Comparison of the Analysis of VOCs in Soils by Method 8260 Using the 4552 and 4100 Autosamplers
Technical notes | | OI AnalyticalInstrumentation
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in soils present environmental and health risks and require sensitive and reliable analysis for regulatory compliance, contamination assessment and remediation monitoring.
This study compares two autosampler configurations—the established 4552 Archon style and the newer 4100 sample processor—using USEPA Method 8260B to assess performance, data quality and operational efficiency in soil VOC analysis.
Calibration response factors (RF) and percent relative standard deviations (%RSD) were comparable between the two autosamplers across over 80 VOCs. The 4100 processor demonstrated slightly lower %RSD for many compounds, indicating improved precision. Both systems achieved correlation coefficients near unity for key analytes, confirming equivalent analytical performance.
Advances in autosampler design may include further automation, integration with real-time monitoring technologies, and coupling with high-resolution mass spectrometry. Data analysis enhancements using machine learning could optimize calibration and detection limits.
The new 4100 sample processor matches or exceeds the analytical performance of the traditional 4552 autosampler under USEPA Method 8260B, providing laboratories with a more reliable and user-friendly solution for VOC analysis in soils.
GC/MSD, Purge and Trap
IndustriesEnvironmental
ManufacturerOI Analytical
Summary
Significance of the Topic
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in soils present environmental and health risks and require sensitive and reliable analysis for regulatory compliance, contamination assessment and remediation monitoring.
Objectives and Overview of the Study
This study compares two autosampler configurations—the established 4552 Archon style and the newer 4100 sample processor—using USEPA Method 8260B to assess performance, data quality and operational efficiency in soil VOC analysis.
Methodology
- GC/MS analysis coupled with a 4660 purge-and-trap system.
- Identical instrument settings and USEPA Method 8260B parameters for both autosamplers.
- Calibration standards run across a range of target VOCs to determine response factors and precision.
Instrumentation Used
- 4100 sample processor (new OI Analytical system).
- 4552 Archon style autosampler.
- Gas chromatograph/mass spectrometer (GC/MS).
- Model 4660 purge-and-trap unit.
Main Results and Discussion
Calibration response factors (RF) and percent relative standard deviations (%RSD) were comparable between the two autosamplers across over 80 VOCs. The 4100 processor demonstrated slightly lower %RSD for many compounds, indicating improved precision. Both systems achieved correlation coefficients near unity for key analytes, confirming equivalent analytical performance.
Benefits and Practical Applications
- The 4100 sample processor offers faster sample throughput and enhanced operational reliability.
- Comparable or improved precision supports its adoption in routine environmental soil testing laboratories.
- Simplified maintenance and user interface reduce downtime and training requirements.
Future Trends and Potential Applications
Advances in autosampler design may include further automation, integration with real-time monitoring technologies, and coupling with high-resolution mass spectrometry. Data analysis enhancements using machine learning could optimize calibration and detection limits.
Conclusion
The new 4100 sample processor matches or exceeds the analytical performance of the traditional 4552 autosampler under USEPA Method 8260B, providing laboratories with a more reliable and user-friendly solution for VOC analysis in soils.
References
- Publication 41370415
Content was automatically generated from an orignal PDF document using AI and may contain inaccuracies.
Similar PDF
Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds Using USEPA Method 8260 and the 4760 Purge and Trap and the 4100 Autosampler
|Agilent Technologies|Applications
Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds Using USEPA Method 8260 and the 4760 Purge and Trap and the 4100 Autosampler Introduction Although analysis of VOCs by purge and trap is considered a mature technique, advances in methodology and refinement of instrumentation…
Key words
purge, purgesoil, soilusepa, usepasam, samtemperature, temperaturestir, stirvolatile, volatilersd, rsdbutylbenzene, butylbenzenedesorb, desorbhot, hotwater, waterorganic, organicmethyl, methylzero
Comparison of Helium and Nitrogen Purge Gases for the Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) by Purge and Trap
2019|Agilent Technologies|Applications
Application Note Comparison of Helium and Nitrogen Purge Gases for the Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) by Purge and Trap Introduction Although analysis of VOCs by purge and trap (P&T) is considered a mature technique, advances in methodology and…
Key words
helium, heliumnitrogen, nitrogenbutylbenzene, butylbenzenersd, rsdmethyl, methylchloride, chloridepurge, purgemethacrylate, methacrylatetert, tertisopropytoluene, isopropytolueneether, ethersolid, solidsoil, soilanalyte, analyteethyl
Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds Using USEPA Method 524.3
|Agilent Technologies|Applications
Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds Using USEPA Method 524.3 Eclipse 4760 Purge and Trap and the 4100 Autosampler Introduction Although analysis of VOCs by purge and trap is considered a mature technique, advances in methodology and refinement of instrumentation are…
Key words
tert, tertether, etherstd, stdbutylbenzene, butylbenzeneethyl, ethylmethyl, methylbutyl, butylpurge, purgeamyl, amylppb, ppbsoil, soilchloride, chloridesam, samchlorodifluoromethane, chlorodifluoromethanechlorodibromomethane
Comparison Study of the Eclipse 4660 and 4760 Purge and Traps Using USEPA Method 524.3
|Agilent Technologies|Technical notes
Comparison Study of the Eclipse 4660 and 4760 Purge and Traps Using USEPA Method 524.3 Introduction USEPA method 524.3 is used for the analysis of volatile organic compounds in drinking water. This brief presents a comparison of response factors and…
Key words
avg, avgtert, tertether, etherrsd, rsdbutylbenzene, butylbenzenetraps, trapsethyl, ethylmethyl, methylbutyl, butylchloride, chlorideamyl, amylpurge, purgebromomethnae, bromomethnaehexchlorobutadiene, hexchlorobutadieneanalyte