Quality Control of Fragrance Samples by GC-FID: Method Transfer from the Agilent 7890 GC to the Agilent Intuvo 9000 GC

Significance of the Topic

Gas chromatography with flame ionization detection (GC-FID) is essential for quality control of complex fragrance and essential oil mixtures in the flavor and fragrance industry. Accurate profiling of major and trace constituents ensures product consistency, detects adulteration, and supports regulatory compliance.

Objectives and Study Overview

This work aimed to transfer a reference GC-FID method developed on an Agilent 7890B GC to the Agilent Intuvo 9000 GC platform, evaluating chromatographic performance, retention indices, and quantitative outcomes on typical fragrance and essential oil samples. Further, method translation software was employed to create faster screening versions with minimal loss of resolution.

Applied Methodology and Instrumentation

• Instruments: Agilent 7890B GC and Agilent Intuvo 9000 GC, both configured with a split/splitless inlet, flame ionization detector, and Agilent 7693 autosampler.
• Reference column: Agilent J&W DB-HeavyWAX, 30 m × 0.25 mm, 0.25 μm film, hydrogen carrier gas at 1.8 mL/min.
• Temperature program: 50 °C (1 min) to 250 °C at 5 °C/min, hold 10 min.
• Method translation to high-throughput variants using 20 m × 0.18 mm (0.18 μm) and 10 m × 0.18 mm (0.18 μm) columns, achieving speed gains of 1.79× and 4.27× respectively.
• Sample set: commercially sourced fragrance oils, a perfume formulation, lemon oil, and sandalwood oil, diluted in acetone.

Main Results and Discussion

• Chromatographic profiles and resolution on the Intuvo 9000 GC matched those from the 7890B GC, with retention index deviations below 2 units for key fragrance constituents.
• Quantitative comparison showed relative peak area differences within 5%, confirming equivalence of both instruments.
• Method translation to the 20 m column reduced analysis time by nearly half (speed gain 1.74 observed vs. 1.79 predicted) while preserving resolution and retention indices.
• The rapid 10 m column method delivered a four-fold faster analysis (4.17× observed vs. 4.27× predicted), with a total cycle time under 5 minutes and sufficient separation of major lemon oil markers.
• Micro-bore guard chip technology in the Intuvo did not affect relative retention or quantitative performance.

Benefits and Practical Applications of the Method

• Maintains high-resolution fingerprinting essential for QA/QC of fragrances and essential oils.
• Enables flexible throughput scaling from full-resolution profiling to rapid screening modes.
• Supports consistent data comparison across different GC platforms via stable retention indices.
• Reduces cycle times and increases laboratory productivity without compromising data quality.

Future Trends and Potential Applications

Advances in column technology, hydrogen carrier gas, and fast-ramp heating will further accelerate GC-FID screening workflows. Integration of automated method translation and inline sample preparation can streamline QA/QC pipelines. Broader adoption of microbore and sub-2 μm phase columns may unlock even faster, high-resolution analyses for complex flavor and fragrance matrices.

Conclusion

The transfer of a GC-FID method from the Agilent 7890B to the Intuvo 9000 GC demonstrated equivalent chromatographic performance and quantitative accuracy. Method translation to shorter columns substantially increased sample throughput while retaining key quality metrics, offering a versatile approach for fragrance industry QC applications.

References

1. van Asten A. The Importance of GC and GC-MS in Perfume Analysis. Trends Analyt. Chem. 2002, 21, 698–708.
2. Chisvert A. et al. Cosmetics Chapter: Analytical Methods. In Analysis of Cosmetic Products, 2nd Ed.; Elsevier, 2018, pp. 225–248.
3. Cachet T. et al. IOFI Recommended Practice For Rapid Quantification of Volatile Flavoring Compounds by GC-FID. Flavor Fragr. J. 2016, 31, 191–194.
4. d’Acampora Zellner B. Linear Retention Indices in Gas Chromatographic Analysis: A Review. Flavor Fragr. J. 2008, 23, 297–314.
5. David F. et al. Applications of Fast High-Resolution Capillary Gas Chromatography. J. Chrom. A 1999, 842, 309–319.
6. ISO 3518:2002, Oil of Sandalwood (Santalum album L.). International Organization for Standardization.
7. ISO 855:2003, Oil of Lemon (Citrus limon). International Organization for Standardization.