The CDS EA-600 for both Screening and Chromatography

Importance of the Topic

Rapid and reliable detection of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in environmental samples is critical for water quality monitoring, site assessment, and regulatory compliance. Combining a screening step with full chromatographic analysis reduces wasted analytical effort, prevents column contamination, and allows laboratories to triage samples based on overall contamination level.

Objectives and Study Overview

This application note demonstrates how a single instrument—the CDS Analytical EA-600 purge-and-trap system equipped with a screening valve—can perform both a fast composite-screening measurement and a detailed gas chromatography (GC) analysis of VOCs in aqueous samples. Key aims include:

• Evaluating the linearity and speed of the screening mode for total purgeable content.
• Comparing screening results to full GC analysis using EPA purge-and-trap protocols.
• Highlighting workflow improvements and contamination control.

Methodology and Instrumental Equipment

The EA-600 was fitted with a Tenax trap insert, a fritted 5 mL sparging vessel, a dual-position screening valve, and a flame ionization detector (FID). Operating parameters included:

• Purge time for screening: 3 minutes at 50 mL/min.
• Trap backflush and desorption: 200 °C for 2 minutes.
• Chromatographic purge: 11 minutes at 50 mL/min.
• GC conditions: isothermal oven at 100 °C, 30 m × 0.53 mm SE-54 column, helium carrier at 7 mL/min.

Main Results and Discussion

Key findings from screening and GC analysis include:

• Composite screening peak for total aromatics was linear from 50 ppb to 1 ppm, enabling rapid quantitation in under 5 minutes.
• The direct-to-detector bypass reduced analysis time and minimized column exposure to heavily contaminated samples.
• Subsequent full GC separation provided individual VOC profiles after extended purge, confirming compound identities and concentrations.

Benefits and Practical Applications

Implementing a preliminary screening step offers multiple advantages:

• Quickly assesses overall contamination and identifies samples outside calibration ranges.
• Preserves chromatography column life by diverting highly contaminated extracts.
• Improves laboratory throughput by prioritizing samples for full analysis.

Future Trends and Opportunities

Advances in integrated purge-and-trap/GC systems will focus on:

• Automation of screening decision logic to trigger full analysis only when needed.
• Enhanced detector options (e.g., MS, infrared) to expand screening selectivity.
• Miniaturized and field-deployable configurations for on-site environmental monitoring.

Conclusion

The CDS EA-600 purge-and-trap system with a built-in screening valve offers a streamlined workflow that combines rapid total VOC screening with full gas chromatographic separation on a single instrument. This dual-mode approach saves time, protects analytical columns, and improves sample throughput without sacrificing sensitivity or compliance with EPA methods.

References

• CDS Analytical Inc. Application Note #036: Deposition and Detection System for Screening and Chromatography.