GCMS
More information
WebinarsAbout usContact usTerms of use
LabRulez s.r.o. All rights reserved. Content available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 Attribution-ShareAlike

Optimal Conditions for USEPA Method 8260 Analysis

Applications |  | EST AnalyticalInstrumentation
GC/MSD, GC/SQ, Purge and Trap
Industries
Environmental
Manufacturer
EST Analytical, Restek, Agilent Technologies

Summary

Importance of the Topic


The ability to detect trace levels of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in water is critical for environmental monitoring, regulatory compliance and public health protection. USEPA Method 8260B establishes guidelines for purge-and-trap gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) analysis of VOCs with detection limits at or below the method detection limit (MDL). Achieving reliable low-level quantification requires optimized moisture management, linear calibration and minimized carryover.

Objectives and Study Overview


This study aimed to identify optimal purge-and-trap operating parameters and instrument configuration to maximize sensitivity, linearity and accuracy for USEPA Method 8260B. Key challenges addressed include control of moisture introduced during purge, elimination of analyte carryover and reliable internal standard delivery. Performance was evaluated through calibration curves, MDL determination, precision (%RSD) and carryover tests.

Methodology and Instrumentation


The analytical system comprised an EST Encon Evolution purge-and-trap concentrator coupled to an Agilent 6890A/5973 inert XL GC/MS. An EST Centurion WS autosampler delivered samples and internal standards without moving parts to enhance reproducibility.

Instrumentation Used

  • Encon Evolution Purge-and-Trap Concentrator with Moisture Reduction Trap (MoRT), Desorb Pressure Control (DPC) and heated sparge vessel bake mode
  • EST Centurion WS Autosampler with direct injection internal standard delivery
  • Agilent 6890A GC with split/splitless inlet, Rxi-624Sil MS column (20 m x 0.18 mm, 1 µm film)
  • Agilent 5973 inert XL MS detector, scan range m/z 35–265

Main Results and Discussion


A nine-point calibration (0.5–200 ppb) achieved excellent linearity for all target compounds (%RSD < 15% and recoveries 90–110%). MDLs ranged from 0.06 to 1.27 ppb depending on analyte. Precision and accuracy at 50 ppb (%RSD < 5.6%) surpassed method requirements. Carryover after a 2000 ppb standard was < 0.3% for late-eluting compounds, demonstrating effective sparge vessel heating and trap bake conditions. Internal standard delivery reproducibility was < 2.1% RSD over ten injections.

Benefits and Practical Applications

  • Robust moisture control via MoRT reduces GC background and vacuum instability
  • DPC ensures sharp, reproducible peaks by balancing trap and inlet pressures
  • Sparge vessel heating virtually eliminates carryover without extending cycle time
  • Direct internal standard injection improves quantitative precision
  • Meets or exceeds quality control criteria for environmental labs performing USEPA Method 8260B

Future Trends and Potential Applications


Emerging needs for even lower detection limits and broader compound scopes will drive further innovations in moisture management and trap design. Integration of automated diagnostics, fiber-optic sensors and advanced data analytics could enhance system reliability and throughput. Adaptation of these purge-and-trap advances to other sample matrices (soil, air) and hybrid GC-MS/MS platforms may expand analytical capabilities.

Conclusion


The optimized Encon Evolution purge-and-trap configuration and Centurion WS autosampler deliver outstanding performance for USEPA Method 8260B. Enhanced moisture reduction, pressure control and vessel heating achieve low MDLs, excellent linearity, precision and minimal carryover. These improvements support reliable, high-throughput VOC analysis in environmental laboratories.

Content was automatically generated from an orignal PDF document using AI and may contain inaccuracies.

Downloadable PDF for viewing
 

Similar PDF

Toggle
Optimal Conditions for USEPA Method 8260 Analysis
Optimal Conditions for USEPA Method 8260 Analysis
|Agilent Technologies|Applications
     JSB is an authorised partner of       Optimal Conditions for USEPA Method 8260 Analysis Anne Jurek Introducttion: Over the past decade, the need for environmental laboratories using purge e and…
Key words
trap, trapencon, enconevolution, evolutionnzene, nzenelbenzene, lbenzeneest, estpurge, purgebrom, brommort, mortcenturion, centurionisopropy, isopropyprogramm, programmbuty, butycision, cisionmable
Optimal Conditions for USEPA Method 8260B Analysis Using the EST Analytical Sampling System and the Shimadzu GCMS-QP2010s
Optimal Conditions s for US SEPA Me ethod 82 260B Ana alysis Us sing the e EST An nalyticall Sampliing Sys stem and d the Shimadzu GCMS-QP2010 0s ANNE E JUREK Introducttion: The USEP PA developed d Method 826 60B…
Key words
trap, trappurge, purgerins, rinsbake, bakedesorb, desorbnzene, nzeneest, estsparge, spargeene, enerinse, rinsemoisture, moisturemple, mplesamp, samptime, timeoroethane
Optimal Conditions for USEPA Method 8260B Analysis using the EST Analytical Sampling system and the Shimadzu GCMS-QP2010s
     JSB is an authorised partner of       Optimal Conditions for USEPA Method 8260B Analysis using the EST Analytical Sampling system and the Shimadzu GCMS-QP2010s Anne Jurek Introducttion: The USEP PA…
Key words
trap, trappurge, purgedesorb, desorbrinse, rinsebake, bakeest, estencon, enconevolution, evolutiontime, timecenturion, centurionmoisture, moisturerinses, rinsesloop, loopflow, flowdela
California Oxygenates and 8260
California Oxygenates and 8260
|Agilent Technologies|Applications
Califo ornia O Oxygen nates a and 82 260 ANNE JUREK Introduc ction: For more e than 30 yea ars, oxygena ated compou unds have b been added to gasoline. The additio on of these compounds prrovides two benefits: b…
Key words
urge, urgepurg, purgtrap, trapether, ethergenate, genateoxyg, oxygert, ertorobenzene, orobenzenecom, comoluene, oluenenzene, nzenebromo, bromopurge, purgebake, bakechloro
Other projects
LCMS
ICPMS
Follow us
More information
WebinarsAbout usContact usTerms of use
LabRulez s.r.o. All rights reserved. Content available under a CC BY-SA 4.0 Attribution-ShareAlike