Separation of Volatile Organic Hydrocarbons with Agilent J&W PLOT GC Columns and Selectivity Tuning

Significance of the topic

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and light hydrocarbons play crucial roles in petrochemical feedstock screening, product quality control, and environmental monitoring. Effective gas chromatographic separation of these compounds under ambient and elevated temperatures is essential for accurate quantification and process optimization.

Objectives and Study Overview

This application note evaluates a series of divinylbenzene-based porous layer open tubular (PLOT) GC columns (Agilent J&W PoraPLOT Q, S, U) and their newly developed bonded counterparts (PoraBOND Q). It demonstrates how functional group incorporation and selectivity tuning through series column coupling can tailor separations of saturated, unsaturated, aromatic, polar, sulfur- and oxygen-containing, and basic analytes.

Methodology and Instrumentation

GC/FID experiments were performed on an Agilent 7890B GC with a split/splitless inlet and Agilent 7693 autosampler using Agilent OpenLab software. Gas samples (0.5 mL manual injection) and liquid standards (1 µL via autosampler) were analyzed under helium constant flow (5 mL/min) with a typical oven program from 50 °C to 200 °C. Columns were coupled using an ultra-inert press-fit connector to evaluate selectivity tuning.

• GC System: Agilent 7890B GC/FID
• Sampler: Agilent 7693 LD autosampler
• Columns: PoraPLOT Q/S/U (25 m×0.53 mm×20 µm), PoraBOND Q (25 m×0.53 mm×10 µm)
• Carrier Gas: Helium, 5 mL/min
• Injection: Split mode 20:1, inlet at 200 °C

Main Results and Discussion

• Single-column separation of C1–C3 hydrocarbons revealed increasing polarity from Q to U phases: Q coeluted acetylene/ethylene; S separated acetylene/ethylene but overlapped acetylene/ethane; U baseline-resolved C2s but coeluted propylene/propane.
• System repeatability for n-alkane standards (C1–C6) showed retention time RSD <0.2% and area RSD <5%.
• Selectivity tuning by series coupling (six column combinations) altered elution order and resolution. For instance, Q+U improved acetylene retention versus Q alone, while U+Q reversed elution sequence. Resolution data guided column choice based on target analyte groups.
• Complex mixtures of 18 light hydrocarbons and aromatics (C1–C9) were separated within 20 min using a PoraPLOT S+Q combination.
• PoraBOND Q demonstrated enhanced robustness, reduced particle shedding, higher maximum temperature (300 °C), and improved inertness versus PoraPLOT Q. This led to sharper peaks for sulfur and oxygenated compounds. Both phases, however, were unsuitable for strongly basic amines due to adsorption and peak tailing.

Benefits and Practical Applications of the Method

• Tailored selectivity across a broad polarity range for volatile and semi-volatile compounds.
• Cost-effective tuning via column coupling without custom synthesis.
• Improved stability and inertness with bonded PLOT phases for trace polar analytes.
• Fast, reproducible analysis suitable for industrial QA/QC and environmental laboratories.

Future Trends and Potential Applications

Advances in polymer chemistry are expected to yield novel functionalized PLOT phases for two-dimensional GC, coupling with mass spectrometry, and micro-GC formats. Further development of inert, high-temperature stable columns will expand applications in petrochemistry, biofuels, and environmental trace analysis.

Conclusion

Agilent J&W PoraPLOT and PoraBOND columns provide versatile porous polymer stationary phases whose selectivity can be fine-tuned via functional group chemistry and series column coupling. PoraBOND Q offers superior stability and inertness, making these columns powerful tools for comprehensive VOC, hydrocarbon, and polar analyte analysis.

References

1. de Zeeuw, J. Gas Solid-Gas Chromatography. Encyclopedia of Separation Science, Academic Press, 2000.
2. Berezkin, V.; de Zeeuw, J. Capillary Adsorption Chromatography. Hüthig, 1996.
3. Ji, Z.; Major, R.; Guthrie, E. Porous Layer Open-Tubular Capillary Columns. J. Chromatogr. A, 1999, 842, 115–142.
4. de Zeeuw, J. et al. PoraPLOT Q: A Styrene-DVB Porous Layer Column. J. High Resolut. Chromatogr., 1988, 11(2), 162–167.
5. Van Loon, R. C1–C3 Hydrocarbon Analysis Using Agilent 490 GC. Agilent Tech. 2012.
6. Ji, Z.; Hutt, S. A New Bonded Porous Polymer PLOTU Column. J. Chromatogr. Sci., 2000, 38, 496–502.
7. Grob, K. Gum Phases for Capillary Columns. Chromatographia, 1977, 10, 625.
8. Grob, K.; Grob, G. Temperature Dependence of Polarity. Chromatographia, 1983, 17, 481–485.
9. Sandra, P. et al. Selectivity Tuning in GC. J. High Resolut. Chromatogr., 1985, 8, 782–798.
10. Freeman, R.; Kukla, D. Role of Selectivity in GC. J. Chromatogr. Sci., 1986, 24, 392–395.
11. Hinshaw Jr., J.; Ettre, L. Selectivity Tuning of Serially Connected Columns. Chromatographia, 1986, 21, 561–572.
12. Cao, M.; Liu, Z.; Zou, Y. PoraBOND Q Analysis of Oxygenates. Agilent Tech. 2012.
13. Hydrocarbons C1–C3. Agilent Tech. 2011.
14. Sulfur Compounds. Agilent Tech. 2011.
15. Halogenated Hydrocarbons. Agilent Tech. 2011.
16. Volatile Chlorinated Compounds. Agilent Tech. 2011.