GCMS
More information
WebinarsAbout usContact usTerms of use
LabRulez s.r.o. All rights reserved. Content available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 Attribution-ShareAlike

EPA 502.2 Analysis using the EA-600

Applications |  | ZOEX/JSBInstrumentation
GC, Purge and Trap
Industries
Environmental
Manufacturer
CDS Analytical

Summary

Importance of the Topic


Determination of trace-level volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in drinking water is critical for public health and regulatory compliance. EPA method 502.2 targets 60 priority pollutants, many of which pose carcinogenic or toxic risks. Employing an optimized purge-and-trap GC-IR approach enhances sensitivity, selectivity, and reproducibility in environmental monitoring.

Objectives and Study Overview


This application note demonstrates the use of an EA-600 purge-and-trap GC-IR system to analyze EPA 502.2 VOCs in water. It evaluates chromatographic separation, peak shape, detector performance, and overall method robustness for simultaneous identification of 60 chlorinated, brominated, and aromatic compounds down to low ppb levels.

Methodology and Instrumentation


The analytical setup comprises:
  • EA-600 environmental analyzer with integrated purge-and-trap unit
  • Tremetrics photoionization detector (PID)
  • HALL electrolytic conductivity detector (ELCO) in halogen mode
  • GC module fitted with a 105 m × 0.53 mm RTX Volatiles capillary column

Key operating conditions:
  • Sample: 5 mL water spiked at 20 ppb total VOCs
  • Purge time: 11 min at 38 cc/min
  • Trap temperature: 35 °C on Tenax–silica gel–charcoal
  • Desorb: 280 °C for 2 min; bake: 220 °C for 4 min
  • GC program: 25 °C hold 10 min, ramp 4 °C/min to 210 °C, hold 5 min

Key Results and Discussion


Baseline resolution was achieved for all 60 analytes, including closely eluting isomers (cis/trans-dichloroethene, xylenes). Peak shapes exhibited minimal tailing due to optimized trap material, water management, and column selection. The hyphenated GC-IR provided full-range FTIR spectra for compound confirmation, enhancing selectivity over single-detector setups.

Benefits and Practical Applications


This method enables:
  • Simultaneous quantification and structural confirmation of chlorinated, brominated, and aromatic VOCs
  • Lower detection limits (<1 ppb) with high reproducibility
  • Compliance with EPA 502.2 requirements for regulatory reporting
  • Reduced false positives through IR spectral matching

Future Trends and Potential Applications


Emerging developments may include integration of machine learning algorithms for automated spectral deconvolution, miniaturized purge-and-trap modules for field applications, and coupling with high-resolution mass spectrometry. Full FTIR databases and real-time monitoring capabilities will further streamline environmental analysis workflows.

Conclusion


The EA-600 GC-IR purge-and-trap system successfully separated and identified all 60 EPA 502.2 VOCs with excellent peak shapes and sensitivity. The combined PID, ELCO, and IR detection approach delivers robust, confirmatory analysis for drinking water quality assurance.

Reference


  1. Washall T.P., Wampler J.W. Sources of error in purge and trap analysis of volatile organic compounds. American Lab. 22(18):38–44 (1990).
  2. J.J. Keller & Associates. Air and Water Pollution: A Guide to Federal Regulations.

Content was automatically generated from an orignal PDF document using AI and may contain inaccuracies.

Downloadable PDF for viewing
 

Similar PDF

Toggle
Reproducibility of Automated Purge & Trap/GC: EPA Method 502.2
         JSB is an authorised partner of   #032 Reproducibility of Automated Purge & Trap/GC: EPA Method 502.2 The reproducibility of the methods used for environmental analyses must be documented for…
Key words
hall, halljsb, jsbelco, elcopio, piotrap, trapeindhoven, eindhovenpid, pidzoex, zoexgradual, gradualauthorised, authorisedreproducibility, reproducibilityanalyses, analysesbuildup, buildupautosampler, autosamplerrtx
EPA Metthod 524 Ussiing tthe CDS 7000 Purrge & Trrap
         JSB is an authorised partner of   #116 EPA Method 524 Using the CDS 7000 Purge & Trap The analysis of water for volatile organic contaminants using purge and trap…
Key words
jsb, jsbwet, wettrap, trapchloroporpane, chloroporpaneeindhoven, eindhovenzoex, zoexauthorised, authorisedupstream, upstreamorganic, organicheadquarters, headquartersireland, irelandpurged, purgedpartner, partnersales, salesbelgium
EPA 601/602 Analysis using the EA-600
EPA 601/602 Analysis using the EA-600
|CDS Analytical|Applications
         JSB is an authorised partner of   #035 EPA 601/602 Analysis using the EA-600 EPA methods 601 and 602 are purge and trap/ GC methods used to detect organic pollutants…
Key words
pio, piojsb, jsbelco, elcotremetrics, tremetricshall, hallpurge, purgetrap, trapphotoionization, photoionizationeindhoven, eindhovenzoex, zoexauthorised, authorisedrtx, rtxmunicipal, municipalorganic, organicheadquarters
EPA 502/524.2 VOCs using the CDS 7400 Autosampler - JSB
         JSB is an authorised partner of   #154 EPA 502/524.2 VOCs using the CDS 7400 Autosampler The CDS Model 7400 autosampler, combined with a Model 7000 Purge & Trap, constitutes…
Key words
butylbenzene, butylbenzenexylene, xylenejsb, jsbprogrammed, programmedautosampling, autosamplingvinylchloride, vinylchloridebromofluorobenzene, bromofluorobenzenevms, vmseindhoven, eindhovenzoex, zoexauthorised, authorisedisopropyltoluene, isopropyltoluenertx, rtxtetrachloroethylene, tetrachloroethylenedibromomethane
Other projects
LCMS
ICPMS
Follow us
More information
WebinarsAbout usContact usTerms of use
LabRulez s.r.o. All rights reserved. Content available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 Attribution-ShareAlike