<p><strong>Sample preparation is one of the most time-consuming steps in analytical workflows. Whether a lab is conducting forensic analyses, environmental testing, pharmaceutical development, or food safety analysis, researchers often face the challenge of concentrating samples before analysis. </strong><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://lcms.labrulez.com/article/5392"><strong>Nitrogen blowdown evaporation</strong></a><strong> has become a widely used technique for this purpose because it is simple, efficient, and adaptable to a wide range of solvents. When preparing samples for evaporation, factors that play a major role in efficiency include: needle gauge and flow rate. Optimization of these parameters could aid in developing more effective solvent evaporation methods.</strong></p><p>At Organomation, all <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://lcms.labrulez.com/products?category=362&amp;manufacturerItems=540&amp;page=2"><strong>blowdown evaporators</strong></a><strong> </strong>come with standard 4-inch, 19-gauge stainless steel needles. This size has proven to be effective for most laboratory applications as it balances evaporation speed with nitrogen consumption while also accommodating for common sample tube sizes. For labs that need to process higher sample volumes, 16-gauge and 14-gauge needles are also available. All needles are constructed from <strong>304 stainless steel</strong> and feature a luer lock fitting for easy attachment and removal from the nitrogen evaporator.</p><p>Traditionally, Organomation has recommended using a <strong>straight 19-gauge needle with a flow rate of 0.33 L/min per sample</strong>. This setting works well for most solvents, but how could changing these parameters aid in increasing evaporation efficiency?</p><ul><li>Could switching to a larger gauge needle accelerate evaporation?</li><li>Does increasing nitrogen flow rate always improve efficiency, or are there trade-offs?</li><li>Can needle design modifications reduce splashing while maintaining faster drying times?</li></ul><p>To investigate this, a series of <strong>controlled trials using methanol </strong>as a representative solvent were conducted. The study compared evaporation rates across different <strong>needle gauges, flow rates, and needle shapes </strong>to provide practical insights for laboratories seeking to optimize their sample preparation methods.</p><h3><strong>Needle Variations</strong></h3><p>While straight stainless-steel needles are the standard for nitrogen blowdown evaporation, alternative needle shapes may influence how nitrogen interacts with the solvent surface. Two main modifications were tested in this study:</p><ul><li><strong>Bent needles:</strong> Designed with either a short bend or a long bend near the end of the needle. The goal was to change the angle of nitrogen delivery to reduce splashing and improve solvent exposure.</li><li><strong>Pseudo-spiral needles: </strong>Created by adding two bends to the bottom quarter of 19-gauge needles, forming it into a spiral-like curve. These were intended to generate a more turbulent nitrogen flow pattern, potentially enhancing evaporation.</li></ul><p>Both designs were hypothesized to improve evaporation efficiency by concentrating gas flow while minimizing sample loss.</p><h3><strong>Experimental Design</strong></h3><p>The study evaluated<strong> how needle gauge, needle modifications, and nitrogen flow rate influence methanol evaporation </strong>under controlled conditions. All experiments were conducted at both room temperature and 63 °C, the recommended bath temperature for methanol.</p><h4><strong>Needle Gauge</strong></h4><ul><li><strong>Compared 19-, 16- and 14-gauge needle </strong>evaporation rates.&nbsp;</li><li>Used each needle’s recommended flow rate<ul><li><strong>19 ga: </strong>0.33 L/min</li><li><strong>16 ga: </strong>0.83 L/min</li><li><strong>14 ga: </strong>1.2 L/min</li></ul></li><li><strong>Purpose:</strong> determine whether larger needle diameters accelerate evaporation relative to the standard 19-gauge configuration.</li></ul><h4><strong>Needle Modifications</strong></h4><ul><li>Compared straight needles to bent and pseudo-spiral designs.&nbsp;</li><li>19- and 16-gauge needles were modified to have a short bend or long bend on the end of the needle.&nbsp;</li><li>Additional pseudo-spiral designs of the 19-gauge needles were created by bending the lower quarter of the needle into two spiral shapes.&nbsp;</li><li><strong>Purpose: </strong>evaluate whether altering gas flow direction could improve evaporation rates.</li></ul><h4><strong>Flow Rate Variation</strong></h4><ul><li>Increased the nitrogen flow rate past original recommendations.</li><li>Used the recommended flow rate for 16-gauge needles on the 19-gauge bent needles.</li><li>Used the recommended flow rate for 14-gauge needles on the 16-gauge bent needles.</li><li><strong>Purpose </strong>assess whether higher flow rates improve efficiency and if pairing higher flow rates with bent needles can reduce splashing.</li></ul><h3><strong>Results</strong></h3><h4><strong>Table 1. Different Needle Sizes - Methanol Evaporation Rate</strong></h4><p><img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/Organomation_The_Effect_of_Needle_Gauge_and_Flow_Rate_on_Evaporation_Rate_2_17a8479b99.jpg" alt="Organomation: The Effect of Needle Gauge and Flow Rate on Evaporation Rate" srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_Organomation_The_Effect_of_Needle_Gauge_and_Flow_Rate_on_Evaporation_Rate_2_17a8479b99.jpg 245w," sizes="100vw" width="1237" height="224"></p><p>The 14-gauge had the fastest evaporation rate, which was expected, as the standard flow rate for this size needle is the fastest. All needle sizes showed an increase in evaporation when using the heated water bath.</p><h4><strong>Table 2. 19-gauge Needle - Methanol Evaporation Rates</strong></h4><p><img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/Organomation_The_Effect_of_Needle_Gauge_and_Flow_Rate_on_Evaporation_Rate_3_01c176196e.jpg" alt="Organomation: The Effect of Needle Gauge and Flow Rate on Evaporation Rate" srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_Organomation_The_Effect_of_Needle_Gauge_and_Flow_Rate_on_Evaporation_Rate_3_01c176196e.jpg 245w," sizes="100vw" width="1473" height="346"></p><h4><strong>Table 3. 16-gauge Needle - Methanol Evaporation Rates</strong></h4><p><img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/Organomation_The_Effect_of_Needle_Gauge_and_Flow_Rate_on_Evaporation_Rate_4_ccd087323f.jpg" alt="Organomation: The Effect of Needle Gauge and Flow Rate on Evaporation Rate" srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_Organomation_The_Effect_of_Needle_Gauge_and_Flow_Rate_on_Evaporation_Rate_4_ccd087323f.jpg 245w," sizes="100vw" width="1473" height="222"></p><p>The most effective needle shape for both the 19- and 16-gauge needles, without increasing nitrogen flow rate, proved to be the standard straight needles for both room temperature and heated water bath evaporation. There was a significant jump observed in the heated evaporation, especially in the 16-gauge needles, with over 75% increase. When comparing the short and long bend needle configurations, there were no significant differences, as the style with faster evaporation varied between trials.</p><h4><strong>Table. 4 Methanol Evaporation Rates with Increased Flow Rates</strong></h4><p><img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/Organomation_The_Effect_of_Needle_Gauge_and_Flow_Rate_on_Evaporation_Rate_5_4c4ba4d1d8.jpg" alt="Organomation: The Effect of Needle Gauge and Flow Rate on Evaporation Rate" srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_Organomation_The_Effect_of_Needle_Gauge_and_Flow_Rate_on_Evaporation_Rate_5_4c4ba4d1d8.jpg 245w," sizes="100vw" width="1524" height="388"></p><p>At room temperature, bent needles showed only a slight improvement in evaporation rates compared to larger gauge straight needles at the same flow rates. However, under heated water bath conditions, needle gauge size played a more significant role. The larger-gauge straight needles achieved substantially higher evaporation rates than bent needles at comparable flow rates. This indicates that gauge size and flow rate have a stronger influence than needle shape when a heated water bath is used.</p><h3><strong>Key Takeaways</strong></h3><ul><li><strong>19-gauge needles remain reliable</strong>, especially at higher-than-standard flow rates.</li><li><strong>Flow rate is critical: </strong>higher flow rates generally increased evaporation speed, but also introduced challenges such as potential sample splashing</li><li><strong>Heated baths amplify overall performance: </strong>all needles performed significantly better at 63 °C water baths than at room temperature.</li><li><strong>Needle design benefits:</strong> bent needles showed potential in minimizing splashing. They allowed for increased flow rate and for the needle to be closer to the sample solution inside the tube.</li></ul><h3><strong>Applying These Findings in Your Lab</strong></h3><p>The results of this study show that needle gauge, flow rate, and needle design can all significantly influence evaporation speed. But how do these findings translate into day-to-day laboratory use?</p><ul><li><strong>Stick with the standard setup for most workflows</strong>. For routine sample preparation, the 19-gauge needle at 0.33 L/min remains an ideal choice, offering reliable performance while minimizing nitrogen consumption.</li><li>If your lab works with high-volume samples or needs quicker turnaround, switching to a 16-gauge needle and increasing the flow rate from 0.83 L/min to 1.2 L/min could provide significant time savings especially when paired with a heated water bath.</li><li>Faster nitrogen delivery can improve speed, but it also increases the risk of sample loss. Start by slowly increasing flow rate, and then adjust needle position above the solvent surface to control splashing.</li><li>Consider using bent or spiral needles for reducing splashing while maintaining strong evaporation rates. While not always necessary, they may be helpful in some scenarios.</li></ul><h3><strong>Conclusion</strong></h3><p>For most applications, the standard 19-gauge, 0.33 L/min setting remains sufficient. However, labs working with high-volume samples or those needing faster evaporation can benefit from using 16-gauge needles at higher flow rates, especially when paired with a heated water bath. Needle modifications can help address the issue of sample splashing, although they have shown to decrease the rate of evaporation when compared to the standard straight needles of the same gauge. Ultimately, the choice of needle gauge and flow rate should balance speed, safety, and solvent conservation. These results provide a framework for labs looking to optimize their evaporation setup.</p><blockquote><p><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.organomation.com/contact"><strong>Contact our team</strong></a> to discuss the best needle option and gas parameters for your application.</p></blockquote>

