Use of Modern Analytical SPDE and TDAS Methods for the Analysis of Sulphur Volatile Flavors

Importance of the Topic

Volatile sulfur compounds at trace levels have a strong sensory impact on beer and other fermented beverages. Despite their low concentrations they can impart both desirable and off flavours. Accurate measurement of these compounds is essential for quality control in brewing and food industries.

Objectives and Study Overview

This study evaluates two advanced sample preparation techniques Solid Phase Dynamic Extraction SPDE and automated Thermal Desorption TDAS for the extraction and concentration of key sulfur volatiles prior to Gas Chromatography with Flame Photometric Detection. A mixed standard of ten analytes was used to compare recovery and suitability.

Methodology

For SPDE ten milliliter aliquots of a standard solution in ethanol were placed in headspace vials heated at fifty degrees Celsius for thirty minutes. Two needle coatings were tested PDMS and PDMS bonded with active charcoal. Extraction involved fifteen sampling cycles and desorption was performed in a programmable temperature vaporizing injector at two hundred and fifty degrees. For TDAS dynamic headspace extraction using nitrogen at ten milliliter per minute at fifty degrees for thirty minutes was coupled to thermal desorption on Tenax TA and Carbotrap sorbents desorbed at two hundred and fifty degrees. All extracts were separated on a sixty meter silica capillary column with flame photometric detection specific to sulfur compounds.

Used Instrumentation

• Gas chromatograph Trace GC Ultra with flame photometric detector
• Autosampler CombiPal with SPME SPDE and TDAS modules
• Silica capillary column GS GasPro 60 m x 0.32 mm
• SPDE needles PDMS and PDMS active charcoal 50 um
• Thermodesorption sorbents Tenax TA and Carbotrap

Main Results and Discussion

The combined PDMS active charcoal SPDE needle provided high recovery for all ten sulfur analytes while the PDMS only fiber was less efficient. In the TDAS method the Tenax TA sorbent trapped all target compounds whereas Carbotrap captured only five. Dynamic headspace with TDAS and Tenax TA achieved the best overall extraction efficiency and reproducibility under the tested conditions.

Benefits and Practical Applications

Both methods eliminate solvent use and reduce sample preparation time. The dynamic headspace TDAS approach offers high reproducibility and minimal contamination while SPDE provides a robust automated alternative requiring no complex instrumentation adjustments. These features make them suitable for routine quality control in breweries laboratories and industrial analytics.

Future Trends and Applications

Integration with mass spectrometric detection could improve sensitivity and selectivity. Advances in sorbent materials and miniaturized TDAS devices may enable in situ field analysis. Application to real beer samples during fermentation and maturation can help optimize process control and flavor profiling.

Conclusion

The comparison confirms that dynamic headspace extraction combined with automated thermal desorption on Tenax TA is the most effective for volatile sulfur compound analysis in beer matrices. SPDE on an autosampler is a valid robust alternative with excellent extraction performance. Both methods surpass traditional solid phase microextraction in efficiency and reproducibility.

Reference

• Davidek J et al Laboratory Handbook of Food Analysis SNTL Prague 1981
• Mestres M Busto O Guasch J Chromatographic Analysis of Volatile Sulphur Compounds in Wines Using Static Headspace with Flame Photometric Detection Journal of Chromatography A 773 1997 261 269
• Pawliszyn J Applications of Solid Phase Microextraction in Food Analysis Journal of Chromatography A 880 2000 35 62
• Wardencki W Problems with the Determination of Environmental Sulphur Compounds by Gas Chromatography Journal of Chromatography A 793 1998 1 19
• Scarlata JL Ebeler SE Headspace Solid Phase Microextraction for the Analysis of Dimethyl Sulfide in Beer Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 47 1999 2505 2508
• Hill PG Smith RM Determination of Sulphur Compounds in Beer Using Headspace SPME and Gas Chromatographic Analysis with Pulsed Flame Photometric Detection Journal of Chromatography A 872 2000 2003 2013
• Chromtech SPDE Needle Scheme Chromtech Germany 2011