SPME/GC for Forensic Applications: Explosives, Fire Debris, and Drugs of Abuse

Importance of the Topic

Solid phase microextraction (SPME) has emerged as a pivotal sample preparation technique in forensic analysis due to its speed, solvent-free operation, and enhanced sensitivity. By simplifying workflows and reducing hazardous solvent use, SPME addresses critical challenges in detecting trace levels of explosives, arson accelerants, and drugs in complex matrices. This makes it highly valuable for crime laboratories, environmental monitoring, and quality control applications.

Objectives and Overview of the Study

The bulletin reviews published SPME/GC and SPME/HPLC methods applied to three main forensic areas:

• Explosive residues in solid debris and aqueous samples.
• Fire debris analysis for residual gasoline and accelerants.
• Drugs of abuse screening in biological fluids (urine and blood).

It aims to compare SPME approaches to conventional extraction techniques in terms of sensitivity, speed, simplicity, and safety.

Applied Methodology and Instrumentation

SPME relies on a polymer-coated fused-silica fiber that establishes an equilibrium between sample matrix, headspace, and coating. Key variables include:

• Fiber coating type and thickness (e.g., 100 µm PDMS for volatiles; 65 µm PDMS/DVB for semivolatiles; 75 µm PDMS/Carboxen for trace compounds).
• Sampling mode: immersion for nonvolatile analytes; headspace for volatiles.
• Matrix modifiers: salt addition, pH adjustment, sample agitation, temperature control—to optimize analyte partitioning.
• Extraction time and temperature tailored to analyte volatility and distribution constants.
• Thermal desorption parameters: injection port temperature, fiber insertion depth, and desorption time to ensure complete release.

Used Instrumentation

• Chromatography systems: GC with ECD, FID, NPD detectors; GC–MS with CI-SIM; HPLC for nonvolatile explosives (HMX, RDX).
• Fiber coatings: PDMS, PDMS/DVB, PDMS/Carboxen.
• Sample heating/stirring blocks and portable field samplers for in-field extraction.
• Autosampler adaptations for Varian 8100/8200 series.

Main Results and Discussion

• Explosives: Direct immersion of 65 µm PDMS/DVB fiber detected nitro-aromatics at <50 ppb in water within 30 min extraction; GC/ECD provided rapid, high-resolution analysis.
• Fire Debris (Gasoline): Headspace sampling of 0.1 µL gasoline yielded identifiable chromatograms using 100 µm PDMS fiber in 20 min. SPME offered 1–11-fold signal enhancement over passive charcoal, detecting as low as 0.04 µL residue.
• Arson Accelerants: SPME/GC/FID identified over 30 potential accelerants in water-containing debris; equilibrium under 25 min for light compounds.
• Amphetamines in Urine: Heated headspace SPME with 100 µm PDMS and GC–MS/CI-SIM achieved quantitation over 0.2–100 mg/L with r>0.997; precision <7% RSD.
• Cocaine in Urine: Immersion SPME extracted 6 ng detection limit per 0.5 mL sample; recovery ~20–30%; linear response from 30–250 ng.

Benefits and Practical Applications

SPME provides multiple advantages in forensic and analytical laboratories:

• Eliminates organic solvents and related disposal costs.
• Reduces sample preparation time from hours to minutes.
• Minimizes sample handling and transfer losses.
• Offers broad linear dynamic range and low detection limits.
• Facilitates both laboratory and field deployments with portable samplers.

Future Trends and Applications

Advancements and emerging directions include:

• Development of novel sorbent coatings incorporating selective adsorbents (carbons, MOFs).
• Integration with tandem MS and high-resolution MS for enhanced selectivity.
• Automated, high-throughput SPME platforms and robotic fiber handling.
• On-site forensic screening with handheld GC-SPME systems.
• Data analytics and chemometric approaches to interpret complex SPME GC profiles.

Conclusion

SPME/GC and SPME/HPLC have revolutionized forensic analyses by offering rapid, sensitive, and solvent-free extraction of explosives, accelerants, and drugs from diverse matrices. Consistent control of fiber type, sampling conditions, and desorption parameters ensures reproducible results. Continued innovation in fiber materials and instrumentation promises to expand SPME’s role in forensic, environmental, and industrial laboratories.

References

1. Almirall JR, Bi G, Furton KG. Analysis of High Explosives by SPME–HPLC, GC/ECD, and GC/MS. Presented at Academy of Forensic Science, 1998.
2. Furton KG, Almirall JR, Bruna JC. J Forensic Sci. 1996;41:12–22.
3. Yang X, Peppard T. J Agric Food Chem. 1994;42:1925–1930.
4. Zhang X, Pawliszyn J. Anal Chem. 1993;65:1843–1852.
5. Furton KG, Bruna J, Almirall JR. J High Resol Chromatogr. 1995;18:625–629.
6. Yashiki M, Kojima T, Miyazaki T, Nagasawa N, Iwasaki Y, Hara K. Forensic Sci Int. 1995;76:169–177.
7. Hara K, Nagata T, Kimura K. Z Rechtsmed. 1986;96:93–104.
8. Brettell T, Sinibaldi M, McLaughlin E, Kennedy M. Eastern Analytical Symposium, 1997.
9. Kumazawa T, Watanabe K, Sato K, Seno H, Ishii A, Suzuki O. J Forensic Toxicol. 1995;13:207–210.
10. Roy IM, Jefferies TM, Threadgill MD, Dewar GH. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 1992;10:943–948.