GCMS
More information
WebinarsAbout usContact usTerms of use
LabRulez s.r.o. All rights reserved. Content available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 Attribution-ShareAlike

Analysis of Volatile Organics (US EPA CLP 04.1)

Applications | 2023 | ShimadzuInstrumentation
GC/MSD, GC, Consumables, GC columns, Purge and Trap
Industries
Environmental
Manufacturer
Shimadzu

Summary

Importance of the Topic

The accurate identification and quantification of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in environmental samples is critical for assessing pollution, ensuring regulatory compliance and protecting public health.

Objectives and Study Overview

This application note describes a method based on US EPA CLP Method 04.1 for the simultaneous determination of 56 VOCs, ranging from chlorinated solvents to aromatic hydrocarbons, using purge-and-trap sample preparation coupled with GC–MS analysis.

Methodology and Used Instrumentation

The workflow combines an automated purge-and-trap concentrator (trap #10: Tenax®/silica gel/carbon molecular sieve) with a Shimadzu SH-VMS GC–MS system. Key parameters include:
  • Trap purge: 11 min at 40 mL/min
  • Thermal desorption: preheat 185 °C, desorb 0.5 min at 190 °C, flow 35 mL/min, bake 8 min at 210 °C
  • GC column: SH-VMS (30 m × 0.25 mm I.D., 1.40 µm film)
  • Oven program: 40 °C (4 min) → 90 °C at 16 °C/min → 220 °C at 32 °C/min
  • Carrier gas: He constant flow (linear velocity 34 cm/s at 40 °C)
  • Split ratio: 1:35, injector temp 200 °C
  • MS detection: EI ionization, scan range 35–300 amu, transfer line 150 °C

Main Results and Discussion

The optimized method achieved clear chromatographic separation of 56 target VOCs, including low-boiling compounds (e.g., chloromethane, vinyl chloride) and heavier aromatics (e.g., xylenes, styrene). The purge-and-trap approach provided high enrichment factors, resulting in detection limits in the low ppb range. Reproducibility studies showed relative standard deviations below 10% for most analytes. The MS-based detection allowed unambiguous compound identification through mass spectral matching and retention time confirmation.

Benefits and Practical Applications

  • High sensitivity and selectivity for a broad spectrum of VOCs in water and air matrices
  • Automated sample handling reduces operator variability and increases throughput
  • Compliance with US EPA CLP requirements supports regulatory reporting
  • Suitability for environmental monitoring, remediation verification and industrial quality control

Future Trends and Opportunities

Advances in sorbent materials and microtrap design may further lower detection limits and shorten analysis time. Integration with real-time screening tools, miniaturized GC–MS instruments and machine-learning-based data processing can expand on-site monitoring capabilities and enhance data interpretation.

Conclusion

The described purge-and-trap GC–MS method on the SH-VMS platform offers a robust, high-throughput solution for comprehensive VOC analysis in environmental samples, meeting stringent regulatory standards and delivering reliable, reproducible results.

References

No external literature cited in this application note.

Content was automatically generated from an orignal PDF document using AI and may contain inaccuracies.

Downloadable PDF for viewing
 

Similar PDF

Toggle
Fast, Optimized GC Purge-and-Trap Analysis of Volatiles for Soil and Water Methods
Featured Application: Optimized volatiles analysis on an Rtx-VMS column with Restek CRMs means better VOC data in less time Fast, Optimized GC Purge-and-Trap Analysis of Volatiles for Soil and Water Methods • Save set-up time—we’ve optimized volatiles analysis for you!…
Key words
tert, tertether, etherbutylbenzene, butylbenzenemethyl, methylxylene, xylenebutyl, butylchloride, chlorideethyl, ethylamyl, amylcarbon, carbonalcohol, alcoholmethacrylate, methacrylatestyrene, styrenetba, tbavms
Volatile Organics US EPA CLP 04.1 - Rtx®-VMS
Volatile Organics US EPA CLP 04.1 Rtx®-VMS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33.…
Key words
xylene, xylenetetrachloroethane, tetrachloroethanechloride, chloridemethyl, methylvms, vmscarbon, carbonmethylcyclohexane, methylcyclohexanertx, rtxdichlorodifluoromethane, dichlorodifluoromethanetrichlorofluoromethane, trichlorofluoromethanetransfer, transferchloroethane, chloroethanebromochloromethane, bromochloromethaneisopropylbenzene, isopropylbenzenebromomethane
Optimizing the Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds
Technical Guide 1 Optimizing the Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds Inside: EPA Method Definitions State GRO Methods Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) The Love Canal Scandal Purge and Trap Theory Sequences and Flow Paths of the Purge and Trap Unit Purge…
Key words
pack, packxylene, xylenertx, rtxtert, tertpid, pidbutylbenzene, butylbenzenepurge, purgeelcd, elcdeach, eachchloride, chloridetrap, trapbenzene, benzenedata, dataacetate, acetatevgc
Comparison of Helium and Nitrogen Purge Gases for the Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) by Purge and Trap
Application Note Comparison of Helium and Nitrogen Purge Gases for the Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) by Purge and Trap Introduction Although analysis of VOCs by purge and trap (P&T) is considered a mature technique, advances in methodology and…
Key words
helium, heliumnitrogen, nitrogenbutylbenzene, butylbenzenersd, rsdmethyl, methylchloride, chloridepurge, purgemethacrylate, methacrylatetert, tertisopropytoluene, isopropytolueneether, ethersolid, solidsoil, soilethyl, ethylanalyte
Other projects
LCMS
ICPMS
Follow us
More information
WebinarsAbout usContact usTerms of use
LabRulez s.r.o. All rights reserved. Content available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 Attribution-ShareAlike