The Effect of Needle Gauge and Flow Rate on Evaporation Rate

<p><strong>Our Library never stops expanding. What are the most recent contributions to LabRulezGCMS Library in the week of 9th March 2026? Check out new documents from the field of the gas phase, especially GC and GC/MS techniques!</strong></p><blockquote><p><span style="font-size:20px;">👉 </span><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://gcms.labrulez.com/library"><span style="font-size:20px;"><strong>SEARCH THE LARGEST REPOSITORY OF DOCUMENTS ABOUT GCMS AND RELATED TECHNIQUES</strong></span></a></p></blockquote><blockquote><p><strong>👉 Need info about different analytical techniques?</strong> Peek into <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://lcms.labrulez.com/library"><strong>LabRulezLCMS</strong></a> or <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://icpms.labrulez.com/library"><strong>LabRulezICPMS</strong></a> libraries.</p></blockquote><p>This week we bring you application notes by <strong>Agilent Technologies, Shimadzu </strong>and <strong>Thermo Fisher Scientific</strong> and<strong> </strong>poster by<strong> MDCW / C³AL!</strong></p><h3><strong>1. Agilent Technologies: Quantitative Volatile PFAS Analysis in Textiles</strong></h3><ul><li>Application note</li><li><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://gcms.labrulez.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/an_tq_ms_volatile_pfas_textiles_8890_7010d_5994_8966en_agilent_cf4eb4ce36.pdf"><strong>Full PDF for download</strong></a></li></ul><p>Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a group of manmade chemicals widely used in textiles for their water, stain, and oil-repellent properties. For decades, the textile industry has been using PFAS for enhancing fabric durability and performance.<sup>1,2</sup> Scientific studies have raised concerns about its potential risks to&nbsp;health.<sup>3-5&nbsp;</sup></p><p>As awareness of these risks has intensified, regulations like REACH/POPs have introduced stringent limits and, in many cases, initiated phase-outs of PFAS usage.<sup>6</sup> Industry-driven standards, such as the ZDHC Manufacturing Restricted Substances List, OEKO-TEX Standard 100, AFIRM Restricted Substance List, and Bluesign standards and criteria complement regulations and reflect a global shift toward stricter compliance.<sup>7-10</sup> Analytical standards like EN 17681-1:2025 provide test methods for PFAS in textiles.11 To keep pace with evolving regulations and industry initiatives, robust and highly sensitive analytical methods are essential for accurate PFAS detection and quantification in complex textile matrices. This study demonstrates the ability of the Agilent 8890 GC coupled with the Agilent&nbsp;7010D GC/TQ system to detect and quantify more than 30 volatile PFAS analytes across various textile matrices, with comprehensive evaluation of sensitivity, accuracy, and precision.</p><h4><strong>Experimental</strong></h4><p>Instrumentation An<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://gcms.labrulez.com/library?mainauthorItems=10&amp;search=8890"><strong> 8890 GC</strong></a> with a <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://gcms.labrulez.com/library?mainauthorItems=10&amp;search=7010D"><strong>7010D GC/TQ</strong></a> equipped with an HES 2.0 ion source was used for this analysis. An Agilent MMI inlet and splitless liner (part number 5190-2293) were used, and chromatographic separation was performed using an Agilent J&amp;W DB-624 column, 30 m × 0.25 mm, 1.40 μm (part number 122-1334UI). The instrument setup is shown in Figure 1. The acquisition method for 34 native PFAS and four internal mix standards (ISTD), including GC condition and TQ parameters, were described in a previous application note.<sup>12</sup></p><h4><strong>Sample analysis</strong></h4><p>PFAS are widely used in textile materials due to their exceptional resistance to heat, water, and oil.1,2,13 In this study, PFAS compounds—specifically 8:2 FTOH and 10:2&nbsp;FTOH, were detected above MDLs in sample waterproof shorts, as shown in Figure 5. However, the concentrations of these two compounds remained within the formulation limits set by ZDHC. Although FTOHs are not explicitly listed as individual compounds under the EU POPs regulation, they fall under restrictions applied to related substances such as PFOA, PFCA, and PFHxA. These results demonstrate that the developed method enables accurate and reliable detection of PFAS in apparel products, providing valuable data to support regulatory bodies in risk management and the establishment of appropriate limits.</p><h4><strong>Conclusion&nbsp;</strong></h4><p>An accurate and robust method was developed using an Agilent 8890 GC coupled with an Agilent 7010D GC/TQ system for the analysis of volatile PFAS in textiles, following the established analytical guidelines. The workflow delivered excellent performance, achieving sub-ppb MDLs for all targets and LOQs of 10&nbsp;µg/kg for more than 80% of compounds. These results confirm high extraction efficiency and exceptional sensitivity for PFAS in textile matrices. Recovery precision (%RSD) remained within 20% across sample preparations, underscoring method reproducibility and suitability for routine, high-throughput PFAS analysis in materials such as textiles</p><h3><strong>2. MDCW / C³AL: Microplastics as Vectors of Organic Contaminants on Southern California Beaches: A TD/Py-GC×CG-TOFMS Study</strong></h3><ul><li>Poster</li><li><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://gcms.labrulez.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/P_18_Nathan_Venegas_C3_AL_2db714dd9b.pdf"><strong>Full PDF for download</strong></a></li></ul><p>Microplastics are increasingly recognized as widespread environmental pollutants that can act as carriers of organic contaminants in marine ecosystems. In this study, researchers from California State University, Los Angeles investigated microplastics collected from several Southern California locations—including Santa Monica State Beach, Doheny State Beach, the Los Angeles River, and the Salton Sea—to better understand the types of organic compounds associated with these particles. The analysis was performed using thermal desorption/pyrolysis comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography coupled with time-of-flight mass spectrometry (<strong>TD/Py-</strong><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://gcms.labrulez.com/products/1097"><strong>GC×GC-TOFMS</strong></a>), a powerful analytical approach for characterizing complex mixtures of organic compounds.</p><p>The results revealed a wide range of organic compounds adsorbed onto microplastic particles, including alkanes, alkenes, alcohols, aromatic and polyaromatic compounds, as well as nitrogen- and sulfur-containing species. Significant variability in contaminant profiles was observed across sampling sites, reflecting differences in local pollution sources and environmental conditions. For example, Santa Monica State Beach samples showed the highest total number of detected compounds, while other sites exhibited distinct chemical signatures linked to their surrounding environments.