🎤Francis Femi OloyIn this episode of Concentrating on Chromatography, David speaks with Francis Femi Oloy about using chromatography to uncover hidden pollutants in real-world water systems.Femi’s team analyzed polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in six major rivers in southwestern Nigeria — compounds that were banned decades ago but still persist in the environment. Using a workflow that many analytical labs will recognize — liquid–liquid extraction, cleanup, rotary evaporation, nitrogen blowdown, and GC-ECD detection — they quantified 25 PCB congeners at trace levels and linked the results to ecological and human health risk.<h4>In this conversation, we cover:</h4><ul><li>Why legacy pollutants like PCBs still show up today</li><li>Choosing GC-ECD vs LC-MS for halogenated compounds</li><li>Liquid–liquid extraction and matrix cleanup strategies</li><li>Why sample concentration is critical for dilute environmental samples</li><li>How rotovap + nitrogen blowdown work together without losing volatile analytes</li><li>Seasonal trends (why wet season levels were higher)</li><li>Translating concentration data into meaningful risk assessments</li></ul><h3>Video Transcription</h3><section><div><div><div><div><div><div>Persistent organic pollutants such as polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) remain a significant environmental concern despite decades of regulatory restrictions. In this interview, Francais Femi Oloy discusses the environmental and analytical challenges associated with monitoring PCB contamination in rivers of southwestern Nigeria, a rapidly industrializing region where urban growth, industrial activity, agriculture, and dense populations intersect with extensive aquatic systems.Oloy explains that his interest in environmental contaminant analysis emerged from observing unexplained health problems and environmental degradation while growing up in Nigeria. This motivated his transition into organic and environmental chemistry, with a focus on identifying pollutants present in drinking water, agricultural soils, and food systems. Southwestern Nigeria, particularly the Lagos region, represents a critical environmental monitoring area due to intense industrial development, shipping activity, and widespread human dependence on rivers for domestic use, agriculture, and fishing.Although PCBs are considered “legacy pollutants” and are no longer intentionally produced, the interview highlights why they continue to persist in aquatic environments. Old electrical transformers and aging industrial equipment still contain PCB residues, while historical contamination stored in river sediments can become remobilized during flooding, dredging, or sediment disturbance. Because PCBs are hydrophobic and resistant to degradation, they preferentially accumulate in sediments and bioaccumulate through aquatic food chains, creating long-term environmental and human exposure risks.A major focus of the discussion centers on the analytical workflow used for PCB determination in environmental water samples. Composite river water samples were collected in amber glass bottles to avoid contamination and photodegradation, preserved with sodium azide to minimize microbial activity, and stored under cooled conditions prior to extraction. The analytical protocol employed liquid–liquid extraction using dichloromethane (DCM) and hexane to recover both polar and nonpolar PCB congeners. Oloy emphasizes that liquid–liquid extraction was selected over solid-phase extraction (SPE) because of concerns about congener retention within sorbent materials and clogging issues associated with large-volume environmental samples.Following extraction, concentration and cleanup represented critical analytical stages due to the trace-level occurrence and volatility of PCBs. Silica and alumina cleanup procedures were used to remove matrix interferences prior to instrumental analysis. The concentration workflow combined rotary evaporation for bulk solvent reduction with nitrogen blowdown for final volume reduction to less than 1 mL, while carefully avoiding excessive temperature or complete dryness to minimize analyte loss. Oloy repeatedly stresses that improper concentration procedures are among the most common causes of analytical failure in PCB analysis.For instrumental determination, the study utilized gas chromatography coupled with electron capture detection (GC-ECD) rather than LC-MS or GC-MS. According to Oloy, GC was preferred because PCBs are sufficiently volatile for gas chromatographic separation, while ECD provided superior sensitivity and selectivity for chlorinated compounds at environmentally relevant concentrations. The interview also discusses analytical validation strategies, including the use of surrogate standards to assess recoveries, which ranged from approximately 85% to 114%, and signal-to-noise-based determination of detection limits.The study further examined seasonal variations in PCB concentrations, revealing higher levels during the wet season. This observation was attributed to rainfall-driven runoff from contaminated infrastructure, sediment resuspension, and lower temperatures that reduce volatilization losses. To communicate toxicological relevance beyond simple concentration reporting, the researchers also calculated toxic equivalency values (TEQs), converting mixtures of PCB congeners into biologically meaningful toxicity estimates comparable to dioxin toxicity metrics.Beyond environmental monitoring, Oloy highlights broader research interests focused on pollutant remediation and sustainable environmental protection. His group is also involved in developing catalytic materials capable of degrading or removing persistent contaminants from environmental systems. Throughout the discussion, he emphasizes that analytical chemistry plays a central role not only in detecting pollutants, but also in enabling prevention, remediation, and long-term environmental management strategies.</div></div></div></div></div></div></section><blockquote>This text has been automatically transcribed from a video presentation using AI technology. It may contain inaccuracies and is not guaranteed to be 100% correct.</blockquote><blockquote><h4>Concentrating on Chromatography Podcast</h4>Dive into the frontiers of chromatography, mass spectrometry, and sample preparation with host David Oliva. Each episode features candid conversations with leading researchers, industry innovators, and passionate scientists who are shaping the future of analytical chemistry. From decoding PFAS detection challenges to exploring the latest in AI-assisted liquid chromatography, this show uncovers practical workflows, sustainability breakthroughs, and the real-world impact of separation science. Whether you’re a chromatographer, lab professional, or researcher you'll discover inspiring content!You can find Concentrating on Chromatography Podcast in podcast apps:<ul><li><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://open.spotify.com/show/1wZg67rCjoGju4yhqxI3tL">Spotify</a></li><li><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://podcasts.apple.com/tz/podcast/concentrating-on-chromatography/id1788429185">Apple podcast</a></li><li><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://podscan.fm/podcasts/concentrating-on-chromatography">podscan</a></li></ul>and on <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.youtube.com/@ChromatographyTalk/videos">YouTube channel</a></blockquote>

