Near-infrared spectroscopy: Comparison of techniques

Importance of the Topic

The comparison between dispersive and Fourier transform near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy is crucial due to the widespread use of NIR for raw material identification and quantitative analysis in research, QA/QC and industrial environments. Choosing the appropriate instrument influences data quality, operational cost and maintenance requirements.

Study Objectives and Overview

This white paper aims to outline the physical principles and design differences between predispersive grating-based spectrometers and Fourier transform (FT) analyzer types, with a focus on NIR applications. It addresses key performance metrics including wavelength range, spectral resolution, accuracy, data acquisition speed and signal-to-noise ratio.

Methodology and Instrumentation Used

• Dispersive Spectrometers: Monochromator grating disperses polychromatic light; an exit slit selects discrete wavelengths scanned by rotating the grating using a digital encoder; exemplified by Metrohm NIRS XDS and DS2500 systems with fixed 8.75 nm resolution.
• Fourier Transform Spectrometers: Michelson interferometer splits light into two paths—one fixed and one movable mirror; recombined beam produces an interferogram that is converted to a spectrum by Fourier transform; wavelength calibration via internal laser and water vapor reference.
• Calibration Standards: Dispersive systems employ rare earth oxide references for bandwidth, wavelength and photometric standardization.

Main Results and Discussion

• Wavelength Range: Dispersive extends from 400 nm to 2500 nm including visible region; FT generally from 800 nm to 2500 nm.
• Resolution and Noise: Dispersive instruments offer stable fixed resolution with low noise; FT allows adjustable resolution (Connes advantage) but higher settings dramatically raise noise, with noise increasing near spectral limits.
• Signal-to-Noise Ratio: Dispersive techniques achieve 2–60 times higher S/N than FT under comparable scan times due to localized noise distribution and optimized beam power density.
• Speed and Robustness: Both systems can acquire two spectra per second; dispersive units require minimal maintenance and are less sensitive to vibration and humidity, whereas FT systems demand desiccant regeneration and careful alignment.

Benefits and Practical Applications

Dispersive NIR spectrometers are particularly suited for high-precision quantitative analyses, robust library development and at/in-line process monitoring. Their low maintenance and superior S/N ratio enhance reliability in industrial QA/QC.

Future Trends and Potential Applications

Ongoing advancements in grating technology, detector sensitivity and chemometric algorithms will drive greater miniaturization, inline process integration and real-time data analytics. Emerging applications include portable field instruments and integration with AI-based predictive models.

Conclusion

Both predispersive and FT-NIR spectrometers offer high performance for NIR analysis. Instrument selection should be guided by specific application requirements—wavelength coverage, resolution-noise trade-off, operational robustness and lifecycle costs.

Reference

1. D. Bertrand et al., La spectroscopie infrarouge et ses applications analytiques, Tec&Doc, 2000.
2. R. A. Shaw and H. H. Mantsch, Encyclopedia of Spectroscopy and Spectrometry, Academic Press, 1999.
3. T. Meyer et al., “Suppression of mechanical noise and the selection of optimal resolution in FT-NIR spectroscopy,” NIR news, 2006.
4. O. Kolomiets et al., “The influence of spectral resolution on the quantitative near infrared spectroscopic determination of an active ingredient in a solid drug formulation,” Journal of Near Infrared Spectroscopy, 2004.
5. FOSS, NIR Spectrometer Technology Comparison, White paper, 2013.
6. E. Ciurczak et al., “Examination of NIR Spectrometers: Dispersive vs. Interferometric Types,” Amer. Pharm. Rev., 2008.
7. E. Voigtman, “The Multiplex Disadvantage and Excess Low-Frequency Noise,” Applied Spectroscopy, 1987.
8. F. Grandmont, Développement d'un spectromètre imageur à transformée de Fourier pour l'astronomie, Doctoral Dissertation, Université Laval, 2006.
9. J. B. I. Reeves and C. M. Zapf, “Discriminant analysis of selected food ingredients by near infrared diffuse reflectance spectroscopy,” J. Near Infrared Spectroscopy, 1997.