</p><p>Overall, the study highlights the important role microplastics can play as vectors for transporting organic contaminants in aquatic environments. The findings demonstrate the usefulness of advanced GC×GC-TOFMS techniques for detailed characterization of contaminants associated with microplastics and contribute to a better understanding of their environmental impact and potential risks to marine ecosystems.</p><h3><strong>3. Shimadzu: Effectiveness of the MonoTrap Collection Method for VOC Analysis in Exhaled Breath Using GC-MS</strong></h3><ul><li>Application note</li><li><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://gcms.labrulez.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/an_01_01140_en_076528bbaa.pdf"><strong>Full PDF for download</strong></a></li></ul><h5><strong>User Benefits</strong></h5><ul><li>Comprehensive analysis of VOCs from non-invasive breath samples is feasible with this system.</li><li>No equipment such as sampling pumps is required, enabling breath collection in remote locations.</li><li>Internal standards support consistent comparison of analytical results across sample groups.</li></ul><p>Exhaled breath is a non-invasive sample that is easy to collect and imposes minimal burden on subjects. It is known to contain volatile organic compounds (VOCs) that reflect metabolic states and disease conditions within the body. More than 1,000 types of VOCs exist in breath, and numerous studies have reported the search for breath markers across various disease areas, including inflammatory diseases¹) , cancer²) , and metabolic disorders³) . Consequently, extensive research is being conducted in the field of breathomics.&nbsp;</p><p>While GC-MS is widely used for comprehensive and highly sensitive analysis of trace components in breath, differences in pretreatment steps, such as sample collection, affect measurement results. Therefore, optimizing analytical protocols to enhance reproducibility and consistency is essential.&nbsp;</p><p>This Application Note compares breath collection methods using Tenax tubes and MonoTrap using a thermal desorption-GC-MS system (Fig. 1) to determine the optimal collection method. Additionally, breath samples from healthy subjects and subjects with inflammatory conditions were analyzed using this analytical system to evaluate the usefulness of measuring and comparing VOC profiles with this approach.</p><h4><strong>Analytical Conditions</strong></h4><p>After collection, MonoTrap and Tenax collection tubes were thermally desorbed using the<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://gcms.labrulez.com/library?mainauthorItems=1&amp;search=TD-30R"><strong> TD-30R thermal desorption</strong></a> device and analyzed by GC-MS (<a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://gcms.labrulez.com/library?mainauthorItems=1&amp;search=GCMS-QP2020+NX"><strong>GCMS-QP2020 NX</strong></a>). Toluene-d8 was added as an internal standard to confirm analytical stability. Detailed analytical conditions are shown in Table 1.</p><h4><strong>Summary</strong></h4><p>This application news evaluated a breath VOC analysis system using thermal desorption–GC–MS with MonoTrap. MonoTrap detected a larger number of VOCs in exhaled breath from healthy subjects compared with the conventional Tenax tube method. Optimization of collection conditions indicated that static collection using one MonoTrap for 24 h is a practical and efficient protocol. Under these conditions, differences in VOC profiles were observed between healthy subjects and subjects with inflammatory conditions. MonoTrap enables breath collection without sampling pumps, and collected samples can be easily stored and transported, making the method suitable for remote sampling. Overall, this system demonstrated the capability for comprehensive VOC profiling of exhaled breath.</p><h3><strong>4. Thermo Fisher Scientific : Rapid analysis of organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) in soil samples using the EXTREVA ASE accelerated solvent extractor</strong></h3><ul><li>Application note</li><li><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://gcms.labrulez.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/an_004311_ic_extreva_ocp_soil_testing_an004311_na_en_81a2272b67.pdf"><strong>Full PDF for download</strong></a></li></ul><p>Organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) are persistent environmental contaminants historically used to control pests in agriculture and other applications. Due to their long-term stability and toxicity, many OCPs have been banned or strictly regulated following international agreements such as the Stockholm Convention. Nevertheless, these compounds can remain in environmental matrices like soil for long periods, making reliable analytical methods essential for environmental monitoring. This application note describes a workflow for the determination of OCPs in soil samples using the Thermo Scientific EXTREVA ASE accelerated solvent extraction system, designed to automate and streamline the traditionally labor-intensive sample preparation process.</p><h4><strong>Experimental approach</strong></h4><p>Soil samples were prepared by mixing clean loamy soil with diatomaceous earth to improve extraction efficiency and prevent sample compaction. The samples were extracted using the <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://gcms.labrulez.com/library?mainauthorItems=3&amp;search=EXTREVA+ASE"><strong>EXTREVA ASE</strong></a> system with an acetone–hexane solvent mixture under controlled temperature and pressure conditions. The system integrates gas-assisted accelerated solvent extraction with automated solvent evaporation, enabling simultaneous extraction of multiple samples with minimal operator intervention. After extraction and concentration to a defined final volume, the analytes were quantified using gas chromatography with electron capture detection (GC-ECD). Calibration standards were prepared across a concentration range of 0.01–0.2 µg/mL to ensure accurate quantification of 20 target OCP compounds.</p><h4><strong>Results and performance</strong></h4><p>The developed workflow demonstrated excellent analytical performance. All target pesticides were well separated in the GC-ECD analysis with a total run time of less than 27 minutes. Extraction recoveries for soil samples fortified at 250 µg/kg ranged between 80% and 121%, meeting the US EPA recommended acceptance criteria of 70–130%. Reproducibility was also strong, with relative standard deviations below 20% for all analytes. Carryover between samples remained very low (&lt;0.6%), indicating effective rinsing and minimal cross-contamination. Additional tests confirmed that thermally sensitive compounds such as endrin and DDT showed minimal degradation during extraction.</p><h4><strong>Conclusion</strong></h4><p>The EXTREVA ASE system provides a fast and highly automated workflow for the determination of organochlorine pesticides in soil samples. By integrating extraction, solvent evaporation, and endpoint volume control in a single instrument, the system reduces manual handling, lowers solvent consumption, and significantly shortens sample preparation time. The method enables reliable determination of 20 OCPs with high recovery, low carryover, and excellent reproducibility, supporting rapid environmental monitoring workflows and compliance with established US EPA analytical methods.</p>