Tracking Toxic PCBs in River Water using Gas Chromatography–Electron Capture Detection

This study presents a high-temperature GC-APCI-MS/MS method for detecting large polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in pyroplastics and environmental samples. The approach enables sensitive analysis of PAHs with molecular weights from 314–424 Da without extensive cleanup or fractionation.Application to pyroplastics from the M/V X-Press Pearl fire revealed substantially elevated levels of large PAHs compared to unburnt plastics. Several compounds, including 1,3,5-triphenylbenzene, emerged as promising markers for identifying pyroplastic contamination, supporting future monitoring of plastic burning, fires, and microplastic pollution.<blockquote><h4>The original article</h4><h4><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.5c11703">Gas Chromatography-Atmospheric Pressure Chemical Ionization (GC-APCI) Expands the Analytical Window for Detection of Large PAHs (≥24 Ringed-Carbons) in Pyroplastics and Other Environmental Matrices</a></h4>Cara Megill, Douglas M. Stevens*, Christopher M. Reddy, Bryan D. James*, Robert K. Nelson, and Frank L. DormanACS Omega 2026, 11, 7, 12321–12329<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.5c11703">https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.5c11703</a><h6>licensed under <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">CC-BY 4.0</a></h6></blockquote>Selected sections from the article follow. Formats and hyperlinks were adapted from the original.<div>The measurement and reporting of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are routine practices in environmental monitoring and risk assessment. <a href="javascript:void(0);">(1−3)</a> However, of the thousands of PAHs, only the 16 designated as Priority Pollutants by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA16) are typically reported. <a href="javascript:void(0);">(4,5)</a> These span two to six ringed parent PAHs, ranging in molecular weight from 128 to 278 Da. It is well recognized that this limited analyte list drastically simplifies and misses a significant fraction of PAHs. <a href="javascript:void(0);">(4)</a> For example, the concentration of C1–C4 alkylated PAHs can be greater than or equal to the concentration of the EPA16 in crude oils and fuels. <a href="javascript:void(0);">(6)</a> Expanding the analytical window of PAHs has proven valuable for forensic analysis of oil spills (e.g., alkylated and heterocycle-containing PAHs) and relevant for toxicological evaluation(e.g., oxygen-, nitrogen-, and sulfur-containing PAHs). <a href="javascript:void(0);">(3,7)</a> Moreover, the sources of PAHs have distinct compositions of PAHs, <a href="javascript:void(0);">(1,8)</a> which enables the use of PAHs for source apportionment. <a href="javascript:void(0);">(2,7)</a> Including alkylated and sulfur-containing PAHs (those beyond the EPA16) in the investigation of environmental samples and other matrices provides greater discriminating power between potential sources (using extracted ion chromatograms). <a href="javascript:void(0);">(3,7,9)</a> Additionally, monitoring the compositional changes of PAHs in the environment can inform about the fate and environmental processing of the matrix (e.g., oil weathering). <a href="javascript:void(0);">(2)</a> While these efforts have made strides in considering other PAHs, an environmentally relevant fraction of PAHs remains underutilized.PAHs with more than six rings have been reported in diverse environmental matrices. <a href="javascript:void(0);">(10,11)</a> These large PAHs (≥24 ringed-carbons <a href="javascript:void(0);">(10)</a>) have been found in combustion-derived particulate matter, <a href="javascript:void(0);">(12−19)</a> urban dust, <a href="javascript:void(0);">(20−23)</a> refinery deposits, <a href="javascript:void(0);">(11)</a> coal tars and pitches, <a href="javascript:void(0);">(24−27)</a> cokes, <a href="javascript:void(0);">(28)</a> soils, <a href="javascript:void(0);">(20,22)</a> sediments, <a href="javascript:void(0);">(20−23)</a> and deep-sea hydrothermal vent bitumen. <a href="javascript:void(0);">(29)</a> Most reports of large PAHs in environmental matrices have been from analyses of U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) standard reference materials (SRMs); <a href="javascript:void(0);">(18,21−23,25,26,30)</a> a few 302 Da isomers have been certified in three SRM. <a href="javascript:void(0);">(31)</a> Nonetheless, isomers ranging from 326 to 374 Da have been reported in SRMs for urban dust (1649a/b), diesel particulate (1650b and 2975), coal tar (1597a), and marine sediment (1941b), displaying qualitative differences between the sources in their large PAH compositions; <a href="javascript:void(0);">(18,20,22,23,27)</a> thus, large PAHs should offer forensic utility.Recent advances in soft ionization within an atmospheric pressure chemical ionization source for gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-APCI) are well-suited for the analysis of large PAHs. Two contributing factors for this are the tolerance for high carrier gas flow rates by GC-APCI and the sensitivity of charge exchange APCI for aromatic species. <a href="javascript:void(0);">(48)</a> Increasing the carrier gas flow rate reduces the elution temperature of analytes, making