GCMS
More information
WebinarsAbout usContact usTerms of use
LabRulez s.r.o. All rights reserved. Content available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 Attribution-ShareAlike

Screening for More Than 740 Pesticide Residues in Food Using an Agilent GC/Q-TOF and an Exact Mass Pesticide Library

Applications | 2015 | Agilent TechnologiesInstrumentation
GC/MSD, GC/MS/MS, GC/HRMS, GC/Q-TOF
Industries
Food & Agriculture
Manufacturer
Agilent Technologies

Summary

Importance of the topic


Ensuring food safety requires reliable methods to screen for hundreds of possible pesticide residues in fruits and vegetables. Global trade and varying maximum residue limits (MRLs) demand broad multiresidue approaches that can detect contaminants at low levels without extensive calibration.

Objectives and study overview


This work evaluates a high resolution Agilent 7200 GC/Q-TOF method combined with an Exact Mass Pesticides Personal Compound Database and Library to screen QuEChERS extracts of six organically grown produce samples spiked with 93 pesticides at 10 and 100 ng/mL levels. Two midcolumn backflushing GC methods were compared: a 20-minute 5×15 configuration and a 40.5-minute 15×15 configuration.

Použitá instrumentace


  • Agilent 7890B Gas Chromatograph with 7693A autosampler
  • Agilent 7200A Quadrupole Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometer
  • Agilent DB-5 columns (5 m×0.25 mm and 15 m×0.25 mm)
  • Agilent QuEChERS EN Extraction and Dispersive SPE kits
  • Robot Coupe Blender, Geno Grinder, Vortexer and Centrifuge

Použitá metodika


Produce samples were homogenized, extracted by the EN QuEChERS method, and cleaned by dispersive SPE. Extracts were spiked at 10 and 100 ng/mL with nine pesticide standard mixes. Data were acquired in full scan high resolution TOF EI mode and processed with MassHunter Qualitative Analysis using the All Ions workflow and the Exact Mass Pesticides PCDL. Retention times were locked to reference compounds, and midcolumn backflushing removed matrix interferences.

Main results and discussion


The 5×15 method identified on average 97.3 % of pesticides at 10 ng/mL and 99.6 % at 100 ng/mL. The longer 15×15 method yielded similar results: 97.1 % at 10 ng/mL and 99.8 % at 100 ng/mL. Mass accuracy of the molecular ion was better than 2 ppm for signals with S/N > 10 and averaged 5.7 ppm for lower abundance ions. Full scan data allowed retrospective compound screening.

Benefits and practical applications


  • High throughput screening for >700 pesticides without individual calibration
  • Robust detection at or below default 10 ppb MRLs
  • Midcolumn backflush reduces matrix buildup and extends column life
  • Retrospective analysis enables postacquisition review for additional compounds

Future trends and applications


  • Expansion of exact mass libraries to cover emerging pesticides
  • Integration with advanced deconvolution and machine learning tools
  • Hybrid HRAM screening combining GC/Q-TOF and LC/HRAM workflows
  • Automated reporting and compliance monitoring in QA/QC labs

Conclusion


The Agilent GC/Q-TOF All Ions screening approach with an Exact Mass pesticide library and rapid midcolumn backflush offers a fast, selective, and sensitive solution for monitoring hundreds of pesticide residues in food matrices with high mass accuracy and flexible data review.

Reference


  1. US EPA. Indexes to Part 180 Tolerance Information for Pesticide Chemicals in Food and Feed Commodities.
  2. European Commission. Maximum Residue Levels.
  3. New Zealand Ministry of Primary Industries. Pesticide Maximum Residue Limit (MRL) legislation around the world.
  4. Codex Alimentarius. CODEX Pesticides Residues in Food Online Database. FAO/WHO.
  5. Mastovska K, Wylie PL. Evaluation of a new column backflushing setup in GC-MS/MS analysis of pesticide residues in dietary supplements. J Chromatogr A. 2012;1265:155–164.
  6. Mastovska K. Rugged GC/MS/MS Pesticide Residue Analysis Fulfilling USDA PDP Requirements. Agilent Technologies; 5991-1054EN.
  7. Chen Y, et al. Multiresidue pesticide analysis of dried botanical dietary supplements using automated d-SPE QuEChERS and LC-MS/MS. J Agric Food Chem. 2012;60(40):9991–9999.
  8. Banerjee K, et al. Multiresidue determination of 375 organic contaminants by GC-MS/MS with semi-quantification. J Chromatogr A. 2012;1270:283–295.
  9. Satpathya G, Tyagi YK, Gupta RK. Optimized microwave-assisted QuEChERS and GC-MS with deconvolution for pesticide residues. Food Chem. 2011;127(3):1300–1308.
  10. Mezcua M, et al. Simultaneous GC-Q-TOF screening and targeted approach for pesticides in produce. J AOAC Int. 2009;92(6):1790–1806.
  11. EN 15662. Foods of plant origin – determination of pesticide residues by GC-MS and/or LC-MS/MS following QuEChERS–d-SPE cleanup.

