EU Regulation 396/2005: Pesticide Residue Testing and the Critical Role of QuEChERS Evaporation in Food Safety

Our Library never stops expanding. What are the most recent contributions to LabRulezGCMS Library in the week of 4th May 2026? Check out new documents from the field of the gas phase, especially GC and GC/MS techniques!<blockquote>👉 <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://gcms.labrulez.com/library">SEARCH THE LARGEST REPOSITORY OF DOCUMENTS ABOUT GCMS AND RELATED TECHNIQUES</a></blockquote><blockquote>👉 Need info about different analytical techniques? Peek into <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://lcms.labrulez.com/library">LabRulezLCMS</a> or <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://icpms.labrulez.com/library">LabRulezICPMS</a> libraries.</blockquote>This week we bring you application note by Shimadzu, presentation by MDCW / JEOL and technical note by Thermo Fisher Scientific!<h3>1. MDCW / JEOL: Flow-Modulated GCxGC-QMS Analysis Without Splitting Off the GC Flow</h3><ul><li>Presentation</li><li><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://gcms.labrulez.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/O_16_Jensen_11e29d5022.pdf">Full PDF for download</a></li></ul><section><div><div><div><div><div><div>This presentation by Kirk Jensen (JEOL USA) explores the feasibility of performing flow-modulated comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC×GC) coupled with quadrupole mass spectrometry (QMS) without splitting the GC flow, which is traditionally required to protect MS systems from high carrier gas flows. The core concept builds on GC×GC, where compounds are separated using a primary and secondary column connected via a modulator, significantly increasing separation power compared to one-dimensional GC. The presentation contrasts thermal modulation (offering sharper peaks and higher theoretical sensitivity but requiring cryogenic cooling) with flow modulation, which avoids cryogens, handles volatile analytes well, and is more flexible, but typically demands higher gas flows that standard MS systems cannot tolerate .To address this limitation, the study utilizes the <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://gcms.labrulez.com/library?manufacturerItems=24&amp;search=JMS-Q1600GC">JEOL JMS-Q1600GC</a> UltraQuad quadrupole GC-MS system, which can accept unusually high carrier gas flows (up to ~20 mL/min), enabling direct coupling with a SepSolve INSIGHT flow modulator without splitting the effluent . The analytical setup includes dual GC columns (e.g., Zebron ZB-5MSplus for the first dimension and BPX50 for the second), high secondary flow rates (~25 mL/min), and electron ionization (EI) MS detection. Additional system components include optional FID detection, bleed line control, and ChromeSpace software for data processing . This configuration allows full analyte transfer into the MS, eliminating the need for flow splitting and potentially improving detection efficiency.Experimental results demonstrate the applicability of this approach to complex mixtures, including a pesticide mixture containing over 200 compounds and real-world samples such as perfumes and fuels. The GC×GC-MS system produced detailed two-dimensional chromatograms with high spectral quality, enabling the correct identification of approximately 120 compounds despite relatively moderate spectral match factors . Comparisons at different flow rates (e.g., 25 vs. 50 mL/min) showed that spectral integrity and compound identification remain robust, indicating that higher flow operation does not significantly compromise MS performance.In conclusion, the work demonstrates that flow-modulated GC×GC-QMS without flow splitting is feasible, provided that the MS system can tolerate high carrier gas flows. While further optimization is needed (e.g., column selection, inlet pressure, and separation conditions), the approach offers a practical alternative to thermal modulation by eliminating cryogens and simplifying operation. Future work will focus on improving sensitivity, optimizing separations, and exploring alternative carrier gases such as hydrogen to reduce costs and expand applicability</div></div></div></div></div></div></section><h3>2. Shimadzu: Detailed Hydrocarbon Analysis by Nexis GC-2030 Using ASTM D6730</h3><ul><li>Application note</li><li><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://gcms.labrulez.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/an_01_00863_en_eb633bc741.pdf">Full PDF for download</a></li></ul><h5>User Benefits</h5><ul><li>Detailed compositional analysis of gasoline in accordance with ASTM D6730 is feasible using the Nexis GC-2030.&nbsp;</li><li>By employing PONAsolution, a PONA/DHA analysis software, laborious identification tasks can be reduced, and quantitation calculations and report generation can be performed automatically.</li></ul>ASTM D6730 specifies the analysis of hydrocarbons in gasoline and oxygenates such as ethanol, methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE), and ethyl tert-butyl ether (ETBE) over a boiling point range up to 225 ̊C. Identification and quantification of individual compounds in gasoline are critically important for refinery process control and product quality assurance. In this application news, we report compositional analysis of gasoline conforming to ASTM D6730 using the <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://gcms.labrulez.com/library?mainauthorItems=1&amp;search=Nexis+GC-2030">Nexis GC-2030 gas chromatograph</a>. Gasoline typically comprises over 100 hydrocarbons, making identification tasks highly complex; however, PONAsolution, a PONA/DHA analysissoftware,simplifies this process.