Determination of genotoxic nitrosamines in Valsartan with gas chromatography and mass spectrometry
Applications | 2019 | Thermo Fisher ScientificInstrumentation
Genotoxic nitrosamines such as NDMA and NDEA are probable human carcinogens that were unexpectedly detected in valsartan drug substances in 2018, prompting global recalls and new regulatory limits far below typical toxicological thresholds. Robust analytical methods are essential to ensure trace levels of these impurities remain below acceptable limits and to safeguard public health.
This study evaluates three gas chromatography mass spectrometry based workflows recommended by Chinese and US regulatory agencies for quantitative detection of NDMA and NDEA in valsartan. The methods include a liquid injection single quadrupole GC-MS method, a headspace single quadrupole GC-MS method, and a direct injection triple quadrupole GC-MS/MS method. Each approach was tested for system suitability, sensitivity, linearity, repeatability and recovery according to pharmacopoeial and FDA guidelines.
Sample preparation workflows varied by method. The liquid injection method used methanol extraction and centrifugation followed by splitless GC-MS analysis. The headspace method dissolved the drug in dimethyl sulfoxide, equilibrated at elevated temperature, and transferred headspace vapor for GC-MS detection. The triple quadrupole workflow applied direct injection of dichloromethane extracts with isotope plus mass labelled transitions monitored by SRM in timed mode for enhanced selectivity and sensitivity. Key hardware included a TRACE 1310 GC with splitless inlet, ISQ 7000 single quadrupole and TSQ 9000 triple quadrupole mass spectrometers, and a TriPlus 500 headspace autosampler. Chromeleon CDS managed acquisition and quantitative processing.
All methods met or exceeded resolution and signal-to-noise criteria. System suitability tests showed resolution between NDMA or NDEA and internal standards well above 1.5 and S/N ratios above 60 at low ppb levels. Linearity was excellent across 1 to 100 ppb, with correlation coefficients above 0.998 in each workflow. Method limits of detection and quantitation ranged from 0.05 to 0.9 ppb LOD and 0.16 to 3.1 ppb LOQ, surpassing regulatory thresholds. Repeatability of peak area across six injections displayed RSDs below 3 percent. Recovery studies at multiple spike levels in a commercial valsartan capsule yielded values between 84 and 108 percent, demonstrating accuracy in real matrices.
Emerging directions include integration of isotopically labelled internal standards for absolute quantitation, expansion to additional nitrosamine analogues, further automation and online sample prep interfaces, and adoption of high resolution mass spectrometry for non-targeted screening. Continuous tightening of regulatory limits will drive demand for ever lower detection thresholds and method innovation.
The evaluated GC-MS and GC-MS/MS methods provide reliable, sensitive and regulatory compliant workflows for detection of genotoxic nitrosamines in valsartan. Thermo Fisher Scientific platforms offer the performance and robustness needed for routine quality control laboratories to enforce strict impurity limits and protect patient safety.
GC/MSD, HeadSpace, GC/SQ
IndustriesPharma & Biopharma
ManufacturerThermo Fisher Scientific
Summary
Significance of topic
Genotoxic nitrosamines such as NDMA and NDEA are probable human carcinogens that were unexpectedly detected in valsartan drug substances in 2018, prompting global recalls and new regulatory limits far below typical toxicological thresholds. Robust analytical methods are essential to ensure trace levels of these impurities remain below acceptable limits and to safeguard public health.
Study objectives and overview
This study evaluates three gas chromatography mass spectrometry based workflows recommended by Chinese and US regulatory agencies for quantitative detection of NDMA and NDEA in valsartan. The methods include a liquid injection single quadrupole GC-MS method, a headspace single quadrupole GC-MS method, and a direct injection triple quadrupole GC-MS/MS method. Each approach was tested for system suitability, sensitivity, linearity, repeatability and recovery according to pharmacopoeial and FDA guidelines.
Methodology and instrumentation
Sample preparation workflows varied by method. The liquid injection method used methanol extraction and centrifugation followed by splitless GC-MS analysis. The headspace method dissolved the drug in dimethyl sulfoxide, equilibrated at elevated temperature, and transferred headspace vapor for GC-MS detection. The triple quadrupole workflow applied direct injection of dichloromethane extracts with isotope plus mass labelled transitions monitored by SRM in timed mode for enhanced selectivity and sensitivity. Key hardware included a TRACE 1310 GC with splitless inlet, ISQ 7000 single quadrupole and TSQ 9000 triple quadrupole mass spectrometers, and a TriPlus 500 headspace autosampler. Chromeleon CDS managed acquisition and quantitative processing.
