Analysis of Essential Oil Using GC-MS/FID Detector Splitting System

Importance of the Topic

Hinoki essential oil is valued in construction and fragrance for its complex aromatic profile. Precise analysis of its volatile constituents is critical for quality control, product consistency, and understanding regional differences in raw materials. Integrating GC-MS and FID detectors in one run enhances data completeness, reduces analysis time, and simplifies workflows.

Objectives and Overview of the Study

This study applied a detector splitting system to acquire both mass spectral and flame ionization data simultaneously for five types of Hinoki oil, including commercial products and custom blends. The goals were to differentiate samples via multivariate analysis and to accurately quantify δ-Cadinene, a key sesquiterpene, across diverse oil sources.

Methodology

Five Hinoki oils were diluted to 1% (v/v) in hexane. A δ-Cadinene standard series (0.5–100% v/v) was prepared similarly. Gas chromatography used a Shimadzu Brevis GC-2050 with SH-I-5Sil MS capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm I.D., 0.25 µm film). Helium flow was pressure-controlled (230 kPa), with oven ramp from 80 °C to 230 °C at 5 °C/min. A Smart Micro Inert 2-Way splitter directed effluent to both GCMS-QP2050 (EI mode, scan m/z 45–500, scan time 0.3 s) and FID (H₂ makeup gas). Split ratio was set to ~1:3 (MS:FID). Data analysis included identification of 60 compounds and principal component analysis using eMSTAT Solution to reveal sample clustering.

Instrumentation

• Gas Chromatograph: Shimadzu Brevis GC-2050 with AOC-30i autosampler
• Mass Spectrometer: Shimadzu GCMS-QP2050 (EI ion source, TMP exhaust 255 L/s)
• Flame Ionization Detector (FID)
• Splitter: SMI FLOW DEVICE 2-Way Splitter with digital flow controller
• Software: LabSolutions GCMS and eMSTAT Solution for multivariate analysis

Main Results and Discussion

Principal component analysis divided five oils into four distinct groups. Shimanto, Yoshino, and Kiso samples clustered together, indicating similar volatile profiles. Loading plots identified (–)-borneol as a characteristic marker for the Shimadzu blend and δ-Cadinene as abundant in the Kiso sample. MS library searches yielded similarity scores of 97% for (–)-borneol and 93% for δ-Cadinene. Overlay of total ion chromatograms (TIC) and FID traces showed matching retention times, enabling qualitative identification of FID peaks via MS data. Quantification of δ-Cadinene by FID demonstrated excellent linearity (R2 = 0.9999), with measured concentrations ranging from 1.5% (Branch and Leaf) to 46.1% (Kiso).

Benefits and Practical Applications of the Method

• Simultaneous MS and FID acquisition reduces analysis time and sample handling.
• Combined qualitative and quantitative data from a single injection enhances workflow efficiency.
• Multivariate analysis facilitates rapid differentiation of essential oil batches for quality control and authentication.
• Compact GC MS-FID configuration saves laboratory space.

Future Trends and Potential Applications

Advances may include integration of machine learning algorithms for automated peak deconvolution and classification, expansion to other complex natural product matrices, and coupling with additional detectors (e.g., nitrogen/phosphorus). Development of portable GC-MS/FID systems could enable on-site aroma profiling in forestry and food industries. Routine monitoring of bioactive volatiles may support sustainable resource management and new product development.

Conclusion

The GC-MS/FID detector splitting system proved effective for comprehensive characterization and quantification of key aroma compounds in Hinoki oils. When combined with multivariate analysis, this approach offers a powerful tool for essential oil quality control, sample differentiation, and research into regional variations.