Polybrominated Diphenyl Ether (PBDE) Analysis Using an Agilent J&W DB-5ms Ultra Inert Capillary GC Column

Significance of the Topic

Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) are widely used flame retardants that have become persistent environmental contaminants. Their stability and lipophilicity lead to bioaccumulation in food chains and human tissues, raising health and ecological concerns. Reliable trace-level analysis of PBDEs is critical for monitoring environmental quality, assessing human exposure, and supporting regulatory actions.

Objectives and Study Overview

This study demonstrates a robust method for quantifying eight PBDE congeners (BDE-47, ‑100, ‑99, ‑154, ‑153, ‑183, ‑205, and ‑209) at trace to ultra-trace levels. The goals were:

• To validate the performance of a 15 m Agilent J&W DB-5ms Ultra Inert capillary GC column for PBDE separations
• To establish calibration linearity and sensitivity down to low picogram on-column loadings
• To illustrate the impact of column inertness on analyte recovery, especially for thermally labile BDE-209

Methodology and Instrumentation

A gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) system (Agilent 6890N GC with 5975B MSD) and an Agilent 7683B autosampler were employed. Key parameters included:

• Column: 15 m × 0.25 mm ID × 0.25 µm Agilent J&W DB-5ms Ultra Inert
• Injection: Pulsed splitless (325 °C, 20 psi), 1 µL, 5 ng standard on column
• Carrier: Helium at 72 cm/s constant flow
• Oven program: 150 °C to 325 °C at 17 °C/min, 5 min hold
• Detection: Electron impact single-quadruple MS in SIM mode (200–1000 amu)

Calibration standards covering 0.5–250 ng/mL (2.5–1000 ng/mL for BDE-209) in isooctane were analyzed directly from amber vials. Agilent’s aggressive probe mixture (1-propionic acid, 4-picoline, trimethyl phosphate) was applied to test column inertness prior to PBDE analyses.

Instrumentation Used

• Agilent 6890N GC coupled to a 5975B MSD
• Agilent 7683B autosampler with 5 µL syringe
• Agilent J&W DB-5ms Ultra Inert GC column (15 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 µm)
• Deactivated dual-taper inlet liner
• Advanced Green septa, Vespel/graphite ferrules

Main Results and Discussion

The Ultra Inert column exhibited minimal active sites, yielding high recovery and symmetrical peaks for all congeners. Key findings:

• BDE-209 retention time was shortened by using a 15 m column, reducing thermal degradation.
• Sensitivity allowed detection of 0.005 ng on-column for congeners and 0.025 ng for BDE-209, with signal-to-noise > 3.
• Calibration curves showed excellent linearity (R² ≥ 0.997) across the studied ranges.
• Baseline inertness profiling with aggressive probes ensured consistent performance for trace analyses.

Benefits and Practical Applications

The described method offers:

• Rapid, 15-minute analysis enabling high sample throughput
• High sensitivity for regulatory compliance and environmental monitoring
• Robustness against analyte adsorption and thermal breakdown
• Applicability to food, dust, and biological matrices in research and QA/QC

Future Trends and Potential Applications

Emerging directions include:

• Integration with triple-axis detectors for lower detection limits
• Application to broader classes of persistent organic pollutants
• Coupling with high-resolution MS for isomer identification
• Automation and miniaturization for field-deployable systems

Conclusion

The combination of an Agilent J&W DB-5ms Ultra Inert 15 m GC column and optimized GC-MS conditions provides a reliable, high-throughput platform for trace PBDE analysis. The method achieves excellent sensitivity, linearity, and robustness, supporting environmental and food safety studies.

References

1. Wu N, Herrmann T, Paepke O, Tickner J, Hale R, Harvey E, La Guardia M, McClean M, Webster T. Human Exposure to PBDEs: Associations of PBDE Body Burdens with Food Consumption and House Dust. Environmental Science & Technology. 2007;41(5):1584–1589.
2. Voorspoels S, Covaci A, Neels H, Schepens P. Dietary PBDE Intake: A Market-Basket Study in Belgium. Environmental International. 2007;33(1):93–97.
3. Tan J, Cheng SM, Loganath A, Chong YS, Obbard JP. Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers in House Dust in Singapore. Chemosphere. 2007;66(6):985–992.
4. Ohta S, Ishizuka D, Nishinura H, Nakoa T, Azoasa O, Shimadzu Y, Ochiai F, Kida T, Nishi M, Miyata H. Comparison of Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers in Fish, Vegetables, and Meats and Levels in Human Milk of Nursing Women in Japan. Chemosphere. 2002;46(5):689–696.
5. McDonald TA. Polybrominated Diphenyl Ether Levels Among United States Residents: Daily Intake and Risk of Harm to the Developing Brain and Reproductive Organs. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management. 2005;1(4):343–354.
6. Hastings M, Vickers AK, George C. Inertness Comparison of Samples of 5% Phenyldimethylpolysiloxane Columns. Poster Presentation, 54th Annual Pittsburgh Conference; Orlando, FL; March 2003.
7. Agilent Technologies. Agilent J&W Ultra Inert GC Columns: A New Tool to Battle Challenging Active Analytes. Publication 5989-8665EN; 2008.
8. Lynam K. Semivolatile Analysis Using an Inertness Performance Tested Agilent J&W Ultra Inert DB-5ms Column. Publication 5989-8616EN; 2008.
9. Lynam K, Smith D. Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon (PAH) Analysis Using an Agilent J&W DB-5ms Ultra Inert Capillary GC Column. Publication 5989-9181EN; 2008.
10. Björklund J, Tollbäck P, Hiärne C, Dyremark E, Östman C. Influence of the Injection Technique and the Column System on Gas Chromatographic Determination of Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers. Journal of Chromatography A. 2004;1041:201–210.
11. Tu C, Prest H. Determination of Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers in Polymeric Materials Using the 6890 GC/5793N Inert MSD with Electron Impact Ionization. Publication 5989-2850EN; 2005.