A Practical Applications Guide for Analytical Pyrolysis - GC/MS - Arts and Antiquities

Importance of the Topic

Thermal analysis via pyrolysis–GC/MS offers a powerful tool for molecular-level identification of organic materials in cultural heritage objects. Its ability to characterize complex polymers, resins, dyes and coatings with minimal sample preparation makes it essential for authentication, conservation and material studies.

Objectives and Study Overview

This application guide by CDS Analytical demonstrates the practical use of pyrolysis–GC/MS to analyze a diverse range of samples, including fossil resins, artist paints, natural dyes, varnishes, pigments, synthetic fibers and museum artifacts. The study aims to highlight diagnostic markers for material differentiation and to showcase method versatility in heritage science.

Methodology

Samples underwent rapid thermal decomposition in a microfurnace pyroprobe at temperatures between 600 and 750°C with short hold times (15 s). Evolved fragments were separated on a 5 % phenyl GC column and detected by mass spectrometry under split injection. Derivatization with tetramethylammonium hydroxide (TMAH) was applied to enhance detection of polar compounds such as natural dyes.

Used Instrumentation

• Pyroprobe microfurnace: set-points 600–750°C, 15 s hold, transfer line 325°C
• Gas chromatograph: 5 % phenyl column, helium carrier, split ratios 50:1 to 75:1
• Mass spectrometer: scan range 25–600 amu, injector 300–325°C, oven gradients from 40°C to 295–325°C

Key Results and Discussion

Sample-specific pyrolysis products served as molecular fingerprints:

• Genuine Baltic amber produced terpene series and succinic anhydride, while an imposter resin yielded only phenols and methylphenols.
• Acrylic paints were distinguished by acrylate oligomers: ethyl acrylate trimers for poly(ethyl acrylate) and butyl acrylate trimers with pigment fragments for Hansa yellow.
• TMAH derivatization revealed carminic acid fragments and methylated indigo peaks in red and blue dyes that otherwise degrade on direct pyrolysis.
• Varnishes: polyurethane coatings regenerated toluene diisocyanate, whereas shellac generated benzoic acids, styrene and toluene.
• Organic pigments: phthalocyanine blue yielded nitrile aromatics; quinacridone red showed aromatic amine fragments.
• Nylon fibers: Nylon 6 produced caprolactam; Nylon 6,6 yielded cyclopentanone and hexanedinitrile.
• Museum mask coatings: copolymers of methyl methacrylate and ethyl acrylate with dioctyl phthalate plasticizer and polyvinyl acetate adhesive were identified by characteristic monomer and ester fragments.

Benefits and Practical Applications

This approach requires microgram samples, provides rapid and reproducible molecular identification, and supports authentication, conservation treatment selection, and material provenance studies across art, archaeology and museum science.

Future Trends and Opportunities

Advancements in fast pyrolysis techniques, high-resolution MS, automated spectral deconvolution and machine learning–based library matching are poised to enhance sensitivity and speed. The development of portable pyrolysis–MS instruments may enable in situ analyses in cultural institutions and field settings.

Conclusion

Pyrolysis–GC/MS stands out as a versatile analytical method for comprehensive characterization of organic materials in cultural heritage. The diagnostic pyrolysis products enable clear differentiation of resins, polymers, dyes, coatings and fibers, informing conservation decisions and artifact authentication.

References

• CDS Analytical LLC. A Practical Applications Guide for Analytical Pyrolysis–GC/MS: Arts and Antiquities. Application Note AP-17, November 2008.