Main results and discussion
All methods met or exceeded resolution and signal-to-noise criteria. System suitability tests showed resolution between NDMA or NDEA and internal standards well above 1.5 and S/N ratios above 60 at low ppb levels. Linearity was excellent across 1 to 100 ppb, with correlation coefficients above 0.998 in each workflow. Method limits of detection and quantitation ranged from 0.05 to 0.9 ppb LOD and 0.16 to 3.1 ppb LOQ, surpassing regulatory thresholds. Repeatability of peak area across six injections displayed RSDs below 3 percent. Recovery studies at multiple spike levels in a commercial valsartan capsule yielded values between 84 and 108 percent, demonstrating accuracy in real matrices.
Benefits and practical applications of the method
- Compliance with both Chinese Pharmacopoeia and US FDA recommended procedures
- High sensitivity to detect impurities well below acceptable limits
- Robust repeatability and accuracy across various sample types
- Flexible analytical portfolio allowing liquid, headspace, or MS/MS approaches
- Minimized instrument downtime through vacuum interlock design for rapid maintenance
Future trends and potential applications
Emerging directions include integration of isotopically labelled internal standards for absolute quantitation, expansion to additional nitrosamine analogues, further automation and online sample prep interfaces, and adoption of high resolution mass spectrometry for non-targeted screening. Continuous tightening of regulatory limits will drive demand for ever lower detection thresholds and method innovation.
Conclusion
The evaluated GC-MS and GC-MS/MS methods provide reliable, sensitive and regulatory compliant workflows for detection of genotoxic nitrosamines in valsartan. Thermo Fisher Scientific platforms offer the performance and robustness needed for routine quality control laboratories to enforce strict impurity limits and protect patient safety.
Reference
- Chinese Pharmacopoeia recommended GC-MS method for nitrosamines in valsartan
- US FDA headspace GC-MS method for NDMA in valsartan
- US FDA combined NDMA and NDEA headspace GC-MS method
- US FDA triple quadrupole GC-MS/MS impurity assay for NDMA and NDEA
Content was automatically generated from an orignal PDF document using AI and may contain inaccuracies.
Similar PDF
Determination of genotoxic nitrosamines in Valsartan with gas chromatography and mass spectrometry
2019|Thermo Fisher Scientific|Applications
APPLICATION NOTE 21922 Determination of genotoxic nitrosamines in Valsartan with gas chromatography and mass spectrometry Authors Introduction Yanggang Zhang, Jinshui Che and Shen Wang Thermo Fisher Scientific, Shanghai, China Valsartan is a widely used anti-hypertensive drug known to reduce human…
Key words
valsartan, valsartanndma, ndmafda, fdandea, ndeanitrosamines, nitrosaminessuitability, suitabilitysim, simgenotoxic, genotoxicinjection, injectiondmf, dmfdmso, dmsotimed, timedthermo, thermodrug, drugsolution
Overcoming the challenges of nitrosamine impurities in drugs
2020|Thermo Fisher Scientific|Technical notes
CASE STUDY 73263 Overcoming the challenges of nitrosamine impurities in drugs What pharmaceutical QA/QC laboratories need to know: Advanced GC-MS capabilities for cGMP nitrosamine testing Why we need to analyze nitrosamine impurities in drugs Unacceptable levels of nitrosamine impurities were…
Key words
min, minndma, ndmandea, ndeanitrosamine, nitrosamineneipa, neipatime, timetemperature, temperatureimpurities, impuritiesorbitrap, orbitrapmass, massaquisition, aquisitionexactive, exactivesource, sourcekpa, kpainjection
Overcoming the challenges of nitrosamine impurities in drugs
2020|Thermo Fisher Scientific|Others
CASE STUDY 73263 Overcoming the challenges of nitrosamine impurities in drugs What pharmaceutical QA/QC laboratories need to know: Advanced GC-MS capabilities for cGMP nitrosamine testing Why we need to analyze nitrosamine impurities in drugs Unacceptable levels of nitrosamine impurities were…
Key words
min, minndma, ndmandea, ndeanitrosamine, nitrosamineneipa, neipatime, timetemperature, temperatureimpurities, impuritiesorbitrap, orbitrapmass, massaquisition, aquisitionexactive, exactivesource, sourcekpa, kpainjection
Nitrosamine Impurities Application Guide - Confidently Detect and Quantify Mutagenic Impurities in APIs and Drug Products
2020|Agilent Technologies|GuidesPresentations
Nitrosamine Impurities Application Guide Confidently Detect and Quantify Mutagenic Impurities in APIs and Drug Products Sartan-Based Losartan Valsartan Candesartan Telmisartan Metformin Ranitidine Nitrosamines are formed by chemical reactions that occur during API manufacturing whether from starting materials, intermediates, reactants, reuse…
Key words
back, backndma, ndmaneipa, neipandea, ndeandipa, ndipafda, fdandba, ndbametformin, metforminnitrosamine, nitrosamineintroduction, introductionapi, apivalsartan, valsartanquant, quantbest, bestdichloromethan