News from LabRulezGCMS Library - Week 11, 2026

<p><strong>How can we make the production of supercapacitors for energy storage more sustainable and replace the traditionally used but toxic solvent NMP (N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone)? According to scientists from CATRIN at Palacký University, the “green” solvents Cyrene and Tamisolve may be a suitable alternative. In an article published in the </strong><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1385894725130696?via%3Dihub#s0060"><i><strong>Chemical Engineering Journal</strong></i></a><strong>, they have shown that these solvents can be used in production without reducing the performance of the equipment. They thus offer a path to the next generation of sustainable, high-performance supercapacitors for industrial use.</strong></p><p>“<i>Supercapacitors are one of the modern technologies for storing electric energy. As sustainable energy storage becomes more prominent, it is essential to replace the hazardous solvents used in the production of supercapacitor electrodes. Our study presents Cyrene and Tamisolve as environmentally friendly alternatives to the toxic solvent NMP, which is traditionally used in production. Both tested solvents enabled the preparation of electrodes that maintain high electrochemical performance while improving environmental compatibility</i>,” said <strong>Michal Otyepka</strong>, <strong>corresponding author</strong> of the article.</p><p>The electrodes were prepared using nitrogen-doped graphene as the active material in combination with two types of binders. The first was a common fluorinated binder (PVDF), which is widely used in industry, including in the manufacturing of battery electrodes. The researchers also tested a fluorine-free binder (PVP), which has a lower environmental impact and is more soluble in environmentally friendly solvents. Using various combinations, they monitored the performance and stability of the electrodes as well as their mechanical resistance.</p><p><img src="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/CATRIN_Vedci_z_CATRIN_nabizeji_zelenejsi_cestu_pro_vyrobu_superkondenzatoru_443775296a.jpg" alt="CATRIN: CATRIN researchers offer a “greener” way to make supercapacitors" srcset="https://storage.googleapis.com/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/thumbnail_CATRIN_Vedci_z_CATRIN_nabizeji_zelenejsi_cestu_pro_vyrobu_superkondenzatoru_443775296a.jpg 245w," sizes="100vw" width="1536" height="768"></p><p>“<i>The results showed that not only can the alternative solvents Cyrene and Tamisolve fully replace the toxic solvent NMP, but also that the prepared electrodes have the necessary mechanical properties. Their compatibility with both fluorinated PVDF and non-fluorinated PVP binders, together with excellent layer uniformity and electrochemical stability, makes them ideal for use in scalable applications. This is essential for industrial production,</i>” said the publication’s <strong>first author, Ivan Dědek</strong>.</p><p>Cyrene, or dihydrolevoglucosenone, is obtained from renewable biomass sources such as cellulose. Tamisolve (N-butyl-2-pyrrolidone) is a substance related to the commonly used NMP, but is more gentle on human health and the environment.</p><p>Supercapacitor research has been a priority at CATRIN for almost ten years. In addition to developing new active materials, such as the successful nitrogen-doped graphene (SC-GN3), it also focuses on environmentally friendly and industrially feasible manufacturing processes. The replacement of toxic NMP with the “greener” solvents Cyrene and Tamisolve confirms that more sustainable production can go hand in hand with high performance and represents an important step towards industrial implementation.</p><blockquote><h4><strong>The original article</strong></h4><h4><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1385894725130696?via%3Dihub#s0060"><strong>Toward transitioning to green and sustainable supercapacitors</strong></a></h4><p>Ivan Dědek, Vojtěch Kupka, Veronika Šedajová, Petr Jakubec, Matěj Navrátil, Michal Otyepka&nbsp;</p><p>Chemical Engineering Journal, 529, 2026, 172220</p><p><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2025.172220">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2025.172220</a></p><h6>licensed under <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><strong>CC-BY 4.0</strong></a></h6></blockquote><h4><strong>Abstract</strong></h4><p>The rapid advancement of supercapacitor technologies has intensified the demand for sustainable electrode fabrication methods that minimize environmental impact. A major challenge arises from the extensive use of the toxic solvent N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP), which is subject to increasingly stringent regulatory restrictions. We demonstrate that NMP can be effectively replaced with two green solvents, dihydrolevoglucosenone (Cyrene) and N-butyl-2-pyrrolidone (Tamisolve), without compromising electrochemical performance. Electrode formulations were prepared using nitrogen-doped graphene as the active material, in combination with either polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF), a widely employed fluorinated binder, or polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), a non-fluorinated alternative with improved environmental profile. Optimized coatings exhibited high mass loadings exceeding 6 mg cm−2 while maintaining strong adhesion to current collectors, an often overlooked yet critical parameter for scalable manufacturing. Electrochemical testing revealed that PVDF in Cyrene delivered an energy density of 66.6 Wh kg−1 at a power density of 1.85 kW kg−1, with excellent cycling stability, retaining 91 % of capacitance after 100,000 cycles. PVP in Cyrene provided a more environmentally benign alternative, achieving an energy density of 64.2 Wh kg−1 at 1.80 kW kg−1, with 78 % capacitance retention after 100,000 cycles, thereby highlighting the trade-off between performance and sustainability.</p>

