GCMS
More information
WebinarsAbout usContact usTerms of use
LabRulez s.r.o. All rights reserved. Content available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 Attribution-ShareAlike

A More Comprehensive And Sensitive Method For CO2 Quality Assurance

Applications |  | ENTECHInstrumentation
GC/MSD, Thermal desorption, Sample Preparation, GC/SQ
Industries
Food & Agriculture
Manufacturer
Agilent Technologies, ENTECH

Summary

Importance of the Topic


A comprehensive and sensitive approach to monitor trace contaminants in carbon dioxide is essential for beverage manufacturers to ensure product quality, comply with regulatory requirements, and protect consumer health. Traditional methods often fall short in sensitivity and scope, necessitating multiple analyses to cover different compound classes. This advanced method addresses these limitations by delivering sub-ppb detection levels across a broad range of volatile organic and sulfur compounds in a single workflow.

Objectives and Study Overview


The primary aim of this work was to develop a unified technique capable of quantifying diverse contaminants—aldehydes, ethers, ketones, alcohols, mercaptans, sulfides, hydrogen sulfide, hydrocarbons, and halocarbons—in CO2. By consolidating multiple analyses into one GC/MS method, the study sought to lower detection thresholds, enhance throughput, and maintain sample integrity throughout the process.

Methodology and Instrumentation


Samples of carbon dioxide were collected in ultra-inert, fused silica-coated stainless steel canisters to minimize adsorption and reactivity. A three-stage preconcentration strategy (“Microscale Purge and Trap”) was implemented:
  • Stage 1 (M1): Glass beads and Tenax trap at –80 °C to condense water, CO2, and VOCs.
  • Stage 2 (M2): Tenax at –60 °C to enrich light VOCs and H2S while excluding most CO2 and water.
  • Stage 3 (M3): Focusing trap at –170 °C to refocus analytes before GC injection.

After each trapping step, controlled heating and helium back-flush transfer analytes to the next stage or into the GC column, achieving high enrichment factors without compromising sample integrity.

Instrumentation


  • Entech 7100 Preconcentrator with 7032L 21-position autosampler for automated multi-sample handling.
  • Agilent 6890/5973N GC/MS system with a DB-5MS capillary column (60 m × 0.32 mm, 1 µm film).


Results and Discussion


Calibration across 68 compounds demonstrated relative standard deviations below 10% for most analytes, confirming quantitative transfer and reproducibility. Instrument detection limits, determined at sub-ppb levels in a >99% CO2 matrix, were 10–100 times lower than existing methods. A representative chromatogram at 40 ppb showed effective CO2 removal and clear separation of polar and non-polar VOCs. Full-scan GC/MS provided both targeted quantification and library-assisted identification of unknown peaks, reducing false positives and expanding the method’s screening capability.

Practical Benefits and Applications


  • Single-run analysis for a wide array of contaminants, lowering time and cost.
  • Sub-ppb detection of off-flavor and potentially toxic compounds to safeguard product quality.
  • Automation enables high sample throughput, including overnight operation.
  • Adaptable to other quality control contexts such as reagent, packaging, and final product testing.


Future Trends and Applications


Emerging developments may include further miniaturization of preconcentration modules, novel inert surface coatings to extend analyte coverage, integration with real-time monitoring platforms, and expanded spectral libraries for broader compound identification. Machine learning approaches to spectral deconvolution could enhance sensitivity and reduce analysis time.

Conclusion


The described GC/MS method, leveraging inert canister sampling and multi-stage preconcentration, achieves exceptional sensitivity and broad applicability for CO2 quality assurance. By enabling comprehensive, single-pass detection of trace contaminants at sub-ppb levels, this approach streamlines quality control workflows and strengthens compliance with regulatory and sensory standards.

References


  • Carbon Dioxide, International Society of Beverage Technologists (ISBT), March 2001.

Content was automatically generated from an orignal PDF document using AI and may contain inaccuracies.

Downloadable PDF for viewing
 

Similar PDF

Toggle
Using Nitrogen Purge Gas for US EPA Drinking Water Methods
Using Nitrogen Purge Gas for US EPA Drinking Water Methods Application Note Abstract The USEPA developed Method 524.4, “Measurement of Purgeable Organic Compounds in Water by Capillary Column Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (Using Nitrogen Purge Gas)”, for identifying and measuring purgeable…
Key words
pass, passpurge, purgetemp, tempdrinking, drinkingbake, bakedesorb, desorbepa, epanitrogen, nitrogenwater, watermethods, methodscondenser, condenserppb, ppbtime, timegas, gasnote
Exploring US EPA Method 524 Purge and Trap Variables: Water Vapor Reduction and Minimizing Cycle Time
Exploring US EPA Method 524 Purge and Trap Variables: Water Vapor Reduction and Minimizing Cycle Time Roger Bardsley, Applications Chemist; Teledyne Tekmar P a g e |1 Introduction Purge and Trap (P&T) concentrators have been used extensively for the analysis…
Key words
purge, purgelumin, luminvapor, vapordesorb, desorbtrap, trapmdl, mdlether, ethertable, tablewater, waterreduction, reductiontime, timefactor, factorrsd, rsdppb, ppbbutylbenzene
Effect of Split Ratio on USEPA Method 8260 Compounds
         JSB is an authorised partner of   Effect of Split Ratio on USEPA Method 8260 Compounds #104 Application Note - Environmental Author Anne Jurek Applications Chemist EST Analytical Cincinnati, OH…
Key words
acetate, acetatetert, tertbutylbenzene, butylbenzenemethyl, methylsur, surether, etherbutyl, butylethyl, ethylchloride, chlorideamyl, amylmethacrylate, methacrylatevinyl, vinylest, estpurge, purgerile
Performance Demonstration of a New GC-MS Instrument and Novel BFB Tune for Analysis of Volatile Compounds by EPA Method 524.2
No. SSI-GCMS-2002 Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry Performance Demonstration of a New GC-MS Instrument and Novel BFB Tune for Analysis of Volatile Compounds by EPA Method 524.2 ■ Abstract The US Environmental Protection Agency has published several versions of its method…
Key words
butylbenzene, butylbenzenebfb, bfbmethyl, methylmdl, mdlacrylonitrile, acrylonitrilechloride, chlorideepa, epamethacrylate, methacrylatetert, terttuning, tuningrsd, rsdxylene, xyleneiodomethane, iodomethaneccv, ccvname
Other projects
LCMS
ICPMS
Follow us
FacebookX (Twitter)LinkedInYouTube
More information
WebinarsAbout usContact usTerms of use
LabRulez s.r.o. All rights reserved. Content available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 Attribution-ShareAlike