV-2700i Plus UV-VIS-NIR Spectrophotometer: Undulating interference waveforms sometimes occur if light is passed through a film. The film thickness of a sample can be determined by using these interference waveforms. The figure shows transmittance data for a cling film. A clear interference waveform is produced. Utilizing optional film thickness measurement software, the film thickness is calculated as 10.4 μm. (Caution) The sample's refractive index must be entered for the film thickness calculation." srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_Shimadzu_UV_2600i_Plus_UV_2700i_Plus_UV_VIS_NIR_Spectrophotometer_4_a5e83ed3ad.jpg 222w," sizes="100vw" width="1038" height="728"></p><h4><strong>Medicines</strong></h4><p><strong>Evaluating Thermal Stability (T<sub>m</sub>) Analysis of Oligonucleotide Therapeutics</strong></p><p><img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/Shimadzu_UV_2600i_Plus_UV_2700i_Plus_UV_VIS_NIR_Spectrophotometer_5_c80d107f38.jpg" alt="Shimadzu UV-2600i Plus, UV-2700i Plus UV-VIS-NIR Spectrophotometer: Oligonucleotide therapeutics samples (9 to 60 M) were analyzed using TMSPC™-8i and 1 mm optical path length cells. Since UV-2600i Plus /2700i Plus can measure over a wide dynamic range, it is possible to perform a thermal stability analysis of nucleic acid drugs by obtaining the Tm value from the melting curve." srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_Shimadzu_UV_2600i_Plus_UV_2700i_Plus_UV_VIS_NIR_Spectrophotometer_5_c80d107f38.jpg 222w," sizes="100vw" width="1038" height="728"></p><h4><strong>Construction</strong></h4><p><strong>Window Glass Transmission Measurements</strong></p><p><img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/Shimadzu_UV_2600i_Plus_UV_2700i_Plus_UV_VIS_NIR_Spectrophotometer_6_41420fd6ba.jpg" alt="Shimadzu UV-2600i Plus, UV-2700i Plus UV-VIS-NIR Spectrophotometer: Two types of window glass were measured utilizing the ISR-2600Plus integrating sphere. The sample shown by the red line is highly transparent to near-infrared light at 800 nm or more. The sample shown by the blue line, however, is apparently not very transparent to near-infrared light." srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_Shimadzu_UV_2600i_Plus_UV_2700i_Plus_UV_VIS_NIR_Spectrophotometer_6_41420fd6ba.jpg 222w," sizes="100vw" width="519" height="364"></p><h4><strong>Cosmetics</strong></h4><p><strong>Measurement of the Ultra Violet Protection Factor Assigned to Ultraviolet Protection Clothes</strong></p><p><img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/Shimadzu_UV_2600i_Plus_UV_2700i_Plus_UV_VIS_NIR_Spectrophotometer_7_528f748880.jpg" alt="Shimadzu UV-2600i Plus, UV-2700i Plus UV-VIS-NIR Spectrophotometer: The UV protection provided by clothes and an umbrella were analyzed by an ISR-2600Plus integrating sphere accessory. The transmittance spectrum of the umbrella (green) shows that very little UV radiation transmits through the umbrella. In regards to the clothing, the black areas block more UV radiation than do the white areas." srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_Shimadzu_UV_2600i_Plus_UV_2700i_Plus_UV_VIS_NIR_Spectrophotometer_7_528f748880.jpg 159w," sizes="100vw" width="474" height="465"></p><h4><strong>Textiles</strong></h4><p><strong>Total Transmittance Spectrum of CNF</strong></p><p><img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/Shimadzu_UV_2600i_Plus_UV_2700i_Plus_UV_VIS_NIR_Spectrophotometer_8_adb8c09844.jpg" alt="Shimadzu UV-2600i Plus, UV-2700i Plus UV-VIS-NIR Spectrophotometer: An ISR-2600Plus integrating sphere was used to measure the total transmittance spectrum of cellulose nanofiber (CNF). Depending on the raw materials used, spectra can vary, transparency can vary, and spectral tendencies in the ultraviolet region can vary." srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_Shimadzu_UV_2600i_Plus_UV_2700i_Plus_UV_VIS_NIR_Spectrophotometer_8_adb8c09844.jpg 222w," sizes="100vw" width="519" height="364"></p><h4><strong>Life Sciences</strong></h4><p><strong>DNA and Protein Measurements</strong></p><p><img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/Shimadzu_UV_2600i_Plus_UV_2700i_Plus_UV_VIS_NIR_Spectrophotometer_9_40a6f16a7b.jpg" alt="Shimadzu UV-2600i Plus, UV-2700i Plus UV-VIS-NIR Spectrophotometer: The red and blue lines are the absorption spectra for dsDNA and BSA (bovine serum albumin), respectively. The concentration values are 45 ng/μL for dsDNA and 2.2 mg/mL for BSA." srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_Shimadzu_UV_2600i_Plus_UV_2700i_Plus_UV_VIS_NIR_Spectrophotometer_9_40a6f16a7b.jpg 222w," sizes="100vw" width="519" height="364"></p><h4><strong>Foods</strong></h4><p><strong>Vitamin Measurements</strong></p><p><img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/Shimadzu_UV_2600i_Plus_UV_2700i_Plus_UV_VIS_NIR_Spectrophotometer_10_c7f5e10b1e.jpg" alt="Shimadzu UV-2600i Plus, UV-2700i Plus UV-VIS-NIR Spectrophotometer: This shows the absorption spectra for riboflavin (vitamin B2). The sample concentrations are, in order from the highest absorbance, 0.08, 0.04, 0.02, and 0.01 mg/mL." srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_Shimadzu_UV_2600i_Plus_UV_2700i_Plus_UV_VIS_NIR_Spectrophotometer_10_c7f5e10b1e.jpg 222w," sizes="100vw" width="1038" height="728"></p></div></div></section></section></section>

Related content

SPE Troubleshooting: Understanding and Resolving Low Recovery in Solid Phase Extraction

News from LabRulezGCMS Library - Week 22, 2026

Developing a Combined Approach to Green Gunshot Residue Analysis in the Forensic Laboratory (Barbara Grace Saunders, MDCW 2026)