many higher mass analytes accessible using a conventional GC and column, although poor thermal stability may still pose challenges for some analytes. <a href="javascript:void(0);">(49)</a> Classic vacuum-source GC/MS systems using electron ionization (EI) restrict the upper carrier gas flow allowed from the GC, and therefore, cannot fully utilize high GC carrier gas flows. The sensitivity of GC-APCI for components of petroleum, such as PAHs, has been previously reported. <a href="javascript:void(0);">(48)</a> Furthermore, unlike LC-APCI, which commonly exhibits protonation of analytes in positive ion mode, <a href="javascript:void(0);">(50)</a> GC-APCI+ can operate with dry source conditions. These conditions result in nitrogen-mediated charge exchange ionization and ions of the form M+•, the same form of molecular ion created using EI. As a result, because the charge site location on an ion dictates which product ions will be stable, the same multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) transitions can be used for both GC-APCI MS/MS and EI MS/MS. <a href="javascript:void(0);">(51)</a>Herein, a GC-APCI method was developed for the detection of large PAHs. Due to the limited availability of pure standards, previously characterized NIST SRMs were used in method development as sources of large PAHs. The values of the method and detection of large PAHs were demonstrated by analyzing environmental plastic samples collected after the M/V X-Press Pearl ship fire and plastic spill.<h4>Materials and Methods</h4><h5>GC-APCI</h5>The solvent extracts and dilutions were analyzed by GC-APCI on a <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://lcms.labrulez.com/products/554">Xevo TQ Absolute</a> (Waters Corporation) tandem quadrupole mass spectrometer (TQ-MS/MS). The atmospheric pressure gas chromatography (APGC) ionization source was operated in charge transfer mode using dry N2 as the reagent gas. Dry N2 reagent gas creates molecular ions of the form M+• with no significant adduct formation for large PAHs. The high reagent gas flow rate of 350 mL/min into the ionization chamber, combined with low energies applied to the transfer optics from the atmospheric pressure region to the first quadrupole, leads to a high molecular ion survival rate. Furthermore, the use of MS/MS with quadrupoles operating at unit mass resolution prevents potential effects on response caused by adduct formation. Acquisitions were performed in positive ion, MRM mode. Two MRM transitions were used for each of the 16 precursor masses, ranging from 314 to 424 Da (<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://pubs.acs.org/doi/suppl/10.1021/acsomega.5c11703/suppl_file/ao5c11703_si_001.pdf">Table S1</a>). No optimization of source conditions specific to the analysis of large PAHs was required. The list of 16 specific precursor masses targeted in this range was developed using multiple sources reporting large PAHs in NIST SRMs and samples from deep-sea hydrothermal vents. <a href="javascript:void(0);">(18,29,30)</a> The two transitions represented constant neutral losses of 2 and 4 Da at high collision energies of 60–100 eV, using N2 as the collision gas.For 1,3,5-TPB analysis, the APGC ionization source was operated in charge transfer mode using N2 as the collision gas. Acquisitions were performed in positive ion, MRM mode, yielding six MRM transitions for analysis (<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://pubs.acs.org/doi/suppl/10.1021/acsomega.5c11703/suppl_file/ao5c11703_si_001.pdf">Table S2</a>). Similar to the large PAHs, this analyte also shows neutral losses of 2 and 4 Da, reflecting behavior like that of the more condensed structures.The <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://gcms.labrulez.com/library?mainauthorItems=10&amp;search=8890+GC">8890 GC (Agilent Technologies)</a> was configured with N2 as the carrier gas and an <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://gcms.labrulez.com/library?mainauthorItems=7&amp;search=Rxi-5HT">Rxi-5HT column (Restek)</a> of 15 m in length, 0.25 mm inner diameter, and 0.10 μm film thickness. The split/splitless (SSL) injection port was operated at a 10:1 split ratio with a temperature of 380 °C. A 1 μL injection volume was used for all analyses. The temperature program was 30.8 min; it started by holding at 40 °C for 0.5 min, then ramped to 160 °C at 14 °C/min, followed by a ramp to 395 °C at 22 °C/min and a hold at the temperature for 11 min. The flow rate of the N2 carrier gas was initially 0.60 mL/min, then ramped at 0.015 mL/min2 to 0.90 mL/min, followed by a ramp at 0.150 mL/min2 to 3.0 mL/min. To adapt the system for high-temperature work, the SSL was configured with a high-temperature septum (400 °C maximum), a 100% graphite liner O-ring, and a straight 4 mm inner diameter, wool-packed liner (450 °C maximum). Additional instrument and method details are included in the <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://pubs.acs.org/doi/suppl/10.1021/acsomega.5c11703/suppl_file/ao5c11703_si_001.pdf">Supporting Information</a>.