GCMS
More information
WebinarsAbout usContact usTerms of use
LabRulez s.r.o. All rights reserved. Content available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 Attribution-ShareAlike

Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Various Drinking Water Sources by GC/MS

Applications | 2011 | Teledyne LABSInstrumentation
GC/MSD, GC/IT
Industries
Environmental
Manufacturer
Teledyne LABS

Summary

Importance of the Topic


Volatile organic compounds in drinking water pose potential health risks. Public water systems follow EPA method 524.2 to monitor these contaminants, while bottled water is subject to less stringent regulation. Comparing different water sources helps consumers and regulators understand actual exposure and treatment effectiveness.

Goals and Study Overview


The study quantified VOC levels in tap, filtered, well and various bottled waters. Using automated purge and trap concentration coupled with GC/MS, the research evaluated regulated and unregulated sources to assess water quality concerns and the cost benefit of bottled water.

Methodology and Instrumentation


  • Sample preparation employed a 25 ml purge volume using a Stratum PTC purge and trap concentrator and AQUATek 100 autosampler
  • Gas chromatography was performed on a Varian 431 GC with a 20 m FactorFour VF-624 column
  • Mass spectrometry used a Varian 210-MS ion trap detector under EPA performance criteria
  • Calibration was linear across the range with relative response factors and a method detection limit study according to EPA method 524.2

Main Results and Discussion


  • Tap water contained trihalomethanes, including dibromochloromethane and bromoform up to 29 ppb, plus 2-butanone and tetrahydrofuran from plumbing outgassing
  • Filtered water showed lower VOCs, but plastic pitcher components introduced additional contaminants, highlighting the need to rinse filters before use
  • Bottled water and untreated well sources exhibited negligible VOC levels, confirming efficient filtration and absence of disinfection byproducts
  • Flushing tap water for 15 to 30 seconds reduced most VOCs by over 80 percent, while trihalomethanes remained constant due to their formation at treatment plants

Benefits and Practical Applications


Automated purge and trap GC/MS improves throughput and reproducibility for routine water quality testing. The findings support flushing taps to lower VOC exposure and validate the low VOC content of bottled and well waters for consumer safety.

Future Trends and Opportunities


Future developments may include miniaturized traps, faster cycle times, integration with high resolution MS for broader analyte coverage and real time monitoring. Advances in sample preparation and digital data analysis will further enhance sensitivity and throughput.

Conclusion


This study highlights the presence of disinfection byproducts in tap water and minimal VOC contamination in bottled and well sources. Automated purge and trap GC/MS is a reliable tool for water quality assessment. Recommendations include tap flushing and filter conditioning to reduce consumer exposure.

Reference


EPA method 524.2 Measurement of purgeable organic compounds in water by capillary column gas chromatography mass spectrometry Revision 4.1 1995

Content was automatically generated from an orignal PDF document using AI and may contain inaccuracies.

Downloadable PDF for viewing
 

Similar PDF

Toggle
Comparison of Mold Odor Analysis in Water by Purge and Trap (PTC) and Solid-Phase Microextraction (SPME)
Comparison of Mold Odor Analysis in Water by Purge and Trap (PTC) and Solid-Phase Microextraction (SPME) Application Note Abstract Taste and odor are important to consumers when it comes to drinking water. Two compounds that are responsible for many taste…
Key words
temp, temppurge, purgebake, bakedesorb, desorbcondenser, condensertime, timerinse, rinsebutylbenzene, butylbenzenedry, drypreheat, preheatflow, flowchloride, chloridemethacrylate, methacrylatedrain, drainisopropylmethoxypyrazine
Validation of USEPA Method 524.2 Using a Stratum PTC, AQUATek 100 Autosampler, and Perkin-Elmer Clarus 600 GC/MS
Validation of USEPA Method 524.2 Using a Stratum PTC, AQUATek 100 Autosampler, and Perkin-Elmer Clarus 600 GC/MS Application Note By: Nathan Valentine Abstract The US EPA developed Method 524.2¹, “Measurement of Purgeable Organic Compounds in Water by Capillary Column Gas…
Key words
temp, temppurge, purgebake, bakedesorb, desorbcondenser, condensertime, timerinse, rinsebutylbenzene, butylbenzenedry, drypreheat, preheatflow, flowchloride, chloridemethacrylate, methacrylatedrain, drainacryl
Validation of USEPA Method 524.2 Using a Stratum PTC and the New AQUATek 100 Autosampler
Validation of USEPA Method 524.2 Using a Stratum PTC and the New AQUATek 100 Autosampler Application Note Abstract Automation is the key to increasing laboratory productivity and minimizing costs. It is equally important to prove that the changes in technology…
Key words
tert, terttemp, temppurge, purgebake, bakeether, etherbutyl, butylbutylbenzene, butylbenzeneptc, ptcethyl, ethylstratum, stratumcondenser, condenserdesorb, desorbmethyl, methyltetrahydrofuran, tetrahydrofurantime
Using Nitrogen Purge Gas for US EPA Drinking Water Methods
Using Nitrogen Purge Gas for US EPA Drinking Water Methods Application Note Abstract The USEPA developed Method 524.4, “Measurement of Purgeable Organic Compounds in Water by Capillary Column Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (Using Nitrogen Purge Gas)”, for identifying and measuring purgeable…
Key words
pass, passpurge, purgetemp, tempbake, bakedrinking, drinkingdesorb, desorbepa, epanitrogen, nitrogenwater, watermethods, methodscondenser, condenserppb, ppbtime, timegas, gasnote
Other projects
LCMS
ICPMS
Follow us
More information
WebinarsAbout usContact usTerms of use
LabRulez s.r.o. All rights reserved. Content available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 Attribution-ShareAlike