Maximizing Sample Throughput In Purge And Trap Analysis
Applications | | EST AnalyticalInstrumentation
The analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by purge and trap followed by GC/MS is vital for environmental monitoring, regulatory compliance and public health protection. Improving sample throughput while maintaining EPA Method 8260B criteria addresses the growing demands on high-volume laboratories and reduces delays caused by moisture interference, carry-over and long cycle times.
This work evaluates a dual-concentrator configuration using the EST Centurion WS autosampler and two EST Encon Evolution purge and trap concentrators on a single GC/MSD system. The primary goals are:
The system employs two purge and trap concentrators in alternating mode to enable injections every 15 minutes. Key purge and trap settings include:
GC/MS conditions (Agilent 7890/5975) feature split injection, RTX‐624 column, 45 °C→220 °C at 18 °C/min and constant helium flow at 0.8 ml/min.
Calibration over 1 ppb–200 ppb showed relative standard deviations below 12 % for all target VOCs in both water and soil matrices. Accuracy at 1 ppb ranged from 80 % to 120 %, with precision better than 10 % RSD for most compounds. The dual-concentrator setup enabled injections every 15 minutes, increasing throughput by 40 samples per instrument per 12-hour shift compared to single-concentrator systems. Moisture interference was minimized by the MoRT device, preserving peak symmetry and sensitivity, while vessel heating during bake eliminated carry-over without lengthening cycle time.
This configuration delivers:
Emerging directions include integration of advanced moisture traps and miniaturized concentrators, real-time monitoring of purge efficiency, AI-driven optimization of cycle parameters and expansion to on-site mobile labs. Continued automation and instrument networking will further boost throughput, data transparency and remote control capabilities.
The dual-concentrator approach using the Centurion WS and Encon Evolution instruments significantly increases VOC analysis throughput while fully complying with EPA Method 8260B. Superior moisture management and carry-over reduction support high-quality, reproducible data and streamline environmental laboratory operations.
GC/MSD, GC/SQ, Purge and Trap
IndustriesOther
ManufacturerEST Analytical, Restek, Agilent Technologies
Summary
Importance of Topic
The analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by purge and trap followed by GC/MS is vital for environmental monitoring, regulatory compliance and public health protection. Improving sample throughput while maintaining EPA Method 8260B criteria addresses the growing demands on high-volume laboratories and reduces delays caused by moisture interference, carry-over and long cycle times.
Objectives and Overview of the Study
This work evaluates a dual-concentrator configuration using the EST Centurion WS autosampler and two EST Encon Evolution purge and trap concentrators on a single GC/MSD system. The primary goals are:
- Maximize sample throughput by reducing cycle time without altering EPA-required purge and trap conditions.
- Maintain calibration linearity, accuracy and precision for water and soil matrices.
- Demonstrate effective moisture management and carry-over reduction strategies.
Methodology and Used Instrumentation
The system employs two purge and trap concentrators in alternating mode to enable injections every 15 minutes. Key purge and trap settings include:
- Purge time 11 minutes at 40 ml/min He
- Dry purge 1 minute at 40 ml/min
- Desorb at 260 °C for 2 minutes at 12 psi
- Bake at 265 °C for 8 minutes with integrated sparge-vessel heater
- Moisture reduction trap (MoRT) placed upstream of analytical trap to eliminate dead volume and cold spots
GC/MS conditions (Agilent 7890/5975) feature split injection, RTX‐624 column, 45 °C→220 °C at 18 °C/min and constant helium flow at 0.8 ml/min.
Main Results and Discussion
Calibration over 1 ppb–200 ppb showed relative standard deviations below 12 % for all target VOCs in both water and soil matrices. Accuracy at 1 ppb ranged from 80 % to 120 %, with precision better than 10 % RSD for most compounds. The dual-concentrator setup enabled injections every 15 minutes, increasing throughput by 40 samples per instrument per 12-hour shift compared to single-concentrator systems. Moisture interference was minimized by the MoRT device, preserving peak symmetry and sensitivity, while vessel heating during bake eliminated carry-over without lengthening cycle time.
Benefits and Practical Applications
This configuration delivers:
- Enhanced productivity: 34 additional revenue-generating samples daily
- Consistent data quality within EPA Method 8260B requirements
- Reduced re-runs by effective moisture and carry-over control
- User-friendly operation via programmable internal standard delivery and soil-vial handling
Future Trends and Potential Applications
Emerging directions include integration of advanced moisture traps and miniaturized concentrators, real-time monitoring of purge efficiency, AI-driven optimization of cycle parameters and expansion to on-site mobile labs. Continued automation and instrument networking will further boost throughput, data transparency and remote control capabilities.
Conclusion
The dual-concentrator approach using the Centurion WS and Encon Evolution instruments significantly increases VOC analysis throughput while fully complying with EPA Method 8260B. Superior moisture management and carry-over reduction support high-quality, reproducible data and streamline environmental laboratory operations.
Content was automatically generated from an orignal PDF document using AI and may contain inaccuracies.
Similar PDF
Optimal Conditions for USEPA Method 8260B Analysis using the EST Analytical Sampling system and the Shimadzu GCMS-QP2010s
|Shimadzu|Applications
JSB is an authorised partner of Optimal Conditions for USEPA Method 8260B Analysis using the EST Analytical Sampling system and the Shimadzu GCMS-QP2010s Anne Jurek Introducttion: The USEP PA…
Key words
trap, trappurge, purgedesorb, desorbrinse, rinsebake, bakeest, estencon, enconevolution, evolutiontime, timecenturion, centurionmoisture, moisturerinses, rinsesloop, loopflow, flowdela
Optimal Conditions for USEPA Method 8260 Analysis
|Agilent Technologies|Applications
JSB is an authorised partner of Optimal Conditions for USEPA Method 8260 Analysis Anne Jurek Introducttion: Over the past decade, the need for environmental laboratories using purge e and…
Key words
trap, trapencon, enconevolution, evolutionnzene, nzenelbenzene, lbenzeneest, estpurge, purgebrom, brommort, mortcenturion, centurionisopropy, isopropyprogramm, programmbuty, butycision, cisionmable
Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule 3 for USEPA Method 524.3 and 524.4
|EST Analytical|Applications
Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule 3 for USEPA Method 524.3 and 524.4 Anne Jurek Abstract: The third Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR 3) was finalized in April of 2012. UCMR 3 requires public water systems to monitor for a specific list…
Key words
purge, purgeregress, regressprecision, precisioncurve, curverecovery, recoverychlorodifluoromethane, chlorodifluoromethanequadratic, quadratictrap, trapdesorb, desorbest, estbromochloromethane, bromochloromethanebromomethane, bromomethanechloromethane, chloromethanebutylbenzene, butylbenzenepropylbenzene
Analysis of Coffee Flavors by Purge and Trap Sampling
|Agilent Technologies|Applications
Analysis of Coffee Flavors by Purge and Trap Sampling Anne Jurek Abstract: Strong or weak, light or dark, black or with cream; everyone who drinks coffee has a preference. Today, there are not only the choices of what you would…
Key words
coffee, coffeepurge, purgecenturion, centurionencon, enconrinse, rinsetrap, trapdesorb, desorbest, estevolution, evolutionbake, bakecoffees, coffeesconcentrator, concentratorinstant, instantroast, roasttime