<h4>Results</h4><h5>Analysis of Large PAHs in Pyroplastic Samples by GC-APCI</h5>Macroplastic and microplastic debris from the M/V X-Press Pearl ship fire and plastic spill were investigated for the presence and distribution of large PAHs. The field samples included white, unburnt polyethylene nurdles and two types of pyroplastic, termed burnt plastic and combustion remnant (<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.5c11703#fig1">Figure 1</a>), both of which were polyethylene. <a href="javascript:void(0);">(43)</a> The types of pyroplastics were previously operationally defined based on the size and shape of the pieces. <a href="javascript:void(0);">(43)</a>Investigation of the 302 Da isomers revealed profiles similar to those of the SRMs; however, unique differences were observed (<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://pubs.acs.org/doi/suppl/10.1021/acsomega.5c11703/suppl_file/ao5c11703_si_001.pdf">Figure S2</a>). Eighteen to twenty-one peaks were detected across the plastic samples. Compared with the SRMs, the pyroplastics showed decreases in the relative abundance of dibenzo[a,e]fluoranthene and increases in dibenzo[a,h]pyrene (<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://pubs.acs.org/doi/suppl/10.1021/acsomega.5c11703/suppl_file/ao5c11703_si_001.pdf">Figure S2</a>). This trend was not the case for the white nurdle sample. Starting at a retention time of 16.80 min, two peaks were unique to the pyroplastic samples (not present in the SRMs and especially minor in the white nurdles). These peaks followed that for dibenzo[a,h]pyrene, which had previously been reported as the last detected 302 Da isomer compound in the SRMs, <a href="javascript:void(0);">(21)</a> supporting their novelty as marker compounds of pyroplastics.The plastic samples displayed similarities and differences in the presence and distribution of large PAHs (<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.5c11703#fig3">Figure 3</a>). The white nurdles, burnt plastic, and combustion remnant all contained high-intensity peaks at 20.50 min for 398 Da and 19.55 min for 374 Da. Peaks between 20.00 and 20.25 min of 398 Da and the 19.35 min peak of 374 Da were reduced in intensity for the pyroplastics compared to the white nurdles (<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://pubs.acs.org/doi/suppl/10.1021/acsomega.5c11703/suppl_file/ao5c11703_si_001.pdf">Figure S3</a>). Conversely, the peaks between 18.50 and 18.75 min of 350 Da were more intense in the pyroplastics compared to the white nurdles.<img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/ACS_Omega_2026_11_7_12321_12329_Figure_3_Comparison_of_the_resolved_isomers_for_398_374_and_350_Da_of_the_white_nurdles_burnt_plastic_and_combustion_remnant_pieces_ec390ebae3.jpg" alt="ACS Omega 2026, 11, 7, 12321–12329: Figure 3. Comparison of the resolved isomers for 398, 374, and 350 Da of the white nurdles, burnt plastic, and combustion remnant pieces collected from Pamunugama Beach, Sri Lanka, following the 2021 M/V X-Press Pearl ship fire and plastic spill." srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_ACS_Omega_2026_11_7_12321_12329_Figure_3_Comparison_of_the_resolved_isomers_for_398_374_and_350_Da_of_the_white_nurdles_burnt_plastic_and_combustion_remnant_pieces_ec390ebae3.jpg 232w," sizes="100vw" width="1600" height="1077">The levels of all the targeted large PAHs were at least 2 orders of magnitude higher in the pyroplastics than in the white nurdles. These levels included the individual PAHs that were common to the pyroplastics. This trend mirrored that observed for smaller PAHs and the solvent-extractable content of the sample types. <a href="javascript:void(0);">(39,43,46)</a> There were also slight differences in the signatures of the large PAHs found in the pyroplastics. The 398 Da peak at 20.24 min, along with the 374 Da peak at 19.31 min and the 350 Da peak at 18.61 min, were more prominent in the combustion remnant compared to the burnt plastic (<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://pubs.acs.org/doi/suppl/10.1021/acsomega.5c11703/suppl_file/ao5c11703_si_001.pdf">Figure S3</a>).Similar to the differences in large PAH signatures between the SRMs, the plastic samples had different signatures. Such qualitative interpretation of extracted ion chromatograms is forensically accepted for distinguishing sources. <a href="javascript:void(0);">(3)</a> This feature can potentially be utilized to differentiate between plastic types (e.g., virgin, weathered, and partially combusted) as well as to identify sources of the large PAHs and the combustion temperature.<h4>Conclusions</h4>GC-APCI-MS/MS proved a useful technique for detecting large PAHs in diverse environmental matrices, including extracts from pyroplastic field samples. Despite a lack of widely available analytical standards for large PAHs, NIST SRMs provided ample material for method development for their detection. Nonetheless, with the increasing research on microplastics in the environment and their relevance to human health, an environmental SRM with certified values for large PAHs is needed, and pyroplastics may provide such a source of material. Large PAHs and 1,3,5-TPB were detected in pyroplastic field samples and hold promise as chemical markers for pyroplastics, complementing other means for their detection in environmental samples (e.g., appearance and physical properties). Due to the accessibility of GC-APCI, the detection of large PAHs can be integrated into workflows for evaluating environmental samples, including those for microplastics.</div>

