Automated Solid Phase Microextraction using the GERSTEL MPS Prepstation and MAESTRO Software

Importance of the Topic

Solid phase microextraction (SPME) has become a key technique in analytical chemistry for isolating trace-level analytes across diverse sample matrices without the need for solvents. Automating SPME workflows addresses challenges related to manual sample handling, matrix interferences, and limited throughput.

Objectives and Study Overview

This application note demonstrates how the GERSTEL MPS PrepStation coupled with MAESTRO software can streamline automated SPME workflows. Four representative case studies illustrate improved precision, accuracy, and laboratory efficiency.

Methodology and Instrumentation

• GERSTEL MPS PrepStation configured with two independent sampling rails: one for liquid handling functions (dilution, spiking, derivatization) and the other for SPME fiber positioning and GC/MS injection.
• MAESTRO control software integrated into Agilent ChemStation, uniting all sample prep and instrument parameters in a single method and sequence table.
• Automated functions include vial heating, agitation, fiber bake‐out, pre- and post-extraction derivatization, and standard addition.
• SPME fibers selected based on analyte volatility and polarity (e.g., DVB/Carboxen/PDMS for volatiles, PDMS for nonpolar compounds, DVB/PDMS for semi-volatiles).

Main Results and Discussion

• Example 1: Trace sulfur in diluted isopropanol. Six sulfur compounds detected by headspace SPME at low ppb levels. Thiophene quantitated at 45 ppb (r²=0.998) with RSD=3.0% (n=3).
• Example 2: Active mouthwash ingredients. Single-standard calibration for eucalyptol, thymol, menthol, carvone, methyl salicylate and benzoic acid. Automated prep yielded 1.8% RSD (n=5) vs. 5.3% by manual prep.
• Example 3: Wine aldehydes with on-fiber PFBOA derivatization. Six oxime derivatives resolved; isovaleraldehyde quantified in three wines (5–7 ppb) with RSD ≤3.5% (n=5).
• Example 4: Drugs of abuse in saliva. Two-step SPME with salt addition, base adjustment, internal standard and butyl chloroformate derivatization. PCP, methadone, amitriptyline, imipramine, amphetamine and methamphetamine quantified at ~1 µg/mL with r² ≥0.986.

Advantages and Practical Applications

• Higher sample throughput through unattended, programmable workflows.
• Improved precision (RSD typically <5%) and accuracy via automated standard addition and derivatization.
• Flexible method development with MAESTRO’s intuitive interface and integrated sequence control.
• Elimination of manual pipetting errors and reduced operator exposure to hazardous reagents.

Future Trends and Applications

• Integration of advanced mass spectrometers (MS/MS, high-resolution MS) for enhanced selectivity and sensitivity.
• Expansion of fiber chemistries and coatings to target emerging contaminants and polar analytes.
• Integration with laboratory information management systems (LIMS) for end-to-end workflow tracking.
• Application of machine-learning algorithms for automated method optimization and real-time quality control.

Conclusion

The GERSTEL MPS PrepStation coupled with MAESTRO software provides a robust, fully automated platform for SPME sample preparation and introduction. Across diverse applications—volatile sulfur compounds, mouthwash actives, wine aldehydes, and drugs in saliva—automation delivered superior precision, reproducibility, and efficiency compared to manual workflows.

References

1. P.A. Martos and J. Pawliszyn, Anal. Chem. 1998, 70, 2311
2. P. Vesely, L. Lusk, G. Basarova, J. Seabrooks, and D. Ryder, J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 6941–6944
3. N. Fucci, N. de Giovanni, and M. Chiarotti, Forensic Sci. Int. 2003, 134, 40–45
4. M. Yonamine, N. Tawil, R. Lucia de Moraes Moreau, and O. Alves Silva, J. Chromatogr. B 2003, 789, 73–78