GCMS
More information
WebinarsAbout usContact usTerms of use
LabRulez s.r.o. All rights reserved. Content available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 Attribution-ShareAlike

Detection of hormones (E1, E2, EE2) according to the requirements of the EU Water Framework Directive using an online-SPE-HPLC-MS/MS

Posters | 2020 | ShimadzuInstrumentation
GC/MSD, GC/MS/MS, GC/QQQ, LC/MS, LC/MS/MS, LC/QQQ
Industries
Environmental
Manufacturer
Shimadzu

Summary

Significance of the Topic


Trace levels of estrogenic compounds such as estrone (E1), 17β-estradiol (E2) and 17α-ethinylestradiol (EE2) pose a significant environmental and public health concern due to their endocrine-disrupting potential. The EU Water Framework Directive has placed these substances on a watch list, mandating stringent detection limits to safeguard water quality and aquatic ecosystems. Developing robust analytical methods capable of reliably quantifying these hormones at ultra-trace concentrations is critical for regulatory compliance and monitoring efforts.

Objectives and Study Overview


The primary goal of this study was to establish an automated, online solid-phase extraction (SPE) coupled with high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) method that meets or surpasses the EU-mandated limits of detection (400 pg/L for E1 and E2; 35 pg/L for EE2). The approach was validated using spiked surface water samples, focusing on improving selectivity, sensitivity and method robustness in complex matrices.

Methodology


Surface water (1 L) was collected and spiked with isotope-labelled internal standards. An initial offline enrichment employed C18 cartridges eluted with a 50:50 n-hexane/ethyl acetate mixture, followed by a silica cleanup step. The eluate was evaporated under nitrogen at 50 °C and reconstituted in water. The final extract underwent online SPE using a cyano (CN) cartridge, with analyte transfer to a biphenyl HPLC column under a gradient of acetonitrile and water (0.05 mM NH4F). Mass spectrometric detection utilized negative-mode electrospray ionization and multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) transitions specific to each estrogen.

Instrumentation


  • Online SPE-HPLC-MS/MS system: Shimadzu LC-MS 8060 with Raptor Biphenyl column (50 × 2.1 mm, 2.7 µm) and CN SPE cartridge.
  • Offline cleanup: Speedisk C18 and silica cartridges.
  • Alternative confirmation: Shimadzu GC-MS/MS TQ 8040 with Restek 5Sil-MS capillary column and derivatization (BSTFA/pyridine).

Key Results and Discussion


Theoretical instrument detection limits derived from signal-to-noise of low-level standards were 0.3 pg/L for E1, 0.4 pg/L for E2 and 0.7 pg/L for EE2. In real surface water matrices, practical detection limits were determined at 10 pg/L for E1 and 30 pg/L for both E2 and EE2, validated by spiking experiments at 30 pg/L EE2. The online SPE-HPLC-MS/MS method successfully achieved the EU target sensitivity for all three analytes. A comparison with GC-MS/MS confirmed that both techniques offer viable routes to meet regulatory requirements, although LC-MS/MS provides a more streamlined workflow without derivatization.

Benefits and Practical Applications


This method delivers high selectivity through dual SPE cleanup and biphenyl chromatography, yielding improved signal-to-noise ratios in complex water samples. Automation of online SPE reduces hands-on time and potential errors, facilitating routine monitoring in environmental laboratories. The approach can be integrated into QA/QC protocols for compliance testing under the EU Water Framework Directive.

Future Trends and Potential Applications


Expanding this methodology to a broader range of estrogenic and micropollutant targets could streamline multi-residue monitoring programs. Incorporation of high-resolution mass spectrometry may further enhance identification of transformation products. Coupling with effect-based bioassays could provide comprehensive assessment of endocrine activity. Portable or miniaturized SPE-LC-MS systems may enable on-site screening in remote locations.