Gas Chromatography-Atmospheric Pressure Chemical Ionization (GC-APCI) Expands the Analytical Window for Detection of Large PAHs (≥24 Ringed-Carbons) in Pyroplastics and Other Environmental Matrices

In the week of May 11, the following webinars await you in the field of gas / solid phase and especially Raman, FTIR, GC and GC/MS.<blockquote><h4><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://gcms.labrulez.com/webinars">👉 DETAILS AND REGISTRATION IN THE WEBINARS SECTION</a></h4>👉 Search and filter in the largest global database with over 5 500 GC, LC, MS and spectroscopy webinars.</blockquote><h5>1. Thermo Fisher Scientific: Uncovering Microplastics: Identification, Quantification, and Exposure Assessment</h5><ul><li>Tu, 12.5.2026 08:00 CEST</li><li><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://gcms.labrulez.com/webinar/6136">Registration</a></li></ul>In this webinar, we will explore complementary analytical solutions for comprehensive microplastics characterization.<h5>2. AZoM: From Lab to Line: Leveraging GC and Process MS for Petrochemical Gas Analysis</h5><ul><li>We, 13.5.2026 16:00 CEST</li><li><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://gcms.labrulez.com/webinar/6171">Registration</a></li></ul>Explore how GC and process MS work together in petrochemical workflows, combining detailed lab analysis with real-time gas monitoring for faster decisions.<h5>3. Milestone: Modern Sample Prep for Organic Contaminants: PAHs, PFAS, MOSH/MOAH in Food</h5><ul><li>We, 13.5.2026 16:00 CET</li><li><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://gcms.labrulez.com/webinar/5822">Registration</a></li></ul>Learn how microwave-assisted extraction streamlines food analysis of PAHs, PFAS, and MOSH/MOAH, improving recoveries, reducing solvents, and meeting regulatory demands.<h5>4. Thermo Fisher Scientific: End-to-end automation in GC/GC-MS: Trends, tools, and practical implementation</h5><ul><li>We, 13.5.2026 18:00 CEST</li><li><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://gcms.labrulez.com/webinar/6186">Registration</a></li></ul>In this GC/GC-MS power hour session, we’ll explore how automation is transforming laboratories by helping teams do more with less time, fewer resources, and greater confidence.<h5>5. GERSTEL: Automating Food Safety Workflows for the Analysis of Edible Oils and Fats</h5><ul><li>We, 13.5.2026 20:00 CEST</li><li><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://gcms.labrulez.com/webinar/6168">Registration</a></li></ul>Learn how automated workflows improve data quality in edible oil testing, including FAMEs, MOSH/MOAH, and 3-MCPD analysis with real-world insights.