<h4>PONAsolution</h4>PONAsolution Ver.6 provides retention index libraries for each relevant standard (ASTM D6730, D6729, D5134, D6733). Identification of n-alkanes automatically corrects the retention times of the remaining several hundred components, thus streamlining the identification process. When only a specific retention region requires adjustment, the two-point identification function is useful (Fig. 1). In the two-point identification procedure, reference and sample chromatograms are compared while assigning corresponding peaks. First, click on an identified component mark in the reference data (Fig. 1, a), then click the matching sample peak (Fig. 1, b). Repeat this for a second pair of peaks. The retention times of components between these two anchor points are then automatically corrected.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Compositional analysis of gasoline in accordance with ASTM D6730 was performed. The combination of SH PONA Tuning Column and SH-1 PONA main column enabled separation of compounds with closely spaced retention times. Moreover, use of PONAsolution software greatly simplifies complex identification tasks.<h3>3. Thermo Fisher Scientific: Fiber optic probes add flexibility to Raman chemical analysis</h3><ul><li>Technical note</li><li><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://gcms.labrulez.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/drx3_flex_tech_note_tn54708_bebb56b870.pdf">Full PDF for download</a></li></ul>Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) and Raman Spectroscopy are non-destructive analytical techniques that rely on the interaction of electromagnetic radiation with molecular vibrations to provide information about the chemical composition and structure of a sample. Despite their similarities, there are some distinct differences between the two techniques. In principle, FTIR is based on the absorption of infrared radiation by molecules and measures changes in dipole moment during molecular vibrations. Raman spectroscopy, on the other hand, is based on the inelastic scattering of monochromatic light and measures changes in polarizability during molecular vibrations.&nbsp;When applied to bulk chemical analysis, both FTIR and Raman spectroscopy can be used to analyze solids, liquids, and gases, but the nature of Raman spectroscopy lends some unique sampling advantages. Additionally, Raman often requires little to no sample preparation. Presented herein are application examples that highlight some of the sampling advantages of Raman spectroscopy. All the spectral data in this technical note were collected using a <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://gcms.labrulez.com/products/2238">Thermo Scientific™ DXR3 Flex Raman Spectrometer</a> equipped with a fiber optic probe. (Fiber optics are readily available for Raman spectroscopy because of the use of visible and NIR light and do not require the exotic materials associated with FTIR fiber optics.) Preliminary tests for all samples were carried out using both 532 nm and 785 nm excitations, and it was determined that the 785 nm laser set gave an overall better balance between fluorescence and Raman scattering efficiency.<h4>Summary&nbsp;</h4>In this technical note, the analyses of a variety of samples by Raman spectroscopy are demonstrated. All samples were analyzed without sample preparation.&nbsp;<ul><li>Precise and localized analysis at the focal point of the Raman-exciting laser allows sampling through glass bottles, blister packaging and plastic containers, which eliminates possible cross contamination and analyst exposure to hazardous materials. The contributions from the packaging and containers depend on the type of container material, the container thickness, and the materials’ chemical compositional complexity, but these contributions can be readily subtracted out when needed.&nbsp;</li><li>Water is a weak Raman scatterer. Raman therefore has reduced water sensitivity, making it a preferred technique for aqueous solution analysis over FTIR. As demonstrated in the analysis of an energy drink, the Raman bands from water can be subtracted from the spectrum of the aqueous solution, leading to the identification of the components of the solution.&nbsp;</li><li>Raman spectroscopy is well suited for the analysis of inorganic materials, especially in identifying the crystal phases and polymorphs, as demonstrated by the analyses of minerals and pigments in a painting.&nbsp;</li><li>Fiber optic probes provide flexibility and ease of maneuverability. This is particularly advantageous when analyzing samples that are difficult to access or manipulate, such as large containers, geological samples and paintings</li></ul>The DXR3 Flex has multiple sampling options available. A properly configured fiber-optic probe is arguably the most versatile accessory for the analysis of bulk solids and liquids. The advantages, both from those inherent to Raman spectroscopy and those resulting from the use of fiber optic probe, provide opportunities for a wide variety of different applications when using the DXR3 Flex Raman Spectrometer.

