Analysis of N-Methyl-2-Pyrrolidone (NMP) in Battery Electrodes

Importance of the topic

N-Methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) plays a central role as a solvent in cathode and anode electrode fabrication for lithium-ion batteries. Its high boiling point, low vapor pressure, and strong solvency for polymer binders make it indispensable in slurry preparation. However, residual NMP can influence electrode performance, reduce cell capacity, impair cycle life, and raise health and regulatory concerns. Reliable quantification of NMP traces is therefore critical for quality control, safety compliance, and optimization of drying processes in battery manufacturing.

Study objectives and overview

This study presents a rapid, cost-effective, and robust method for detecting NMP residues in battery electrodes. Key goals include:

• Developing an ultrasound-assisted extraction protocol using ethanol as a benign solvent.
• Establishing GC separation and detection conditions on an Agilent 8860 GC with FID.
• Validating method performance in terms of extraction efficiency, linearity, sensitivity, repeatability, and accuracy.
• Demonstrating applicability to both uncalendered and calendered cathode and anode samples.

Methodology and instrumentation

Electrode samples (~0.8 g) were ultrasonically extracted with 10 mL ethanol for 15 minutes. After filtration through a 0.45 µm PTFE syringe filter, extracts were analyzed by GC-FID. Analytical parameters included:

• GC system: Agilent 8860 with split/splitless injector and Agilent J&W DB-WAX column (30 m × 0.25 mm, 0.25 µm).
• Carrier gas: N₂ at constant flow of 2.0 mL/min; injector temperature 250 °C; split ratio 20:1.
• Oven program: 60 °C (2 min) → 250 °C at 20 °C/min (hold 3 min).
• Detector: Flame ionization detector at 250 °C with standard gas flows.
• Software: Agilent OpenLab CDS 2.6 for data acquisition and processing.

Key results and discussion

Extraction efficiency exceeded 90% in uncalendered cathodes within 10 minutes but remained below 65% for calendered samples, indicating stronger solvent retention in compacted coatings. Baseline separation of NMP, DMF, and DMSO was achieved within 10 minutes with peak symmetry near unity. Calibration curves were linear (R² ≥ 0.9998) over 0.5–100 mg/L. Method detection limit (MDL) and limit of quantification (LOQ) were 0.085 mg/L and 0.282 mg/L, respectively. Repeatability (RSD) was below 2% across low (0.5 mg/L), medium (10 mg/L), and high (50 mg/L) levels. Accuracy improved to within ±3% error when using calibration ranges matched to sample concentration. Real-world analyses detected NMP residues from 36.9 to 1,154 µg/g in cathodes and 84.0 to 164.2 µg/g in anodes, confirming method suitability for diverse electrode conditions.

Benefits and practical applications

This GC-FID workflow offers:

• High throughput and minimal solvent consumption through ultrasonic extraction.
• Excellent sensitivity and precision for trace-level NMP monitoring.
• Robustness across different electrode formats and treatment histories.
• Cost efficiency by employing common laboratory equipment and ethanol as extractant.

Future trends and applications

Emerging directions include:

• Integration of greener extraction solvents or solvent-free techniques to further reduce environmental impact.
• On-line or in-situ monitoring via miniaturized GC or portable detectors during electrode production.
• Automation of sample handling and data processing for inline quality control.
• Exploration of alternative detectors (e.g., MS) to simultaneously profile a broader range of residual organics.

Conclusion

The developed ultrasound-assisted ethanol extraction combined with Agilent 8860 GC-FID analysis delivers a reliable, sensitive, and cost-effective solution for quantifying NMP residues in battery electrodes. With strong linearity, low detection limits, and high repeatability, the method supports rigorous quality assurance and regulatory compliance in battery manufacturing.

Reference

1. Liu Y., Zhang R., Wang J., Wang Y., Current and Future Lithium-Ion Battery Manufacturing, iScience 2021;24:102332.
2. Zhang Y. et al., A Review of Lithium-Ion Battery Electrode Drying: Mechanisms and Metrology, Adv. Energy Mater. 2021;12:2102233.
3. Hawley B.W., Li J., Electrode Manufacturing for Lithium-Ion Batteries—Analysis of Current and Next Generation Processing, J. Energy Storage 2019;25:100862.
4. Susarla N., Ahmed S., Dees D.W., Modeling and Analysis of Solvent Removal During Li-Ion Battery Electrode Drying, J. Power Sources 2018;378:660–670.
5. Wang P., Wang F., Effects of NMP Concentration on Performance of Lithium Iron Phosphate Battery, Chin. J. Power Sources 2018;12:1799–1801.
6. Yue M. et al., Residual NMP and Its Impacts on Performance of Lithium-Ion Cells, J. Electrochem. Soc. 2024;171:050515.
7. Zhang X., Han G. et al., Effect of NMP Addition on Battery Performance in Negative Electrodes, Henan Chem. Ind. 2021;38:23–25.
8. European Chemicals Agency, How to Comply with REACH Restriction 71 for NMP, 2019.
9. Chernysh O., Khomenko V., Makyeyeva I., Barsukov V., Effect of Binder’s Solvent on Electrodes for Lithium-Ion Batteries and Supercapacitors, Mater. Today Proc. 2019;6:42–47.
10. Wang M., Dong X. et al., Lithium Ion Battery Electrodes Using DMSO – A Green Solvent, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2020;8:11046–11051.
11. Sliz R. et al., Suitable Cathode NMP Replacement for Sustainable Printed Li-Ion Batteries, ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2022;5:4047–4058.