Webinars LabRulezGCMS Week 20/2026

Article

Webinars

Video

Scientists

Plastics

Environment

Scientific article

Interview

Science and research

Everything from the world of analytical chemistry in one place. We connect people in solving their problems. At Labrulez you will find all the necessary information easily, quickly and clearly. Stop searching and start finding.

LabRulez

Organomation, founded in 1959, designs and manufactures high-quality nitrogen evaporators and extraction systems. Known for innovation and durability, their lab instruments are used globally for efficient sample preparation with strong customer support.

Organomation

Wasson Dynamic Blender for GC (DB302)

The Dynamic Blender is a portable gas blending device that dilutes a sample or a certified standard with a matrix gas of choice.

Gas chromatography (GC) analyses often include trace level detection of components requiring samples or standards at low concentrations. Some analytes are expensive or difficult to purchase at low levels due to reactivity, adsorption, or high molecular weight. Analyses may also cover a wide concentration range, requiring multi-point calibration.
The Wasson-ECE Dynamic Blender (DB302) provides a simple solution to these calibration needs. The Dynamic Blender is a portable gas blending device that dilutes a sample or a certified standard with a matrix gas of choice. One certified standard with concentrations at the upper limit of the desired calibration curve can be diluted to a lower level (&gt;2 orders of magnitude lower) to create a full calibration curve.
An inert flow path and heated bridge eliminate adsorption and condensation problems when blending gas standards that include sulfur, nitrogen, and other reactive compounds.
An on-board flow controller allows the diluent gas flow to be controlled digitally and samples are fed directly to a gas chromatograph. The Dynamic Blender eliminates the need to purchase and store multiple gas cylinders and provides an easy, cost-effective solution for gas phase calibration needs.
<h4>Dynamic Blender Features</h4>
<ul>
<li>Approximately 100 pre-programmed pure diluent gases and mixtures and twenty user configurable diluent mixture slots.
</li>
<li>Maximum Diluent Pressure of 100 psi (leak tested to this pressure)
</li>
<li>Maximum Temperature of 150°C (operation verified at this temp.)
</li>
<li>Mass Flow Controller Range of 10 – 500 cc/min
</li>
<li>7 μm in-line gas filters (treated) are also provided
</li>
<li>Specially passivated tubing for trace reactive compounds (sulfurs, oxygenates, etc.)
</li>
</ul>
*This treatment is not suitable for samples with pH &gt; 8.0, so please notify your sales representative if you have high pH samples.

ARC Polyarc System

A Breakthrough Innovation Revolutionizing GC/FID Technology. The Polyarc System is transforming the way scientists use gas chromatographs with Flame Ionization Detectors.