News from LabRulezGCMS Library - Week 19, 2026

🎤Francis Femi OloyIn this episode of Concentrating on Chromatography, David speaks with Francis Femi Oloy about using chromatography to uncover hidden pollutants in real-world water systems.Femi’s team analyzed polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in six major rivers in southwestern Nigeria — compounds that were banned decades ago but still persist in the environment. Using a workflow that many analytical labs will recognize — liquid–liquid extraction, cleanup, rotary evaporation, nitrogen blowdown, and GC-ECD detection — they quantified 25 PCB congeners at trace levels and linked the results to ecological and human health risk.<h4>In this conversation, we cover:</h4><ul><li>Why legacy pollutants like PCBs still show up today</li><li>Choosing GC-ECD vs LC-MS for halogenated compounds</li><li>Liquid–liquid extraction and matrix cleanup strategies</li><li>Why sample concentration is critical for dilute environmental samples</li><li>How rotovap + nitrogen blowdown work together without losing volatile analytes</li><li>Seasonal trends (why wet season levels were higher)</li><li>Translating concentration data into meaningful risk assessments</li></ul><h3>Video Transcription</h3><section><div><div><div><div><div><div>Persistent organic pollutants such as polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) remain a significant environmental concern despite decades of regulatory restrictions. In this interview, Francais Femi Oloy discusses the environmental and analytical challenges associated with monitoring PCB contamination in rivers of southwestern Nigeria, a rapidly industrializing region where urban growth, industrial activity, agriculture, and dense populations intersect with extensive aquatic systems.Oloy explains that his interest in environmental contaminant analysis emerged from observing unexplained health problems and environmental degradation while growing up in Nigeria. This motivated his transition into organic and environmental chemistry, with a focus on identifying pollutants present in drinking water, agricultural soils, and food systems. Southwestern Nigeria, particularly the Lagos region, represents a critical environmental monitoring area due to intense industrial development, shipping activity, and widespread human dependence on rivers for domestic use, agriculture, and fishing.Although PCBs are considered “legacy pollutants” and are no longer intentionally produced, the interview highlights why they continue to persist in aquatic environments. Old electrical transformers and aging industrial equipment still contain PCB residues, while historical contamination stored in river sediments can become remobilized during flooding, dredging, or sediment disturbance. Because PCBs are hydrophobic and resistant to degradation, they preferentially accumulate in sediments and bioaccumulate through aquatic food chains, creating long-term environmental and human exposure risks.A major focus of the discussion centers on the analytical workflow used for PCB determination in environmental water samples. Composite river water samples were collected in amber glass bottles to avoid contamination and photodegradation, preserved with sodium azide to minimize microbial activity, and stored under cooled conditions prior to extraction. The analytical protocol employed liquid–liquid extraction using dichloromethane (DCM) and hexane to recover both polar and nonpolar PCB congeners. Oloy emphasizes that liquid–liquid extraction was selected over solid-phase extraction (SPE) because of concerns about congener retention within sorbent materials and clogging issues associated with large-volume environmental samples.Following extraction, concentration and cleanup represented critical analytical stages due to the trace-level occurrence and volatility of PCBs. Silica and alumina cleanup procedures were used to remove matrix interferences prior to instrumental analysis. The concentration workflow combined rotary evaporation for bulk solvent reduction with nitrogen blowdown for final volume reduction to less than 1 