GCMS
More information
WebinarsAbout usContact usTerms of use
LabRulez s.r.o. All rights reserved. Content available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 Attribution-ShareAlike

Techniques for Optimizing the Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds in Water Using Purge-and-Trap/GC/MS

Applications | 2011 | Agilent TechnologiesInstrumentation
GC/MSD, Purge and Trap, GC/SQ
Industries
Environmental
Manufacturer
Agilent Technologies, Teledyne LABS

Summary

Significance of the Topic



The reliable determination of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in water is critical for environmental monitoring, regulatory compliance, and public health protection. Purge-and-trap gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (P&T/GC/MS) remains a gold-standard technique for trace-level quantification of VOCs in surface water, groundwater, wastewater, and drinking water. Optimization of sample introduction, chromatographic separation, and mass spectrometric detection improves sensitivity, reproducibility, and instrument uptime in high-throughput analytical laboratories.

Objectives and Study Overview


  • Evaluate and refine U.S. EPA Method 8260B (P&T/GC/MS) for analysis of VOCs in water matrices.
  • Identify key instrumental variables in purge-and-trap, GC, and MS that influence calibration linearity, method precision, and long-term stability.
  • Demonstrate simple techniques and best practices for routine laboratory implementation.

Methodology and Instrumentation


  • Sample introduction based on EPA Method 5030C: 5 mL water aliquot purged with inert gas for 11 min at 40 mL/min onto a Vocarb 3000 trap; desorption at 250 °C into GC/MS.
  • Gas chromatograph: Agilent 6890N with split/splitless inlet (250 °C, 50:1 split), 20 m×0.18 mm×1 µm DB-VRX column, helium at 1.0 mL/min, oven program 40 °C→100 °C (10 °C/min)→225 °C (25 °C/min).
  • Mass spectrometer: Agilent 5973 inert MSD, transfer line 260 °C, source 230 °C, quad 150 °C, EM tuned for BFB to meet EPA 8260B ion ratio criteria, scan 35–260 m/z.
  • Calibration: Eight-level curve from 1 to 300 µg/L using secondary methanolic standards; internal standards (fluorobenzene, chlorobenzene-d5, 1,4-dichlorobenzene-d4) at 50 µg/L; surrogate recoveries monitored.
  • Performance checks every 12 h: system performance check compounds (SPCCs) and calibration check compounds (CCCs) verification.

Main Results and Discussion


  • Linearity and precision: Over the 1–200 µg/L range, average response factor (RF) RSD was 4.6% for all targets, with 91% of compounds <10% RSD.
  • Detector overload: At 300 µg/L, several compounds showed RF depressions, indicating MSD electron multiplier (EM) overload; optimal range limited to 200 µg/L.
  • Signal stability: Proper EM voltage reduction and inert flow path eliminated gradual signal decay and surrogate competition effects seen in non-optimized systems.
  • Optimization strategies:
    • Reduce electron multiplier voltage to prevent continuous-injection overload while maintaining signal/noise ratio.
    • Maintain inert sample flow paths and perform regular bake-rinses to eliminate active sites and adsorption losses.
    • Exclude solvent ions by starting MS scan above 40 m/z to reduce baseline disturbances from water and methanol.
    • Minimize vial headspace and prevent leaks through proper closures to ensure consistent calibration preparation.

Benefits and Practical Applications of the Method


  • Robust, sensitive quantification of a broad range of VOCs in diverse water matrices.
  • Wide dynamic range with low detection limits and reliable calibration across laboratories.
  • Alignment with EPA QA/QC requirements for environmental compliance and monitoring programs.

Future Trends and Opportunities


  • Implementation of high-resolution and inert MSD sources for enhanced selectivity and longevity.
  • Advanced software integration for real-time method performance tracking and automated tuning.
  • Expansion of P&T/GC/MS workflows to include emerging contaminants and non-target screening using time-of-flight or orbitrap detectors.
  • Development of greener protocols by reducing solvent usage and improving trap chemistries for selective analyte retention.

