Large Volume Injection in Capillary GC Using PTV Injectors: Comparison of Inertness of Packing Materials

Significance of the Topic

The introduction of large volume injection via programmed temperature vaporization (PTV) injectors in capillary gas chromatography addresses critical needs in trace-level analysis by enhancing sensitivity and eliminating off-line concentration steps. Optimizing liner packing materials is essential to retain injected solvent while avoiding analyte adsorption or thermal degradation, thereby improving reproducibility and reliability in diverse analytical applications.

Objectives and Overview of the Study

This work aimed to evaluate alternatives to silanized glass wool as packing materials for large volume PTV injection. Key goals included:

• Determining maximum sample volumes retained without flooding.
• Assessing thermal stability of different packings.
• Comparing inertness toward labile and polar analytes using standardized test mixtures.

Methodology and Instrumentation

A Hewlett-Packard 5890A GC with FID and an Optic PTV injector was used. The injector was cooled to sub-ambient temperatures for solvent venting, then ramped to transfer analytes under splitless conditions. Seven liner configurations were tested: empty liner with glass frit (“cup liner”), liners packed with silanized glass wool, untreated and PMHS-deactivated quartz wool, glass beads, Tenax TA, Dexsil-coated support, PTFE wool, and polyimide wool. Deactivation was performed in-situ with bis(trimethylsilyl)amine (HMDS) and polymethylhydrosiloxane (PMHS). Solvent vent times, maximum injection volumes, conditioning temperatures, and splitless hold times were systematically varied.

Main Results and Discussion

• Maximum Retained Volume: Cup, quartz and silanized glass wool packed liners, and Tenax liners retained ≥100 µL; glass beads failed above ~50 µL.
• Thermal Stability: Dexsil-coated liners remained inert up to 340 °C; Tenax up to 310 °C; PTFE and polyimide up to 275 °C.
• Inertness Tests: Donike test esters showed significant degradation on glass wool and untreated quartz wool. PMHS-deactivated quartz, Dexsil, PTFE and the cup liner yielded ≥90 % recovery for labile silyl esters.
• 27-Compound Mixture: Sum of recoveries relative to on-column injection was highest for PTFE wool and Dexsil-coated support, followed by cup liner and Tenax. Glass wool yielded poor responses for polar or thermolabile analytes.
• Large Volume Injections: PTFE and Dexsil liners achieved average recoveries ~90 % at 8–16 ng/mL levels (60 µL injection). Tenax suited for volatile analytes; cup liner best for high-boiling compounds but required elevated vent temperatures.

Benefits and Practical Applications

The identified inert liners enable robust large volume injections without extensive sample preparation. Laboratories in environmental monitoring, food safety, pesticide residue analysis, and industrial quality control benefit from improved sensitivity, reduced sample handling, and greater method reproducibility.

Future Trends and Applications

Emerging directions include:

• Development of novel polymer-based or deactivated materials for enhanced inertness.
• Integration with automated systems and high-throughput workflows.
• Coupling large volume PTV injection with mass spectrometry for trace-level multi-residue analysis.
• Miniaturized PTV designs for portable GC applications.

Conclusion

This comparative study demonstrates that PTFE wool and Dexsil-coated supports outperform traditional glass wool in large volume PTV GC injection, providing superior inertness and thermal stability. The cup liner and Tenax packing offer targeted solutions for specific volatility ranges. Careful selection of liner and packing material is crucial to achieving high recoveries and reliable trace analysis.

References

1. Vogt W, Jacob K, Obwexer HW. J Chromatogr 174 (1979) 437–439.
2. Staniewski J, Rijks JA. J Chromatogr 623 (1992) 105–113.
3. Staniewski J, Rijks JA. J High Resol Chromatogr 16 (1993) 182–187.
4. Mol HGJ, Janssen H-G, Cramers CA, Brinkman UAT. J High Resol Chromatogr 18 (1995) 19.
5. Schomburg G. In: Sandra P, editor. Sample Introduction in Capillary GC. Vol 1. Heidelberg: Huethig; 1985.
6. Müller H-M, Stan H-J. J High Resol Chromatogr 13 (1990) 759–763.
7. Grob K, Wagner C. J High Resol Chromatogr 16 (1993) 464–468.
8. Donike M. Chromatographia 6 (1973) 190–195.
9. Emery DR, Poole CF. J High Resol Chromatogr 16 (1993) 501–503.