2-Step Multi-Volatile Method (2-Step MVM) for Characterization of Aroma Compounds in Bread
Applications | 2016 | GERSTELInstrumentation
Analysis of volatile aroma compounds in fermented foods such as bread is crucial for quality control, product development and understanding the link between processing parameters and sensory properties. Headspace gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (HS-GC-MS) offers automation, reduced solvent use and minimal nonvolatile interference but often underrepresents hydrophilic or low-vapor-pressure compounds in ethanol-rich matrices.
This study aimed to develop and validate a 2-Step Multi-Volatile Method (2-Step MVM) combining two dynamic headspace (DHS) sampling conditions to uniformly extract and enrich aroma compounds over a broad vapor pressure range while removing ethanol and water. The approach was demonstrated for bread samples made with butter or shortening and related lipid ingredients.
Instrumental setup
Recovery and linearity tests in 5 % ethanol–water showed >79 % recovery (r2 > 0.996) for compounds with VP <21 kPa in step 1, except for 2,3-butanedione (27 %). Furan and propanal (VP >40 kPa) required the second step. Comparison of original and new step 1 trap conditions resolved ethanol overload and restored detection of key compounds such as 2,3-butanedione. Screening using AMDIS deconvolution and Aroma Office database identified 44–87 aroma candidates in fats and 60–65 in bread fractions. Principal component analysis differentiated butter vs shortening effects, fermentative vs baking markers, and crumb vs crust profiles.
The 2-Step MVM delivers a comprehensive aroma profile in ethanol-rich samples without extensive sample cleanup. It is fully automatable, reduces matrix interferences and extends coverage to polar, low-volatility compounds. Applications include flavor quality control, comparative studies of formulations, process optimization and routine QA/QC in bakery and fermented food industries.
The 2-Step MVM is a robust, efficient and versatile approach for headspace extraction of diverse aroma compounds in ethanol-rich, aqueous samples. It overcomes limitations of traditional HS methods, enabling reliable detection of hydrophilic and low-volatility analytes and offering valuable insights into formulation and processing effects on product aroma.
GC/MSD, HeadSpace, GC/SQ
IndustriesFood & Agriculture
ManufacturerAgilent Technologies, GERSTEL
Summary
Importance of the topic
Analysis of volatile aroma compounds in fermented foods such as bread is crucial for quality control, product development and understanding the link between processing parameters and sensory properties. Headspace gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (HS-GC-MS) offers automation, reduced solvent use and minimal nonvolatile interference but often underrepresents hydrophilic or low-vapor-pressure compounds in ethanol-rich matrices.
Study objectives and overview
This study aimed to develop and validate a 2-Step Multi-Volatile Method (2-Step MVM) combining two dynamic headspace (DHS) sampling conditions to uniformly extract and enrich aroma compounds over a broad vapor pressure range while removing ethanol and water. The approach was demonstrated for bread samples made with butter or shortening and related lipid ingredients.
Methodology and instrumentation used
Instrumental setup
- 7890 B GC with 5977 MSD (Agilent) coupled to GERSTEL MPS with DHS option, Thermal Desorption Unit (TDU) and programmable temperature vaporization inlet (CIS4).
- DHS step 1 at 25 °C, 650 mL headspace trapped on Carbopack B/Carbopack X to capture moderately volatile compounds (VP 1–20 kPa) while purging ethanol and water.
- DHS step 2 at 80 °C, 3000 mL headspace trapped on Tenax TA to enrich low-volatility or hydrophilic compounds (VP <1 kPa).
- DB-Wax column, helium carrier, oven 40 → 240 °C, scan m/z 29–300.
- Thermal desorption and PTV injection in splitless mode.
- Bread made from wheat flour, yeast, sugar, water and either butter or palm oil shortening; crust and crumb analyzed separately.
- Butter and shortening tested before and after heating at 150 °C to profile heat-induced compounds.
Main results and discussion
Recovery and linearity tests in 5 % ethanol–water showed >79 % recovery (r2 > 0.996) for compounds with VP <21 kPa in step 1, except for 2,3-butanedione (27 %). Furan and propanal (VP >40 kPa) required the second step. Comparison of original and new step 1 trap conditions resolved ethanol overload and restored detection of key compounds such as 2,3-butanedione. Screening using AMDIS deconvolution and Aroma Office database identified 44–87 aroma candidates in fats and 60–65 in bread fractions. Principal component analysis differentiated butter vs shortening effects, fermentative vs baking markers, and crumb vs crust profiles.
Benefits and practical applications of the method
The 2-Step MVM delivers a comprehensive aroma profile in ethanol-rich samples without extensive sample cleanup. It is fully automatable, reduces matrix interferences and extends coverage to polar, low-volatility compounds. Applications include flavor quality control, comparative studies of formulations, process optimization and routine QA/QC in bakery and fermented food industries.
