Comprehensive profiling of plastic polymers using pyrolysis coupled to GC-MS

Significance of the topic

Pyrolysis coupled to GC-MS offers a comprehensive approach to characterize microplastics by converting polymer chains into detectable fragments. As environmental accumulation of plastic particles poses ecological and health risks, a rapid and reliable analytical method is essential for monitoring and regulatory enforcement.

Study objectives and overview

This study evaluated a single-shot Py-GC-MS method for simultaneous identification and quantitation of the 12 most common plastics in a single run. It also applied the method to analyze beach-collected debris, assessing performance metrics such as linearity, detection limits, and repeatability.

Methodology and Instrumentation

A Multi-Shot Pyrolyzer EGA/PY-3030D with Auto-Shot Sampler AS-2020E was used at 600 °C in inert gas to thermally degrade 0.5 mg sample aliquots. Degradation products were separated on a Thermo Scientific TRACE 1610 GC with a TraceGOLD TG-5SILMS column and detected by an ISQ 7610 single quadrupole mass spectrometer (full scan m/z 29–350). Data were acquired in Chromeleon 7.3, and polymer identification employed NIST23 and F-Search MPs 2.1 libraries. Calibration standards spanned 0.2–4.0 mg of a 12-polymer microplastic mixture.

Main results and discussion

All 12 polymers exhibited linear calibration (R² > 0.990), with calibration factor RSD < 10%. Limits of detection ranged from 0.22 to 17.3 µg and LOQs from 0.67 to 52.4 µg. Repeatability tests (n=9) showed peak area RSD < 15%. Characteristic pyrolyzate patterns enabled confident polymer identification. Analysis of beach samples revealed predominance of polyethylene, polypropylene, polymethyl methacrylate, and nylons, with one unknown pyrolyzate assigned to fluorinated polymer (PTFE/FEP) by spectral matching.

Benefits and Practical Applications

• Simultaneous qualitative and quantitative profiling of multiple polymers.
• Minimal sample preparation and rapid throughput.
• Trace-level detection and quantitation of microplastics.
• Direct analysis of solid and liquid samples without extraction.

Future Trends and Applications

Integration with high-resolution MS and AI-driven spectral libraries will enhance identification of copolymers and additives. Automated sampling and data workflows will support large-scale environmental monitoring. Development of portable field-deployable Py-GC-MS systems may enable in-situ plastic pollution assessment.

Conclusion

Single-shot Py-GC-MS delivers robust, reproducible profiling of common plastic polymers, providing both qualitative and quantitative insights. The method is suitable for environmental studies, microplastic research, and regulatory analysis due to its accuracy, speed, and minimal sample preparation.

References

1. Frias J P G L, Nash R. Microplastics: Finding a consensus on the definition. Marine Pollution Bulletin 2019, 138, 145–147.
2. European Chemical Agency (ECHA). Hot topics: Microplastics.
3. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Microplastics facts.
4. Schnurr R E J et al. Reducing marine pollution from single-use plastics (SUPs): A review. Marine Pollution Bulletin 2018, 137, 157–171.
5. Xanthos D, Walker T R. International policies to reduce plastic marine pollution from single-use plastics. Marine Pollution Bulletin 2017, 118, 17–26.
6. Thompson R C et al. Plastics, the environment and human health: Current consensus and future trends. Phil Trans R Soc B 2009, 364(1526), 2153–2166.
7. US Microbead-Free Waters Act of 2015. Public Law 114–114.
8. Huang Z, Hu B, Wang H. Analytical methods for microplastics in the environment: A review. Environ Chem Lett 2022, 21, 383–401.
9. Białek M, Fryga J. Copolymerization of ethylene with selected vinyl monomers catalyzed by multidentate ligands: A short review. Polymers 2021, 13(24), 4456.