CATRIN researchers offer a “greener” way to make supercapacitors

Article

Product

Application

Scientific article

Science and research

Video

Poster

The Czech Advanced Technology and Research Institute (CATRIN) at Palacký University is a cutting-edge scientific hub dedicated to advancing research in the fields of nanotechnology, biotechnology, and biomedicine. At its core, CATRIN boasts outstanding scientific teams, featuring international researchers. We emphasize interdisciplinarity, foster global collaborations, and work to translate our research findings into practical applications.

CATRIN

Everything from the world of analytical chemistry in one place. We connect people in solving their problems. At Labrulez you will find all the necessary information easily, quickly and clearly. Stop searching and start finding.

LabRulez

Organomation, founded in 1959, designs and manufactures high-quality nitrogen evaporators and extraction systems. Known for innovation and durability, their lab instruments are used globally for efficient sample preparation with strong customer support.

Organomation

Agilent Technologies

LECO

Thermo Fisher Scientific

Wasson-ECE Instrumentation

C&EN

SciY/Mestrelab Research

<p><strong>Agilent Raman spectrometers use proprietary spatially offset Raman spectroscopy (SORS) and transmission Raman spectroscopy (TRS) in pharmaceutical raw material verification and quality control.&nbsp;</strong></p><p>SORS enables our Raman spectrometers to analyze through containers and opaque barriers, from helping first responders identify the contents of suspect packages, to high-throughput raw material identification inside unopened packaging at pharmaceutical quality control. TRS nondestructively screens whole tablets and capsules in seconds, for rapid content uniformity and polymorph analysis in pharma QC and formulation development</p><blockquote><p><strong>Presenter: </strong>Yanqia Wang, PhD (Application Engineer, Molecular Spectroscopy, Agilent Technologies, Inc.)</p><p>Dr. Yanqia Wang started working for Agilent Technologies Inc. as a FTIR application Engineer in 2013, providing pre-&amp;post-sale application support. The products he covers from Bench-top FTIR microscopes to various Mobile FTIR spectrometers. Dr. Wang received his PhD of analytical chemistry from Duke University in 2004, doing dynamic IR spectroscopy research. Then he joined Fitzpatrick Center for Photonics at Duke University, doing Tissue Raman spectrometer instrumentation. Since 2007, Dr. Wang worked for Avery Dennison Corp. as a spectroscopist, providing molecular analytical support to the research &amp; development.</p></blockquote><p>&nbsp;</p>

Agilent Technologies: Raman Spectroscopy for Pharmaceutical Applications

Raman Spectroscopy for Pharmaceutical Applications

Agilent Raman spectrometers use proprietary SORS and TRS in pharmaceutical raw material verification and quality control

<div><div><div><div><div><div><article><div><div><div><div><div><div><p>Explore best practices for sample capture, transport, and introduction to ensure accuracy, integrity, and reliability in analytical workflows and laboratory applications.</p></div></div></div></div></div></div></article><div>&nbsp;</div></div></div></div></div></div></div><blockquote><p><strong>Presenter:</strong> John Wasson</p><p>John Wasson has over 40 years of experience in Gas Chromatography and Chemical Instrumentation. He is President of Wasson-ECE Instrumentation, Inc.</p></blockquote>

Wasson-ECE Instrumentation: Free Webinar Series

Sample Capture, Transport and Introduction

Explore best practices for sample capture, transport, and introduction to ensure accuracy, integrity, and reliability in analytical workflows.