The Polyarc system has a catalytic microreactor that enhances new and existing gas chromatographs (GCs) with flame ionization detectors (FIDs) by converting all organic compounds to methane molecules prior to their detection by the FID. In doing so, the Polyarc system reduces the need to perform time-consuming calibrations by creating a uniform detector response for truly universal carbon detection.
The Polyarc system gives scientists the capability to determine purity, quantify unknowns, qualify products, investigate, improve development and more in a simple, fast and more economical way that is transforming the industry.
<blockquote>
Available for gas chromatographs (GC) <a href="https://gcms.labrulez.com/products?category=1&amp;manufacturerItems=10">Agilent</a> 5890, 6890, 7820, 7890, 8890, <a href="https://gcms.labrulez.com/products?category=1&amp;manufacturerItems=1">Shimadzu</a> 2030, <a href="https://gcms.labrulez.com/products?category=1&amp;manufacturerItems=3">Thermo Fisher</a>, Varian, Bruker a Scion GC.
</blockquote>
<h3>What is Polyarc?</h3>
The Polyarc is the next evolution of flame ionization detection (FID). The Polyarc converts the FID into a truly universal carbon detector using proprietary catalytic reactions that convert organic molecules to methane immediately prior to detection.
<h3>Why is it important?</h3>
The FID has two main challenges: lack of uniform response and low response to certain compounds. The Polyarc enhances your FID to solve these challenges by giving your FID a uniform response to nearly all organic molecules. The result is more accurate data, improved productivity, lab efficiencies, and the ability to detect more compounds.
<h3>How Does the Polyarc® System Work to Simplify and Improve GC/FID Quantification?</h3>
The Polyarc system has a catalytic microreactor that enhances GC/FIDs by converting all organic compounds to methane molecules prior to detection by the FID. The result?
A universal response for ALL organic molecules.
<img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/ARC_Polyarc_FID_vs_FID_Response_Factors_0f9c958558/ARC-PolyarcFID-vs-FID-Response-Factors.jpg" alt="ARC: Comaprison of Polyarc/FID vs FID Response Factors.jpg"/>
<h3>The Polyarc System Features an Optimized Design and Seamless Integration</h3>
The Polyarc system is the first commercial technology of its kind. The device uses proprietary technologies including novel catalysts, a specially designed 3D-printed micro reactor, and fast seamless integration into existing equipment.
The optimized internal design and catalyst microstructure maintains separation performance and peak shape while increasing sensitivity and enabling accurate quantification without calibration standards.
<img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/ARC_Optimalizovany_design_a_specialne_navrzeny_3_D_tisteny_mikroreaktor_Polyarc_70ccedc41e/ARC-Optimalizovany-design-a-specialne-navrzeny-3D-tisteny-mikroreaktor-Polyarc.jpg" alt="ARC: Specially designed 3D-printed micro reactor Polyarc"/>
<h3>Perform Cutting-Edge Chromatography on Any Organic Compound with a Polyarc® System</h3>
Realize a greater breadth of analysis with improved detection of compounds previously invisible or with an extremely low sensitivity by gas chromatography using FID only — while reducing the need for time intensive calibration.
The careful selection and robust catalyst design enables the analysis of a wide variety of compounds including a range of heteroatoms, compounds of various sizes, and samples containing common catalytic poisons (e.g., S).
<img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/ARC_Analyza_siroke_skaly_sloucenin_pomoci_Polyarc_systemu_3e18241358/ARC-Analyza-siroke-skaly-sloucenin-pomoci-Polyarc-systemu.png" alt="ARC: Polyarc system enables the analysis of a wide variety of compounds"/>
<h3>How Does the Polyarc System Compare to a Methanizer?</h3>
A conventional methanizer converts CO and CO₂ to methane, allowing low level FID detection of CO and CO₂. The significant advantage of the Polyarc system is that it converts all compounds to methane, allowing not only for the detection of CO and CO₂ , but also millions of other organic compounds.
<img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/ARC_Srovnani_systemu_Polyarc_s_metanizerem_7df16e09c7/ARC-Srovnani-systemu-Polyarc-s-metanizerem.jpg" alt="ARC: Comparison of the Polyarc System with a metanizer"/>

ARC Jetanizer (Methanizer)

The Jetanizer is the easiest and most robust methanizer.

