Analysis of Waste Solvent by Purge and Trap

Significance of the topic

Trace analysis of halogenated organics in waste cleaning solvents is crucial for environmental compliance and safe disposal. Accurate detection at low concentrations protects water resources and meets regulatory standards.

Objectives and Study Overview

This study evaluates the effectiveness of purge and trap extraction from aqueous solutions to quantify residual halogenated solvents in an alcohol cleaning medium. A comparison with static headspace results highlights improvements in sensitivity and resolution.

Methodology and Instrumentation

A two-step approach was applied:

• Static headspace analysis: 10 mL sample heated at 70 °C for 30 min; 4 mL headspace injected into GC.
• Purge and trap from water: 4 mL alcohol diluted in 5 mL water; purged with helium at 30 mL/min for 10 min; organics trapped on Tenax; backflushed and cryofocused at –100 °C before GC injection.

Used Instrumentation

• Sample concentrator with Tenax trap and cryofocusing capability
• Gas chromatograph with flame ionization detector
• Column: 50 m × 0.25 mm SE-54
• Transfer line and valve oven maintained at 250 °C

Main Results and Discussion

The static headspace method generated a dominant alcohol peak obscuring minor halogenated compounds. The purge and trap technique enhanced recovery of less water-soluble halogenated solvents by retaining most alcohol in the aqueous phase. Cryofocusing sharpened early eluting peaks, yielding clear separation and increased sensitivity for trace analytes.

Benefits and Practical Applications

• Improved detection limits for halogenated contaminants in waste solvents
• Enhanced chromatographic resolution of volatile compounds
• Applicability to various matrices including water, soils, and industrial waste streams
• Supports regulatory compliance and quality control in manufacturing and environmental monitoring

Future Trends and Opportunities

Advances may include integration with mass spectrometric detection for compound identification, automated sample handling for high throughput, and development of novel sorbents to target a broader range of analytes. Miniaturized purge and trap systems could enable field-deployable monitoring.

Conclusion

Purge and trap extraction from aqueous media combined with cryofocusing on Tenax significantly outperforms static headspace for trace analysis of halogenated solvents in alcohol cleaning wastes. The method offers sharp peak resolution and improved sensitivity essential for environmental and industrial quality assurance.

References

1. Bellar T and Lichtenberg J L, J. Am. Water Works Assn. 66(12): 739.
2. Wampler T, Bowe W, Higgins J and Levy E, Systems Approach to Automatic Cryofocusing in Purge and Trap, Head-space and Pyrolytic Analyses, Am. Lab. 17(8): 82, 1985.
3. Grote J, Apparatus for Concentration of Volatile Organic Pollutants in Water, Am. Lab. 7(2): 47, 1975.