<p><strong>Sustainable Aviation Fuels (SAF) are pivotal in reducing the carbon footprint of aviation, with diverse feedstocks and production routes under active development. Fuel quality and stability must be maintained throughout the process to meet ASTM and ICAO specifications and ensure safe engine performance.</strong></p><p>This session will focus on the role of gas chromatography (GC) and liquid chromatography (LC) in assessing SAF composition. Key areas include hydrocarbon profiling, measurement of aromatics, and detection of oxygenates such as FAME that influence fuel behavior. Case examples will show how analytical workflows support feedstock evaluation, refining optimization, and blend certification.</p><p>By linking analytical control to performance and safety, the session demonstrates how chromatography ensures SAF meets the stringent requirements of aviation applications.</p><blockquote><p><strong>Presenter:&nbsp;</strong> Naoto Hashikita (Product Specialist, Agilent Technologies, Japan)</p><p>Naoto joined Agilent in 2018 as a technical sales specialist specializing in GC and GC/MS. He holds a master’s degree from the University of Tokyo in the field of fuel cells. He has supported customers in the energy and chemical industries, with a focus on promoting green analytical solutions. His motto is: "Contributing to a carbon-neutral society through analytical instruments."</p></blockquote>

Agilent Technologies: Energy Transition Webinar Series

Sustainable Aviation Fuels: Path to Greener Skies

Webinar on Agilent GC/LC for Sustainable Aviation Fuels—analyze composition, certify blends, and ensure compliance with ASTM and ICAO standards.

<p><strong>Plastic waste is a growing environmental and industrial challenge, and chemical recycling through pyrolysis is emerging as a pathway to circularity. By converting mixed or contaminated plastics into liquid hydrocarbons, pyrolysis enables their reuse as feedstocks for fuels and new materials. Ensuring process efficiency and product quality requires robust analytical control.</strong></p><p>This session will outline how gas chromatography (GC) solutions support pyrolysis workflows. Topics include characterization of pyrolysis oils, quantification of hydrocarbon fractions, and detection of oxygenates, sulfur, and other contaminants that affect downstream refining. Examples will highlight how analytical testing enables consistent product streams suitable for integration into petrochemical and fuel supply chains.</p><p>By linking process monitoring with circular economy goals, the session will demonstrate how GC workflows help advance scalable solutions for plastic waste conversion.</p><blockquote><p><strong>Presenter: Ms. Phoebe Phan </strong>(<span>Business Development Manager, Agilent Technologies, Singapore)</span></p><p><span>Phoebe joined Agilent Technologies in 2020 as Business Development Manager, and currently is Market Development Specialist focusing on alternative energy segment. Her educational background includes a BS in Applied Chemistry.</span></p></blockquote>

Plastic Circularity: Pyrolysis and Workflow Solutions

This session will outline how gas chromatography (GC) solutions support pyrolysis workflows.

<div><div container-id="cq-colctrl-lt0" comp-id="A1"><div><p><strong>Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) remain one of the most pressing environmental challenges of our time. Their structural diversity, persistence, and presence across complex environmental matrices make them particularly difficult to monitor. Despite their relatively high molecular masses, many PFAS possess sufficient volatility to be analysed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS), opening new possibilities for both targeted and non-targeted screening.</strong></p><p>In this webinar, Prof. Flavio Franchinaand Marco De Poli (University of Ferrara) will present a dual analytical strategy combining one-dimensional GC and comprehensive two-dimensional GC (GC×GC) coupled with time-of-flight mass spectrometry (TOFMS). By applying multiple ionisation modes—including EI, PCI, and NCI—the workflow enables improved sensitivity and selectivity across different PFAS families.</p><p>A novel dynamic headspace (DHS)–thermal desorption (TD) approach for water samples will also be introduced, providing a robust platform for the detection, characterisation, and quantification of semi-volatile PFAS. Beyond the targeted analysis of known PFAS subclasses, the power of GC×GC-TOFMS allows the identification of other relevant contaminants, making it an indispensable tool for advancing environmental monitoring.</p><p>Join us to discover how these advanced analytical strategies can help you go beyond the target in addressing PFAS contamination and safeguarding our essential resources of air, water, and soil.</p><blockquote><p><strong>Presenter: </strong>Flavio Antonio Franchina (Associate Professor, University of Ferrara)</p><p><strong>Presenter:&nbsp;</strong>Marco De Poli (PhD Student, University of Ferrara)</p></blockquote></div></div></div>

LECO: Beyond the Target: Analytical Strategies for the Non-Targeted Screening of Per- and Poly-Fluorinated Substances by GC-TOFMS

Beyond the Target: Analytical Strategies for the Non-Targeted Screening of Per- and Poly-Fluorinated Substances by GC-TOFMS

 Prof. Flavio will present a dual analytical strategy combining one-dimensional GC and comprehensive two-dimensional GC (GC×GC) coupled with TOFMS.

Non-Targeted PFAS Screening by GC-TOFMS

<div><div container-id="cq-colctrl-lt0" comp-id="A1"><div><p><strong>Join us for an insightful webinar designed for scientists and quality professionals working in protein synthesis and analysis. Dr. Jan Wuelfken will showcase how to accelerate your workflows and ensure compliance with cutting-edge analytical tools.</strong></p><h4><strong>Key learning objectives:</strong></h4><ul><li>Learn how Vaya Raman Spectroscopy enables rapid, non-destructive raw material identification to support efficient and compliant protein synthesis workflows.</li><li>Discover how the Cary 3500 UV-Vis spectrophotometer delivers high-throughput, precise protein quantification and characterization.</li><li>Gain practical insights into streamlining your analytical processes from raw materials to final protein products.</li></ul><h4><strong>Who should attend?</strong></h4><p>This webinar is tailored for professionals involved in protein synthesis and analysis, including analytical scientists, QC specialists, lab technicians, and researchers in biopharma and biotech. If you're looking to enhance raw material verification and streamline protein quantification workflows, this webinar will serve your needs.</p><blockquote><p><strong>Presenter:</strong> Jan Wülfken (Product Specialist, Raman Spectroscopy, Agilent Technologies)</p><p>Jan Wulfken graduated from the University of Hamburg in 1997, first with a diploma thesis about NMR-based conformation analysis of an antimicrobial peptide, and again in 2001 with his PhD thesis about developing CD4-binding peptides as inhibitors for HIV infection. He joined Varian, inc. in 2001 as a sales representative for molecular spectroscopy. With the acquisition of Varian in 2010 by Agilent, he took over the position of a product specialist for molecular spectroscopy in the Agilent International Distributor Organization (IDO). Today, his responsibility is the full Agilent molecular spectroscopy portfolio, including UV-Vis, UV-Vis/NIR, fluorescence, FTIR, and Raman spectroscopy, in IDO.</p></blockquote></div></div></div>

Agilent Technologies: Optimizing Biomolecular Quality Control - Addressing Manufacturing and Residue Analysis Challenges

UV-VIS and Raman Spectroscopy in BioPharma Protein Analysis

Boost protein analysis efficiency with Agilent’s Raman and UV-Vis tools. Learn to accelerate synthesis workflows and enhance compliance in your lab.