<h3>What is Jetanizer™?</h3>
The Jetanizer is the easiest and most robust methanizer. A methanizer is a chemical reactor that converts carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide to methane to enable sensitive detection by a flame ionization detector (FID) from &lt;20 ppb to 100%!
<img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/ARC_Analyza_CO_2_od_1ppm_do_100_s_pouzitim_GC_jetanizeru_FID_9c922be2e9/ARC-Analyza-CO2-od-1ppm-do-100percent-s-pouzitim-GC-jetanizeru-FID.jpg" alt="ARC: CO₂ analysis from 1ppm to 100% with GC/Jetanizer/FID"/>
<h3>Why is it important?</h3>
<h4>Low-level detection of CO and CO₂ is important in:</h4>
<ul>
<li>catalysis </li>
<li>hydrogen (H₂) purity analysis </li>
<li>dissolved gas analysis (DGA)</li>
<li>greenhouse gas (GHG) analysis, </li>
<li>transformer oil gas analysis (TOGA)</li>
<li>ethylene/propylene monomers analysis </li>
<li>safe entry analysis, and more</li>
</ul>
Traditionally, large nickel-catalyst-filled tube methanizers are used, however, they are prone to frequent failures, and they are difficult and time consuming to operate and maintain. 
<blockquote>
Legacy nickel catalyst methanizers take 2-6 hours to install and replace. Jetanizers take &lt;5 minutes.
</blockquote>
ARC’s Jetanizer solves these challenges by improving response, robustness and ease of installation, by incorporating state-of-the-art catalysts into an FID jet. Moreover, the Jetanizer enables low level &lt;1 ppm formaldehyde analysis by GC avoiding the pitfalls of HPLC analysis of formaldehyde.
<blockquote>
For use with these GC models: <a href="https://gcms.labrulez.com/products?category=1&amp;manufacturerItems=10">Agilent 5890, 6890, 7890, 8890, Intuvo</a>, <a href="https://gcms.labrulez.com/products?category=1&amp;manufacturerItems=1">Shimadzu 2010, 2030 GC</a>.
</blockquote>
<h3>Benefits over Traditional Methanizers</h3>
<ul>
<li>Lower up-front cost</li>
<li>No extra plumbing: minimize fittings and leaks</li>
<li>No extra heater or controller: utilizes heat from FID</li>
<li>FAST installation: Less than 5 minutes</li>
<li>Ability to be used with formaldehyde</li>
<li>Higher sulfur tolerance</li>
<li>Higher catalytic activity = larger linear dynamic range</li>
<li>Free up space on the GC</li>
<li>No toxic metals: The Jetanizer™ does not contain nickel catalysts</li>
</ul>
<img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/ARC_Kalibrace_analyzy_CO_2_s_pouzitim_GC_jetanizeru_FID_2f0b6171fc/ARC-Kalibrace-analyzy-CO2-s-pouzitim-GC-jetanizeru-FID.jpg" alt="ARC: CO₂ analysis calibration with GC/Jetanizer/FID"/>

ARC Precision Split

ARC’s PrecisionSplit device allows scientists and chromatographers to take advantage of the quantitative power of the Polyarc/FID in combination with the mass identification power of the mass spectrometer, all in the same injection in real time.

<h3>Why does my MS need an FID?</h3>
A mass spectrometer (MS) provides valuable qualitative data, but poses several challenges to accurate quantification. Adding a flame ionization detector (FID) in parallel with the MS gives complementary quantitative carbon concentrations with minimal extra effort or equipment. We believe every MS needs an FID companion for quantitative analysis, especially for non-targeted analysis or tentatively identified compounds where quantification is desired.
<img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/ARC_Precision_Split_6271ed1240/ARC-Precision-Split.jpg" alt="ARC: Precision Split"/>
<h3>The benefits of a MS/FID split:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Virtually eliminate response factor variability</li>
<li>Quantify accurately (better linearity, more consistent response, fewer calibration errors)</li>
<li>Improve sensitivity for poor ionizers with the FID</li>
<li>Save your source!</li>
</ul>
<h3>The Data</h3>
Response factor (RF) variation in the mass spectrometer (i.e., the relative response of the MS to different chemicals) can lead to significant errors in quantification. Two compounds that have the same response/area in the MS can have concentrations that differ more than 100-fold (see <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0731708520304283">Jordi et al.</a>). 
As you can see below, the Polyarc/FID split can reduce this response factor variation so that accurate quantification of tentatively identified compounds is possible.
<img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/ARC_Variance_RF_u_MS_detektoru_8e02773edc/ARC-Variance-RF-u-MS-detektoru.jpg" alt="ARC: RF variation with MS"/>
<img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/ARC_Variance_RF_s_Polyarc_FID_splittrem_ca7def3cb3/ARC-Variance-RF-s-Polyarc-FID-splittrem.jpg" alt="ARC: RF variation with Polyarc/FID split"/>

Products from category Accessories focused on GC - page 1

Related content

Webinars LabRulezGCMS Week 20/2026

Gas Chromatography-Atmospheric Pressure Chemical Ionization (GC-APCI) Expands the Analytical Window for Detection of Large PAHs (≥24 Ringed-Carbons) in Pyroplastics and Other Environmental Matrices

Tracking Toxic PCBs in River Water using Gas Chromatography–Electron Capture Detection