Future trends and applications
- Integration with chemometric tools and large-scale databases for rapid classification of product quality and authenticity.
- Application to other fermented matrices (dairy, beverages) and real-time monitoring of fermentation or baking processes.
- Coupling with two-dimensional GC or high-resolution MS for enhanced separation and compound identification.
Conclusion
The 2-Step MVM is a robust, efficient and versatile approach for headspace extraction of diverse aroma compounds in ethanol-rich, aqueous samples. It overcomes limitations of traditional HS methods, enabling reliable detection of hydrophilic and low-volatility analytes and offering valuable insights into formulation and processing effects on product aroma.
Reference
- M. Markelov, J. P. Guzouski Jr., Anal. Chim. Acta 276 (1993) 235–245.
- N. Ochiai, K. Sasamoto, A. Hoffmann, K. Okanoya, J. Chromatogr. A 1240 (2012) 59–68.
- C. Devos, N. Ochiai, K. Sasamoto, F. David, P. Sandra, J. Chromatogr. A 1255 (2012) 207–215.
- N. Ochiai, J. Tsunokawa, K. Sasamoto, A. Hoffmann, J. Chromatogr. A 1371 (2014) 65–73.
- K. MacNamara, N. Ochiai, K. Sasamoto, A. Hoffmann, R. Shellie, GERSTEL AppNote 183, 2016.
Content was automatically generated from an orignal PDF document using AI and may contain inaccuracies.
Similar PDF
The development of the MVM (Multi-Volatile Method) in the whisky matrix
2015|Agilent Technologies|Applications
Chromatography Technical Note No AS148 The development of the MVM (Multi-Volatile Method) in the whisky matrix Maïlie SAINT-HILAIRE, Kathy RIDGWAY, Anatune Ltd. Girton, Cambridgeshire (UK). Introduction Recently, a new method named the Multi Volatile Method (MVM) was developed by GERSTEL…
Key words
mvm, mvmextraction, extractioncarbopack, carbopackdhs, dhsshincarbon, shincarbonwhisky, whiskytrap, trapacrylate, acrylateethyl, ethyltenax, tenaxcompounds, compoundsvolatile, volatilegerstel, gerstelshincarbonx, shincarbonxcis
Comparison between the MVM (Multi-Volatile Method), single DHS extraction and SPME (Solid Phase Micro Extraction) for extraction of volatiles in Whisky
2015|Agilent Technologies|Applications
Chromatography Technical Note No AS149 Comparison between the MVM (Multi-Volatile Method), single DHS extraction and SPME (Solid Phase Micro Extraction) for extraction of volatiles in Whisky. Maïlie SAINT-HILAIRE, Kathy RIDGWAY, Anatune Ltd. Girton, Cambridgeshire (UK). Introduction Methods Each analysis was…
Key words
shincarbon, shincarbonmvm, mvmcarbopack, carbopackextraction, extractionheadspace, headspacewhisky, whiskyspme, spmedhs, dhsdynamic, dynamicmethod, methodfirstly, firstlyvolatile, volatiletdu, tdusolid, solidconfirms
COMPARISON OF EXTRACTION TECHNIQUES FOR VOLATILES IN A SELECTION OF SPIRITS AND LIQUEURS
2019|Agilent Technologies|Applications
AS180 Wellbrook Court | Girton Road | Cambridge | CB3 0NA | | tel: +44 (0) 1223 279210 | fax: +44 (0) 1223 279253 | email: [email protected] | anatune.co.uk COMPARISON OF EXTRACTION TECHNIQUES FOR VOLATILES IN A SELECTION OF SPIRITS…
Key words
dhs, dhstenax, tenaxshincarbon, shincarbonvodka, vodkagerstel, gerstelcarbopack, carbopacktechniques, techniquestdu, tdutwister, twisterheadspace, headspacebecherovka, becherovkadrambuie, drambuiedaniels, danielsliqueurs, liqueurscognac
Use of automated sample preparation techniques for challenging sample by GC-MS
2015|GERSTEL|Presentations
Use of automated sample preparation techniques for challenging sample by GC-MS Sean O’Connor • 7 Years Flavour Industry – GC-FID, GCMS • 11 ½ Years Unilever SEAC – LC, GC, GCMS, LCMS, GCQQQ, LCQQQ MPS • 1 Year Anatune –…
Key words
multivolatile, multivolatilederivatisation, derivatisationomics, omicsextraction, extractiontdu, tduautomated, automatedcarbopack, carbopackdhs, dhsmethod, methodautomate, automateautomation, automationmanual, manualwhy, whyheadspace, headspaceliner