Highly Sensitive TOF Mass Spectrometry Allows for New User-Friendly Flow Modulator Design for GCxGC

Significance of the Topic

Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography (GC×GC) significantly improves separation of complex mixtures in fields such as environmental analysis, petrochemicals, and food safety. Traditional thermal modulators achieve high performance but require cryogens and costly hardware. Flow modulation offers a lower-cost, user-friendly approach, yet until recently was limited by reduced sensitivity and complex setup. Coupling flow modulation with a new generation of highly sensitive time-of-flight mass spectrometers addresses these challenges and broadens adoption of GC×GC.

Objectives and Study Overview

This study evaluates the performance of a LECO FLUX™ diverting flow modulator combined with the Pegasus® BT 4D benchtop TOF-MS. Key goals include:

• Comparing GC×GC detection limits and chromatographic performance against a Pegasus® 4D-C with thermal modulation.
• Assessing user-friendly method setup and robustness of the new flow modulation design.

Methodology and Instrumentation

The FLUX flow modulator employs a three-way valve and two fittings to alternate between divert and inject states. In divert mode, auxiliary gas opposes the primary column effluent, sending it to exhaust and supplying the secondary column. In inject mode, the valve redirects the primary effluent onto the second column for 2D separation. The Pegasus BT 4D TOF-MS recorded data, while the Pegasus 4D-C provided thermal modulation benchmarks. Modulation periods were set to one-third of peak widths from a preceding 1D GC run to ensure quantitative precision.

Used Instrumentation

• LECO FLUX™ diverting flow modulator
• LECO Pegasus® BT 4D benchtop TOF-MS
• LECO Pegasus® 4D-C GC×GC-TOF-MS (thermal modulation reference)
• Standard GC columns and auxiliary gas control via instrument software

Key Results and Discussion

The Pegasus BT 4D with FLUX achieved a GC×GC detection limit of 1 pg of octafluoronaphthalene (OFN) on column, matching thermal modulation performance. In 1D GC the LOD reached 20 fg OFN. Chromatographic peak widths were slightly broader with flow modulation but maintained comparable peak capacity. Analysis of a complex fuel oil sample produced nearly identical contour plots between the two systems, demonstrating that minor early-eluting volatiles lost during shipping did not affect overall resolution.

Benefits and Practical Applications

• Eliminates need for cryogens, reducing operational costs and maintenance.
• Simplifies method development: users select only second-dimension time and injection duration via dropdown menu.
• Provides sensitivity on par with thermal modulation through advanced TOF-MS detection.
• Maintains similar flow rates to 1D GC, facilitating method transfer and user training.

Future Trends and Opportunities

Advances in benchtop TOF mass spectrometry will continue to enhance sensitivity and affordability for GC×GC. Further innovations in flow modulator design may integrate automated valve control and expand compatibility with emerging detectors. Wider adoption in research and industrial labs is expected as user-friendly, low-cost systems meet rigorous QA/QC requirements.

Conclusion

The combination of the LECO FLUX diverting flow modulator and Pegasus BT 4D TOF-MS delivers equivalent sensitivity and chromatographic performance to traditional thermal modulation systems, while drastically simplifying operation and lowering costs. This configuration represents a viable, user-friendly alternative for routine GC×GC analysis across diverse application areas.

Reference

• Edwards M., Mostafa A., Gorecki T. Modulation in Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography: 20 Years of Innovation. Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 401 (2011) 2335–2349
• Seeley J. V., Seeley S. K. Multidimensional Gas Chromatography: Fundamental Advances and New Applications. Anal. Chem., 85 (2013) 557–578
• Seeley J. V., Schimmel N. E., Seeley S. K. The Multi-mode Modulator: A Versatile Fluidic Device for Two-dimensional Gas Chromatography. J. Chrom. A, 1536 (2018) 6–15
• Soyk M., Artaev V., Judkins T. A Novel Robust Direct Extraction EI Source for GC-TOFMS and GC×GC-TOFMS. Poster TP385. ASMS Conference, 2018
• Soyk M., Artaev V., Borton D. Sub-Picogram Detection and Identification of Analytes in Complex Matrices Using a Novel GC-TOFMS. Poster 105. IMSS Conference, 2016
• Seeley J. V. Theoretical Study of Incomplete Sampling of the First Dimension in Comprehensive Two-dimensional Chromatography. J. Chrom. A, 962 (2002) 21–27