<div><div container-id="cq-colctrl-lt0" comp-id="A1"><div><p><strong>Join Agilent for an insightful webinar focused on quality control strategies for the release testing of biopharmaceutical drugs in alignment with USP protocols. Three expert speakers will explore critical analytical techniques: (U)HPLC for detecting and characterizing aggregate formation, ICP-MS for quantifying metal impurities, and GC/MS for analyzing residual solvents.&nbsp;</strong></p><h4><strong>Key learning objectives:</strong></h4><ul><li>This session will provide practical guidance and innovative solutions to ensure compliance and product safety in Biopharma QC workflows.</li></ul><h4><strong>Who should attend?</strong></h4><p>Whether you're an analytical scientist, technician, researcher, or quality control specialist, this webinar is designed to empower you with practical insights and cutting-edge techniques. Discover how to streamline your workflows, boost analytical precision, and ensure regulatory compliance. Don’t miss this opportunity to explore integrated solutions that help bring biopharmaceutical products to market—safely, efficiently, and confidently.</p><blockquote><p><strong>Presenter:</strong> Hans Christian Høiberg (HPLC Product Specialist, Agilent Technologies)</p><p>Hans Høibergis a product specialist in liquid chromatography at Agilent and has been working here for the past 6 years. He holds a PhD in Nanoscience from Aarhus University, with a focus on biopharmaceuticals. Hans is passionate about the characterization of biologicals, and is a part of Agilent’s European Biopharma focus team.</p><p><strong>Presenter: </strong>Raimund Wahlen (Atomic Spectroscopy Product Specialist, Agilent Technologies)</p><p>Raimund Wahlen is the atomic spectroscopy product specialist for Agilent Technologies in the UK and Ireland and is actively involved in delivering technology-based solutions to the Li-ion battery market. Before joining Agilent in 2009, Raimund was a self-employed training consultant delivering ICP-MS applications training across EMEA, North America and South Africa. Between 1999 and 2003, Raimund worked as a Research Specialist at LGC Ltd in Teddington, UK with the focus of developing high-accuracy methods for analysis of organometallic species by LC, GC, and ICP-MS, which were used for the certification of new organometallic speciation reference materials.</p><p><strong>Presenter: </strong>Dr. Marion Schäffer (Product Specialist, GC and GC/MS, Agilent)</p><p>Marion Schäffer works as a product specialist for gas chromatography/mass spectrometry at Agilent Technologies in Germany. She has +15years of experience in analytical chemistry, joining Agilent in 2014 as an application engineer for GC/MS.</p></blockquote></div></div></div>

Quality Control in Focus: USP-Aligned Testing for Biopharmaceuticals

Join us for webinar focused on quality control strategies for the release testing of biopharmaceutical drugs in alignment with USP protocols. 

USP-Aligned Testing for Biopharmaceuticals

<div><div container-id="cq-colctrl-lt0" comp-id="A1"><div><p><strong>Join us for the "Chromeleon Processing Method Masterclass", where we will delve into the intricacies of integration, calibration, and beyond. This webinar is designed for professionals looking to enhance their skills and knowledge in Thermo Scientific Chromeleon software.</strong></p><h4><strong>Topics:</strong></h4><ul><li><strong>Processing method:</strong> Learn how to create, edit, and manage tabs and access with the Chromeleon Processing Method.</li><li><strong>Detection: </strong>Explore integration options beyond Cobra to optimize your detection processes.</li><li><strong>Component table:</strong> Discover tools for creating and managing your component table effectively.</li><li><strong>Calibration: </strong>Understand how to set up, adjust, and manage calibrations for accurate results.</li><li><strong>Subtraction:</strong> Get insights into background subtraction options and setup.<br>Peak tracking: Utilize 3D data to automatically name and track peaks with precision.</li></ul><h4><strong>Why Attend:</strong></h4><ul><li>This masterclass will provide you with comprehensive knowledge and practical skills to leverage Chromeleon software for your analytical needs. Whether you are new to Chromeleon CDS or looking to refine your expertise, this webinar will offer valuable insights and techniques to improve your workflows.</li></ul><p><i>Cannot attend the live broadcast?&nbsp;</i></p><p><i>Please register anyway, and we will automatically send you the link to the recording.</i></p><blockquote><p><strong>Presenter: </strong>Darren Barrington-Light (Senior Manager, Product Marketing, Thermo Fisher Scientific)</p><p>Darren Barrington-Light’s background includes over 25 years of experience in the field of analytical chemistry, chromatography hardware and computer software. Having worked in chromatography throughout his career, Darren has a unique understanding of the requirements of organizations that rely on chromatography data to manage their day to day operations. As capabilities have advanced, he has worked with clients across multiple industries to show them how software solutions can help them to improve their day to day operations and drive fast, informed decisions.</p></blockquote></div></div></div>

Thermo Fisher Scientific: Chromeleon Processing Method Masterclass - From Integration to Calibration and Beyond

Chromeleon Processing Method Masterclass - From Integration to Calibration and Beyond

Join us for Chromeleon Processing Method Masterclass, where we will delve into the intricacies of integration, calibration etc.