Conclusion


An online-SPE-HPLC-MS/MS workflow has been developed that meets the stringent EU Water Framework Directive requirements for ultra-trace quantification of E1, E2 and EE2 in surface waters. The method demonstrates robust performance in real matrices and offers an efficient, automatable solution for routine environmental monitoring. Broader validation across diverse water bodies and extension to additional analytes represent logical next steps.

References


  1. EU 2018/840. Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/840 of 5 June 2018 establishing a watch list of substances for Union-wide monitoring in the field of water policy pursuant to Directive 2008/105/EC and repealing Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/495.
  2. Loos, R., Marinov, D., Sanseverino, I., Napierska, D., & Lettieri, T. (2018). Review of the 1st Watch List under the Water Framework Directive and recommendations for the 2nd Watch List. EUR 29173 EN. Publications Office of the European Union.
  3. Itzel, F., Gehrmann, L., Teutenberg, T., Schmidt, T. C., & Tuerk, J. (2019). Recent developments and concepts of effect-based methods for the detection of endocrine activity and the importance of antagonistic effects. Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 118, 699–708.

Content was automatically generated from an orignal PDF document using AI and may contain inaccuracies.

Downloadable PDF for viewing
 

Similar PDF

Toggle
The European Water Framework Directive Thermo Scientific Environmental Solutions Reference Guide
Table of Contents Introduction to WFD page1 Introduction to UK CIP 2 List of compounds and analytical technique Sample preparation - General sample preparation - Automated solutions - LC-MS compounds - GC-MS compounds - ICP-MS GC-MS compounds - Highlights &…
Key words
compounds, compoundshighlights, highlightsphenoles, phenolesconfiguration, configurationwfd, wfdtriazoles, triazoleshbcdd, hbcddorganotins, organotinsicp, icplist, listpbde, pbdedioxins, dioxinsalkanes, alkanespfos, pfossteroids
Thermo Scientific Water Analysis - Compliance and Workflows European Water Framework Directive
Thermo Scientific Water Analysis Compliance and Workflows European Water Framework Directive 2013/39/EU An introduction to the 2013/39/EU Directive Many chemicals produced by human industrial activities have a negative impact on the aquatic environment, even at extremely low concentrations. Some very…
Key words
tsq, tsqsrm, srmthermo, thermoptv, ptvicp, icpscientific, scientificequan, equanspe, speseries, seriestriple, triplequadrupole, quadrupoleextraction, extractionquantiva, quantivaendura, enduracompounds
Automated determination of EU Water Framework Directive priority contaminants in surface water at pg/L detection limits using Stir Bar Sorptive Extraction (SBSE) GC/MS/MS
Application Note Environmental Analysis Automated determination of EU Water Framework Directive priority contaminants in surface water at pg/L detection limits using Stir Bar Sorptive Extraction (SBSE) GC/MS/MS Abstract Authors Oliver Lerch, Jasmin Zboron, GERSTEL GmbH & Co. KG Ken Brady,…
Key words
relative, relativeacquisition, acquisitionwfd, wfdtrueness, truenesswater, watertwister, twisteranalytes, analytesmin, minadsorbed, adsorbedinland, inlandhexachlorocyclohexane, hexachlorocyclohexanesurface, surfacetime, timeloqs, loqstdu
Meeting the requirements of US and European water standards
Analytical solutions: Meeting the requirements of US and European water standards Foreward The quality of the water in our rivers, lakes and seas is of significant concern for both the organisms that inhabit these environments and those that rely on…
Key words
eic, eicwater, waterdirective, directiveemerging, emergingframework, frameworkcontaminants, contaminantsdrinking, drinkingpass, passthermo, thermoscientific, scientificcompound, compoundcompounds, compoundsenvironmental, environmentalorbitrap, orbitraprsd
Other projects
LCMS
ICPMS
Follow us
More information
WebinarsAbout usContact usTerms of use
LabRulez s.r.o. All rights reserved. Content available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 Attribution-ShareAlike