mL, while carefully avoiding excessive temperature or complete dryness to minimize analyte loss. Oloy repeatedly stresses that improper concentration procedures are among the most common causes of analytical failure in PCB analysis.For instrumental determination, the study utilized gas chromatography coupled with electron capture detection (GC-ECD) rather than LC-MS or GC-MS. According to Oloy, GC was preferred because PCBs are sufficiently volatile for gas chromatographic separation, while ECD provided superior sensitivity and selectivity for chlorinated compounds at environmentally relevant concentrations. The interview also discusses analytical validation strategies, including the use of surrogate standards to assess recoveries, which ranged from approximately 85% to 114%, and signal-to-noise-based determination of detection limits.The study further examined seasonal variations in PCB concentrations, revealing higher levels during the wet season. This observation was attributed to rainfall-driven runoff from contaminated infrastructure, sediment resuspension, and lower temperatures that reduce volatilization losses. To communicate toxicological relevance beyond simple concentration reporting, the researchers also calculated toxic equivalency values (TEQs), converting mixtures of PCB congeners into biologically meaningful toxicity estimates comparable to dioxin toxicity metrics.Beyond environmental monitoring, Oloy highlights broader research interests focused on pollutant remediation and sustainable environmental protection. His group is also involved in developing catalytic materials capable of degrading or removing persistent contaminants from environmental systems. Throughout the discussion, he emphasizes that analytical chemistry plays a central role not only in detecting pollutants, but also in enabling prevention, remediation, and long-term environmental management strategies.</div></div></div></div></div></div></section><blockquote>This text has been automatically transcribed from a video presentation using AI technology. It may contain inaccuracies and is not guaranteed to be 100% correct.</blockquote><blockquote><h4>Concentrating on Chromatography Podcast</h4>Dive into the frontiers of chromatography, mass spectrometry, and sample preparation with host David Oliva. Each episode features candid conversations with leading researchers, industry innovators, and passionate scientists who are shaping the future of analytical chemistry. From decoding PFAS detection challenges to exploring the latest in AI-assisted liquid chromatography, this show uncovers practical workflows, sustainability breakthroughs, and the real-world impact of separation science. Whether you’re a chromatographer, lab professional, or researcher you'll discover inspiring content!You can find Concentrating on Chromatography Podcast in podcast apps:<ul><li><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://open.spotify.com/show/1wZg67rCjoGju4yhqxI3tL">Spotify</a></li><li><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://podcasts.apple.com/tz/podcast/concentrating-on-chromatography/id1788429185">Apple podcast</a></li><li><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://podscan.fm/podcasts/concentrating-on-chromatography">podscan</a></li></ul>and on <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.youtube.com/@ChromatographyTalk/videos">YouTube channel</a></blockquote>

Tracking Toxic PCBs in River Water using Gas Chromatography–Electron Capture Detection

Article

Product

Application

Video

Scientists

Environment

Food

Presentation

Interview

Science and research

Laboratories

Everything from the world of analytical chemistry in one place. We connect people in solving their problems. At Labrulez you will find all the necessary information easily, quickly and clearly. Stop searching and start finding.

LabRulez

Organomation, founded in 1959, designs and manufactures high-quality nitrogen evaporators and extraction systems. Known for innovation and durability, their lab instruments are used globally for efficient sample preparation with strong customer support.

