Analysis of gasoline range hydrocarbons

Importance of the topic

Analysis of gasoline‐range hydrocarbons is essential in petrochemical research, fuel quality control and environmental monitoring. Detailed speciation of aliphatic, cycloalkane and aromatic constituents underpins regulatory compliance, optimizes octane rating and supports process troubleshooting across refining and blending operations.

Study objectives and overview

The application note describes a comprehensive gas chromatography–flame ionization detection (GC‐FID) method for rapid separation and identification of over sixty C5–C11 hydrocarbons commonly found in gasoline. Key aims are:

• To evaluate the resolution and reproducibility of a BP1 capillary column for gasoline components.
• To establish a temperature program delivering baseline separation within a single analytical run.
• To demonstrate practical applicability for routine QA/QC laboratories.

Methodology and instrumentation

This analysis employs a 50 m × 0.15 mm i.d. capillary column coated with a 0.5 µm film of BP1 phase. The temperature program initiates at 30 °C (5 min hold), ramps at 2 °C/min to 80 °C, then 50 °C/min to 120 °C, and finally 10 °C/min to a 190 °C endpoint. Hydrogen carrier gas is maintained at 40 psi. Sample introduction is performed in split mode, and the detector is an FID operating under optimized flow and temperature conditions.

Instrumentation details:

• Gas chromatograph: Single‐channel GC equipped with FID.
• Column specification: BP1, 50 m × 0.15 mm, 0.5 µm film thickness.
• Carrier gas: High‐purity hydrogen, 40 psi.
• Injection: Split mode for narrow peaks and matrix accommodation.

Main results and discussion

The method achieves baseline separation for a complex mixture of straight‐chain alkanes, branched isomers, cycloalkanes and aromatic hydrocarbons. Retention times span from 4.85 min (Cyclopentane) to 44.54 min (n‐Undecane). Peak shapes are symmetrical with minimal tailing, and resolution among critical pairs exceeds 1.5. The gradient program balances analysis speed and chromatographic efficiency, completing the full separation in under 45 minutes.

Key observations:

• Consistent elution order aligns with increasing carbon number and branching complexity.
• Branched isomers (e.g., trimethylhexanes) are fully resolved from linear analogues.
• Aromatic compounds elute in the upper temperature range, allowing clear discrimination of toluene, xylenes and C9‐C11 alkylbenzenes.

Benefits and practical applications

This robust GC‐FID method offers laboratories:

• High throughput analysis with full hydrocarbon range coverage in a single run.
• Reliable quantification for quality control and compliance testing.
• Flexibility to adapt to related petrochemical fraction analyses.
• Cost‐effective operation by using hydrogen carrier gas and standard FID detection.

Future trends and potential applications

Emerging developments may include coupling the BP1 method with mass spectrometry for confirmatory analysis, adopting ultra‐fast GC protocols to reduce run times below 20 minutes, and integrating chemometric models for automated peak identification and quantification. Green analytical chemistry initiatives could also explore alternative carrier gases and micro‐extraction sample preparation to minimize solvent use.

Conclusion

The described BP1‐based GC‐FID protocol delivers efficient, reproducible separation of gasoline‐range hydrocarbons. It meets quality assurance demands in both industrial and regulatory settings, offering a valuable tool for fuel characterization and process monitoring.

References

1. Trajan Scientific Australia Pty Ltd. AN-0173-G Application Note: Analysis of gasoline range hydrocarbons. January 2017.