Content was automatically generated from an orignal PDF document using AI and may contain inaccuracies.

Downloadable PDF for viewing
 

Similar PDF

Toggle
GC/Q-TOF MS Surveillance of Pesticides in Food
GC/Q-TOF MS Surveillance of Pesticides in Food
2017|Agilent Technologies|Applications
GC/Q-TOF MS Surveillance of Pesticides in Food A Combined Workflow for Quantitative and Qualitative Screening of Pesticides using the Agilent MassHunter GC/Q‑TOF Pesticide Personal Compound Database and Library Application Note Food Safety Authors Abstract Kai Chen, Sofia Nieto, and High…
Key words
qual, qualquant, quantscreening, screeningpeach, peachpesticides, pesticidesavocado, avocadotof, tofqualitative, qualitativesalmon, salmonpesticide, pesticidequantitative, quantitativefood, foodtomato, tomatoapple, appleresponses
Screening for Hundreds of Pesticide Residues Using a GC/Q-TOF with an Exact Mass Pesticide Database in Food
Screening for Hundreds of Pesticide Residues Using a GC/Q-TOF with an Exact Mass Pesticide Database in Food Application Note Food Authors Abstract Amadeo R. Fernandez-Alba, The Agilent 7200 GC/Q-TOF, in concert with the Agilent MassHunter Qualitative Samanta Uclés, and Analysis…
Key words
tof, tofmasshunter, masshunterpesticide, pesticideions, ionsacquisition, acquisitionhch, hchtee, teecoelution, coelutionscreening, screeningviewing, viewingfbf, fbfqualitative, qualitativeendosulfan, endosulfancompound, compoundleek
GC/Q-TOF Screening of Pesticides in Food
GC/Q-TOF Screening of Pesticides in Food
2017|Agilent Technologies|Applications
GC/Q-TOF Screening of Pesticides in Food Searching and Verification using Agilent MassHunter GC/Q-TOF Pesticide Personal Compound Database and Library Application Note Food Safety Author Abstract Kai Chen, Joan Stevens, and The use of high-resolution accurate mass GC/Q-TOF mass spectrometry is…
Key words
tof, tofpcdl, pcdlscreening, screeningmass, masspesticide, pesticidepesticides, pesticidessuspect, suspectfragment, fragmentspectrum, spectrumspectra, spectraaccurate, accurateions, ionsmasshunter, masshunterqualified, qualifiedcompound
Targeted and Untargeted Analysis of Pesticides and Other Contaminants in Fruits and Vegetables Using Multi-Platform GC-MS/MS and GC/Q-TOF
Poster Reprint ASMS 2018 TP-213 Targeted and Untargeted Analysis of Pesticides and Other Contaminants in Fruits and Vegetables Using Multi-Platform GC-MS/MS and GC/Q-TOF Jing Qiu1; Qi Jia1; Yihong Yang1; Wenwen Wang2 1Institute of Quality Standards and Testing Technology for Agro-products,…
Key words
yes, yesuntargeted, untargetedscreening, screeningtof, toftargeted, targetedcontaminants, contaminantspesticides, pesticidessuremass, suremassquantification, quantificationlibrary, libraryvegetable, vegetableother, otherfruit, fruitresult, resultnist
Other projects
LCMS
ICPMS
Follow us
More information
WebinarsAbout usContact usTerms of use
LabRulez s.r.o. All rights reserved. Content available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 Attribution-ShareAlike