Organomation

Agilent Technologies

Teledyne LABS

Thermo Fisher Scientific

SelectScience

Waters Corporation

<ul>
<li>Wait what?! Who knew!? There are so many things that a mass spec can do.
</li>
<li>I&#39;ve used it for years, yes this may be true.
</li>
<li>I&#39;ve processed some samples, more than a few.
</li>
<li>But between me and you, I had no idea all the things it could do!
</li>
<li>From sample prep to separation, you just won&#39;t believe…
</li>
<li>All of the tips and tricks we have up our sleeve.
</li>
<li>So, take a few minutes, about 15 should do.
</li>
<li>And learn all the things your mass spec can do.
</li>
</ul>
Thinking of developing a new method utilizing MS? Selecting the best analytical method begins with a decision on how to best separate the analytes of interest. This choice will affect sample preparation and sample introduction, so it is important to get it right early. In this webinar we will review analyte structural properties that make the compound more amenable to either liquid chromatography or to gas chromatography.
<blockquote>
Presenter: Karen Yannell (LC/MS Application Engineer, Agilent Technologies, Inc.)
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Karen E. Yannell is a LC/MS Application Engineer at Agilent Technologies. She is an expert in small molecule high throughput analysis by triple quadrupole (TQ) and quadrupole time-of-flight (QTOF) mass spectrometry for applied markets. Her recent work has focused on developing routine Q-TOF workflows for both expert and non-expert users alike. Previously, Karen worked on forensic, metabolomics, and biomarker discovery applications with ambient ionization sources. She received her PhD in Analytical Chemistry from Purdue University where studied under the advisement of Prof. R. Graham Cooks. Outside of the laboratory, she enjoys cooking unique dishes and hiking along the beach with her dog.
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Presenter: David Weil, PhD (Senior Applications Scientist, Agilent Technologies, Inc.)
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
David Weil is a senior applications scientist in Agilent located in Wood Dale with over 30 years of experience using mass spectrometry. Prior to joining Agilent in 2004, he worked for 14 years at 3M in the Corporate Research Analytical Laboratories (St.Paul, MN) and 4 years at Nicolet/Extrel doing ultra-high resolution mass spectrometry. David received his Ph.D. in Physical Chemistry from the University of Minnesota and Post Doc with Dr Charles Wilkins at University of California-Riverside developing laser desorption FTMS and ion-molecule reactions. David has three grown sons and live with his wife Naomi just blocks from Wrigley Field and Lake Michigan.
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Presenter: Matt Curtis, PhD (GC/MS Applications Scientist, Agilent Technologies, Inc.)
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Matt joined Agilent in 2013 as a GC/MS applications scientist in the Santa Clara, CA Center of Excellence. His primary responsibility is focused on providing instrument demos for customer interested in each technology Agilent offers; the GC/MS single quadrupole, triple quadrupole and the quadrupole Time-of-Flight. The variety of different samples submitted to the demo lab provide a unique knowledge of optimizing parameters for different applications to provide the best quality data from the instrument.
</blockquote>

Agilent Technologies: Selecting your Separation: Are my Compounds Better for GC or LC

Selecting your Separation: Are my Compounds Better for GC or LC

We will review analyte structural properties that make the compound more amenable to either liquid chromatography or to gas chromatography.

Separation selection: Are my Compounds Better for GC or LC

<h5>Join us Wednesday, June 21, for this information-packed, 30-minute webinar to learn</h5>
<ul>
<li>Fundamentals of Purge and Trap: what it is and how it works</li>
<li>Requirements of a trap and how they adsorb and release volatile compounds</li>
<li>Purge gas selection</li>
<li>The effects of purge parameters on purge efficiency</li>
</ul>
This is a must-attend session if:
<ul>
<li>You work with purge and trap methods in the soil, wastewater and/or drinking water fields</li>
<li>Are a scientist or analyst wishing to learn more about P&amp;T analysis </li>
<li>Are an environmental scientist/technician, analytical chemist or lab manager</li>
</ul>
<blockquote>
Presenter: Amy Nutter (the VOC technical product specialist at Teledyne Tekmar)
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Amy currently is focused on OEM and customer technical training and application support on the Purge and Trap product line. Previously, Amy worked for the City of Cincinnati in both the drinking water and wastewater laboratories.
</blockquote>
To attend, please select the time on Wednesday, June 21, that works best for you. We look forward to sharing this valuable information.