Chromeleon Processing Method Masterclass

<p><strong>Content uniformity and assay are critical quality attributes for solid oral dosage forms, yet traditional wet chemistry methods are time consuming and destructive. In this webinar, we’ll showcase the automated SciYbotic Tablet Testing (TT) system that enables faster, more accurate non-destructive testing for tablet release.</strong></p><p>The system showcases a fully automated workflow for tablet quality testing that integrates robotic handling, 3D vision, and spectroscopic analysis with the Bruker Multi Purpose Analyzer (MPA) to eliminate manual variability and enhance precision. By aligning with Process Analytical Technology (PAT) and Pharma 4.0 goals, the SciYbotic TT enables real-time predictions of API content. It supports efficient, compliant tablet release, demonstrating the transformative impact of automation in pharmaceutical manufacturing.</p><h4><strong>Learning Points</strong></h4><ul><li>You’ll discover how the SciYbotic Tablet Testing (TT) system enables non-destructive, real-time analysis of content uniformity and assay.&nbsp;</li><li>Explore the integration of robotic handling, 3D vision, and spectroscopic analysis by Bruker MPA in a fully automated workflow.&nbsp;</li><li>Learn how the system aligns with PAT and Pharma 4.0 initiatives.&nbsp;</li><li>See how automation enhances precision, compliance, and efficiency in tablet release processes.&nbsp;</li></ul><h4><strong>Who should attend</strong></h4><ul><li>Oral Solid Dose (OSD) manufacturing professionals seeking to modernize quality control.&nbsp;</li><li>Quality assurance and quality control specialists focused on improving tablet release workflows.&nbsp;</li><li>Senior managers, process engineers and automation leads exploring Pharma 4.0 solutions and technology transfer.&nbsp;</li><li>PAT and advanced control strategy experts and leaders.&nbsp;</li></ul><blockquote><p><strong>Presenter:</strong> Andrew Anderson (Consultant)</p><p>Andrew Anderson is a strategic pharma leader with extensive expertise in small molecule development and advanced analytical technologies. At GSK and Johnson &amp; Johnson, he led the technology strategy, roadmaps, automation, and Process Analytical Technology (PAT) across R&amp;D and commercial operations. Recognized for forging impactful government, academic, and cross-pharma partnerships, Andrew promotes innovation through cross-functional leadership and comprehensive tech implementation, delivering measurable improvements in efficiency, data integrity, and resource optimization.</p><p><strong>Presenter: </strong>Matt Jones (Account Manager, SciY)</p><p>Matt Jones is a seasoned automation specialist with over 20 years of experience delivering engineered solutions across highly regulated sectors, including pharmaceuticals, biotechnology, and advanced manufacturing. His work frequently involves the application of process analytical technology (PAT) within custom automation systems designed to meet stringent industry standards.<br>With a strong foundation in vision systems and robotics engineering, Matt has deep expertise in machine integration, control architecture, and data-driven process optimization. He excels at translating complex requirements into scalable, compliant automation platforms that enhance throughput, quality, and traceability.</p><p><strong>Presenter: </strong>Holger Lutz (Business Unit Manager Chemistry, Pharma &amp; Process Applied Spectroscopy - Bruker Optics GmbH &amp; Co. KG)</p><p>PhD in Chemistry at University of Karlsruhe, Germany, focus on Analytical Chemistry. Starting 2002 as a NIR sales person at Bruker Optics. In 2007, took over the sales responsibility of PAT solutions in Germany. In parallel, built up a global sales and support infrastructure for PAT. Since 2018, is business unit manager of the newly created business unit “Chemistry, Pharma &amp; Process”. In this function, is involved in the product management of the new PAT analyzers and related software, supports the global sales &amp; application team, and is the main contact for Key Accounts.</p></blockquote>

SciY: Tablet Release Reinvented: Robotics, Vision, and Spectral Intelligence

Tablet Release Reinvented: Robotics, Vision, and Spectral Intelligence

Learn how automated robotic, vision, and spectroscopic workflows streamline non-destructive tablet testing, compliance, and Pharma 4.0 readiness.

Tablet Release Reinvented with Robotics and Spectral AI

<p><strong>Product mix-ups don’t announce themselves, but their consequences do. Whether it’s a misidentified raw material, a wrong line transfer, or a product transmix during pipeline transport, these errors can trigger scrapped batches, costly reprocessing, unplanned downtime, hazardous reactions, and serious safety risks. Traditional lab testing often catches these issues too late, after the damage is done.</strong></p><p>In this mini course, experts from HF Sinclair and Metrohm USA will show how inline Raman spectroscopy reduces product identification time from minutes to seconds, delivering measurable ROI and protecting product integrity. Throughout the presentation, you’ll be able to submit your questions, which will be answered during the live Q&amp;A.</p><p>All participants will have the opportunity to receive a certificate of participation. Join us to gain practical strategies and real-world insights. Register today and take the first step toward eliminating costly mix-ups for good.</p><h4><strong>Key Learning Objectives:</strong></h4><ul><li><strong>Understand the hidden risks of product mix-ups:</strong> Learn how errors during unloading, manufacturing, or transport—such as misidentified materials or wrong line transfers—can lead to safety incidents, quality failures, and costly downtime.</li><li><strong>Discover the limitations of traditional lab testing: </strong>See why lab-based methods often catch problems too late, and how inline Raman spectroscopy enables faster, more proactive detection—before consequences escalate.</li><li><strong>Identify where inline Raman fits in your operations:</strong> Whether you're in chemicals, pharma, energy, or manufacturing, learn how this technology supports product integrity, safety compliance, and cost control across your process streams.</li></ul><h4><strong>Who Should Attend:</strong></h4><ul><li><strong>Production and operations leaders</strong> – including Production Managers, Plant Managers and Operational Managers</li><li><strong>Technical and quality experts </strong>– such as Process Engineers, Quality Control Specialists and Automation &amp; Control Engineers</li><li><strong>Safety and compliance professionals</strong> – including EHS Managers, Safety Officers and Compliance Specialists</li><li><strong>Strategic decision-makers</strong> – such as Project Leads and Technical Stakeholders</li></ul><blockquote><p><strong>Presenter: </strong>Kyle Rasmussen (Quality Assurance Lead, HFSinclair Midstream)</p><p><strong>Presenter:&nbsp;</strong>Teresa Alleman (Product Quality, HFSinclair)</p><p><strong>Presenter:&nbsp;</strong>Elena Hagemann (Product Manager, Process Spectroscopy, Metrohm USA)</p><p><strong>Presenter:&nbsp;</strong>Alexandra Taylor (Contributing Editor, C&amp;EN Media Group)</p></blockquote>

Metrohm: Inline Raman: Avoid the Million-Dollar Product Mix-Up

Inline Raman: Avoid the Million-Dollar Product Mix-Up

Discover how inline Raman spectroscopy prevents product mix-ups, improves safety, and cuts costs with rapid material identification

Related content

CATRIN researchers offer a “greener” way to make supercapacitors

The Effect of Needle Gauge and Flow Rate on Evaporation Rate

News from LabRulezGCMS Library - Week 11, 2026