Volatile organic compounds in water by purge and trap/capillary column GC with photoionization and electrolytic conductivity detectors in series
Applications | 2011 | Agilent TechnologiesInstrumentation
Ensuring the safety of drinking water requires reliable detection of a wide range of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). The 1986 amendments to the US Safe Drinking Water Act expanded regulatory limits to include eight new compounds and monitor fifty-one others. Accurate VOC analysis protects public health, informs treatment strategies, and maintains compliance with environmental regulations.
This application note outlines the adaptation of EPA Method 502.2 for VOC analysis, employing purge-and-trap sampling followed by capillary column gas chromatography (GC). Key goals include improved resolution, lower detection limits, and dual-detection confirmation by photoionization detector (PID) for aromatics and electrolytic conductivity detector (ELCD) for halocarbons.
The optimized capillary method achieved clear separation of 37 target VOCs at 20 ppb concentration. Dual-column validation and dual-detector response ratios (e.g., halogenated aromatics) enhanced compound confirmation. Chromatograms demonstrated consistent retention time shifts and reversed elution orders between columns, streamlining the identification process.
Advances in microtrap materials, faster oven programs, and enhanced detector technologies (e.g., tandem MS) could further lower detection limits and expand analyte coverage. Integration with remote monitoring networks and real-time data analytics may provide continuous water quality surveillance and rapid response capabilities.
The purge-and-trap capillary GC method with PID/ELCD detection offers a robust, sensitive, and automatable solution for comprehensive VOC analysis in water. It meets stringent regulatory standards and supports high-throughput laboratory workflows.
Agilent Technologies. Application Note: Volatile organic compounds in water by purge and trap/capillary column GC with photoionization and electrolytic conductivity detectors in series. 2011.
GC, GC columns, Consumables
IndustriesEnvironmental
ManufacturerAgilent Technologies
Summary
Significance of the Topic
Ensuring the safety of drinking water requires reliable detection of a wide range of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). The 1986 amendments to the US Safe Drinking Water Act expanded regulatory limits to include eight new compounds and monitor fifty-one others. Accurate VOC analysis protects public health, informs treatment strategies, and maintains compliance with environmental regulations.
Objectives and Overview of the Study
This application note outlines the adaptation of EPA Method 502.2 for VOC analysis, employing purge-and-trap sampling followed by capillary column gas chromatography (GC). Key goals include improved resolution, lower detection limits, and dual-detection confirmation by photoionization detector (PID) for aromatics and electrolytic conductivity detector (ELCD) for halocarbons.
Methodology and Instrumentation
- Purge and Trap: A Tenax–silica gel–charcoal trap concentrates VOCs via an 11-minute helium purge.
- Capillary GC Column: A 624-type (6% cyanopropylphenyl/94% methyl, 0.53 mm x 30 m, 3 µm film) or CP-Select 624 CB column ensures high resolution.
- Oven Program: 10 °C hold for 10 min, ramp at 5 °C/min to 160 °C, hold for 0 min.
- Carrier Gas: Helium at 6.0 mL/min.
- Detectors in Series: PID detects aromatic VOCs; ELCD targets halogenated compounds.
- Column Selector: Automated switching between primary and confirmatory columns enables two-column confirmation and unattended operation.
Main Results and Discussion
The optimized capillary method achieved clear separation of 37 target VOCs at 20 ppb concentration. Dual-column validation and dual-detector response ratios (e.g., halogenated aromatics) enhanced compound confirmation. Chromatograms demonstrated consistent retention time shifts and reversed elution orders between columns, streamlining the identification process.
Benefits and Practical Applications
- Lower Detection Limits: Capillary columns provided improved sensitivity over packed columns.
- Enhanced Resolution: Complex VOC mixtures are resolved effectively, reducing coelution risks.
- Automated Confirmation: Column selector and dual detectors minimize manual intervention and increase throughput.
- Regulatory Compliance: Method aligns with EPA 502.2 requirements for drinking water testing.
Future Trends and Opportunities
Advances in microtrap materials, faster oven programs, and enhanced detector technologies (e.g., tandem MS) could further lower detection limits and expand analyte coverage. Integration with remote monitoring networks and real-time data analytics may provide continuous water quality surveillance and rapid response capabilities.
Conclusion
The purge-and-trap capillary GC method with PID/ELCD detection offers a robust, sensitive, and automatable solution for comprehensive VOC analysis in water. It meets stringent regulatory standards and supports high-throughput laboratory workflows.
Reference
Agilent Technologies. Application Note: Volatile organic compounds in water by purge and trap/capillary column GC with photoionization and electrolytic conductivity detectors in series. 2011.
Content was automatically generated from an orignal PDF document using AI and may contain inaccuracies.
Similar PDF
USEPA Methods 502.2 and 8021B using the Eclipse Purge-and-Trap (P&T) Sample Concentrator and PID/ELCD Tandem Detectors
|Agilent Technologies|Applications
USEPA Methods 502.2 and 8021B using the Eclipse Purge-and-Trap (P&T) Sample Concentrator and PID/ELCD Tandem Detectors Application Note 31630508 Keywords Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) Purge-and-Trap (P&T) USEPA Method 502.2 USEPA Method 8021B Eclipse Purge-and-trap Sample Concentrator Photoionization Detector (PID) Electrolyic…
Key words
yes, yespid, pidelcd, elcdbutylbenzene, butylbenzenephotoionization, photoionizationpurge, purgeeclipse, eclipsetrap, trapphdetect, phdetectdetector, detectorxylene, xylenemdl, mdlelectrolytic, electrolyticdibromochloromethane, dibromochloromethaneconductivity
Optimizing the Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds
2003|Restek|Guides
Technical Guide 1 Optimizing the Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds Inside: EPA Method Definitions State GRO Methods Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) The Love Canal Scandal Purge and Trap Theory Sequences and Flow Paths of the Purge and Trap Unit Purge…
Key words
pack, packxylene, xylenertx, rtxtert, tertpid, pidpurge, purgebutylbenzene, butylbenzeneelcd, elcdeach, eachchloride, chloridetrap, trapbenzene, benzenedata, dataacetate, acetatevgc
Alternatives for Separating Volatile Organic Compounds by Capillary GC
1999|Merck|Applications
TheReporter Reprinted from Volume 14, No. 4, 1995 T295014 © 1999 Sigma-Aldrich Co. For more information, or current prices, contact your nearest Supelco subsidiary listed below. To obtain further contact information, visit our website (www.sigma-aldrich.com), see the Supelco catalog, or…
Key words
yes, yesspb, spbvocol, vocoloctyl, octylcoeluting, coelutingvocs, vocstrennzahl, trennzahlelcd, elcdcolumn, columnpid, pidbutylbenzene, butylbenzeneunique, uniquesupelco, supelcopartially, partiallyseparations
Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds in Water Using Static Headspace-GC/MS
2008|Agilent Technologies|Applications
Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds in Water Using Static Headspace-GC/MS Application Note Environmental Authors Abstract Karine Jacq, Frank David, Pat Sandra A static headspace (SHS) method was optimized for the determination of volatile Research Institute for Chromatography organic compounds (VOCs)…
Key words
shs, shsabundance, abundancebutylbenzene, butylbenzenesalt, saltxylene, xylenetime, timevocs, vocsheadspace, headspaceincubation, incubationfluorotrichloromethane, fluorotrichloromethanesolutes, solutestribromomethane, tribromomethanemethod, methodtetrachloromethane, tetrachloromethanestatic