Teledyne Tekmar: Fundamentals of Purge & Trap

Fundamentals of Purge & Trap

Fundamentals of Purge and Trap. Requirements of a trap. Purge gas selection. The effects of purge parameters on purge efficiency...

How about a 20 minute coffee break along with a bite of Empower? Here you go!
What you can learn: 
<ul>
<li>What&#39;s the difference between Archive and Backup and why do you need both</li>
<li>The cheapest, the fastest, or the most definitive data management strategy is meaningless if the data is untrustworthy</li>
<li>How including a complementary archive strategy to your existing backup will not only improve efficiency, but can reduce costs and regulatory risk</li>
<li>How both approaches are viable and the business value each one can offer</li>
</ul>
Register and prepare a coffee!
<blockquote>
Presenter: Ralf Schröder (Informatics Product Marketing Europe·Waters GesmbH)
</blockquote>

Waters Corporation: Waters Informatics series #5: Archive vs Backup (Po2)

Waters Informatics series #5: Archive vs Backup (Po2)

What's the difference between Archive and Backup and why do you need both?

The calculation of signal to noise ratio is a critical parameter during method development, method validation and routine monitoring the performance of a chromatographic method. Both Limit of Detection (LOD or LDL) and Limit of Quantitation (LOQ or LQL) are based on signal to noise ratio. Empower can calculate signal to noise ratio in many ways. While we designed this functionality in Empower to comply with pharmacopeia requirements, there are alternative methods for this calculation.
Key points of discussion will be:
<ul>
<li>Calculating Signal to Noise ratio as per USP/EP/JP Requirements</li>
<li>Calculating Signal to Noise ratio using other options within the System Suitability option</li>
<li>Calculating Signal to Noise ratio without the System Suitability Option</li>
</ul>
Please join us for a live discussion. As always, don’t forget to bring your Empower questions for this exclusive opportunity to ask our experts anything about Empower Software.
<blockquote>
Presenter: Neil Lander (Principal Product Manager, Waters Corporation)
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Neil has worked for Waters Corporation since 1994 and has held a variety of positions including Technical Support Specialist, Technical Trainer, Manager Customer Education and currently, Principal Marketing Manager focusing on Informatics solutions. He provides internal support for Empower Chromatography Data System and is focused on developing laboratory software solutions that help organizations achieve their scientific and operational objectives. Prior to joining Waters, he was an analytical chemist where he gained experience in both the cosmetics and specialty chemical industries.
</blockquote>

Waters Corporation: Empower Tips: Ask Me Anything About Calculating Signal to Noise Ratio

Empower Tips: Ask Me Anything About Calculating Signal to Noise Ratio

The calculation of signal to noise ratio is a critical parameter during method development, validation and monitoring the performance.

Empower Tips: Calculating Signal to Noise Ratio

In this session, explore the operation and latest developments of automated SPME for VOCs and SVOCs by headspace, direct immersion, and derivatization techniques.
Furthermore, discover how SPME has key applications for food, water, environmental and forensic samples for use in laboratories for GC-MS and LC-MS and direct MS analysis.
<blockquote>
Presenter: Hans-Joachim Huebschmann (Consultant, VP Sample Preparation, CTC Analytics)
</blockquote>

SelectScience: Solid phase microextraction – How does it work for my samples?

Solid phase microextraction – How does it work for my samples?

Explore the operation and latest developments of automated SPME for VOCs and SVOCs.

Solid phase microextraction–How does it work for my samples?

There are many consumables in the GC flow path, and sometimes it can be tricky to know when it is time for a replacement.
Join us as we review the common consumables in the GC flow path and point out common signs or symptoms that indicate it may be time to do some maintenance.
<blockquote>
Presenter: Alex Ucci (Application Engineer, Agilent Technologies, Inc.)
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
In his current position at Agilent, Alex provides application assistance and technical support for sample preparation products as well as GC and LC consumables. Before he joined Agilent in 2014, Alex was a graduate student at the Pennsylvania State University researching the morphology and surface properties of aerosol particles using a wide variety of analytical techniques. He has an MS degree in chemistry.
</blockquote>

Agilent technologies: How to Keep a Good Thing Going: Preventive and Routine Maintenance for Your GC System

How to Keep a Good Thing Going: Preventive and Routine Maintenance for Your GC System

Common consumables in the GC flow path and point out common signs or symptoms that indicate it may be time to do some maintenance.

