Analyze Drugs of Abuse with Agilent J&W Ultimate Plus Tubing in an Inert Flow Path

Importance of the topic

The accurate identification and quantification of drugs of abuse in biological matrices such as urine or blood is essential in forensic toxicology. High sensitivity and reproducibility are required to detect trace-level active compounds without derivatization. An inert flow path in gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) prevents analyte adsorption or decomposition, improving peak shape and quantitative reliability.

Objectives and study overview

This application note evaluates Agilent J&W Ultimate Plus deactivated fused silica tubing against a competitive premium tubing when used as a GC/MS restrictor for the analysis of 28 active drugs of abuse. The comparison was performed under identical chromatographic conditions to assess response intensity, peak shape, and reproducibility at both 5 ng and 1 ng on-column.

Methodology

Analytical conditions:

• Column: Agilent J&W DB-5ms Ultra Inert, 25 m × 0.25 mm, 0.25 µm
• Carrier gas: Helium, constant flow 1.4 mL/min
• Injection: pulsed splitless, inlet at 80 °C, purge 30 mL/min
• Oven program: 95 °C (2 min) to 320 °C at 10 °C/min, hold 5.5 min
• MS conditions: Agilent 5975C MSD, full scan 50–450 amu, transfer line 300 °C
• Sample prep: 5 ng/µL drugs checkout standard diluted to 1 ng/µL in toluene/methanol/acetonitrile

Instrumentation

• GC: Agilent 7890A
• MS: Agilent 5975C with triple-axis detector
• Autosampler: Agilent 7693A with 10 µL syringe
• Restrictor tubing: Agilent J&W Ultimate Plus fused silica, 0.89 m × 0.18 mm
• Flow path components: Purged Ultimate union, UltiMetal Plus flexible metal ferrules

Main results and discussion

• Ultimate Plus tubing delivered higher signal responses for most analytes compared to the rival tubing, with the greatest improvements observed for highly active compounds (oxazepam, lorazepam, temazepam, nitrazepam, clonazepam, trazodone).
• Enhanced inertness yielded better peak shapes and prevented analyte loss at both 5 ng and 1 ng on-column levels.
• Normalized response analysis showed up to 40–60 % increases for sensitive drugs when using Agilent tubing.

Benefits and practical applications

The improved inert flow path enables direct analysis of underivatized drugs, reduces method development time, and ensures consistent quantitation at trace levels. Rapid column or restrictor changes can be performed without venting the MS, increasing throughput in forensic and clinical toxicology laboratories.

Future trends and potential applications

As analytical requirements evolve toward ultra-trace detection, advanced deactivation coatings will play a critical role. Integration with high-resolution MS, automated sample preparation, and extension into environmental and pharmaceutical residue analysis are promising future applications for inert tubing technologies.

Conclusion

Agilent J&W Ultimate Plus deactivated fused silica tubing significantly improves GC/MS inertness, yielding superior sensitivity and reproducibility for drugs of abuse analysis compared to competitive premium tubing. It constitutes a key enhancement for robust forensic toxicology workflows.

References

1. Kapúr B. M. Drug-testing methods and clinical interpretations of test results. Bull. Narc. 1993, 45, 115–154.
2. Lynam K. Semivolatile Analysis Using an Inertness Performance Tested Agilent J&W DB-5ms Ultra Inert Column; Agilent Technologies, Application Note 5989-8616EN, 2008.
3. Zhao L. et al. Evaluation of the Ultra Inert Liner Deactivation for Active Compounds by GC; Agilent Technologies, Technical Overview 5990-7380EN, 2011.
4. Lynam K. Agilent Inert Flow Path Enhancements Improve Drugs of Abuse Testing; Application Note 5991-1859EN, 2013.
5. Purged Ultimate Union; Agilent Technologies, Technical Overview 5991-1114EN, 2013.
6. Smith D., Lynam K. Evaluating CLP and EPA Methods for Pesticides in Water Using Agilent J&W DB-CLP1/DB-CLP2 GC columns; Application Note 5991-0615EN, 2012.
7. Ultimate Plus Fused Silica Tubing; Agilent Technologies, Technical Overview 5991-5142EN, 2014.
8. Wang Y. Analysis of Sulfur Compounds in Petroleum Gases and Natural Gas; Application Note 5991-4643EN, 2014.