USEPA 8260D Determination Using the New Evolution 2 Purge and Trap Concentrator
Applications | | EST AnalyticalInstrumentation
This application note addresses the need for sensitive and reliable analysis of volatile organic compounds in environmental water and soil samples. Efficient purge and trap concentration coupled with gas chromatography mass spectrometry is critical for regulatory compliance, pollution monitoring, and quality control in industrial and research laboratories.
The study evaluates the performance of the EST Analytical Evolution 2 purge and trap concentrator under USEPA Method 8260D. Key goals include assessing calibration linearity, precision, detection limits, carryover effects, and internal standard stability in both water and soil matrices.
A Vocarb 3000 trap was conditioned and installed in the Evolution 2 concentrator. Automated sampling of water and soil extracts was performed with a Centurion WS autosampler. Target analytes were purged from the samples at 40 mL/min for 11 minutes, followed by controlled desorption into a gas chromatograph equipped with a Rxi 624Sil MS column. Mass spectrometric detection scanned m/z 35 to 300. Studies included:
The system demonstrated excellent performance under EPA 8260D criteria:
The Evolution 2 concentrator offers:
Emerging developments may include integration with laboratory information management systems, remote operation and diagnostics via network connectivity, novel sorbent materials for broader analyte ranges, and miniaturized concentrators for field deployment. Advances in AI-driven data analysis could further enhance method robustness and throughput.
The EST Analytical Evolution 2 purge and trap concentrator, combined with the Centurion WS autosampler, meets all USEPA 8260D requirements for volatile organic compound analysis in water and soil. Its improved design and performance deliver reliable, accurate, and efficient workflows for environmental and industrial laboratories.
United States Environmental Protection Agency Method 8260D Revision 4 June 2018
GC/MSD, GC/SQ, Purge and Trap
IndustriesEnvironmental
ManufacturerEST Analytical, Restek
Summary
Importance of the Topic
This application note addresses the need for sensitive and reliable analysis of volatile organic compounds in environmental water and soil samples. Efficient purge and trap concentration coupled with gas chromatography mass spectrometry is critical for regulatory compliance, pollution monitoring, and quality control in industrial and research laboratories.
Objectives and Overview of the Study
The study evaluates the performance of the EST Analytical Evolution 2 purge and trap concentrator under USEPA Method 8260D. Key goals include assessing calibration linearity, precision, detection limits, carryover effects, and internal standard stability in both water and soil matrices.
Methodology
A Vocarb 3000 trap was conditioned and installed in the Evolution 2 concentrator. Automated sampling of water and soil extracts was performed with a Centurion WS autosampler. Target analytes were purged from the samples at 40 mL/min for 11 minutes, followed by controlled desorption into a gas chromatograph equipped with a Rxi 624Sil MS column. Mass spectrometric detection scanned m/z 35 to 300. Studies included:
- Nine-point calibration from 0.5 to 200 µg/L
- Method detection limit determination over three days
- Precision and recovery at 50 µg/L in seven replicates
- Internal standard stability across 30 blanks
- Carryover assessment after 50 and 200 µg/L injections
Instrumentation Used
- EST Analytical Evolution 2 purge and trap concentrator with moisture reduction trap
- Vocarb 3000 trapping material
- EST Analytical Centurion WS autosampler
- Gas chromatograph with Rxi 624Sil MS column (30 m x 0.25 mm id x 1.4 um film)
- Mass spectrometer in scan mode (m/z 35–300)
Main Results and Discussion
The system demonstrated excellent performance under EPA 8260D criteria:
- Calibration linearity showed RSD below 15% across all compounds
- Method detection limits met target values for water and soil samples
- Precision at 50 µg/L averaged under 5% RSD with mean recoveries around 95%
- Internal standards exhibited stability below 2% RSD over sequential blank runs
- Carryover was minimal, averaging below 0.3% after both 50 and 200 µg/L standards
Benefits and Practical Applications
The Evolution 2 concentrator offers:
- Reduced footprint and improved laboratory ergonomics
- Enhanced moisture control and reduced analyte carryover
- Faster cycle times through advanced air circulation
- User-friendly software interface for routine operation
Future Trends and Potential Applications
Emerging developments may include integration with laboratory information management systems, remote operation and diagnostics via network connectivity, novel sorbent materials for broader analyte ranges, and miniaturized concentrators for field deployment. Advances in AI-driven data analysis could further enhance method robustness and throughput.
Conclusion
The EST Analytical Evolution 2 purge and trap concentrator, combined with the Centurion WS autosampler, meets all USEPA 8260D requirements for volatile organic compound analysis in water and soil. Its improved design and performance deliver reliable, accurate, and efficient workflows for environmental and industrial laboratories.
References
United States Environmental Protection Agency Method 8260D Revision 4 June 2018
Content was automatically generated from an orignal PDF document using AI and may contain inaccuracies.
Similar PDF
A Single Calibration Method for Water AND Soil Samples Performing EPA Method 8260 
|Agilent Technologies|Applications
Solid Phase Micro Extraction of Flavor Compounds in Beer ANNE JUREK A Single Calibration Method for Water AND Soil Samples Performing EPA Method 8260 Application Note Environmental Author Abstract Anne Jurek Applications Chemist EST Analytical Cincinnati, OH Environmental laboratories are…
Key words
jurek, jurekanne, annecenturion, centuriondesorb, desorbacetate, acetateest, estsampling, samplingpurge, purgebake, bakebeer, beertert, tertflavor, flavorbutylbenzene, butylbenzeneextraction, extractionmicro
Optimal Conditions for USEPA Method 8260B Analysis Using the EST Analytical Sampling System and the Shimadzu GCMS-QP2010s
|EST Analytical|Applications
Optimal Conditions s for US SEPA Me ethod 82 260B Ana alysis Us sing the e EST An nalyticall Sampliing Sys stem and d the Shimadzu GCMS-QP2010 0s ANNE E JUREK Introducttion: The USEP PA developed d Method 826 60B…
Key words
trap, trappurge, purgerins, rinsbake, bakedesorb, desorbnzene, nzeneest, estsparge, spargeene, enerinse, rinsemoisture, moisturemple, mplesamp, samptime, timecarryove
Optimal Conditions for USEPA Method 8260B Analysis using the EST Analytical Sampling system and the Shimadzu GCMS-QP2010s
|Shimadzu|Applications
JSB is an authorised partner of Optimal Conditions for USEPA Method 8260B Analysis using the EST Analytical Sampling system and the Shimadzu GCMS-QP2010s Anne Jurek Introducttion: The USEP PA…
Key words
trap, trappurge, purgedesorb, desorbrinse, rinseest, estbake, bakeencon, enconevolution, evolutiontime, timecenturion, centurionmoisture, moisturerinses, rinsesloop, loopflow, flowdela
Effect of Split Ratio on USEPA Method 8260 Compounds 
|EST Analytical|Applications
Solid Phase Micro Extraction of Flavor Compounds in Beer ANNE JUREK Effect of Split Ratio on USEPA Method 8260 Compounds Application Note Environmental Author Abstract Anne Jurek Applications Chemist EST Analytical Cincinnati, OH USEPA Method 8260 involves purging analytes out…
Key words
acetate, acetatetert, tertbutylbenzene, butylbenzenemethyl, methylether, etherbutyl, butylsur, surethyl, ethylchloride, chlorideamyl, amylmethacrylate, methacrylatevinyl, vinylxylene, xylenejurek, jurekpurge