Measurement of Chemical Emissions from Spray Polyurethane Foam (SPF) Insulation Using an Automated Micro-Scale Chamber Coupled Directly with the Analysis System

Significance of the Topic

The assessment of volatile and semi-volatile emissions from spray polyurethane foam (SPF) insulation is critical for indoor air quality, occupant health, and worker safety. SPF is widely used in building and renovation projects, but emitted amine catalysts, flame retardants, and blowing agents can pose potential risks. Precise, reproducible measurement methods support safe re-entry times, product development, and regulatory compliance.

Objectives and Study Overview

This study aimed to develop and validate a fully automated micro-scale chamber method for evaluating chemical emissions from open-cell and closed-cell SPF samples. Key goals included:

• Implementing a dynamic headspace (DHS L) autosampler directly coupled to thermal desorption–GC/MS for unattended, time-resolved measurements.
• Investigating the effects of sample thickness, temperature, and sampling duration on emission factors.
• Comparing results qualitatively with an adapted VDA 278 direct thermal extraction method for rapid screening.

Methodology and Instrumentation

Sample Preparation:

• Open-cell and closed-cell SPF panels cored into 92 mm disks of 3, 5, or 8 cm thickness using a custom tool.
  
• Cores sealed in 1 L stainless steel micro-scale chambers with inert coating.

Automated Micro-Scale Chamber System:

• Dynamic headspace (DHS L) containers, flow-controlled (5–100 mL/min) and temperature-controlled (23–200 °C).
• Automated MultiPurpose Sampler (MPS) to purge analytes onto Tenax TA sorbent tubes at defined intervals.
• TDS 3 thermal desorption and GC/MS analysis with Rtx-5 Amine column.

VDA 278 Direct Thermal Extraction:

• TDS 3 with A2 autosampler and CIS 4 cryo-trap.
• Extraction at 40–120 °C (adjusted to 40 °C for open-cell, 65 °C for closed-cell) with helium and split venting.
• Quantitation of target amines, flame retardants, and blowing agents using calibration curves.

Main Results and Discussion

Effect of Sample Thickness:

• Open-cell SPF emissions increased with thickness, indicating internal diffusion control.
• Closed-cell SPF showed little thickness dependence due to surface barrier effects.

Emission Kinetics over Time:

• Open-cell foam exhibited stable emission factors for catalysts and retardants over 12 h (RSD < 3%).
• Closed-cell foam released HFC-245fa and TCPP gradually, stabilizing after ~8 h; amine catalyst emissions remained low.

Temperature Dependence:

• Elevated temperatures (40 °C, 65 °C) increased emission factors and enabled detection of higher-boiling amines and retardants.
• Closed-cell samples required higher extraction temperatures to desorb semi-volatiles.

Comparison with VDA 278:

• Both methods identified similar compound classes; micro-chamber better simulates real-world exposure.
• Direct extraction at 40 °C matched chamber results for open-cell; 65 °C optimized for closed-cell.
• High-temperature extraction (90–120 °C) overloaded GC/MS with flame retardants and degraded labile amines.

Water Management:

• Open-cell foam contains moisture that can freeze trap inlets; a 20 °C solvent-vent purge for 1 min removes excess water before desorption.

Benefits and Practical Applications

• Fully automated sampling reduces operator error and labor and ensures precise control of flow, temperature, and timing.
• Time-resolved emission profiles support modeling of indoor air concentrations and sink effects.
• Adapted VDA 278 direct extraction offers rapid, low-sample-mass screening for quality control and database development.
• Data can inform safe re-entry protocols for SPF installation and occupant re-occupancy guidelines.

Future Trends and Opportunities

• Standardization of micro-scale chamber protocols for SPF and other construction materials to minimize sink effects.
• Integration with predictive modeling tools to forecast indoor air concentrations under variable conditions.
• Miniaturized on-line detection and real-time monitoring sensors for continuous emission surveillance.
• Extension of methodology to novel polymeric insulation products and flame-retardant systems.

Conclusion

A fully automated micro-scale chamber method using a DHS L autosampler coupled to TD-GC/MS provides robust, reproducible emission data for open- and closed-cell SPF insulation. The approach minimizes sink effects, allows long-term kinetic studies, and yields emission factors under controlled temperatures. Complementary use of an adapted VDA 278 direct extraction method enables rapid screening with minimal sample mass, supporting product development, quality assurance, and safety assessments.

References

1. Dernehl CU. Health Hazards Associated with Polyurethane Foam. Journal of Occupational Medicine. 1965.
2. Umweltbundesamt. Substituting Environmentally Relevant Flame Retardants: Assessment Fundamentals. Berlin: Umweltbundesamt; 2000. Report No. 25, Vol. I–III.
3. Sebroski JR. Measuring Emissions from Spray Polyurethane Foam Insulation. Center for the Polyurethanes Industry (CPI), American Chemistry Council; 2012.
4. ISO 16000-9. Determination of the emission of volatile organic compounds from building products – Emission test chamber method. 2006.
5. ISO 16000-6. Determination of VOCs in indoor air by active sampling on Tenax TA, thermal desorption, and GC–MS/FID. 2010.
6. Uhde E, Salthammer T. Influence of Molecular Parameters on the Sink Effect in Test Chambers. Indoor Air. 2006;16:158–165.
7. VDA 278. Thermal Desorption Analysis of Organic Emissions for Characterization of Non-Metallic Materials for Automobiles. Verband der Automobilindustrie; 2011.
8. ASTM D7859-13e1. Standard Practice for Spraying, Sampling, Packaging, and Test Specimen Preparation of SPF Insulation for Emission Testing Using Environmental Chambers. ASTM International; 2013.
9. Salthammer T, Uhde E. Organic Indoor Air Pollutants: Occurrence, Measurement, Evaluation. 2nd ed. Wiley; 2009. p. 108.
10. Terheiden A, Landers R, Schlöns H, Hübel R. Novel Amine Catalyst for Low Emission Flexible Polyurethane Foam. PU Technical Conference. 2008;2.
11. Salthammer T, Fuhrmann F, Uhde E. Flame retardants in the indoor environment – Part II: Release of VOCs from polyurethane. Indoor Air. 2003;13:49–52.
12. Albrecht WN, Stephenson RL. Health Hazards of Tertiary Amine Catalysts. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health. 1988;14:209–219.