Conclusion


Through systematic optimization of purge-and-trap parameters, GC/MS settings, and MSD tuning, EPA Method 8260B can deliver highly reproducible and sensitive VOC analysis in water. Key practices—such as careful standard preparation, inert flow management, and regular system checks—minimize downtime and ensure data quality for environmental laboratories.

References


  1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Method 8260B: Volatile organic compounds by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (SW-846, Revision 2, 1996).
  2. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Method 5030C: Purge-and-Trap for aqueous samples (SW-846, Revision 3, 2003).
  3. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Method 524.2: Determination of organic compounds in drinking water (EPA/600/R-95/131, 1995).
  4. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Contract Laboratory Program Statement of Work for Organics Analysis, OLM04.2.
  5. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. SW-846 Method 8000B: Determinative chromatographic separations (Revision 2, 1996).
  6. Wylie, P.L. BFB tuning for environmental analysis: Three ways to succeed. Agilent Technologies Application Note 5988-4373EN (2011).

Content was automatically generated from an orignal PDF document using AI and may contain inaccuracies.

Downloadable PDF for viewing
 

Similar PDF

Toggle
Developing an eMethod for the Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds in Water Using Purge and Trap/GC with Agilent’s New 5975 inert Mass Spectrometer
Developing an eMethod for the Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds in Water Using Purge and Trap/GC with Agilent’s New 5975 inert Mass Spectrometer Application Environmental Author Introduction Philip L. Wylie Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2850 Centerville Road Wilmington, DE 19808-1610 USA…
Key words
scan, scansim, simpurge, purgebake, baketemperature, temperatureemethod, emethoddesorb, desorbtime, timexpt, xptsur, surcalibration, calibrationmethod, methodbromoform, bromoformvocs, vocsflow
Measuring Environmental Volatile Organic Compounds by U.S. EPA Method 8260B with Headspace Trap GC/MS
w w w. p e r k i n e l m e r. c o m This application note demonstrates the use of a new sample-introduction technology (incorporated in the PerkinElmer® TurboMatrix™ HS-110 Trap) for U.S. EPA Method 8260B.…
Key words
target, targetheadspace, headspacetrap, trapspccs, spccsspcc, spccstandard, standardccc, cccinternal, internalcheck, checkrrf, rrfsurrogate, surrogatebromoform, bromoformperkinelmer, perkinelmerrsd, rsdcompounds
Volatile Organic Compound Analysis Using Purge and Trap
Volatile Organic Compound Analysis Using Purge and Trap Success with VOC analysis using the Agilent 5975C Mass Selective Detector Application Note Environmental Authors Abstract Jeffery S. Hollis Despite the status and widespread application of Purge and Trap (P&T) with GC/MS…
Key words
averaged, averagedbake, bakepurge, purgetemperature, temperaturedesorb, desorbrinse, rinsetime, timerrf, rrfflow, flowbfb, bfbdrain, draindry, drycondenser, condensersweep, sweepstandby
US EPA Method 524.2: Successful Measurement of Purgeable Organic Compounds in Drinking Water by Agilent 8860/5977B GC/MSD
Application Note Environmental US EPA Method 524.2: Successful Measurement of Purgeable Organic Compounds in Drinking Water by Agilent 8860/5977B GC/MSD Authors Bruce D. Quimby and Anastasia A. Andrianova Agilent Technologies, Inc. Abstract An Agilent 8860/5977B GC/MSD system coupled with a…
Key words
rrf, rrfistd, istdtrichloromonofluoromethane, trichloromonofluoromethanetribromomethane, tribromomethanebfb, bfbethyl, ethylchloride, chloridemethyl, methylbutylbenzene, butylbenzenemethacrylate, methacrylatetetrachloroethylene, tetrachloroethyleneaquatek, aquateksurr, surrtert, tertlumin
Other projects
LCMS
ICPMS
Follow us
More information
WebinarsAbout usContact usTerms of use
LabRulez s.r.o. All rights reserved. Content available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 Attribution-ShareAlike