Purge and Trap Extraction of Tea Flavor Components
Applications | | EST AnalyticalInstrumentation
The accurate profiling of volatile flavor compounds in tea is essential for ensuring product quality, consumer satisfaction and consistency in production. Purge and Trap sampling offers an exhaustive approach to capture low-level volatiles that may be under-represented by other techniques.
This application note evaluates the effectiveness of Purge and Trap extraction for identifying and quantifying flavor components in white tea. The study compares the exhaustiveness of this method to the more common Solid Phase Micro Extraction and demonstrates repeatability across multiple replicates.
White tea leaves were steeped in heated reagent water and filtered prior to analysis. Four replicates of 10 mL tea infusions were processed using an EST Analytical Evolution Purge and Trap concentrator with a Vocarb™ 3000 trap. Captured volatiles were thermally desorbed into an Agilent 7890A gas chromatograph coupled to a 5975C inert XL mass spectrometer. A Restek Rxi® 624Sil MS column facilitated separation. Key parameters such as purge flow, trap temperature, desorb time and GC oven programming were optimized to maximize compound recovery.
Purge and Trap sampling delivered consistent chromatographic performance, with individual analyte retention times and response levels exhibiting relative standard deviations below 10 %, and most below 5 %. Twenty-six key volatile compounds ranging from light aldehydes to medium-chain esters and terpenes were detected. The exhaustive nature of the technique ensured reliable quantification of both highly volatile and semi-volatile constituents, surpassing the representativeness typically offered by SPME.
As food and beverage analysis demands ever finer detection of aroma compounds, Purge and Trap may extend to other matrixes such as brewed coffee, spirits and botanical extracts. Advances in trap materials and automated autosampler configurations will further streamline high-throughput flavor screening. Coupling with high-resolution mass spectrometry could enhance compound identification in complex mixtures.
This study demonstrates that Purge and Trap extraction is a robust, exhaustive and reproducible technique for the analysis of tea volatiles. Its adoption in flavor laboratories can yield richer analytical insights and tighter quality control compared to non-exhaustive sampling methods.
No additional references provided.
GC/MSD, GC/SQ, Purge and Trap, SPME
IndustriesFood & Agriculture
ManufacturerEST Analytical, Restek, Agilent Technologies
Summary
Significance of the topic
The accurate profiling of volatile flavor compounds in tea is essential for ensuring product quality, consumer satisfaction and consistency in production. Purge and Trap sampling offers an exhaustive approach to capture low-level volatiles that may be under-represented by other techniques.
Objectives and overview of the study
This application note evaluates the effectiveness of Purge and Trap extraction for identifying and quantifying flavor components in white tea. The study compares the exhaustiveness of this method to the more common Solid Phase Micro Extraction and demonstrates repeatability across multiple replicates.
Methodology and instrumentation used
White tea leaves were steeped in heated reagent water and filtered prior to analysis. Four replicates of 10 mL tea infusions were processed using an EST Analytical Evolution Purge and Trap concentrator with a Vocarb™ 3000 trap. Captured volatiles were thermally desorbed into an Agilent 7890A gas chromatograph coupled to a 5975C inert XL mass spectrometer. A Restek Rxi® 624Sil MS column facilitated separation. Key parameters such as purge flow, trap temperature, desorb time and GC oven programming were optimized to maximize compound recovery.
Main results and discussion
Purge and Trap sampling delivered consistent chromatographic performance, with individual analyte retention times and response levels exhibiting relative standard deviations below 10 %, and most below 5 %. Twenty-six key volatile compounds ranging from light aldehydes to medium-chain esters and terpenes were detected. The exhaustive nature of the technique ensured reliable quantification of both highly volatile and semi-volatile constituents, surpassing the representativeness typically offered by SPME.
Benefits and practical applications of the method
- Comprehensive recovery of trace volatiles for more complete flavor profiles
- High repeatability suitable for quality assurance and control
- Low detection limits support differentiation of subtle product variations
- Compatibility with existing EPA-approved P&T protocols facilitates regulatory compliance
Future trends and potential applications
As food and beverage analysis demands ever finer detection of aroma compounds, Purge and Trap may extend to other matrixes such as brewed coffee, spirits and botanical extracts. Advances in trap materials and automated autosampler configurations will further streamline high-throughput flavor screening. Coupling with high-resolution mass spectrometry could enhance compound identification in complex mixtures.
Conclusion
This study demonstrates that Purge and Trap extraction is a robust, exhaustive and reproducible technique for the analysis of tea volatiles. Its adoption in flavor laboratories can yield richer analytical insights and tighter quality control compared to non-exhaustive sampling methods.
Reference
No additional references provided.
Content was automatically generated from an orignal PDF document using AI and may contain inaccuracies.
Similar PDF
Analysis of Yogurt by Dynamic Headspace and SPME
|EST Analytical|Applications
Solid Phase Micro Extraction of Flavor Compounds in Beer ANNE JUREK Analysis of Yogurt by Dynamic Headspace and SPME Application Note Food and Flavor Author Abstract Anne Jurek Applications Chemist EST Analytical Cincinnati, OH This application note will compare dynamic…
Key words
count, countheadspace, headspaceyogurt, yogurtagitate, agitatefiber, fiberjurek, jurekpurge, purgearea, areaanne, annedynamic, dynamicspme, spmepropanoic, propanoicdiethylphthalate, diethylphthalateacetone, acetonetrap
Flavor Compound Abundances in Orange Juice Comparison Using Purge and Trap
|Agilent Technologies|Applications
Flavor Compound Abundances in Orange Juice Comparison Using Purge and Trap Application Note Food and Flavor Author Abstract Anne Jurek Applications Chemist EST Analytical Cincinnati, OH Before the advent of orange juice from concentrate, people would fresh squeeze oranges for…
Key words
brand, brandpurge, purgejuice, juiceorange, orangerinse, rinseest, estlimonene, limonenedesorb, desorbtime, timetrap, trapbake, bakecompound, compoundflavor, flavorcenturion, centuriondecanal
The Determination of Flavors in E-Liquids Using Purge and Trap Concentration
|EST Analytical|Applications
Solid Phase Micro Extraction of Flavor Compounds in Beer ANNE JUREK The Determination of Flavors in E-Liquids Using Purge and Trap Concentration Application Note Food and Flavor Author Abstract Anne Jurek Applications Chemist EST Analytical Cincinnati, OH In the past…
Key words
flavor, flavorethyl, ethyljurek, jurekester, esteranne, annebutanoic, butanoicbeer, beermicro, micropropanoic, propanoicacetate, acetatepurge, purgeacid, acidrinse, rinsesolid, solidcompound
A Single Calibration Method for Water AND Soil Samples Performing EPA Method 8260 
|Agilent Technologies|Applications
Solid Phase Micro Extraction of Flavor Compounds in Beer ANNE JUREK A Single Calibration Method for Water AND Soil Samples Performing EPA Method 8260 Application Note Environmental Author Abstract Anne Jurek Applications Chemist EST Analytical Cincinnati, OH Environmental laboratories are…
Key words
jurek, jurekanne, annecenturion, centuriondesorb, desorbacetate, acetateest, estsampling, samplingpurge, purgebake, bakebeer, beertert, tertflavor, flavorbutylbenzene, butylbenzeneextraction, extractionmicro