Preventive and Routine Maintenance for Your GC System

Do you face difficulty in selecting the most appropriate GC column for your analysis? Are you always wondering which column will work best for your application or if the existing column will work for your application or not?
In this webinar, we will discuss:
<ul>
<li>Things to consider while choosing GC Columns
</li>
<li>GC Column types
</li>
<li>Stationary Phase Polymers
</li>
<li>Low Bleed Phases
</li>
<li>Ultra Inert columns
</li>
<li>Suitable columns for Critical Applications
</li>
</ul>
Join us in this live webinar to discuss on various aspects of GC column selection.
<blockquote>
Presenter: Sunil B Lakhmapure (Technical Support Specialist, Agilent Technologies)
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Sunil holds 19 year plus experience in the analytical field with major exposure to LC/GC with Single Quad, Triple Quad and high resolution (QToF) mass spectroscopy. Started career in Pharma R&amp;D as a scientist with hands on experience on high end instruments like LC/MS, XRD &amp; NMR. Developed &amp; published application notes using Chromatographic techniques on real world samples/issues at various levels.
</blockquote>

Agilent Technologies: Practical Advice on GC Column Selection

Practical Advice on GC Column Selection

Do you have a new GC column to install? Do you often wonder about the nuances of GC column installation and how to get your new column up and running? Do you often wonder for how long you should condition the column and at what temperature?
In this webinar, we will discuss:
<ul>
<li>Column construction
</li>
<li>Column Unboxing
</li>
<li>Column Installation
</li>
<li>Leak and Installation Check
</li>
<li>Preventive measures for better column life 
</li>
<li>Corrective measures in case you run into a problem
</li>
</ul>
Join us in this webinar to understand a hassle-free GC column installation and how to take care of your GC column.
<blockquote>
Presenter: Dr. Rajni Mujoo (Technical Support Specialist, Chemistries &amp; Supplies Division, Agilent Technologies)
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Dr. Rajni is working with us as Technical Support Specialist in Chemistries and Supplies Division at Agilent Technologies since 2011. She has a Ph.D degree in Food Science from CFTRI, Mysore and Post Doctorate from Department Of Food Science, Michigan State University. She also has four International Presentations &amp; 13 publications in reputed National &amp; International journals to her credit. Rajni has a total work experience of 16 yrs spread across research and Sales building expertise in different Instrument techniques.
</blockquote>

Agilent Technologies: Best Practices for GC Column Installation and Care

Best Practices for GC Column Installation and Care

Understand a hassle-free GC column installation and how to take care of your GC column.

Join us in this live webinar, as our speakers take you on a virtual tour to our laboratories in Germany and Italy.
There is a myriad of analytical challenges when performing analysis with GC-MS and one of the first is configuring the correct GC instrumentation for the application at hand. You will get to learn the key aspects of selecting the right GC instrumentation for your application, the benefits of GC-MS, advantages of moving to GC-MS/MS as well as what high resolution Orbitrap GC-MS can offer. Theory and real-world data examples will be given to highlight the benefits and limitations of each technique. Analysis of pesticides, persistent organic pollutants (POPs) and PFAS will also be covered during this interactive session.
<blockquote>
Presenter: Daniel Kutscher (Application Manager, Thermo Fisher Scientific)
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
After graduation in Chemistry in 2007, Daniel obtained his PhD from the University of Oviedo in 2011. In the same year he joined Thermo Fisher Scientific and has had different roles in application development and marketing. Currently, he manages the Application Development for trace elemental analysis and GC/GC-MS products.
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Presenter: Dr. Nicholas Warner (Product Applications Specialist GC-MS, Thermo Fisher Scientific)
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Nicholas is a product specialist with a strong scientific background in GC and GC-MS applications. Originally from Canada, he has worked as an environmental researcher for 14 years within Norway before moving to join the Thermo Fisher Scientific team in Bremen, Germany in 2021. With a background in Environmental/Analytical chemistry, he is a specialist in the analysis of emerging harmful substances in the environment using gas chromatography mass spectrometry and high-resolution mass spectrometry.
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Presenter: Giulia Riccardino (Senior Product Applications Specialist GC-MS, Thermo Fisher Scientific)
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Giulia Riccardino is a senior applications specialist for the GC-GC/MS business unit. Before joining Thermo Fisher Scientific, she worked for more than 10 years as a biologist in a clinical and toxicology lab where she had an extensive experience with both gas and liquid chromatography. She started at Thermo Fisher Scientific as a product specialist for GC standalone and autosamplers and then joined the applications specialist team. Giulia holds a degree in Biology from the University of Milan with a further Specialization in Clinical Biochemistry.
</blockquote>

