Carbon isotope analyses on dissolved inorganic carbon of seawater samples: Sample preparation and analysis using the GasBench Plus System

Importance of the Topic

Vanillin is a high-value aromatic compound used extensively in food, fragrance and pharmaceutical industries. Natural extraction from vanilla beans is limited by cost and availability, while synthetic and nature-identical vanillin offers economical alternatives. Compound-specific stable isotope analysis (δ13C, δ2H, δ18O) provides a robust tool to authenticate vanillin origin and detect adulteration, supporting quality control and regulatory compliance.

Objectives and Study Overview

This procedure outlines a standard operating protocol for simultaneous measurement of carbon, hydrogen and oxygen isotope ratios in vanillin extracts. The goal is to deliver a three-dimensional isotopic signature capable of differentiating natural, synthetic and nature-identical vanillin sources. Detailed instructions cover sample preparation, instrument configuration, sequence design, data normalization and quality assurance.

Methodology and Instrumentation

Vanillin samples and reference powders are dissolved in methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) and injected (1–3 µL) via a splitless injector into a gas chromatograph. The GC effluent is split between a single-quadrupole mass spectrometer for compound identification and a ConFlo IV™ Universal interface to IRMS for stable isotope measurement. Carbon isotopes are analyzed by on-line combustion, hydrogen by high-temperature conversion, and oxygen by pyrolysis (HTC).

Used Instrumentation

• Thermo Scientific TRACE™ Series GC with TG-5MS column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 µm)
• Thermo Scientific™ TriPlus™ RSH Series Autosampler
• iConnect SSL Injector Module (splitless)
• Thermo Scientific™ ISQ™ Series Single Quadrupole MS (EI mode, 35–350 amu)
• Thermo Scientific™ GC IsoLink™ II Conversion Interface
• Thermo Scientific™ DELTA™ Series IRMS via ConFlo IV™
• Chromeleon™ CDS and Qtegra™ ISDS Software for control and data acquisition

Main Results and Discussion

Chromatograms from GC-MS confirm vanillin peak identity and reveal potential co-eluting impurities. IRMS traces show clean peak shapes for δ13C, δ2H and δ18O measurements. Typical analytical precision achieved is 0.1–0.2 ‰ for δ13C, 1–2 ‰ for δ2H and 0.3–0.4 ‰ for δ18O. Drift and memory effects are negligible for carbon and hydrogen but require systematic drift correction in oxygen analyses. Two-point or multi-point normalization against in-house reference materials ensures accurate scale conversion. Quality control charts fulfilling Westgard rules monitor performance over extended periods.

Benefits and Practical Applications

• Reliable discrimination of natural versus synthetic vanillin sources
• Improved laboratory throughput by simultaneous MS and IRMS acquisition
• Robust quality assurance through use of calibrated reference materials and QC sequence design
• Adaptability to different vanillin extract matrices and impurity profiles

Future Trends and Potential Applications

Advances in GC-IRMS instrumentation may allow miniaturized reactors, faster conditioning and higher multiplexing for greater sample throughput. Integration with high-resolution MS and chemometric tools could expand isotope fingerprinting to minor flavor compounds. Application of additional isotope systems (e.g., nitrogen, sulfur) and non-GC separations may further enhance source attribution in complex botanical and food matrices.

Conclusion

This standard operating procedure delivers precise and accurate δ13C, δ2H and δ18O measurements of vanillin in vanilla extracts. The hybrid GC-MS-IRMS approach provides both structural confirmation and isotopic data from a single injection. Adherence to outlined sample preparation, instrument maintenance, sequence design and data processing protocols ensures long-term analytical robustness suitable for routine authenticity testing.

References

1. Hoffman P.G., Salb M. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1979, 27(2), 352–355.
2. Greule M., Tumino L.D., Kronewald T., Hener U., Schleucher J., Mosandl A., Keppler F. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2010, 231, 933–941.
3. Sølvbjerg Hansen A.M., Fromberg A., Frandsen H.L. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62(42), 10326–10331.
4. Bensaid F.F., Wietzerbin K., Martin G.J. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50(22), 6271–6275.
5. Dunn P.J.H., Carter J.F., eds. Good Practice Guide for Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometry, 2nd Edition; FIRMS, 2018. ISBN 978-0-948926-33-4.
6. Werner R.A., Brand W.A. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2001, 15, 7–10.