Determination of methanol in biodiesel

Importance of the topic

Biodiesel is a growing alternative fuel derived from plant oils or animal fats through transesterification. Residual methanol in biodiesel can damage engines, reduce fuel stability and pose safety risks. Regulatory standards limit methanol content to ensure fuel quality and performance. Reliable analysis of methanol traces is therefore essential for producers, refineries and quality control laboratories.

Objectives and overview

This application note demonstrates a headspace gas chromatography method for quantifying residual methanol in biodiesel, following the DIN EN 14110 standard. Key aims include achieving high sensitivity, linearity and reproducibility across the regulatory concentration range (0.01–0.5 % m/m), while streamlining sample preparation and automating analysis for routine throughput.

Methodology and sample preparation

The process uses static headspace sampling to separate volatile methanol from non-volatile fatty acid methyl esters (FAME). Biodiesel samples and calibration standards (0.01, 0.1, 0.5 % m/m methanol in methanol-free biodiesel) are spiked with 5 µL of 2-propanol as an internal standard, then placed in 20 mL vials.

Automated headspace parameters:

• Equilibration: heating at 60 °C, agitation to establish liquid-gas equilibrium
• Sample volume: 500 µL of headspace gas
• Injection split ratio: 1 : 10

Main results and discussion

Calibration achieved excellent linearity (R² > 0.99999) across the 0.01–0.5 % m/m range. The detection limit provided signal-to-noise ratios above 2000 at 0.01 % m/m methanol. Reproducibility over six repeat measurements yielded relative standard deviations below 1 %, well within the DIN EN 14110 tolerance of 0.00151 % m/m at low concentration levels. Sample throughput benefits from concurrent vial equilibration and injection steps, reducing hold-up times.

Benefits and practical application of the method

This automated GC-headspace approach offers:

• High sensitivity and accuracy for regulatory compliance
• Robust reproducibility across low-level methanol concentrations
• Streamlined workflow ideal for routine quality control
• Flexibility to adjust split ratios or separation conditions for faster analysis or higher throughput

Future trends and possibilities for use

Advancements may include integration of faster heating equilibrators, miniaturized sample trays for small-scale producers, coupling with mass spectrometry for multi-residue screening, and implementation of predictive maintenance via instrument data analytics. Further adaptation to analyze other volatile contaminants in biofuels could broaden applications.

Conclusion

The combination of Shimadzu’s HT200H headspace autosampler and GC-2014AFsc system provides a validated, automated solution for residual methanol determination in biodiesel. The method meets DIN EN 14110 requirements, delivering high linearity, low detection limits and excellent reproducibility. Its ease of use and throughput make it well suited for industrial and laboratory settings.

Used instrumentation

• Shimadzu GC-2014AFsc gas chromatograph with flame ionization detector
• Shimadzu HT200H static headspace autosampler
• Restek Stabilwax-DA capillary column (30 m × 0.32 mm, 1.0 µm film)
• Helium carrier gas at 35 cm/s linear velocity

References

• DIN EN 14214: Fatty Acid Methyl Esters (Biodiesel) – Requirements and Test Methods
• DIN EN 14110: Biodiesel – Determination of Methanol Content
• Shimadzu GC-2014AFsc Operating Manual
• Shimadzu HT200H Headspace Autosampler User Guide