Thermo Scientific: Back to Basics – GCMS

Back to Basics – GCMS

Key aspects of selecting the right GC instrumentation for your application.

Data integrity is strengthened through a detailed understanding of your data. This includes mapping your data flow, which necessitates questions such as:
<ul>
<li>How is data created?
</li>
<li>Where is data stored?
</li>
<li>What other data is relevant?
</li>
<li>How and where is data used within your business process?
</li>
<li>Where could risk exist?
</li>
</ul>
Understanding your data workflow allows you to focus in on the most critical data so you can identify potential data integrity risks and vulnerabilities. Facilitating a risk-based approach to process design, data integrity controls, workflow validation, and computerized system validation (CSV) enables you to confidently identify areas to monitor as you strive to ensure quality.
Please join us for a lively discussion as we explore this topic. As always, don’t forget to bring your questions for this exclusive opportunity to ask our experts anything about Empower Software.
<blockquote>
Presenter: Neil Lander (Principal Product Manager - Informatics Group, Waters Corporation)
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Neil has worked for Waters Corporation since 1994 and has held a variety of positions including Technical Support Specialist, Technical Trainer, Manager Customer Education and currently, Principal Marketing Manager in Waters in the Informatics group. Neil provides internal support for Empower CDS software and is focused on developing laboratory software solutions that help organizations achieve their scientific and operational objectives. Prior to joining Waters Corporation, he was an analytical chemist where he gained experience in both the cosmetics and specialty chemical industries.
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Presenter: Fiona O&#39;Leary (Empower Informatics Consultant, Waters Corp.)
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Fiona is an experienced Empower Software and Data Integrity professional working with the EU Professional Services Team. She has ~18 years of experience with Waters, beginning with Technical Support &amp; Empower Training, moving to Empower Consultancy and Workflow Optimization in more recent years. Her focus now is on building Data Integrity into the Lab workflow, Custom Field automation and Electronic Data Review / Reporting optimization.
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Prior to joining Waters, Fiona spent some years in the GxP Pharmaceutical Manufacturing world, setting the scene for her currently goal of helping organizations achieve their scientific and operational objectives efficiently and within compliance guidelines. She graduated from Dublin City University in 2001 with a BSc Hons. Analytical Science.
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Presenter: Tracy Hibbs (Principal Consulting Product and Marketing Manager, Waters Corp.)
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
Tracy has worked for Waters Corporation since 1999 and has held a variety of positions including Technical Trainer, Business Impact Consultant, Training Manager for Informatics and Data Integrity, and currently, Principal Consulting Marketing Manager focusing on Informatics solutions. Tracy provides support for Waters Empower Software Suite and is concentrated on developing laboratory data management software solutions that help organizations achieve their scientific and operational objectives in regulated environments. Prior to joining Waters, Tracy was a Research Scientist where she gained experience in chromatography and the associated data systems.​
</blockquote>

Waters: Empower Tips: Ask Me Anything About Data Flow and Data Process Mapping with Data Governance in Mind

GCMS webinars focusing on Academy/Principles - page 6

Empower Tips: Ask Me Anything About Data Flow and Data Process Mapping with Data Governance in Mind