Replacing Multiple 50-Minute GC and GC-MS/SIM Analyses with One 15-Minute Full-Scan GC-MS Analysis for Nontargeted Pesticides Screening and >10x Productivity Gain

Importance of the Topic

The routine monitoring of pesticide residues in food and botanical products is critical for consumer safety and regulatory compliance. Conventional multiresidue methods often require multiple long analyses per sample, creating a bottleneck in high-throughput laboratories. Introducing faster, yet equally reliable, screening techniques can greatly enhance productivity without compromising sensitivity or confirmatory power.

Objectives and Study Overview

This study aimed to replace the traditional sequence of three 50-minute GC and GC-MS/SIM injections used by FDA/CFSAN with a single 15-minute full-scan GC-MS analysis. By integrating novel hardware and software tools—capillary flow three-way splitter, trace ion detection (TID), automated backflush, and deconvolution reporting software (DRS)—the goal was to achieve comprehensive, non-targeted pesticide screening in complex matrices while increasing throughput by more than tenfold.

Methodology

Sample Preparation

• Fresh produce extracts (ginseng, peach, tomato) were prepared by QuEChERS-based protocols: homogenization, acidified acetonitrile extraction, MgSO4/NaOAc partitioning, dispersive SPE cleanup with C-18, PSA and GCB, toluene partitioning, evaporation, and addition of internal standards.
• Dried ginseng powder was treated similarly with scaled-down sample amounts.

Used Instrumentation

The analytical platform consisted of

• Agilent 7890A GC with split/splitless inlet and 240 V fast-ramp oven
• Capillary flow three-way splitter dividing effluent to three detectors (1:1:0.1 MSD:DFPD:µECD) with constant makeup gas control
• Agilent 5975C mass selective detector operating in full-scan and SIM modes
• Micro-electron capture detector (µECD) and dual flame photometric detector (DFPD) for element-selective signals
• Agilent ChemStation software with TID, automated backflush control, and deconvolution reporting software (Agilent DRS) interfaced to NIST05 and custom pesticide libraries.

Main Results and Discussion

Backflush Optimization

• Blank runs following varying backflush durations demonstrated removal of late-eluting residues, preserving column cleanliness and locked retention times.

Trace Ion Detection

• Enabling TID increased signal-to-noise ratios, smoothed spectral baselines, and prevented false negatives (e.g., atrazine, diazinon) by improving deconvolution input.

Deconvolution and Library Search

• DRS separated overlapping peaks into individual spectra, enabling reliable identification via retention time and spectral matching (AMDIS + NIST05 libraries).
• Simultaneous MSD (SIM/full-scan), µECD, and DFPD data provided orthogonal confirmation of target compounds.

Performance Comparison

• The single 15-minute full-scan method identified all pesticide residues found by the multi-instrument FDA/CFSAN approach and additional nitrogen-containing analytes (e.g., carbaryl, azoxystrobin) at low ppb levels.
• Overall analysis time was reduced from ~200 minutes to 15 minutes per sample.

Benefits and Practical Applications

• Substantial productivity gains (>10× faster sample throughput).
• Comprehensive non-targeted screening without sacrificing confirmation capability.
• Reduced solvent and carrier gas consumption per analysis.
• Extended column and ion source lifetime due to controlled backflush.
• Versatile detection of halogenated, phosphorus-containing, and other polar pesticide classes in a single run.

Future Trends and Applications

Continued development of larger, retention-time locked libraries and machine-learning-assisted deconvolution could further broaden compound scope and automate result interpretation. Integration with high-resolution mass spectrometry, miniaturized GC systems, and cloud-based data analysis platforms will enable real-time monitoring in regulatory, industrial QA/QC, and environmental laboratories.

Conclusion

The combination of a three-way splitter, trace ion detection, automated backflush, and deconvolution reporting software enables a single 15-minute full-scan GC-MS method that rivals traditional multistep pesticide screening protocols. This approach delivers high sensitivity, robust confirmation, and unparalleled laboratory productivity for non-targeted pesticide residue analysis.

References

1. Lee SM et al. Multipesticide Residue Method for Fruits and Vegetables. J AOAC Int. 1991;74(2):376–383.
2. Cook J et al. Multiresidue Analysis of Pesticides Using GC-MS. J AOAC Int. 1999;82(6):1419–1435.
3. Mercer GE. Determination of 112 Halogenated Pesticides Using GC-MS/SIM. J AOAC Int. 2005;88(5):1452–1462.
4. Mercer GE, Hurlbut JA. Multiresidue Pesticide Monitoring Using GC-MS and SIM. J AOAC Int. 2004;87(6):1224–1236.
5. USDA Pesticide Data Program Analytical Methods. USDA AMS. 2007.
6. Fillion J et al. Multiresidue Determination of Pesticides in Produce by GC-MS. J AOAC Int. 1995;78(5):1252–1266.
7. Nemoto S et al. Multiresidue Determination of 110 Pesticides by GC/MS(SIM). J Food Hyg Soc Japan. 2000;41:233–241.
8. Pang GF et al. Determination of 446 Pesticide Residues by GC-MS and LC-MS/MS. J AOAC Int. 2006;89(3):740–771.
9. Anastassiades M et al. Fast and Easy Multiresidue Method Employing QuEChERS. J AOAC Int. 2003;86(2):412–431.
10. Lehotay SJ et al. Buffering to Improve Pesticide Residue Analysis. J AOAC Int. 2005;88(2):615–629.
11. Wong JW et al. Analysis of Organophosphorus Pesticides in Ginseng. J Agric Food Chem. 2007;55(3):1117–1128.
12. Meng CK, Quimby B. Identifying Pesticides with Full Scan, SIM, µECD, and FPD from One Injection. Agilent Technologies. 2005.
13. Meng CK. Improving Productivity and Extending Column Life with Backflush. Agilent Technologies. 2006.
14. Klee M. Simplified Backflush Using Agilent 6890 GC Post Run Command. Agilent Technologies. 2006.
15. Roushall R, Prest H. The 5975C Series MSDs: Method Optimization and Trace Ion Detection. Agilent Technologies. 2007.
16. AMDIS Deconvolution Software. NIST. 2007.
17. Wylie PL et al. Comprehensive Pesticide Screening by GC/MSD Using DRS. Agilent Technologies. 2004.
18. Wylie PL. Screening for 926 Pesticides and Endocrine Disruptors by GC/MS with DRS. Agilent Technologies. 2006.
19. Szelewski M, Meng CK. New Features of Deconvolution Reporting Software Revision A.02. Agilent Technologies. 2005.
20. Quimby B, Szelewski M. Screening for Hazardous Chemicals Using GC/MS/ECD/FPD with DRS. Agilent Technologies. 2006.