GCMS
More information
WebinarsAbout usContact usTerms of use
LabRulez s.r.o. All rights reserved. Content available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 Attribution-ShareAlike

Determination of mineral oil aromatic hydrocarbons (MOAH) in food by LC GC FID – Comparison of conventional vs. automated epoxidation

Posters |  | OtherInstrumentation
GC, Sample Preparation
Industries
Food & Agriculture
Manufacturer
Agilent Technologies, Axel Semrau, CTC Analytics

Summary

Importance of the topic


Mineral oil hydrocarbons represent a common contamination in food, comprising saturated (MOSH) and aromatic fractions (MOAH). MOAH is of particular concern due to potential carcinogenic effects and analytical challenges posed by coextractives like squalene and sterenes, which interfere with standard detection methods.

Objectives and study overview


This work compares a conventional manual epoxidation protocol using m-CPBA in dichloromethane under subambient conditions with a novel fully automated epoxidation in ethanol/n-hexane at room temperature. The goal is to evaluate precision, recovery, and interference removal in LC-GC-FID analysis of MOAH in food matrices.

Methodology and instrumentation


  • Sample extraction with n-hexane and clean-up by silica gel column elution
  • Conventional epoxidation using m-CPBA in dichloromethane with cooling and quenching by sodium bicarbonate
  • Automated epoxidation adding ethanolic m-CPBA, quenching with sodium thiosulfate, shaking and centrifugation inside an autosampler
  • Detection by LC-GC-FID with a 1260 Infinity HPLC, a 7890B GC-FID, DualPAL autosampler and CHRONECT LC-GC interface

Key results and discussion


  • Repeatability below 1.1 percent and recoveries between 94 and 103 percent for both methods
  • Automated epoxidation markedly reduced squalene and other interferences in maize and olive oil chromatograms
  • MOAH concentrations determined by both methods were comparable: maize oil 11.7 ppm and olive oil 7.4 to 7.8 ppm

Benefits and practical applications


The automated approach simplifies sample preparation by eliminating low temperature steps, volatile solvent evaporation and reconstitution, while ensuring quantitative recovery of MOAH. It enhances routine laboratory throughput and reduces risk of misinterpretation from residual interferences.

Future trends and opportunities


  • Extension of automated epoxidation to diverse food and environmental matrices
  • Integration into high throughput quality control and monitoring workflows
  • Adaptation for analysis of related hydrocarbon contaminants and further reduction of matrix effects

Conclusion


Automated epoxidation in ethanol/n-hexane provides an effective alternative to conventional methods, delivering equivalent accuracy and recovery of MOAH with improved selectivity and operational efficiency suitable for routine LC-GC-FID analysis.

Reference


  1. Barp L Kornauth C Wuerger T Rudas M Biedermann M Reiner A Concin N Grob K Food Chem Toxicol 2014 72 312–321
  2. Biedermann M Grob K J Chromatogr A 2015 1375 136–153
  3. Biedermann M Fiselier K Grob K J Agric Food Chem 2009 57 8711–8721
  4. CEN TC 275 N 1069
  5. Nestola M Schmidt TC J Chromatogr A 2017 1505 69–76

Content was automatically generated from an orignal PDF document using AI and may contain inaccuracies.

Downloadable PDF for viewing
 

Similar PDF

Toggle
Mineral Oil Residues in Food - Part 2 - Automated Removal of Natural Interferences by Online Epoxidation
Food – MOSH/MOAH Mineral Oil Residues in Food Part 2 - Automated Removal of Natural No. SCA_100_002 Interferences by Online Epoxidation ▪ Introduction ▪ System Setup Mineral oil (MO) residues in food raised public concern due to some elevated concentrations…
Key words
epoxidation, epoxidationmoah, moahmosh, moshmineral, mineralfood, foodhydrocarbons, hydrocarbonsoil, oilfractions, fractionssqualene, squaleneinterferences, interferencesfid, fidonline, onlineway, waymarked, markedcentrifugated
Mineral Oil Residues in Food: Part 5 - How to choose the right sample preparation
Food – MOSH/MOAH Mineral Oil Residues in Food: Part 5 How to choose the right sample preparation No. SCA_100_005 ▪ Introduction Mineral oil (MO) residues in food raised public concern due to some elevated concentrations up to several thousand milligrams…
Key words
mosh, moshkohlenwasserstoffen, kohlenwasserstoffenmineralöl, mineralölmoah, moahhydrocarbons, hydrocarbonsmineral, mineralfood, foodöle, öleund, undlebensmittel, lebensmitteloil, oilneeds, needsvon, vonaromatic, aromaticgesättigten
Automated LC-GC system for MOSH and MOAH analysis in food, according to EN 16995:2017
Application note | 002208 Food safety Automated LC-GC system for MOSH and MOAH analysis in food, according to EN 16995:2017 Goal Authors Jorn Hofsteenge , Inge de Dobbeler , To streamline the analysis of mineral oil saturated and aromatic hydrocarbons…
Key words
mosh, moshmoah, moahepoxidation, epoxidationmineral, mineraloil, oilchannel, channelalox, aloxsample, sampleautomated, automatedery, eryspike, spikepreparation, preparationfood, foodstation, stationfid
Determination of mineral oil contaminations in foodstuff, cosmetics and packaging
AS Application Note 1801 MOSH-MOAH Determination of mineral oil contaminations in foodstuff, cosmetics and packaging with the CHRONECT® Workstation MOSH/MOAH ASAN 1801 MOSH-MOAH – Status: April 2018 Page 1 / 8 AS Application Note 1801 MOSH-MOAH Introduction Device setup Mineral…
Key words
moah, moahmosh, moshchronect, chronecthplc, hplcmineral, mineralaluminum, aluminumvoltage, voltageoxide, oxideepoxidation, epoxidationolefins, olefinsbiogenic, biogenichydrocarbons, hydrocarbonsperylene, peryleneoil, oiltime
Other projects
LCMS
ICPMS
Follow us
More information
WebinarsAbout usContact usTerms of use
LabRulez s.r.o. All rights reserved. Content available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 Attribution-ShareAlike